To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
JadeS
+Follow
Posts · 76
Posts · 76
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-05-07
Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
1.98K
回复
Comment
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-04-11
Own preference
Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.
When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire
Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.
看
1.76K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-04-10
There are those who fall and those who gain more
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.19K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-04-10
$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$
👍
看
1.95K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-04-09
Which one will you choose?
Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?
SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks
Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?
看
2.16K
回复
Comment
点赞
5
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-04-09
$AT&T Inc(T)$
communications
看
1.55K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-03-30
$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$
good prospect
看
1.98K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2022-03-19
It is one's opinion
Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says
One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a
Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says
看
2.87K
回复
Comment
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2021-05-12
Can sustain?
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
3.34K
回复
2
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
JadeS
JadeS
·
2021-05-08
A joke that make you rich
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.73K
回复
1
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573644992811813","uuid":"3573644992811813","gmtCreate":1610551284516,"gmtModify":1650194166088,"name":"JadeS","pinyin":"jades","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":14,"headSize":544,"tweetSize":76,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.02.22","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.22%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.39%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9066342141,"gmtCreate":1651856184683,"gmtModify":1676534985601,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔","listText":"Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔","text":"Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9066342141","repostId":"2233539913","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1976,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9014848573,"gmtCreate":1649642889484,"gmtModify":1676534543066,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Own preference ","listText":"Own preference ","text":"Own preference","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9014848573","repostId":"1191869405","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191869405","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649638156,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1191869405?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-11 08:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191869405","media":"Barrons","summary":"When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire Hathaway founder Warren Buffett was eight years old. Eighty-three years later, Buffett added HP Inc. to his long list of storied investments.</p><p>This past week, Berkshire (ticker: BRK.A) disclosed an 11.4% stake in the PC and printer company HP (HPQ), which is not to be confused with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), the server, networking, and storage company from which it split in 2014.</p><p>You could argue that Berkshire is a little late here. HP’s PC business soared during the pandemic, driving growth to the highest level since the company was split in two; HP’s stock price has doubled since 2019. Meanwhile, there are signs that PC demand is going to slow from here as the stay-at-home trend fades. Analysts at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Barclays have all turned cautious on the PC sector for just that reason.</p><p>As <i>Barron’s</i>has repeatedly noted, HP shares are cheap by almost any statistical measure. In an October 2021 column, I described them as a “screaming buy.” (I’d like to think Buffett read the column.) Even after the stock rallied 15% this past week on the Buffett news, HP shares still trade for a modest nine times expected earnings for the October 2023 fiscal year, and just 0.7 times sales. And HP remains exceedingly shareholder-friendly: Over the past eight quarters, it repurchased 26% of its shares—and it has promised to buy back at least $4 billion of stock in the current fiscal year. The stock sports a 2.8% dividend yield.</p><p>For the first time in years, HP also has a growth story to talk about, thanks to the soaring PC demand during the pandemic. Even as the company’s enterprise printer business slowed during office shutdowns, demand for home printers spiked.</p><p>While the pandemic boom may be fading, HP CEO Enrique Lores is expanding the company’s product portfolio to include a broader range of businesses. HP spent $425 million last year to buy the HyperX gaming peripherals unit from memory maker Kingston Technology. A leader in gaming headsets, HyperX also sells keyboards, mice, and microphones.</p><p>Then in late March, HP agreed to buy the headset and audioconferencing company Poly (POLY) for $3.3 billion. It’s a direct play on the future of hybrid work.</p><p>Even so, prominent Wall Street firms are taking a bearish view on HP. Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring, who recently cut his rating on HP shares to Underweight from Equal Weight, thinks consumer hardware spending will be pressured as supply improves, prices fall, and demand normalizes—and he sees macro risks to enterprise demand. UBS analyst David Vogt on Friday reduced his HP rating to Neutral from Buy, citing softening PC demand, the potential for slowing buybacks, and the considerable appreciation in the stock price.</p><p>Paul Wick, portfolio manager of the Columbia Seligman Technology and Information fund, which owns HP stock, thinks Wall Street is missing the bigger picture.</p><p>“We’ve been big fans of Hewlett-Packard and CEO Enrique Lores, who has executed extremely well,” Wick told me during an interview for our <i>Barron’s</i>Live interview series this past week. He concedes the PC business will be flattish but sees a shift to more-profitable commercial models from cheaper consumer units. And he says the printing business is recovering.</p><p>Wick thinks HP can earn $5 a share in fiscal 2024, up from $3.79 in 2021. Buybacks are shrinking the share count quarter after quarter, he notes. “It’s not a sexy business, but it is better than people give it credit for.”</p><p>Berkshire’s big bet on HP is a good reminder that now is the time to be looking for other tech bargains, especially as interest rates head higher. In order to find good candidates, I screened for tech stocks in the S&P 500 trading at less than 10 times Wall Street’s projected earnings for next year. It’s a small group that includes both HP and HP Enterprise, the IT services company DXC Technology (DXC), the two disk-drive stocks Seagate Technology (STX) and Western Digital (WDC), and a handful of chip names, including Micron Technology (MU), which I wrote about bullishly last week, and the mobile phone radio chip firms Qorvo (QRVO) and Skyworks Solutions (SWKS).</p><p>Some of those chip names are part of a new, actively managed exchange-traded fund just launched by Wick.Columbia Seligman Semiconductor & Technology trades under the ticker SEMI and should be a good way to play both cheap tech and ongoing strength in the chip world.</p><p>“Semiconductor fundamentals are strong, and valuations are reasonable—a lot more reasonable than other parts of technology, and even relative to the broad market,” Wick says.</p><p>As it happens, Micron is one of Wick’s top picks; he’s also upbeat on Intel (INTC), which he says is far more attractive than more popular (and expensive) options like Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Nvidia (NVDA). He’s also bullish on optical networking plays, including Ciena (CIEN), Lumentum Holdings (LITE), Ericsson (ERIC), and Viavi Solutions (VIAV), and the enterprise storage company NetApp (NTAP). They all benefit from increased data center spending.</p><p>My guess is Berkshire won’t be waiting decades to invest in its next Palo Alto-based tech firm.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-11 08:49 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/hp-stock-buffett-buy-51649455403?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire Hathaway founder Warren Buffett was eight years old. Eighty-three years later, Buffett added HP Inc....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/hp-stock-buffett-buy-51649455403?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BRK.A":"伯克希尔","HPQ":"惠普","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/hp-stock-buffett-buy-51649455403?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191869405","content_text":"When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire Hathaway founder Warren Buffett was eight years old. Eighty-three years later, Buffett added HP Inc. to his long list of storied investments.This past week, Berkshire (ticker: BRK.A) disclosed an 11.4% stake in the PC and printer company HP (HPQ), which is not to be confused with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), the server, networking, and storage company from which it split in 2014.You could argue that Berkshire is a little late here. HP’s PC business soared during the pandemic, driving growth to the highest level since the company was split in two; HP’s stock price has doubled since 2019. Meanwhile, there are signs that PC demand is going to slow from here as the stay-at-home trend fades. Analysts at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Barclays have all turned cautious on the PC sector for just that reason.As Barron’shas repeatedly noted, HP shares are cheap by almost any statistical measure. In an October 2021 column, I described them as a “screaming buy.” (I’d like to think Buffett read the column.) Even after the stock rallied 15% this past week on the Buffett news, HP shares still trade for a modest nine times expected earnings for the October 2023 fiscal year, and just 0.7 times sales. And HP remains exceedingly shareholder-friendly: Over the past eight quarters, it repurchased 26% of its shares—and it has promised to buy back at least $4 billion of stock in the current fiscal year. The stock sports a 2.8% dividend yield.For the first time in years, HP also has a growth story to talk about, thanks to the soaring PC demand during the pandemic. Even as the company’s enterprise printer business slowed during office shutdowns, demand for home printers spiked.While the pandemic boom may be fading, HP CEO Enrique Lores is expanding the company’s product portfolio to include a broader range of businesses. HP spent $425 million last year to buy the HyperX gaming peripherals unit from memory maker Kingston Technology. A leader in gaming headsets, HyperX also sells keyboards, mice, and microphones.Then in late March, HP agreed to buy the headset and audioconferencing company Poly (POLY) for $3.3 billion. It’s a direct play on the future of hybrid work.Even so, prominent Wall Street firms are taking a bearish view on HP. Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring, who recently cut his rating on HP shares to Underweight from Equal Weight, thinks consumer hardware spending will be pressured as supply improves, prices fall, and demand normalizes—and he sees macro risks to enterprise demand. UBS analyst David Vogt on Friday reduced his HP rating to Neutral from Buy, citing softening PC demand, the potential for slowing buybacks, and the considerable appreciation in the stock price.Paul Wick, portfolio manager of the Columbia Seligman Technology and Information fund, which owns HP stock, thinks Wall Street is missing the bigger picture.“We’ve been big fans of Hewlett-Packard and CEO Enrique Lores, who has executed extremely well,” Wick told me during an interview for our Barron’sLive interview series this past week. He concedes the PC business will be flattish but sees a shift to more-profitable commercial models from cheaper consumer units. And he says the printing business is recovering.Wick thinks HP can earn $5 a share in fiscal 2024, up from $3.79 in 2021. Buybacks are shrinking the share count quarter after quarter, he notes. “It’s not a sexy business, but it is better than people give it credit for.”Berkshire’s big bet on HP is a good reminder that now is the time to be looking for other tech bargains, especially as interest rates head higher. In order to find good candidates, I screened for tech stocks in the S&P 500 trading at less than 10 times Wall Street’s projected earnings for next year. It’s a small group that includes both HP and HP Enterprise, the IT services company DXC Technology (DXC), the two disk-drive stocks Seagate Technology (STX) and Western Digital (WDC), and a handful of chip names, including Micron Technology (MU), which I wrote about bullishly last week, and the mobile phone radio chip firms Qorvo (QRVO) and Skyworks Solutions (SWKS).Some of those chip names are part of a new, actively managed exchange-traded fund just launched by Wick.Columbia Seligman Semiconductor & Technology trades under the ticker SEMI and should be a good way to play both cheap tech and ongoing strength in the chip world.“Semiconductor fundamentals are strong, and valuations are reasonable—a lot more reasonable than other parts of technology, and even relative to the broad market,” Wick says.As it happens, Micron is one of Wick’s top picks; he’s also upbeat on Intel (INTC), which he says is far more attractive than more popular (and expensive) options like Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Nvidia (NVDA). He’s also bullish on optical networking plays, including Ciena (CIEN), Lumentum Holdings (LITE), Ericsson (ERIC), and Viavi Solutions (VIAV), and the enterprise storage company NetApp (NTAP). They all benefit from increased data center spending.My guess is Berkshire won’t be waiting decades to invest in its next Palo Alto-based tech firm.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BRK.B":0.9,"HPQ":0.9,"BRK.A":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1764,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015725090,"gmtCreate":1649557021496,"gmtModify":1676534529576,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"There are those who fall and those who gain more ","listText":"There are those who fall and those who gain more ","text":"There are those who fall and those who gain more","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015725090","repostId":"2226576805","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2192,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015767953,"gmtCreate":1649556273256,"gmtModify":1676534529419,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>👍","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>👍","text":"$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$👍","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d7f2b779d6e484fcd50c6c2d0c689d1d","width":"1080","height":"3064"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015767953","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1953,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015502283,"gmtCreate":1649502376750,"gmtModify":1676534522343,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Which one will you choose? ","listText":"Which one will you choose? ","text":"Which one will you choose?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015502283","repostId":"1179777825","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179777825","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649469608,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1179777825?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-09 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179777825","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>Palantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks fell out of favor with investors and both companies' forward-looking guidance disappointed the market.</li><li>The long-term outlook for both SNOW and PLTR is good, considering the growth in new data creation and the expected revenue increase and profit margin expansion for the two companies.</li><li>Palantir is the more attractive Buy of the two stocks, taking into account both valuations and key risk factors.</li></ul><p>Elevator Pitch</p><p>Palantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE:PLTR) is a better buy compared with Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). I prefer PLTR over SNOW because the former has maintained a good balance between revenue growth and profit margins. Palantir is expected to grow its top line by more than +30% every year going forward, while still delivering normalized net profit margins of above +20% in the future. In comparison, Snowflake's top line growth expectations are better, but it is relatively less profitable. More importantly, Palantir is much cheaper than Snowflake based on the forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue metric.</p><p>How Are SNOW And PLTR's Stock Performance?</p><p>The year-to-date stock price performance of SNOW and PLTR have been poor on both an absolute and relative basis.</p><p><b>Snowflake's And Palantir's 2022 Year-To-Date Share Price Performance</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3dfec436e13ecbd10b4390c8ec9c312b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"221\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>The shares of Palantir and Snowflake were down by -29.5% and -37.4%, respectively, so far this year. During the same period, the S&P 500 declined by a relatively modest -5.2%. Both SNOW and PLTR saw their shares fall the most around mid-March 2022. March 11, 2022, <i>Seeking Alpha News</i>articlehighlighted that "Snowflake shares fell sharply" on the day alongside "several other cloud-related stocks, as investors continued to shun technology stocks."</p><p>Apart from weak investor sentiment, which has hurt the share price performance of technology stocks in general, there are also company-specific headwinds relating to Snowflake and Palantir, which I detail in the next section.</p><p>SNOW And PLTR Stock Key Metrics</p><p>Both SNOW's and PLTR's forward-looking guidance disappointed the market. This was a key factor that led to the sell-down in their shares in 2022 year-to-date.</p><p>Starting with Palantir, the company released the company's Q4 2021 financial results in a media release issued on February 17, 2022, before the market opened. PLTR's shares subsequently fell by -16% to close at $11.77 on the day of the earnings release. Palantir has yet to fully recover from its post-results announcement correction, as its last closing share price of $12.84 as of April 7, 2022, was still -8% below its pre-results stock price of $13.97 (closing price on February 16th).</p><p>PLTR's top line expanded by +34% YOY to $433 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. This was+4%above what the market had expected. The company's robust revenue growth was driven by a +71% YOY increase in the number of customers, from 139 as of December 31, 2020, to 237 as of year-end 2021, as per its recent quarterly results presentation. Palantir grew its client base much faster than what Wall Street was expecting; the sell-side's consensus 2021 year-end estimate was 219 clients, according to<i>S&P Capital IQ</i>.</p><p>However, Palantir's non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share contracted from $0.03 in Q4 2020 to $0.02 in Q4 2021. More significantly, PLTR's fourth quarter bottom line was approximately-44%below the market consensus EPS forecast. Palantir's total adjusted costs (excluding stock-based compensation) rose by +42% YOY to $309 million in the most recent quarter. This was largely attributable to a substantial jump in commercial sales headcount, from 12 as of end-2020 to 80 as of December 31, 2021, as indicated in PLTR's Q4 2021 results presentation.</p><p>Looking forward, PLTR's revenue guidance was encouraging. As per its Q4 2021 earnings press release, Palantir guided for Q1 2022 revenue of $443 million (implying +30% YOY top line expansion) and "annual revenue growth of 30% or greater through 2025."</p><p>However, Palantir's near-term profitability guidance didn't meet market expectations. The company expects to achieve a non-GAAP adjusted operating profit margin of 23% in the first quarter of this year, which is much lower than Wall Street's consensus Q1 2022 operating margin estimate of 28%, as per<i>S&P Capital IQ</i>. At the <i>Morgan Stanley</i>(MS)Technology, Media & Telecom Conference on March 9, 2022, PLTR explained that "the investments in the product" in 2021 "drove more improvement faster than we actually thought they might," and the company is "giving ourselves a little space there to invest as aggressively as possible."</p><p>Moving on to Snowflake, its Q4 2021 revenue of $360 million beat the sell-side consensus by+3%, and this represented a +102% YOY growth. But SNOW's shares still dropped by -15%, from a $264.69 close on March 2, 2022, to $224.02 on March 3, 2022 (post-earnings release). In the next one month or so, Snowflake's stock price declined further, closing at $213.88 as of April 7, 2022.</p><p>SNOW's shares performed poorly because investors were unsatisfied with the company's fiscal 2023 (YE January 31) revenue growth guidance. Based on the midpoint of Snowflake's management, the company expected its revenue to increase by +66% in FY 2023. This implied a substantial slowdown in SNOW's top line expansion, as the company's sales grew by +106% in fiscal 2022.</p><p>Snowflake attributed the weaker-than-expected revenue growth guidance for FY 2023 to platform performance improvements, which will provide more value to its clients. SNOW acknowledged at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference on March 8, 2022, that "every performance improvement we do, we may have a revenue hit," but it stressed that "those customers are consuming more" in around half a year's time.</p><p>In the subsequent two sections of the article, I will touch on the similarities and the differences between Palantir and Snowflake.</p><p>Do Snowflake And Palantir Share The Same Market?</p><p>Snowflake and Palantir do share the same market to a large extent.</p><p>A December 2020research report published by <i>Harris Williams</i> classified both PLTR and SNOW as infrastructure software companies. More specifically, the investment bank placed these two companies in the "data" sub-segment of the infrastructure software sector alongside other listed companies like Splunk (SPLK) and Alteryx (AYX), among others.</p><p><b>Harris Williams'Definition Of The Data Sub-Segment Of The Infrastructure Software Sector</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95d28544977ca9c17ef60304a8f96c55\" tg-width=\"474\" tg-height=\"280\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Harris Williams</p><p>In a blog post published on November 11, 2020, Palantir describes itself as a "software company" which builds "digital infrastructure for data-driven operations." This provides support for Harris Williams' categorization of PLTR as an infrastructure company that belongs in the data sub-category.</p><p>In summary, both companies operate in the infrastructure software market. This is also where the similarities between PLTR and SNOW end, as I highlight in the next section.</p><p>How Do Snowflake And Palantir Differ?</p><p>Referring to PLTR's November 2020 blog post (which I referred to in the preceding section) again, Palantir mentioned that it plays the role of "data processor." PLTR emphasized that its platforms "allow organizations to better manage" data "by bringing the right data to the people" and enabling "them to take data-driven decisions" and "conduct sophisticated analytic."</p><p>In contrast, Snowflake's cloud data platform, known as Data Cloud, is mainly focused on data warehousing and data sharing; and it partners with other companies to offer solutions such as data analytics to its clients, as per the chart below.</p><p><b>SNOW's Data Cloud Platform And Partnerships With Other Data Analytics Companies</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ced24e78a2353a0f9f8a45e9fab883b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"314\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Snowflake</p><p>I touch on the two companies' growth prospects in the long run in the next section.</p><p>What Are Snowflake And Palantir's Long-Term Outlooks?</p><p>Both Snowflake and Palantir have long growth runways.</p><p>Interactive Data Trends (IDC) has forecast that new data created will expand at a CAGR of +23%, from 64.1ZB in 2020 to 175ZB in 2025, according to January 31, 2022, article published in <i>CDO Trends</i>. As more data gets created, it is natural that this will boost demand for data warehousing, sharing, processing, and analytics going forward. This will be positive for both PLTR and SNOW.</p><p>PLTR and SNOW are expected to deliver robust top-line growth and profit margin expansion over the next few years. Snowflake will grow its revenue at a faster pace compared with Palantir, but the former's profitability will still be inferior to that of the latter.</p><p>According to consensus sell-side financial estimates sourced from<i>S&P Capital IQ</i>, Snowflake's sales are forecasted to increase by a forward four-year CAGR of +57.0%. Over the same period, Palantir's top line is predicted to grow by a slower CAGR of +34.5%, which is still pretty decent. In terms of profitability, Wall Street expects PLTR's normalized net profit margin to widen from 20.0% in 2021 to 26.8% by 2025. In comparison, SNOW's normalized net profit margin is forecasted to improve from 0.3% in fiscal 2022 (YE January 31 or approximating calendar year 2021) to 9.1% in FY 2026.</p><p>SNOW is a pioneer and leading player in the cloud data warehousing space, which explains its strong revenue growth. But Snowflake's profit margins are low on an absolute basis and inferior to that of PLTR as well. A key factor contributing to Snowflake's modest profitability is the company's dependence on third-party vendors such as Microsoft's (MSFT) Azure and Amazon's (AMZN) AWS. In my July 20, 2021,article for SNOW, I noted that the company's key suppliers of public cloud services are also the company's competitors and "have a big impact on Snowflake's path to profitability." This is the most significant downside risk for SNOW.</p><p>On the other hand, a key concern for Palantir has been its reliance on government organizations. This implies that the company's revenue can be negatively impacted when the government's budget shrinks. But there have been encouraging signs with respect to client (commercial customers versus government clients) diversification in recent quarters. PTLR's commercial segment has been rapidly growing in recent quarters, as its commercial revenue growth went from +28% YOY and +37% YOY in Q2 2021 and Q3 2021, respectively, to +47% YOY in Q4 2021.</p><p>In comparison, Palantir's government revenue increased by a slower +26% YOY in the fourth quarter of last year. Also, as I mentioned in an earlier section of my article, Palantir has invested significantly in commercial sales headcount so as to further support the growth of the commercial segment.</p><p>In a nutshell, both companies' long-term outlooks are decent. But PLTR has struck a better balance between top-line growth and profitability compared with SNOW, as evidenced by the consensus financial forecasts.</p><p>Is SNOW Or PLTR Stock A Better Buy?</p><p>PLTR stock is a better buy. Palantir boasts superior profit margins, and Snowflake is growing its top line at a much faster pace. But the gap in valuations between the two is huge; PLTR and SNOW are valued by the market at consensus forward next twelve months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiples of 11.9 times and 30.7 times, respectively, according to<i>S&P Capital IQ</i>. Taking into account the difference in the two companies' valuations and future financial forecasts, I view Palantir as the more appealing investment candidate of the two.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-09 10:00 GMT+8 <a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500463-palantir-vs-snowflake-stock-better-buy><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks fell out of favor with investors and both companies' forward-looking guidance disappointed the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500463-palantir-vs-snowflake-stock-better-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc.","SNOW":"Snowflake"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500463-palantir-vs-snowflake-stock-better-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1179777825","content_text":"SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks fell out of favor with investors and both companies' forward-looking guidance disappointed the market.The long-term outlook for both SNOW and PLTR is good, considering the growth in new data creation and the expected revenue increase and profit margin expansion for the two companies.Palantir is the more attractive Buy of the two stocks, taking into account both valuations and key risk factors.Elevator PitchPalantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE:PLTR) is a better buy compared with Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). I prefer PLTR over SNOW because the former has maintained a good balance between revenue growth and profit margins. Palantir is expected to grow its top line by more than +30% every year going forward, while still delivering normalized net profit margins of above +20% in the future. In comparison, Snowflake's top line growth expectations are better, but it is relatively less profitable. More importantly, Palantir is much cheaper than Snowflake based on the forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue metric.How Are SNOW And PLTR's Stock Performance?The year-to-date stock price performance of SNOW and PLTR have been poor on both an absolute and relative basis.Snowflake's And Palantir's 2022 Year-To-Date Share Price PerformanceSeeking AlphaThe shares of Palantir and Snowflake were down by -29.5% and -37.4%, respectively, so far this year. During the same period, the S&P 500 declined by a relatively modest -5.2%. Both SNOW and PLTR saw their shares fall the most around mid-March 2022. March 11, 2022, Seeking Alpha Newsarticlehighlighted that \"Snowflake shares fell sharply\" on the day alongside \"several other cloud-related stocks, as investors continued to shun technology stocks.\"Apart from weak investor sentiment, which has hurt the share price performance of technology stocks in general, there are also company-specific headwinds relating to Snowflake and Palantir, which I detail in the next section.SNOW And PLTR Stock Key MetricsBoth SNOW's and PLTR's forward-looking guidance disappointed the market. This was a key factor that led to the sell-down in their shares in 2022 year-to-date.Starting with Palantir, the company released the company's Q4 2021 financial results in a media release issued on February 17, 2022, before the market opened. PLTR's shares subsequently fell by -16% to close at $11.77 on the day of the earnings release. Palantir has yet to fully recover from its post-results announcement correction, as its last closing share price of $12.84 as of April 7, 2022, was still -8% below its pre-results stock price of $13.97 (closing price on February 16th).PLTR's top line expanded by +34% YOY to $433 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. This was+4%above what the market had expected. The company's robust revenue growth was driven by a +71% YOY increase in the number of customers, from 139 as of December 31, 2020, to 237 as of year-end 2021, as per its recent quarterly results presentation. Palantir grew its client base much faster than what Wall Street was expecting; the sell-side's consensus 2021 year-end estimate was 219 clients, according toS&P Capital IQ.However, Palantir's non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share contracted from $0.03 in Q4 2020 to $0.02 in Q4 2021. More significantly, PLTR's fourth quarter bottom line was approximately-44%below the market consensus EPS forecast. Palantir's total adjusted costs (excluding stock-based compensation) rose by +42% YOY to $309 million in the most recent quarter. This was largely attributable to a substantial jump in commercial sales headcount, from 12 as of end-2020 to 80 as of December 31, 2021, as indicated in PLTR's Q4 2021 results presentation.Looking forward, PLTR's revenue guidance was encouraging. As per its Q4 2021 earnings press release, Palantir guided for Q1 2022 revenue of $443 million (implying +30% YOY top line expansion) and \"annual revenue growth of 30% or greater through 2025.\"However, Palantir's near-term profitability guidance didn't meet market expectations. The company expects to achieve a non-GAAP adjusted operating profit margin of 23% in the first quarter of this year, which is much lower than Wall Street's consensus Q1 2022 operating margin estimate of 28%, as perS&P Capital IQ. At the Morgan Stanley(MS)Technology, Media & Telecom Conference on March 9, 2022, PLTR explained that \"the investments in the product\" in 2021 \"drove more improvement faster than we actually thought they might,\" and the company is \"giving ourselves a little space there to invest as aggressively as possible.\"Moving on to Snowflake, its Q4 2021 revenue of $360 million beat the sell-side consensus by+3%, and this represented a +102% YOY growth. But SNOW's shares still dropped by -15%, from a $264.69 close on March 2, 2022, to $224.02 on March 3, 2022 (post-earnings release). In the next one month or so, Snowflake's stock price declined further, closing at $213.88 as of April 7, 2022.SNOW's shares performed poorly because investors were unsatisfied with the company's fiscal 2023 (YE January 31) revenue growth guidance. Based on the midpoint of Snowflake's management, the company expected its revenue to increase by +66% in FY 2023. This implied a substantial slowdown in SNOW's top line expansion, as the company's sales grew by +106% in fiscal 2022.Snowflake attributed the weaker-than-expected revenue growth guidance for FY 2023 to platform performance improvements, which will provide more value to its clients. SNOW acknowledged at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference on March 8, 2022, that \"every performance improvement we do, we may have a revenue hit,\" but it stressed that \"those customers are consuming more\" in around half a year's time.In the subsequent two sections of the article, I will touch on the similarities and the differences between Palantir and Snowflake.Do Snowflake And Palantir Share The Same Market?Snowflake and Palantir do share the same market to a large extent.A December 2020research report published by Harris Williams classified both PLTR and SNOW as infrastructure software companies. More specifically, the investment bank placed these two companies in the \"data\" sub-segment of the infrastructure software sector alongside other listed companies like Splunk (SPLK) and Alteryx (AYX), among others.Harris Williams'Definition Of The Data Sub-Segment Of The Infrastructure Software SectorHarris WilliamsIn a blog post published on November 11, 2020, Palantir describes itself as a \"software company\" which builds \"digital infrastructure for data-driven operations.\" This provides support for Harris Williams' categorization of PLTR as an infrastructure company that belongs in the data sub-category.In summary, both companies operate in the infrastructure software market. This is also where the similarities between PLTR and SNOW end, as I highlight in the next section.How Do Snowflake And Palantir Differ?Referring to PLTR's November 2020 blog post (which I referred to in the preceding section) again, Palantir mentioned that it plays the role of \"data processor.\" PLTR emphasized that its platforms \"allow organizations to better manage\" data \"by bringing the right data to the people\" and enabling \"them to take data-driven decisions\" and \"conduct sophisticated analytic.\"In contrast, Snowflake's cloud data platform, known as Data Cloud, is mainly focused on data warehousing and data sharing; and it partners with other companies to offer solutions such as data analytics to its clients, as per the chart below.SNOW's Data Cloud Platform And Partnerships With Other Data Analytics CompaniesSnowflakeI touch on the two companies' growth prospects in the long run in the next section.What Are Snowflake And Palantir's Long-Term Outlooks?Both Snowflake and Palantir have long growth runways.Interactive Data Trends (IDC) has forecast that new data created will expand at a CAGR of +23%, from 64.1ZB in 2020 to 175ZB in 2025, according to January 31, 2022, article published in CDO Trends. As more data gets created, it is natural that this will boost demand for data warehousing, sharing, processing, and analytics going forward. This will be positive for both PLTR and SNOW.PLTR and SNOW are expected to deliver robust top-line growth and profit margin expansion over the next few years. Snowflake will grow its revenue at a faster pace compared with Palantir, but the former's profitability will still be inferior to that of the latter.According to consensus sell-side financial estimates sourced fromS&P Capital IQ, Snowflake's sales are forecasted to increase by a forward four-year CAGR of +57.0%. Over the same period, Palantir's top line is predicted to grow by a slower CAGR of +34.5%, which is still pretty decent. In terms of profitability, Wall Street expects PLTR's normalized net profit margin to widen from 20.0% in 2021 to 26.8% by 2025. In comparison, SNOW's normalized net profit margin is forecasted to improve from 0.3% in fiscal 2022 (YE January 31 or approximating calendar year 2021) to 9.1% in FY 2026.SNOW is a pioneer and leading player in the cloud data warehousing space, which explains its strong revenue growth. But Snowflake's profit margins are low on an absolute basis and inferior to that of PLTR as well. A key factor contributing to Snowflake's modest profitability is the company's dependence on third-party vendors such as Microsoft's (MSFT) Azure and Amazon's (AMZN) AWS. In my July 20, 2021,article for SNOW, I noted that the company's key suppliers of public cloud services are also the company's competitors and \"have a big impact on Snowflake's path to profitability.\" This is the most significant downside risk for SNOW.On the other hand, a key concern for Palantir has been its reliance on government organizations. This implies that the company's revenue can be negatively impacted when the government's budget shrinks. But there have been encouraging signs with respect to client (commercial customers versus government clients) diversification in recent quarters. PTLR's commercial segment has been rapidly growing in recent quarters, as its commercial revenue growth went from +28% YOY and +37% YOY in Q2 2021 and Q3 2021, respectively, to +47% YOY in Q4 2021.In comparison, Palantir's government revenue increased by a slower +26% YOY in the fourth quarter of last year. Also, as I mentioned in an earlier section of my article, Palantir has invested significantly in commercial sales headcount so as to further support the growth of the commercial segment.In a nutshell, both companies' long-term outlooks are decent. But PLTR has struck a better balance between top-line growth and profitability compared with SNOW, as evidenced by the consensus financial forecasts.Is SNOW Or PLTR Stock A Better Buy?PLTR stock is a better buy. Palantir boasts superior profit margins, and Snowflake is growing its top line at a much faster pace. But the gap in valuations between the two is huge; PLTR and SNOW are valued by the market at consensus forward next twelve months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiples of 11.9 times and 30.7 times, respectively, according toS&P Capital IQ. Taking into account the difference in the two companies' valuations and future financial forecasts, I view Palantir as the more appealing investment candidate of the two.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SNOW":0.9,"PLTR":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2157,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015506480,"gmtCreate":1649502212051,"gmtModify":1676534522326,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/T\">$AT&T Inc(T)$</a>communications ","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/T\">$AT&T Inc(T)$</a>communications ","text":"$AT&T Inc(T)$communications","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/156f38b04fcfb11f9fa7737d9d6c2bb7","width":"1080","height":"3064"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015506480","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1552,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019527200,"gmtCreate":1648611621200,"gmtModify":1676534364917,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>good prospect","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>good prospect","text":"$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$good prospect","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7d3f0de987a14a187cf62e6d40999177","width":"1080","height":"3064"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019527200","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1979,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9035712518,"gmtCreate":1647680438564,"gmtModify":1676534258275,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It is one's opinion","listText":"It is one's opinion","text":"It is one's opinion","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9035712518","repostId":"1184059964","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1184059964","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1647651682,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1184059964?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-19 09:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184059964","media":"TheStreet","summary":"One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a closer look.</p><p>As the equities market shows signs that it has finally found its footing (fingers crossed), one vocal Wall Street analyst has given a “bright green light” for Apple stock to climb further.</p><p>Today, the Apple Maven reviews Wedbush’s stance on AAPL, still its top tech pick. Could analyst Dan Ives be right that Apple stock and some of its peers have bottomed for the year?</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd834b5930cc8484f73b322c50b95c91\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"827\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Figure 1: Apple Stock: Bright Green Light To Buy, Says One Analyst</span></p><p><b>Interest rate hikes underway</b></p><p>Mr. Ives’ key catalyst this week has been the Federal Reserve’s announcement on monetary policy. In a move that has been widely anticipated, the US central bank is raising short-term interest rates by 25 basis points. Six more hikes are expected in 2022.</p><p>I explained yesterday that the bullish reaction to the rate bump can be counterintuitive. Shouldn’t higher interest be a drag for tech and growth stocks?</p><p>The key here is that the markets do not usually react to what is happening right at this moment. Rather, it tends to look forward a few months and anticipate future events.</p><p>Dan Ives seems to agree with me that, rather than causing concern, the start of the rate hike campaign has been felt as a relief. Finally, monetary policy will begin to tighten, and investors can slowly start to worry about something other than rampant inflation.</p><p>This is very much what happened in early November of last year. When the Fed announced the start of the tapering process (that is, the winding down of the Bank’s bond purchase program), the Nasdaq immediately rallied — although enthusiasm lasted barely two months.</p><p>Therefore, yes, I believe that the macroeconomics events of the week were a positive for Apple stock. If “left alone” (i.e., absent market-level shocks and concerns), I think that AAPL share price will tend to rise due to the company’s strong fundamentals and execution.</p><p><b>Has AAPL bottomed?</b></p><p>While I think that Apple stock will be worth much more several years down the road, the harder question to answer is whether shares have seen the worst of 2022.</p><p>Any realistic analyst or investor must leave the door open for further share price weakness. I still think it is a bit too early to say, with much conviction, that the early-year selloff in the markets has completely run its course.</p><p>But here’s one thing that I can do: look at the historical data to understand what could happen next. Barron’s has done some of the work for us.</p><p>According to the publication, citing Dow Jones Market Data in an email that landed in my inbox last evening:</p><blockquote>“The start of a Fed tightening is not necessarily bad for stocks. There have been five rate-raising cycles since 1990, and the major stock indexes ended<i>higher</i>a year after the first rate increase 80% of the time.”</blockquote><p>In isolation, this figure is not particularly impressive, since the S&P 500 has produced positive returns for the year 80% of the time in the past 3 decades. But at least, the observation suggests that recent rate hikes have not been any more likely to drag the performance of the stock market.</p><p>I then looked at Apple stock itself. Keep in mind that AAPL dropped as much as 17% from its all-time high, with the YTD bottom being reached as recently as March 14.</p><p>In the iPhone era, i.e. since 2007, Apple shares dropped at least this much a few times: certainly during the Great Recession of 2008, but also in 2013-2014, 2017-2018, and during the more recent COVID-19 bear market.</p><p>Whenever a 17%-plus selloff happened, Apple managed to produce outstanding average returns of 56% one year later! While, in rare instances, share price continued to decline after the 17% drawdown, the stock was in positive territory a year later 92% of the time.</p><p>Check out the histogram below, which shows the distribution of one-year forward returns after Apple stock dipped 17% of more from a peak, since 2007:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d0028f6b3627c6e01dbd676d5158e65\" tg-width=\"823\" tg-height=\"494\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Figure 2: AAPL: 1-year return after 17%+ selloff.</span></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-19 09:01 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/apple-stock-bright-green-light-to-buy-says-one-analyst><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a closer look.As the equities market shows signs that it has finally found its footing (fingers ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/apple-stock-bright-green-light-to-buy-says-one-analyst\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/apple-stock-bright-green-light-to-buy-says-one-analyst","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184059964","content_text":"One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a closer look.As the equities market shows signs that it has finally found its footing (fingers crossed), one vocal Wall Street analyst has given a “bright green light” for Apple stock to climb further.Today, the Apple Maven reviews Wedbush’s stance on AAPL, still its top tech pick. Could analyst Dan Ives be right that Apple stock and some of its peers have bottomed for the year?Figure 1: Apple Stock: Bright Green Light To Buy, Says One AnalystInterest rate hikes underwayMr. Ives’ key catalyst this week has been the Federal Reserve’s announcement on monetary policy. In a move that has been widely anticipated, the US central bank is raising short-term interest rates by 25 basis points. Six more hikes are expected in 2022.I explained yesterday that the bullish reaction to the rate bump can be counterintuitive. Shouldn’t higher interest be a drag for tech and growth stocks?The key here is that the markets do not usually react to what is happening right at this moment. Rather, it tends to look forward a few months and anticipate future events.Dan Ives seems to agree with me that, rather than causing concern, the start of the rate hike campaign has been felt as a relief. Finally, monetary policy will begin to tighten, and investors can slowly start to worry about something other than rampant inflation.This is very much what happened in early November of last year. When the Fed announced the start of the tapering process (that is, the winding down of the Bank’s bond purchase program), the Nasdaq immediately rallied — although enthusiasm lasted barely two months.Therefore, yes, I believe that the macroeconomics events of the week were a positive for Apple stock. If “left alone” (i.e., absent market-level shocks and concerns), I think that AAPL share price will tend to rise due to the company’s strong fundamentals and execution.Has AAPL bottomed?While I think that Apple stock will be worth much more several years down the road, the harder question to answer is whether shares have seen the worst of 2022.Any realistic analyst or investor must leave the door open for further share price weakness. I still think it is a bit too early to say, with much conviction, that the early-year selloff in the markets has completely run its course.But here’s one thing that I can do: look at the historical data to understand what could happen next. Barron’s has done some of the work for us.According to the publication, citing Dow Jones Market Data in an email that landed in my inbox last evening:“The start of a Fed tightening is not necessarily bad for stocks. There have been five rate-raising cycles since 1990, and the major stock indexes endedhighera year after the first rate increase 80% of the time.”In isolation, this figure is not particularly impressive, since the S&P 500 has produced positive returns for the year 80% of the time in the past 3 decades. But at least, the observation suggests that recent rate hikes have not been any more likely to drag the performance of the stock market.I then looked at Apple stock itself. Keep in mind that AAPL dropped as much as 17% from its all-time high, with the YTD bottom being reached as recently as March 14.In the iPhone era, i.e. since 2007, Apple shares dropped at least this much a few times: certainly during the Great Recession of 2008, but also in 2013-2014, 2017-2018, and during the more recent COVID-19 bear market.Whenever a 17%-plus selloff happened, Apple managed to produce outstanding average returns of 56% one year later! While, in rare instances, share price continued to decline after the 17% drawdown, the stock was in positive territory a year later 92% of the time.Check out the histogram below, which shows the distribution of one-year forward returns after Apple stock dipped 17% of more from a peak, since 2007:Figure 2: AAPL: 1-year return after 17%+ selloff.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2870,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3573703375513385","authorId":"3573703375513385","name":"JonLucky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15afb66e92e4e4d6d1a8e9b7854e9d5e","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3573703375513385","authorIdStr":"3573703375513385"},"content":"green 🍏 🤔😄","text":"green 🍏 🤔😄","html":"green 🍏 🤔😄"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193645574,"gmtCreate":1620786859998,"gmtModify":1704348384298,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Can sustain? ","listText":"Can sustain? ","text":"Can sustain?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/193645574","repostId":"1192265758","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3340,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":107912764,"gmtCreate":1620438542758,"gmtModify":1704343696295,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"A joke that make you rich","listText":"A joke that make you rich","text":"A joke that make you rich","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/107912764","repostId":"1192861382","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2729,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}