Profile - To The Moon

JadeS

Posts · 76Posts · 76
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-05-07
  Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔
  9 High-Yield Blue-Chips To Help You Sleep Well At Night In This Bear Market
  gradyreese/E+ via Getty ImagesThe wild stock market ride in 2022 continues.YChartsOn Wednesday, May
  9 High-Yield Blue-Chips To Help You Sleep Well At Night In This Bear Market
  442 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-04-11
  Own preference
  Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.
  When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire
  Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.
  311 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-04-10
  There are those who fall and those who gain more
  Hot Stocks: Semiconductor Stocks Fall; BCRX, CCCC Plunge; WDFC Rises on Earnings; KR Set a New High
  With investors worried about a murky economic future, the major U.S. equity averages posted a mixed
  Hot Stocks: Semiconductor Stocks Fall; BCRX, CCCC Plunge; WDFC Rises on Earnings; KR Set a New High
  485 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-04-10
  $Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$👍
  290 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-04-09
  Which one will you choose?
  Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?
  SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks
  Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?
  507 Comment
  5
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-04-09
  $AT&T Inc(T)$communications
  292 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-03-30
  $Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$good prospect
  472 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2022-03-19
  It is one's opinion
  Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says
  One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a
  Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says
  573 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2021-05-12
  Can sustain?
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  1.10K 2
  4
  Share
  Report
- JadeSJadeS
  ·2021-05-08
  A joke that make you rich
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  905 1
  3
  Share
  Report

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3573644992811813","uuid":"3573644992811813","gmtCreate":1610551284516,"gmtModify":1650194166088,"name":"JadeS","pinyin":"jades","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":14,"headSize":545,"tweetSize":76,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.11","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.37%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.46%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9066342141,"gmtCreate":1651856184683,"gmtModify":1676534985601,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔","listText":"Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔","text":"Have not been sleeping well for months!! 😔","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9066342141","repostId":"2233539913","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2233539913","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1651839340,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2233539913?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-06 20:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"9 High-Yield Blue-Chips To Help You Sleep Well At Night In This Bear Market","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2233539913","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"gradyreese/E+ via Getty ImagesThe wild stock market ride in 2022 continues.YChartsOn Wednesday, May ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c9e5cba011e06e7f7d9fd5aca6e0787\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>gradyreese/E+ via Getty Images</p><p></p><p>The wild stock market ride in 2022 continues.</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/80a1bb2e88cfacad35fade7d6e4450db\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"387\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>YCharts</p><p></p><p>On Wednesday, May 4th, after Fed Chairman Jerome Powell took 75 basis point hikes off the table, the market roared higher with the Nasdaq soaring 3.5%.</p><p>As I write this, the market is down 3.7% and the Nasdaq 5.1%.</p><p>Bonds are getting crushed and even low volatility stocks are selling off, though just a fraction as much.</p><p>Why is the market getting hammered today? There is no news to explain it, it&#39;s just soaring interest rates and crashing stock prices.</p><p>I understand that a lot of investors are getting exhausted by this volatility.</p><p>It seems historic and in a way it is.</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7afc29e391d43e816b6d641e57034359\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"653\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Charlie Bilello</p><p></p><p>In fact, it&#39;s the 3rd worst start of the year for stocks in history.</p><p>But guess what?</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91aaea5881a2fe583b6899f459c4e7c5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Daily Shot </p><p></p><p>It&#39;s also a perfectly average correction, just <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> that&#39;s happening a bit quicker than usual.</p><p>The temptation to sell everything and hide in cash (and under your bed) might be strong, but as I&#39;ve explained in numerous articles, market timing is a great way to destroy your nest egg.</p><blockquote>If you try to time the market you&#39;ll churn your portfolio to death.&#34; - Joshua Brown, CEO Ritholtz Wealth Management</blockquote><p>This article explains why this bear market is normal, healthy, and could end within the next month or so (about 6% lower on the S&amp;P 500).</p><p>But in the meantime, let me show you how to harness the power of the world&#39;s best low volatility, high-yield blue-chips to sleep well at night, while growing rich over time, in this and all future bear markets.</p><p><b>Up 2% YTD While The Market Is Down 15% And Tech -23%... The Ultimate SWAN Portfolio </b></p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6cc28eeeb3fd642ac0aa284500b4617c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"260\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Portfolio Visualizer Premium</p><p></p><p>The portfolio I&#39;m highlighting today is up 2% in 2022, beating the market by 17% and the Nasdaq by 25%.</p><ul><li>This is the power of low volatility blue-chips and prudent risk-management</li></ul><h2>9 High-Yield Blue-Chips For The Ultimate Sleep Well At Night Portfolio</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/830dee466fa7d063f45a3c0379b7eeb5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>(Source: DK Zen Research Terminal)</p><p></p><ul><li>Verizon (VZ)</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UGI\">UGI Corp</a> (UGI)</li><li>Altria (MO)</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MMM\">3M</a> (MMM)</li><li>Merck (MRK)</li><li><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/IBM\">IBM</a> (IBM)</li><li>Enbridge (ENB)</li><li>$Royal Bank of Canada(RY-T)$ (RY)</li><li>Realty Income (O)</li></ul><p>I&#39;ve linked to articles covering these companies&#39; long-term investment thesis, growth potential, and risk profiles.</p><p>But the reason for these nine blue-chips is simple.</p><ul><li>4.5% very safe yield</li><li>21.6% average annual volatility (vs. 23% aristocrats and 28% standalone companies)</li><li>Aristocrat level safety and quality</li><li>10.8% long-term return potential</li></ul><h2>World-Class Quality You Can Trust In All Economic And Market Conditions</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bd618885cc81dccd2ff7e33fc573bf15\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"302\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Sorted By Credit Rating (Source: DK Zen Research Terminal)</p><p></p><p>For context, the average aristocrat has</p><ul><li>87% quality</li><li>89% safety score</li><li>84% dependability</li><li>67% LT risk-management percentile</li></ul><p>These high-yield, low volatility blue-chips average 86% Ultra SWAN quality, matching the aristocrats, and are BBB+ stable rated by S&amp;P (on average).</p><p>What does that mean? That this is one of the safest 4.5% yielding portfolio on earth.</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><b>Rating</b></td><td><b>Dividend Kings Safety Score (161 Point Safety Model)</b></td><td><b>Approximate Dividend Cut Risk (Average Recession)</b></td><td><p><b>Approximate Dividend Cut Risk In Pandemic Level Recession</b></p></td></tr><tr><td>1 - unsafe</td><td>0% to 20%</td><td>over 4%</td><td>16+%</td></tr><tr><td>2- below average</td><td>21% to 40%</td><td>over 2%</td><td>8% to 16%</td></tr><tr><td>3 - average</td><td>41% to 60%</td><td>2%</td><td>4% to 8%</td></tr><tr><td>4 - safe</td><td>61% to 80%</td><td>1%</td><td>2% to 4%</td></tr><tr><td>5- very safe</td><td>81% to 100%</td><td>0.5%</td><td>1% to 2%</td></tr><tr><td><b>High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chips</b></td><td><b>88%</b></td><td><b>0.5%</b></td><td><b>1.60%</b></td></tr><tr><td>Risk Rating</td><td>Low-Risk (70th industry percentile risk-management consensus)</td><td>BBB+ Stable outlook credit rating 5% 30-year bankruptcy risk</td><td><p>20% OR LESS Max Risk Cap Recommendation Each (IBM and UGI 2.5%)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>In the historical average recession, the risk of these companies cutting their dividends is approximately 1 in 200.</p><p>In a severe recession, such as the Great Recession or Pandemic, it&#39;s approximately 1 in 63.</p><p>S&amp;P estimates the average bankruptcy risk at 4.2%, a BBB+ stable credit rating.</p><p>And six rating agencies estimate these blue-chips are in the top 30% of their industries in terms of long-term risk-management.</p><p>And for final confirmation of safety and quality let&#39;s consider their 30-year average dividend growth streak.</p><ul><li>Effectively an aristocrat portfolio</li><li>1.5x longer than the Ben Graham standard of excellence</li></ul><h2>Wonderful Companies At Wonderful Prices</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/87605a934ed63c5e2974b94481d3a056\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"311\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: DK Zen Research Terminal</p><p></p><p>The S&amp;P 500 is about 5% historically overvalued trading at 18x forward earnings.</p><p>These high-yield blue-chips trade at 12.6x earnings, and a 14% historical discount to fair value.</p><p>Analysts expect them to deliver 14% returns in the next year alone, but 23% total returns would be justified by fundamentals.</p><h2>Long-Term Fundamentals That Could Make You Rich</h2><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b78f0eb5c79513c5c571e2a4320d3036\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"312\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Source: DK Zen Research Terminal</p><p></p><p>This is effectively a BBB+ rated aristocrat that yields 4.5%, is growing 6.3% and analysts expect to deliver 10.8% annual returns.</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td>Investment Strategy</td><td>Yield</td><td>LT Consensus Growth</td><td>LT Consensus Total Return Potential</td><td>Long-Term Risk-Adjusted Expected Return</td><td>Long-Term Inflation And Risk-Adjusted Expected Returns</td><td>Years To Double Your Inflation &amp; Risk-Adjusted Wealth</td><td><p>10 Year Inflation And Risk-Adjusted Expected Return</p></td></tr><tr><td><b>High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chips</b></td><td><b>4.5%</b></td><td><b>6.30%</b></td><td><b>10.8%</b></td><td><b>7.6%</b></td><td><b>5.0%</b></td><td><b>14.4</b></td><td><b>1.63</b></td></tr><tr><td>Adam&#39;s Planned Correction Buys</td><td>3.9%</td><td>18.8%</td><td>22.7%</td><td>15.9%</td><td>13.3%</td><td>5.4</td><td>3.50</td></tr><tr><td>10-Year US Treasury</td><td>3.1%</td><td>0.0%</td><td>3.1%</td><td>3.1%</td><td>0.5%</td><td>133.3</td><td>1.06</td></tr><tr><td>REITs</td><td>2.9%</td><td>6.5%</td><td>9.4%</td><td>6.6%</td><td>4.0%</td><td>17.9</td><td>1.48</td></tr><tr><td>High-Yield</td><td>2.8%</td><td>10.3%</td><td>13.1%</td><td>9.2%</td><td>6.6%</td><td>10.9</td><td>1.90</td></tr><tr><td>S&amp;P 500</td><td>1.5%</td><td>8.5%</td><td>10.0%</td><td>7.0%</td><td>4.5%</td><td>16.2</td><td>1.55</td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>(Source: Morningstar, FactSet, YCharts)</i></p><p>What does this mean for you?</p><h4>Inflation-Adjusted Consensus Total Return Potential: $1,000 Initial Investment</h4><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><b>Time Frame (Years)</b></td><td><b>7.4% CAGR Inflation-Adjusted S&amp;P Consensus</b></td><td><b>8.7% Inflation-Adjusted Aristocrat Consensus</b></td><td><b>8.3% CAGR Inflation-Adjusted High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chip Consensus</b></td><td><b>Difference Between Inflation Adjusted High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chip Consensus And S&amp;P Consensus</b></td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>$1,432.29</td><td>$1,514.08</td><td>$1,486.41</td><td>$54.12</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>$2,051.47</td><td>$2,292.44</td><td>$2,209.42</td><td>$157.96</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>$2,938.30</td><td>$3,470.93</td><td>$3,284.12</td><td>$345.82</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>$4,208.51</td><td>$5,255.26</td><td>$4,881.55</td><td>$673.04</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>$6,027.82</td><td>$7,956.89</td><td>$7,256.01</td><td>$1,228.18</td></tr><tr><td><b>30</b></td><td><b>$8,633.61</b></td><td><b>$12,047.36</b></td><td><b>$10,785.42</b></td><td><b>$2,151.81</b></td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)</i></p><p>Analysts think these blue-chips can deliver 11x inflation-adjusted returns over the next 30 years.</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><b>Time Frame (Years)</b></td><td><b>Ratio Aristocrats/S&amp;P</b></td><td><b>Ratio Inflation-Adjusted High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chip Consensus, And S&amp;P Consensus</b></td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>1.06</td><td>1.04</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>1.12</td><td>1.08</td></tr><tr><td>15</td><td>1.18</td><td>1.12</td></tr><tr><td>20</td><td>1.25</td><td>1.16</td></tr><tr><td>25</td><td>1.32</td><td>1.20</td></tr><tr><td><b>30</b></td><td><b>1.40</b></td><td><b>1.25</b></td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)</i></p><p>That&#39;s potentially 25% better returns than the market, with 3x the much safer yield on day one and a lot less volatility.</p><h2>Historical Returns Since 1996 (Annual Rebalancing)</h2><blockquote>&#34;The future doesn&#39;t repeat, but it often rhymes.&#34; - Mark Twain</blockquote><p>Past performance is no guarantee of future results, but studies show that blue-chips with relatively stable fundamentals over time offer predictable returns based on yield, growth, and valuation mean reversion.</p><p></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/65819e34d5e25e03f6e8073cac9429fb\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"638\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Bank of America </p><p>So let&#39;s take a look at how these high-yield blue-chips have performed over the last 26 years when over 91% of total returns were the result of fundamentals, not luck.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/abf063928bfbc73e00b68ef7db3c80a2\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"146\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Portfolio Visualizer Premium </p><p></p><p>They almost doubled a 60/40 retirement portfolio and beat the S&amp;P 500 by 3% annually but with 2.6% lower annual volatility.</p><p>Most impressively, during the 2nd biggest stock market crash in US history, they fell no more than a 60/40 portfolio.</p><ul><li>9 blue-chips falling less than a 40% bond portfolio</li></ul><p>And let&#39;s not forget about the main job of this portfolio, generous, safe, and steadily growing income.</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><b>Portfolio</b></td><td><b>1996 Income Per $1,000 Investment</b></td><td><b>2021 Income Per $1,000 Investment</b></td><td><b>Annual Income Growth</b></td><td><b>Starting Yield</b></td><td><b>2021 Yield On Cost</b></td></tr><tr><td>High-Yield Low Volatility Blue-Chips</td><td>$53</td><td>$1,068</td><td>12.76%</td><td>5.3%</td><td>106.8%</td></tr><tr><td>S&amp;P 500</td><td>$22</td><td>$147</td><td>7.89%</td><td>2.2%</td><td>14.7%</td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>(Source: Portfolio Visualizer Premium)</i></p><p>While the market grew its dividends at a decent 8% rate, these much higher-yielding low volatility blue-chips delivered 13% long-term income growth.</p><ul><li>5.3% yield in 1996 and 107% yield on cost in 2021</li></ul><p>What about future income growth?</p><table><colgroup></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><b>Analyst Consensus Income Growth Forecast</b></td><td><b>Risk-Adjusted Expected Income Growth</b></td><td><b>Risk And Tax-Adjusted Expected Income Growth</b></td><td><p><b>Risk, Inflation, And Tax Adjusted Income Growth Consensus</b></p></td></tr><tr><td>10.4%</td><td>7.3%</td><td>6.2%</td><td>3.6%</td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)</i></p><p>Analysts expect 10.4% long-term income growth.</p><p>When we adjust for the risk of these companies not growing as expected, inflation and taxes, we get a real expected income growth rate of 3.6%.</p><p>Now compare that to what they expect from the S&amp;P 500.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><b>Time Frame</b></td><td><b>S&amp;P Inflation-Adjusted Dividend Growth</b></td><td><b>S&amp;P Inflation-Adjusted Earnings Growth</b></td></tr><tr><td>1871-2021</td><td>1.6%</td><td>2.1%</td></tr><tr><td>1945-2021</td><td>2.4%</td><td>3.5%</td></tr><tr><td>1981-2021 (Modern Falling Rate Era)</td><td>2.8%</td><td>3.8%</td></tr><tr><td>2008-2021 (Modern Low Rate Era)</td><td>3.5%</td><td>6.2%</td></tr><tr><td><b>FactSet Future Consensus</b></td><td><b>2.0%</b></td><td><b>5.2%</b></td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>(Sources: S&amp;P, FactSet, Multipl.com)</i></p><p>What about a 60/40 retirement portfolio?</p><ul><li>0.5% consensus inflation, risk, and tax-adjusted income growth.</li></ul><p>In other words, these 6 blue-chip bargains offer:</p><ul><li>3x the market&#39;s yield (and a much safer yield at that)</li><li>nearly 2x its long-term inflation-adjusted consensus income growth potential</li><li><i>7x better long-term inflation-adjusted income growth than a 60/40 retirement portfolio</i></li></ul><p>This is the power of high-yield, low volatility blue-chip investing to change your financial future and your life.</p><h2>Bottom Line: These 9 High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chips Could Be Just What You Need To Sleep Well At Night</h2><p>I know this correction/bear market might seem scary. That&#39;s especially true if you are new to the market, joining in the giddiness following the pandemic.</p><ul><li>The single fastest bull run in history</li><li>+100% in 12 months</li></ul><p>That wasn&#39;t normal, this correction? Totally normal.</p><ul><li>The market&#39;s average peak decline since 1980 is 15%</li><li>In any given year you need to be prepared for this kind of decline</li><li>It&#39;s the cost of owning the best performing asset class in history</li></ul><p>If you have no savings to put to work, then the best course of action is to sit tight and trust your portfolio&#39;s risk management, which you hopefully have remained disciplined with and followed with annual rebalancing.</p><blockquote>Volatility caused by money managers who speculate irrationality with huge sums will offer the true investor more chance to make intelligent investment moves. <b>He can be hurt by such volatility only if he is forced, by either financial or psychological pressures, to sell at untoward times.</b>&#34; - Warren Buffett</blockquote><p>Volatility is not a threat to any prudently diversified and risk-managed portfolio.</p><p>In fact, anyone reinvesting dividends benefits immensely from these kinds of periodic and completely normal sell-offs.</p><p>And that&#39;s where the power of high-yield, low volatility blue-chips like VZ, MRK, UGI, MO, MMM, IBM, ENB, O, and RY come in.</p><ul><li>Aristocrat safety and quality</li><li>30-year average dividend growth streak</li><li>BBB+ stable average credit rating</li><li>4.5% very safe yield (3x that of the S&amp;P 500)</li><li>6.3% long-term growth consensus</li><li>10.8% CAGR total return consensus potential (vs. 13% historical returns over the last 26 years)</li><li>Average annual volatility of 12.5% vs. 15% S&amp;P 500</li><li>Peak decline of 31% during the Great Recession (same as a 60/40 portfolio)</li><li>Up almost 3% YTD vs. -15% S&amp;P 500</li></ul><p>This is the power of trusting the world&#39;s best low volatility high-yield blue-chips when the market is at its most frightening.</p><p>This is how you take charge of your financial destiny and stop praying for luck on Wall Street.</p><p>This is how you can avoid costly mistakes, such as panic selling within 7% of what could be this bear market bottom.</p><p>If you&#39;re exhausted from this correction, you&#39;re not alone.</p><p>Just remember that 97% of long-term investing returns are a function of fundamentals, not luck.</p><p>And the fundamentals of these nine high-yield, low volatility blue-chips are rock solid.</p><p>And that&#39;s why they combine to form one of the best Ultra SWAN portfolios in the world, perfect for troubled times like these.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>9 High-Yield Blue-Chips To Help You Sleep Well At Night In This Bear Market</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n9 High-Yield Blue-Chips To Help You Sleep Well At Night In This Bear Market\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-06 20:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4507751-9-high-yield-blue-chips-help-sleep-well-bear-market><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>gradyreese/E+ via Getty ImagesThe wild stock market ride in 2022 continues.YChartsOn Wednesday, May 4th, after Fed Chairman Jerome Powell took 75 basis point hikes off the table, the market roared ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4507751-9-high-yield-blue-chips-help-sleep-well-bear-market\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4075":"烟草","BK4575":"芯片概念","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","BK4007":"制药","BK4080":"零售业房地产投资信托","BK4566":"资本集团","O":"Realty Income Corp","BK4206":"工业集团企业","BK4538":"云计算","IBM":"IBM","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","BK4579":"人工智能","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4115":"综合电信业务","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF","BK4134":"信息科技咨询与其它服务","RY":"加拿大皇家银行","BK4197":"燃气公用事业","BK4207":"综合性银行",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","ENB":"安桥","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","BK4512":"苹果概念","SH":"标普500反向ETF","VZ":"威瑞森","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","BK4516":"特朗普概念","MO":"奥驰亚","UGI":"UGI公用事业","BK4515":"5G概念","MMM":"3M","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","MRK":"默沙东","BK4144":"石油与天然气的储存和运输","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4507751-9-high-yield-blue-chips-help-sleep-well-bear-market","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2233539913","content_text":"gradyreese/E+ via Getty ImagesThe wild stock market ride in 2022 continues.YChartsOn Wednesday, May 4th, after Fed Chairman Jerome Powell took 75 basis point hikes off the table, the market roared higher with the Nasdaq soaring 3.5%.As I write this, the market is down 3.7% and the Nasdaq 5.1%.Bonds are getting crushed and even low volatility stocks are selling off, though just a fraction as much.Why is the market getting hammered today? There is no news to explain it, it's just soaring interest rates and crashing stock prices.I understand that a lot of investors are getting exhausted by this volatility.It seems historic and in a way it is.Charlie BilelloIn fact, it's the 3rd worst start of the year for stocks in history.But guess what?Daily Shot It's also a perfectly average correction, just one that's happening a bit quicker than usual.The temptation to sell everything and hide in cash (and under your bed) might be strong, but as I've explained in numerous articles, market timing is a great way to destroy your nest egg.If you try to time the market you'll churn your portfolio to death.\" - Joshua Brown, CEO Ritholtz Wealth ManagementThis article explains why this bear market is normal, healthy, and could end within the next month or so (about 6% lower on the S&P 500).But in the meantime, let me show you how to harness the power of the world's best low volatility, high-yield blue-chips to sleep well at night, while growing rich over time, in this and all future bear markets.Up 2% YTD While The Market Is Down 15% And Tech -23%... The Ultimate SWAN Portfolio Portfolio Visualizer PremiumThe portfolio I'm highlighting today is up 2% in 2022, beating the market by 17% and the Nasdaq by 25%.This is the power of low volatility blue-chips and prudent risk-management9 High-Yield Blue-Chips For The Ultimate Sleep Well At Night Portfolio(Source: DK Zen Research Terminal)Verizon (VZ)UGI Corp (UGI)Altria (MO)3M (MMM)Merck (MRK)IBM (IBM)Enbridge (ENB)$Royal Bank of Canada(RY-T)$ (RY)Realty Income (O)I've linked to articles covering these companies' long-term investment thesis, growth potential, and risk profiles.But the reason for these nine blue-chips is simple.4.5% very safe yield21.6% average annual volatility (vs. 23% aristocrats and 28% standalone companies)Aristocrat level safety and quality10.8% long-term return potentialWorld-Class Quality You Can Trust In All Economic And Market ConditionsSorted By Credit Rating (Source: DK Zen Research Terminal)For context, the average aristocrat has87% quality89% safety score84% dependability67% LT risk-management percentileThese high-yield, low volatility blue-chips average 86% Ultra SWAN quality, matching the aristocrats, and are BBB+ stable rated by S&P (on average).What does that mean? That this is one of the safest 4.5% yielding portfolio on earth.RatingDividend Kings Safety Score (161 Point Safety Model)Approximate Dividend Cut Risk (Average Recession)Approximate Dividend Cut Risk In Pandemic Level Recession1 - unsafe0% to 20%over 4%16+%2- below average21% to 40%over 2%8% to 16%3 - average41% to 60%2%4% to 8%4 - safe61% to 80%1%2% to 4%5- very safe81% to 100%0.5%1% to 2%High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chips88%0.5%1.60%Risk RatingLow-Risk (70th industry percentile risk-management consensus)BBB+ Stable outlook credit rating 5% 30-year bankruptcy risk20% OR LESS Max Risk Cap Recommendation Each (IBM and UGI 2.5%)In the historical average recession, the risk of these companies cutting their dividends is approximately 1 in 200.In a severe recession, such as the Great Recession or Pandemic, it's approximately 1 in 63.S&P estimates the average bankruptcy risk at 4.2%, a BBB+ stable credit rating.And six rating agencies estimate these blue-chips are in the top 30% of their industries in terms of long-term risk-management.And for final confirmation of safety and quality let's consider their 30-year average dividend growth streak.Effectively an aristocrat portfolio1.5x longer than the Ben Graham standard of excellenceWonderful Companies At Wonderful PricesSource: DK Zen Research TerminalThe S&P 500 is about 5% historically overvalued trading at 18x forward earnings.These high-yield blue-chips trade at 12.6x earnings, and a 14% historical discount to fair value.Analysts expect them to deliver 14% returns in the next year alone, but 23% total returns would be justified by fundamentals.Long-Term Fundamentals That Could Make You RichSource: DK Zen Research TerminalThis is effectively a BBB+ rated aristocrat that yields 4.5%, is growing 6.3% and analysts expect to deliver 10.8% annual returns.Investment StrategyYieldLT Consensus GrowthLT Consensus Total Return PotentialLong-Term Risk-Adjusted Expected ReturnLong-Term Inflation And Risk-Adjusted Expected ReturnsYears To Double Your Inflation & Risk-Adjusted Wealth10 Year Inflation And Risk-Adjusted Expected ReturnHigh-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chips4.5%6.30%10.8%7.6%5.0%14.41.63Adam's Planned Correction Buys3.9%18.8%22.7%15.9%13.3%5.43.5010-Year US Treasury3.1%0.0%3.1%3.1%0.5%133.31.06REITs2.9%6.5%9.4%6.6%4.0%17.91.48High-Yield2.8%10.3%13.1%9.2%6.6%10.91.90S&P 5001.5%8.5%10.0%7.0%4.5%16.21.55(Source: Morningstar, FactSet, YCharts)What does this mean for you?Inflation-Adjusted Consensus Total Return Potential: $1,000 Initial InvestmentTime Frame (Years)7.4% CAGR Inflation-Adjusted S&P Consensus8.7% Inflation-Adjusted Aristocrat Consensus8.3% CAGR Inflation-Adjusted High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chip ConsensusDifference Between Inflation Adjusted High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chip Consensus And S&P Consensus5$1,432.29$1,514.08$1,486.41$54.1210$2,051.47$2,292.44$2,209.42$157.9615$2,938.30$3,470.93$3,284.12$345.8220$4,208.51$5,255.26$4,881.55$673.0425$6,027.82$7,956.89$7,256.01$1,228.1830$8,633.61$12,047.36$10,785.42$2,151.81(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)Analysts think these blue-chips can deliver 11x inflation-adjusted returns over the next 30 years.Time Frame (Years)Ratio Aristocrats/S&PRatio Inflation-Adjusted High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chip Consensus, And S&P Consensus51.061.04101.121.08151.181.12201.251.16251.321.20301.401.25(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)That's potentially 25% better returns than the market, with 3x the much safer yield on day one and a lot less volatility.Historical Returns Since 1996 (Annual Rebalancing)\"The future doesn't repeat, but it often rhymes.\" - Mark TwainPast performance is no guarantee of future results, but studies show that blue-chips with relatively stable fundamentals over time offer predictable returns based on yield, growth, and valuation mean reversion.Bank of America So let's take a look at how these high-yield blue-chips have performed over the last 26 years when over 91% of total returns were the result of fundamentals, not luck.Portfolio Visualizer Premium They almost doubled a 60/40 retirement portfolio and beat the S&P 500 by 3% annually but with 2.6% lower annual volatility.Most impressively, during the 2nd biggest stock market crash in US history, they fell no more than a 60/40 portfolio.9 blue-chips falling less than a 40% bond portfolioAnd let's not forget about the main job of this portfolio, generous, safe, and steadily growing income.Portfolio1996 Income Per $1,000 Investment2021 Income Per $1,000 InvestmentAnnual Income GrowthStarting Yield2021 Yield On CostHigh-Yield Low Volatility Blue-Chips$53$1,06812.76%5.3%106.8%S&P 500$22$1477.89%2.2%14.7%(Source: Portfolio Visualizer Premium)While the market grew its dividends at a decent 8% rate, these much higher-yielding low volatility blue-chips delivered 13% long-term income growth.5.3% yield in 1996 and 107% yield on cost in 2021What about future income growth?Analyst Consensus Income Growth ForecastRisk-Adjusted Expected Income GrowthRisk And Tax-Adjusted Expected Income GrowthRisk, Inflation, And Tax Adjusted Income Growth Consensus10.4%7.3%6.2%3.6%(Source: DK Research Terminal, FactSet)Analysts expect 10.4% long-term income growth.When we adjust for the risk of these companies not growing as expected, inflation and taxes, we get a real expected income growth rate of 3.6%.Now compare that to what they expect from the S&P 500.Time FrameS&P Inflation-Adjusted Dividend GrowthS&P Inflation-Adjusted Earnings Growth1871-20211.6%2.1%1945-20212.4%3.5%1981-2021 (Modern Falling Rate Era)2.8%3.8%2008-2021 (Modern Low Rate Era)3.5%6.2%FactSet Future Consensus2.0%5.2%(Sources: S&P, FactSet, Multipl.com)What about a 60/40 retirement portfolio?0.5% consensus inflation, risk, and tax-adjusted income growth.In other words, these 6 blue-chip bargains offer:3x the market's yield (and a much safer yield at that)nearly 2x its long-term inflation-adjusted consensus income growth potential7x better long-term inflation-adjusted income growth than a 60/40 retirement portfolioThis is the power of high-yield, low volatility blue-chip investing to change your financial future and your life.Bottom Line: These 9 High-Yield, Low Volatility Blue-Chips Could Be Just What You Need To Sleep Well At NightI know this correction/bear market might seem scary. That's especially true if you are new to the market, joining in the giddiness following the pandemic.The single fastest bull run in history+100% in 12 monthsThat wasn't normal, this correction? Totally normal.The market's average peak decline since 1980 is 15%In any given year you need to be prepared for this kind of declineIt's the cost of owning the best performing asset class in historyIf you have no savings to put to work, then the best course of action is to sit tight and trust your portfolio's risk management, which you hopefully have remained disciplined with and followed with annual rebalancing.Volatility caused by money managers who speculate irrationality with huge sums will offer the true investor more chance to make intelligent investment moves. He can be hurt by such volatility only if he is forced, by either financial or psychological pressures, to sell at untoward times.\" - Warren BuffettVolatility is not a threat to any prudently diversified and risk-managed portfolio.In fact, anyone reinvesting dividends benefits immensely from these kinds of periodic and completely normal sell-offs.And that's where the power of high-yield, low volatility blue-chips like VZ, MRK, UGI, MO, MMM, IBM, ENB, O, and RY come in.Aristocrat safety and quality30-year average dividend growth streakBBB+ stable average credit rating4.5% very safe yield (3x that of the S&P 500)6.3% long-term growth consensus10.8% CAGR total return consensus potential (vs. 13% historical returns over the last 26 years)Average annual volatility of 12.5% vs. 15% S&P 500Peak decline of 31% during the Great Recession (same as a 60/40 portfolio)Up almost 3% YTD vs. -15% S&P 500This is the power of trusting the world's best low volatility high-yield blue-chips when the market is at its most frightening.This is how you take charge of your financial destiny and stop praying for luck on Wall Street.This is how you can avoid costly mistakes, such as panic selling within 7% of what could be this bear market bottom.If you're exhausted from this correction, you're not alone.Just remember that 97% of long-term investing returns are a function of fundamentals, not luck.And the fundamentals of these nine high-yield, low volatility blue-chips are rock solid.And that's why they combine to form one of the best Ultra SWAN portfolios in the world, perfect for troubled times like these.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":442,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9014848573,"gmtCreate":1649642889484,"gmtModify":1676534543066,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Own preference&nbsp;","listText":"Own preference&nbsp;","text":"Own preference","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9014848573","repostId":"1191869405","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1191869405","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649638156,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1191869405?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-11 08:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1191869405","media":"Barrons","summary":"When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire Hathaway founder Warren Buffett was eight years old. Eighty-three years later, Buffett added HP Inc. to his long list of storied investments.</p><p>This past week, Berkshire (ticker: BRK.A) disclosed an 11.4% stake in the PC and printer company HP (HPQ), which is not to be confused with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), the server, networking, and storage company from which it split in 2014.</p><p>You could argue that Berkshire is a little late here. HP’s PC business soared during the pandemic, driving growth to the highest level since the company was split in two; HP’s stock price has doubled since 2019. Meanwhile, there are signs that PC demand is going to slow from here as the stay-at-home trend fades. Analysts at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Barclays have all turned cautious on the PC sector for just that reason.</p><p>As <i>Barron’s</i>has repeatedly noted, HP shares are cheap by almost any statistical measure. In an October 2021 column, I described them as a “screaming buy.” (I’d like to think Buffett read the column.) Even after the stock rallied 15% this past week on the Buffett news, HP shares still trade for a modest nine times expected earnings for the October 2023 fiscal year, and just 0.7 times sales. And HP remains exceedingly shareholder-friendly: Over the past eight quarters, it repurchased 26% of its shares—and it has promised to buy back at least $4 billion of stock in the current fiscal year. The stock sports a 2.8% dividend yield.</p><p>For the first time in years, HP also has a growth story to talk about, thanks to the soaring PC demand during the pandemic. Even as the company’s enterprise printer business slowed during office shutdowns, demand for home printers spiked.</p><p>While the pandemic boom may be fading, HP CEO Enrique Lores is expanding the company’s product portfolio to include a broader range of businesses. HP spent $425 million last year to buy the HyperX gaming peripherals unit from memory maker Kingston Technology. A leader in gaming headsets, HyperX also sells keyboards, mice, and microphones.</p><p>Then in late March, HP agreed to buy the headset and audioconferencing company Poly (POLY) for $3.3 billion. It’s a direct play on the future of hybrid work.</p><p>Even so, prominent Wall Street firms are taking a bearish view on HP. Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring, who recently cut his rating on HP shares to Underweight from Equal Weight, thinks consumer hardware spending will be pressured as supply improves, prices fall, and demand normalizes—and he sees macro risks to enterprise demand. UBS analyst David Vogt on Friday reduced his HP rating to Neutral from Buy, citing softening PC demand, the potential for slowing buybacks, and the considerable appreciation in the stock price.</p><p>Paul Wick, portfolio manager of the Columbia Seligman Technology and Information fund, which owns HP stock, thinks Wall Street is missing the bigger picture.</p><p>“We’ve been big fans of Hewlett-Packard and CEO Enrique Lores, who has executed extremely well,” Wick told me during an interview for our <i>Barron’s</i>Live interview series this past week. He concedes the PC business will be flattish but sees a shift to more-profitable commercial models from cheaper consumer units. And he says the printing business is recovering.</p><p>Wick thinks HP can earn $5 a share in fiscal 2024, up from $3.79 in 2021. Buybacks are shrinking the share count quarter after quarter, he notes. “It’s not a sexy business, but it is better than people give it credit for.”</p><p>Berkshire’s big bet on HP is a good reminder that now is the time to be looking for other tech bargains, especially as interest rates head higher. In order to find good candidates, I screened for tech stocks in the S&amp;P 500 trading at less than 10 times Wall Street’s projected earnings for next year. It’s a small group that includes both HP and HP Enterprise, the IT services company DXC Technology (DXC), the two disk-drive stocks Seagate Technology (STX) and Western Digital (WDC), and a handful of chip names, including Micron Technology (MU), which I wrote about bullishly last week, and the mobile phone radio chip firms Qorvo (QRVO) and Skyworks Solutions (SWKS).</p><p>Some of those chip names are part of a new, actively managed exchange-traded fund just launched by Wick.Columbia Seligman Semiconductor &amp; Technology trades under the ticker SEMI and should be a good way to play both cheap tech and ongoing strength in the chip world.</p><p>“Semiconductor fundamentals are strong, and valuations are reasonable—a lot more reasonable than other parts of technology, and even relative to the broad market,” Wick says.</p><p>As it happens, Micron is one of Wick’s top picks; he’s also upbeat on Intel (INTC), which he says is far more attractive than more popular (and expensive) options like Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Nvidia (NVDA). He’s also bullish on optical networking plays, including         Ciena (CIEN), Lumentum Holdings (LITE), Ericsson (ERIC), and Viavi Solutions (VIAV), and the enterprise storage company NetApp (NTAP).       They all benefit from increased data center spending.</p><p>My guess is Berkshire won’t be waiting decades to invest in its next Palo Alto-based tech firm.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too. </title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWarren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Bought HP Stock. Why You Should, Too. \n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-11 08:49 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/hp-stock-buffett-buy-51649455403?mod=hp_LATEST><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire Hathaway founder Warren Buffett was eight years old. Eighty-three years later, Buffett added HP Inc....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/hp-stock-buffett-buy-51649455403?mod=hp_LATEST\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"HPQ":"惠普","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/hp-stock-buffett-buy-51649455403?mod=hp_LATEST","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1191869405","content_text":"When Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard founded Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto, Calif., in 1939, Berkshire Hathaway founder Warren Buffett was eight years old. Eighty-three years later, Buffett added HP Inc. to his long list of storied investments.This past week, Berkshire (ticker: BRK.A) disclosed an 11.4% stake in the PC and printer company HP (HPQ), which is not to be confused with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), the server, networking, and storage company from which it split in 2014.You could argue that Berkshire is a little late here. HP’s PC business soared during the pandemic, driving growth to the highest level since the company was split in two; HP’s stock price has doubled since 2019. Meanwhile, there are signs that PC demand is going to slow from here as the stay-at-home trend fades. Analysts at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, UBS, and Barclays have all turned cautious on the PC sector for just that reason.As Barron’shas repeatedly noted, HP shares are cheap by almost any statistical measure. In an October 2021 column, I described them as a “screaming buy.” (I’d like to think Buffett read the column.) Even after the stock rallied 15% this past week on the Buffett news, HP shares still trade for a modest nine times expected earnings for the October 2023 fiscal year, and just 0.7 times sales. And HP remains exceedingly shareholder-friendly: Over the past eight quarters, it repurchased 26% of its shares—and it has promised to buy back at least $4 billion of stock in the current fiscal year. The stock sports a 2.8% dividend yield.For the first time in years, HP also has a growth story to talk about, thanks to the soaring PC demand during the pandemic. Even as the company’s enterprise printer business slowed during office shutdowns, demand for home printers spiked.While the pandemic boom may be fading, HP CEO Enrique Lores is expanding the company’s product portfolio to include a broader range of businesses. HP spent $425 million last year to buy the HyperX gaming peripherals unit from memory maker Kingston Technology. A leader in gaming headsets, HyperX also sells keyboards, mice, and microphones.Then in late March, HP agreed to buy the headset and audioconferencing company Poly (POLY) for $3.3 billion. It’s a direct play on the future of hybrid work.Even so, prominent Wall Street firms are taking a bearish view on HP. Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring, who recently cut his rating on HP shares to Underweight from Equal Weight, thinks consumer hardware spending will be pressured as supply improves, prices fall, and demand normalizes—and he sees macro risks to enterprise demand. UBS analyst David Vogt on Friday reduced his HP rating to Neutral from Buy, citing softening PC demand, the potential for slowing buybacks, and the considerable appreciation in the stock price.Paul Wick, portfolio manager of the Columbia Seligman Technology and Information fund, which owns HP stock, thinks Wall Street is missing the bigger picture.“We’ve been big fans of Hewlett-Packard and CEO Enrique Lores, who has executed extremely well,” Wick told me during an interview for our Barron’sLive interview series this past week. He concedes the PC business will be flattish but sees a shift to more-profitable commercial models from cheaper consumer units. And he says the printing business is recovering.Wick thinks HP can earn $5 a share in fiscal 2024, up from $3.79 in 2021. Buybacks are shrinking the share count quarter after quarter, he notes. “It’s not a sexy business, but it is better than people give it credit for.”Berkshire’s big bet on HP is a good reminder that now is the time to be looking for other tech bargains, especially as interest rates head higher. In order to find good candidates, I screened for tech stocks in the S&P 500 trading at less than 10 times Wall Street’s projected earnings for next year. It’s a small group that includes both HP and HP Enterprise, the IT services company DXC Technology (DXC), the two disk-drive stocks Seagate Technology (STX) and Western Digital (WDC), and a handful of chip names, including Micron Technology (MU), which I wrote about bullishly last week, and the mobile phone radio chip firms Qorvo (QRVO) and Skyworks Solutions (SWKS).Some of those chip names are part of a new, actively managed exchange-traded fund just launched by Wick.Columbia Seligman Semiconductor & Technology trades under the ticker SEMI and should be a good way to play both cheap tech and ongoing strength in the chip world.“Semiconductor fundamentals are strong, and valuations are reasonable—a lot more reasonable than other parts of technology, and even relative to the broad market,” Wick says.As it happens, Micron is one of Wick’s top picks; he’s also upbeat on Intel (INTC), which he says is far more attractive than more popular (and expensive) options like Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Nvidia (NVDA). He’s also bullish on optical networking plays, including         Ciena (CIEN), Lumentum Holdings (LITE), Ericsson (ERIC), and Viavi Solutions (VIAV), and the enterprise storage company NetApp (NTAP).       They all benefit from increased data center spending.My guess is Berkshire won’t be waiting decades to invest in its next Palo Alto-based tech firm.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":311,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015725090,"gmtCreate":1649557021496,"gmtModify":1676534529576,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"There are those who fall and those who gain more&nbsp;","listText":"There are those who fall and those who gain more&nbsp;","text":"There are those who fall and those who gain more","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015725090","repostId":"2226576805","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2226576805","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649463365,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2226576805?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-09 08:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Stocks: Semiconductor Stocks Fall; BCRX, CCCC Plunge; WDFC Rises on Earnings; KR Set a New High","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2226576805","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"With investors worried about a murky economic future, the major U.S. equity averages posted a mixed ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>With investors worried about a murky economic future, the major U.S. equity averages posted a mixed performance on Friday. Weakness in tech drove the Nasdaq and S&amp;P 500 lower, while the Dow scratched out a modest gain.</p><p>Semiconductor makers contributed to the slide in technology, with Truist issuing a cautious note on the sector. Nvidia (NVDA), Advanced Micro Devices (<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>) and Broadcom (AVGO) all finished lower.</p><p>Meanwhile, drug development setbacks sparked multiple sell-offs during the session. BioCryst (BCRX) dropped after the firm was forced to halt enrollment in a clinical trial. At the same time, issues with dose-limiting toxicities sent C4 Therapeutics (CCCC) reeling, with the stock losing more than half its value.</p><p>Looking at some of the day&#39;s standout gainers, WD-40 (WDFC) rallied on earnings news and an analyst&#39;s upgrade allowed Kroger (NYSE:KR) to set a new 52-week high.</p><p><b>Sector In Focus</b></p><p>Worries about the tech space drove the Nasdaq lower again on Friday, with the index dropping nearly 6% over the past four sessions. This slide has been led, in part, by a retreat in shares of computer chip makers, a downward march that continued during Friday&#39;s session.</p><p>Truist provided the most recent catalyst for retreat, with the firm warning that it has seen &#34;hard evidence of order cuts&#34; for semiconductors. Analyst William Stein added that data points to a &#34;sudden negative shift&#34; in demand.</p><p>Weighed down by the darkening industry sentiment, big-name players were among the losers in the sector. Nvidia (NVDA) fell 4.5%, while Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) retreated almost 3%.</p><p>Broadcom (AVGO) also posted a notable slide, declining by nearly 3%.</p><p><b>Standout Gainer</b></p><p>Strong earnings prompted buying interest in WD-40 (WDFC), which rose about 7% on the session.</p><p>The maker of the iconic mechanical lubricating product reported a quarterly profit that exceeded expectations. This came as revenue rose 16% from last year to reach nearly $130M.</p><p>Looking ahead, the firm projected 2022 sales between $522M and $547M, with earnings expected to hit a level of $5.14 to $5.27 per share. Analysts were looking for a figure of $5.18 per share, with sales around $538M.</p><p>WDFC rose $12.37 to conclude trading at $186.88. The advance allowed the stock to bounce off a 52-week low of $170.44 set earlier in the week.</p><p>Even with Friday&#39;s pop, shares have fallen almost 27% since late January.</p><p><b>Standout Loser </b></p><p>BioCryst (BCRX) plunged on news that it has decided to halt enrollment in a clinical trial of its factor D inhibitor, known as BCX9930. Shares dropped almost 38% on the news.</p><p>The company reported that it paused enrollment after testing found elevated serum creatinine levels in some patients. BCX9930 was being tested in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, a rare hematological condition.</p><p>BCRX finished Friday&#39;s trading at $11.12, a decline of $6.76 on the session. With the slide, the stock reversed gains posted in January and early February, but it remained above a 52-week low of $9.23 set last April.</p><p><b>Notable New High</b></p><p>A positive analyst comment sparked gains in Kroger (KR), allowing shares of the grocery store chain to extend recent gains. The stock rose about 3% on the day, setting a fresh 52-week high.</p><p>Bank of America upgraded KR to Buy from Neutral, arguing the company can thrive in a high-inflation environment. The firm also raised the stock&#39;s price target to $75 from $61.</p><p>Analyst Robert Ohmes said elevated inflation, which he sees lasting at least through the first half of 2023, will favor retailers with more variety. Ohmes also praised the firm&#39;s &#34;scale and price leadership, strong execution, digital outlook, and developing ecosystem.&#34;</p><p>KR rose $1.80 to close at $61.67. during the session, the stock also reached an intraday 52-week high of $62.78.</p><p>With Friday&#39;s advance, the stock resumed an upswing posted in late February and early March. That earlier rally was helped in part by a better-than-expected earnings report.</p><p>KR has climbed 39% since Feb. 24 and 56% over the last six months.</p><p><b>Notable New Low</b></p><p>Shares of C4 Therapeutics (CCCC) fell off a cliff on Friday, dragged down by the release of clinical trial data. The stock cratered almost 51%, falling to a new 52-week low.</p><p>The company reported that a Phase 1/2 study of its lead asset, called CFT7455, included two dose-limiting toxicities at the starting dose. The trial was looking at the product in patients with multiple myeloma.</p><p>CCCC stated that the trial also produced early evidence of clinical activity.</p><p>CCCC plummeted in the early afternoon as news of trial data broke. The retreat sent the stock to a new intraday 52-week low of $9.75. Shares recovered a bit before the close but still finished at $11.32, a decline of $11.58 on the day.</p><p>Friday&#39;s drop took CCCC below recent support, adding to weakness shown in late 2021 and early 2022. Shares have fallen almost 78% since setting a 52-week high of $51.21 last September.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Stocks: Semiconductor Stocks Fall; BCRX, CCCC Plunge; WDFC Rises on Earnings; KR Set a New High</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Stocks: Semiconductor Stocks Fall; BCRX, CCCC Plunge; WDFC Rises on Earnings; KR Set a New High\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-09 08:16 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3822152-hot-stocks-semiconductor-stocks-fall-bcrx-cccc-plunge-wdfc-rises-on-earnings-kr-set-a-new-high><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>With investors worried about a murky economic future, the major U.S. equity averages posted a mixed performance on Friday. Weakness in tech drove the Nasdaq and S&P 500 lower, while the Dow scratched ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3822152-hot-stocks-semiconductor-stocks-fall-bcrx-cccc-plunge-wdfc-rises-on-earnings-kr-set-a-new-high\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CCCC":"C4 Therapeutics, Inc.","KR":"克罗格","WDFC":"WD-40","BCRX":"BioCryst制药"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3822152-hot-stocks-semiconductor-stocks-fall-bcrx-cccc-plunge-wdfc-rises-on-earnings-kr-set-a-new-high","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2226576805","content_text":"With investors worried about a murky economic future, the major U.S. equity averages posted a mixed performance on Friday. Weakness in tech drove the Nasdaq and S&P 500 lower, while the Dow scratched out a modest gain.Semiconductor makers contributed to the slide in technology, with Truist issuing a cautious note on the sector. Nvidia (NVDA), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Broadcom (AVGO) all finished lower.Meanwhile, drug development setbacks sparked multiple sell-offs during the session. BioCryst (BCRX) dropped after the firm was forced to halt enrollment in a clinical trial. At the same time, issues with dose-limiting toxicities sent C4 Therapeutics (CCCC) reeling, with the stock losing more than half its value.Looking at some of the day's standout gainers, WD-40 (WDFC) rallied on earnings news and an analyst's upgrade allowed Kroger (NYSE:KR) to set a new 52-week high.Sector In FocusWorries about the tech space drove the Nasdaq lower again on Friday, with the index dropping nearly 6% over the past four sessions. This slide has been led, in part, by a retreat in shares of computer chip makers, a downward march that continued during Friday's session.Truist provided the most recent catalyst for retreat, with the firm warning that it has seen \"hard evidence of order cuts\" for semiconductors. Analyst William Stein added that data points to a \"sudden negative shift\" in demand.Weighed down by the darkening industry sentiment, big-name players were among the losers in the sector. Nvidia (NVDA) fell 4.5%, while Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) retreated almost 3%.Broadcom (AVGO) also posted a notable slide, declining by nearly 3%.Standout GainerStrong earnings prompted buying interest in WD-40 (WDFC), which rose about 7% on the session.The maker of the iconic mechanical lubricating product reported a quarterly profit that exceeded expectations. This came as revenue rose 16% from last year to reach nearly $130M.Looking ahead, the firm projected 2022 sales between $522M and $547M, with earnings expected to hit a level of $5.14 to $5.27 per share. Analysts were looking for a figure of $5.18 per share, with sales around $538M.WDFC rose $12.37 to conclude trading at $186.88. The advance allowed the stock to bounce off a 52-week low of $170.44 set earlier in the week.Even with Friday's pop, shares have fallen almost 27% since late January.Standout Loser BioCryst (BCRX) plunged on news that it has decided to halt enrollment in a clinical trial of its factor D inhibitor, known as BCX9930. Shares dropped almost 38% on the news.The company reported that it paused enrollment after testing found elevated serum creatinine levels in some patients. BCX9930 was being tested in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, a rare hematological condition.BCRX finished Friday's trading at $11.12, a decline of $6.76 on the session. With the slide, the stock reversed gains posted in January and early February, but it remained above a 52-week low of $9.23 set last April.Notable New HighA positive analyst comment sparked gains in Kroger (KR), allowing shares of the grocery store chain to extend recent gains. The stock rose about 3% on the day, setting a fresh 52-week high.Bank of America upgraded KR to Buy from Neutral, arguing the company can thrive in a high-inflation environment. The firm also raised the stock's price target to $75 from $61.Analyst Robert Ohmes said elevated inflation, which he sees lasting at least through the first half of 2023, will favor retailers with more variety. Ohmes also praised the firm's \"scale and price leadership, strong execution, digital outlook, and developing ecosystem.\"KR rose $1.80 to close at $61.67. during the session, the stock also reached an intraday 52-week high of $62.78.With Friday's advance, the stock resumed an upswing posted in late February and early March. That earlier rally was helped in part by a better-than-expected earnings report.KR has climbed 39% since Feb. 24 and 56% over the last six months.Notable New LowShares of C4 Therapeutics (CCCC) fell off a cliff on Friday, dragged down by the release of clinical trial data. The stock cratered almost 51%, falling to a new 52-week low.The company reported that a Phase 1/2 study of its lead asset, called CFT7455, included two dose-limiting toxicities at the starting dose. The trial was looking at the product in patients with multiple myeloma.CCCC stated that the trial also produced early evidence of clinical activity.CCCC plummeted in the early afternoon as news of trial data broke. The retreat sent the stock to a new intraday 52-week low of $9.75. Shares recovered a bit before the close but still finished at $11.32, a decline of $11.58 on the day.Friday's drop took CCCC below recent support, adding to weakness shown in late 2021 and early 2022. Shares have fallen almost 78% since setting a 52-week high of $51.21 last September.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":485,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015767953,"gmtCreate":1649556273256,"gmtModify":1676534529419,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>👍","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>👍","text":"$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$👍","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d7f2b779d6e484fcd50c6c2d0c689d1d","width":"1080","height":"3064"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015767953","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":290,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015502283,"gmtCreate":1649502376750,"gmtModify":1676534522343,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Which one will you choose?&nbsp;","listText":"Which one will you choose?&nbsp;","text":"Which one will you choose?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015502283","repostId":"1179777825","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1179777825","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649469608,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1179777825?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-09 10:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1179777825","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>Palantir&#39;s and Snowflake&#39;s shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks fell out of favor with investors and both companies&#39; forward-looking guidance disappointed the market.</li><li>The long-term outlook for both SNOW and PLTR is good, considering the growth in new data creation and the expected revenue increase and profit margin expansion for the two companies.</li><li>Palantir is the more attractive Buy of the two stocks, taking into account both valuations and key risk factors.</li></ul><p>Elevator Pitch</p><p>Palantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE:PLTR) is a better buy compared with Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). I prefer PLTR over SNOW because the former has maintained a good balance between revenue growth and profit margins. Palantir is expected to grow its top line by more than +30% every year going forward, while still delivering normalized net profit margins of above +20% in the future. In comparison, Snowflake&#39;s top line growth expectations are better, but it is relatively less profitable. More importantly, Palantir is much cheaper than Snowflake based on the forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue metric.</p><p>How Are SNOW And PLTR&#39;s Stock Performance?</p><p>The year-to-date stock price performance of SNOW and PLTR have been poor on both an absolute and relative basis.</p><p><b>Snowflake&#39;s And Palantir&#39;s 2022 Year-To-Date Share Price Performance</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3dfec436e13ecbd10b4390c8ec9c312b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"221\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>The shares of Palantir and Snowflake were down by -29.5% and -37.4%, respectively, so far this year. During the same period, the S&amp;P 500 declined by a relatively modest -5.2%. Both SNOW and PLTR saw their shares fall the most around mid-March 2022. March 11, 2022, <i>Seeking Alpha News</i>articlehighlighted that &#34;Snowflake shares fell sharply&#34; on the day alongside &#34;several other cloud-related stocks, as investors continued to shun technology stocks.&#34;</p><p>Apart from weak investor sentiment, which has hurt the share price performance of technology stocks in general, there are also company-specific headwinds relating to Snowflake and Palantir, which I detail in the next section.</p><p>SNOW And PLTR Stock Key Metrics</p><p>Both SNOW&#39;s and PLTR&#39;s forward-looking guidance disappointed the market. This was a key factor that led to the sell-down in their shares in 2022 year-to-date.</p><p>Starting with Palantir, the company released the company&#39;s Q4 2021 financial results in a media release issued on February 17, 2022, before the market opened. PLTR&#39;s shares subsequently fell by -16% to close at $11.77 on the day of the earnings release. Palantir has yet to fully recover from its post-results announcement correction, as its last closing share price of $12.84 as of April 7, 2022, was still -8% below its pre-results stock price of $13.97 (closing price on February 16th).</p><p>PLTR&#39;s top line expanded by +34% YOY to $433 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. This was+4%above what the market had expected. The company&#39;s robust revenue growth was driven by a +71% YOY increase in the number of customers, from 139 as of December 31, 2020, to 237 as of year-end 2021, as per its recent quarterly results presentation. Palantir grew its client base much faster than what Wall Street was expecting; the sell-side&#39;s consensus 2021 year-end estimate was 219 clients, according to<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i>.</p><p>However, Palantir&#39;s non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share contracted from $0.03 in Q4 2020 to $0.02 in Q4 2021. More significantly, PLTR&#39;s fourth quarter bottom line was approximately-44%below the market consensus EPS forecast. Palantir&#39;s total adjusted costs (excluding stock-based compensation) rose by +42% YOY to $309 million in the most recent quarter. This was largely attributable to a substantial jump in commercial sales headcount, from 12 as of end-2020 to 80 as of December 31, 2021, as indicated in PLTR&#39;s Q4 2021 results presentation.</p><p>Looking forward, PLTR&#39;s revenue guidance was encouraging. As per its Q4 2021 earnings press release, Palantir guided for Q1 2022 revenue of $443 million (implying +30% YOY top line expansion) and &#34;annual revenue growth of 30% or greater through 2025.&#34;</p><p>However, Palantir&#39;s near-term profitability guidance didn&#39;t meet market expectations. The company expects to achieve a non-GAAP adjusted operating profit margin of 23% in the first quarter of this year, which is much lower than Wall Street&#39;s consensus Q1 2022 operating margin estimate of 28%, as per<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i>. At the <i>Morgan Stanley</i>(MS)Technology, Media &amp; Telecom Conference on March 9, 2022, PLTR explained that &#34;the investments in the product&#34; in 2021 &#34;drove more improvement faster than we actually thought they might,&#34; and the company is &#34;giving ourselves a little space there to invest as aggressively as possible.&#34;</p><p>Moving on to Snowflake, its Q4 2021 revenue of $360 million beat the sell-side consensus by+3%, and this represented a +102% YOY growth. But SNOW&#39;s shares still dropped by -15%, from a $264.69 close on March 2, 2022, to $224.02 on March 3, 2022 (post-earnings release). In the next one month or so, Snowflake&#39;s stock price declined further, closing at $213.88 as of April 7, 2022.</p><p>SNOW&#39;s shares performed poorly because investors were unsatisfied with the company&#39;s fiscal 2023 (YE January 31) revenue growth guidance. Based on the midpoint of Snowflake&#39;s management, the company expected its revenue to increase by +66% in FY 2023. This implied a substantial slowdown in SNOW&#39;s top line expansion, as the company&#39;s sales grew by +106% in fiscal 2022.</p><p>Snowflake attributed the weaker-than-expected revenue growth guidance for FY 2023 to platform performance improvements, which will provide more value to its clients. SNOW acknowledged at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media &amp; Telecom Conference on March 8, 2022, that &#34;every performance improvement we do, we may have a revenue hit,&#34; but it stressed that &#34;those customers are consuming more&#34; in around half a year&#39;s time.</p><p>In the subsequent two sections of the article, I will touch on the similarities and the differences between Palantir and Snowflake.</p><p>Do Snowflake And Palantir Share The Same Market?</p><p>Snowflake and Palantir do share the same market to a large extent.</p><p>A December 2020research report published by <i>Harris Williams</i> classified both PLTR and SNOW as infrastructure software companies. More specifically, the investment bank placed these two companies in the &#34;data&#34; sub-segment of the infrastructure software sector alongside other listed companies like Splunk (SPLK) and Alteryx (AYX), among others.</p><p><b>Harris Williams&#39;Definition Of The Data Sub-Segment Of The Infrastructure Software Sector</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/95d28544977ca9c17ef60304a8f96c55\" tg-width=\"474\" tg-height=\"280\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Harris Williams</p><p>In a blog post published on November 11, 2020, Palantir describes itself as a &#34;software company&#34; which builds &#34;digital infrastructure for data-driven operations.&#34; This provides support for Harris Williams&#39; categorization of PLTR as an infrastructure company that belongs in the data sub-category.</p><p>In summary, both companies operate in the infrastructure software market. This is also where the similarities between PLTR and SNOW end, as I highlight in the next section.</p><p>How Do Snowflake And Palantir Differ?</p><p>Referring to PLTR&#39;s November 2020 blog post (which I referred to in the preceding section) again, Palantir mentioned that it plays the role of &#34;data processor.&#34; PLTR emphasized that its platforms &#34;allow organizations to better manage&#34; data &#34;by bringing the right data to the people&#34; and enabling &#34;them to take data-driven decisions&#34; and &#34;conduct sophisticated analytic.&#34;</p><p>In contrast, Snowflake&#39;s cloud data platform, known as Data Cloud, is mainly focused on data warehousing and data sharing; and it partners with other companies to offer solutions such as data analytics to its clients, as per the chart below.</p><p><b>SNOW&#39;s Data Cloud Platform And Partnerships With Other Data Analytics Companies</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ced24e78a2353a0f9f8a45e9fab883b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"314\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Snowflake</p><p>I touch on the two companies&#39; growth prospects in the long run in the next section.</p><p>What Are Snowflake And Palantir&#39;s Long-Term Outlooks?</p><p>Both Snowflake and Palantir have long growth runways.</p><p>Interactive Data Trends (IDC) has forecast that new data created will expand at a CAGR of +23%, from 64.1ZB in 2020 to 175ZB in 2025, according to January 31, 2022, article published in <i>CDO Trends</i>. As more data gets created, it is natural that this will boost demand for data warehousing, sharing, processing, and analytics going forward. This will be positive for both PLTR and SNOW.</p><p>PLTR and SNOW are expected to deliver robust top-line growth and profit margin expansion over the next few years. Snowflake will grow its revenue at a faster pace compared with Palantir, but the former&#39;s profitability will still be inferior to that of the latter.</p><p>According to consensus sell-side financial estimates sourced from<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i>, Snowflake&#39;s sales are forecasted to increase by a forward four-year CAGR of +57.0%. Over the same period, Palantir&#39;s top line is predicted to grow by a slower CAGR of +34.5%, which is still pretty decent. In terms of profitability, Wall Street expects PLTR&#39;s normalized net profit margin to widen from 20.0% in 2021 to 26.8% by 2025. In comparison, SNOW&#39;s normalized net profit margin is forecasted to improve from 0.3% in fiscal 2022 (YE January 31 or approximating calendar year 2021) to 9.1% in FY 2026.</p><p>SNOW is a pioneer and leading player in the cloud data warehousing space, which explains its strong revenue growth. But Snowflake&#39;s profit margins are low on an absolute basis and inferior to that of PLTR as well. A key factor contributing to Snowflake&#39;s modest profitability is the company&#39;s dependence on third-party vendors such as Microsoft&#39;s (MSFT) Azure and Amazon&#39;s (AMZN) AWS. In my July 20, 2021,article for SNOW, I noted that the company&#39;s key suppliers of public cloud services are also the company&#39;s competitors and &#34;have a big impact on Snowflake&#39;s path to profitability.&#34; This is the most significant downside risk for SNOW.</p><p>On the other hand, a key concern for Palantir has been its reliance on government organizations. This implies that the company&#39;s revenue can be negatively impacted when the government&#39;s budget shrinks. But there have been encouraging signs with respect to client (commercial customers versus government clients) diversification in recent quarters. PTLR&#39;s commercial segment has been rapidly growing in recent quarters, as its commercial revenue growth went from +28% YOY and +37% YOY in Q2 2021 and Q3 2021, respectively, to +47% YOY in Q4 2021.</p><p>In comparison, Palantir&#39;s government revenue increased by a slower +26% YOY in the fourth quarter of last year. Also, as I mentioned in an earlier section of my article, Palantir has invested significantly in commercial sales headcount so as to further support the growth of the commercial segment.</p><p>In a nutshell, both companies&#39; long-term outlooks are decent. But PLTR has struck a better balance between top-line growth and profitability compared with SNOW, as evidenced by the consensus financial forecasts.</p><p>Is SNOW Or PLTR Stock A Better Buy?</p><p>PLTR stock is a better buy. Palantir boasts superior profit margins, and Snowflake is growing its top line at a much faster pace. But the gap in valuations between the two is huge; PLTR and SNOW are valued by the market at consensus forward next twelve months&#39; Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiples of 11.9 times and 30.7 times, respectively, according to<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i>. Taking into account the difference in the two companies&#39; valuations and future financial forecasts, I view Palantir as the more appealing investment candidate of the two.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Palantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nPalantir Vs. Snowflake Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-09 10:00 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500463-palantir-vs-snowflake-stock-better-buy><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks fell out of favor with investors and both companies' forward-looking guidance disappointed the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500463-palantir-vs-snowflake-stock-better-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SNOW":"Snowflake","PLTR":"Palantir Technologies Inc."},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4500463-palantir-vs-snowflake-stock-better-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1179777825","content_text":"SummaryPalantir's and Snowflake's shares performed badly in 2022 year-to-date, as technology stocks fell out of favor with investors and both companies' forward-looking guidance disappointed the market.The long-term outlook for both SNOW and PLTR is good, considering the growth in new data creation and the expected revenue increase and profit margin expansion for the two companies.Palantir is the more attractive Buy of the two stocks, taking into account both valuations and key risk factors.Elevator PitchPalantir Technologies Inc. (NYSE:PLTR) is a better buy compared with Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). I prefer PLTR over SNOW because the former has maintained a good balance between revenue growth and profit margins. Palantir is expected to grow its top line by more than +30% every year going forward, while still delivering normalized net profit margins of above +20% in the future. In comparison, Snowflake's top line growth expectations are better, but it is relatively less profitable. More importantly, Palantir is much cheaper than Snowflake based on the forward Enterprise Value-to-Revenue metric.How Are SNOW And PLTR's Stock Performance?The year-to-date stock price performance of SNOW and PLTR have been poor on both an absolute and relative basis.Snowflake's And Palantir's 2022 Year-To-Date Share Price PerformanceSeeking AlphaThe shares of Palantir and Snowflake were down by -29.5% and -37.4%, respectively, so far this year. During the same period, the S&P 500 declined by a relatively modest -5.2%. Both SNOW and PLTR saw their shares fall the most around mid-March 2022. March 11, 2022, Seeking Alpha Newsarticlehighlighted that \"Snowflake shares fell sharply\" on the day alongside \"several other cloud-related stocks, as investors continued to shun technology stocks.\"Apart from weak investor sentiment, which has hurt the share price performance of technology stocks in general, there are also company-specific headwinds relating to Snowflake and Palantir, which I detail in the next section.SNOW And PLTR Stock Key MetricsBoth SNOW's and PLTR's forward-looking guidance disappointed the market. This was a key factor that led to the sell-down in their shares in 2022 year-to-date.Starting with Palantir, the company released the company's Q4 2021 financial results in a media release issued on February 17, 2022, before the market opened. PLTR's shares subsequently fell by -16% to close at $11.77 on the day of the earnings release. Palantir has yet to fully recover from its post-results announcement correction, as its last closing share price of $12.84 as of April 7, 2022, was still -8% below its pre-results stock price of $13.97 (closing price on February 16th).PLTR's top line expanded by +34% YOY to $433 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. This was+4%above what the market had expected. The company's robust revenue growth was driven by a +71% YOY increase in the number of customers, from 139 as of December 31, 2020, to 237 as of year-end 2021, as per its recent quarterly results presentation. Palantir grew its client base much faster than what Wall Street was expecting; the sell-side's consensus 2021 year-end estimate was 219 clients, according toS&P Capital IQ.However, Palantir's non-GAAP adjusted earnings per share contracted from $0.03 in Q4 2020 to $0.02 in Q4 2021. More significantly, PLTR's fourth quarter bottom line was approximately-44%below the market consensus EPS forecast. Palantir's total adjusted costs (excluding stock-based compensation) rose by +42% YOY to $309 million in the most recent quarter. This was largely attributable to a substantial jump in commercial sales headcount, from 12 as of end-2020 to 80 as of December 31, 2021, as indicated in PLTR's Q4 2021 results presentation.Looking forward, PLTR's revenue guidance was encouraging. As per its Q4 2021 earnings press release, Palantir guided for Q1 2022 revenue of $443 million (implying +30% YOY top line expansion) and \"annual revenue growth of 30% or greater through 2025.\"However, Palantir's near-term profitability guidance didn't meet market expectations. The company expects to achieve a non-GAAP adjusted operating profit margin of 23% in the first quarter of this year, which is much lower than Wall Street's consensus Q1 2022 operating margin estimate of 28%, as perS&P Capital IQ. At the Morgan Stanley(MS)Technology, Media & Telecom Conference on March 9, 2022, PLTR explained that \"the investments in the product\" in 2021 \"drove more improvement faster than we actually thought they might,\" and the company is \"giving ourselves a little space there to invest as aggressively as possible.\"Moving on to Snowflake, its Q4 2021 revenue of $360 million beat the sell-side consensus by+3%, and this represented a +102% YOY growth. But SNOW's shares still dropped by -15%, from a $264.69 close on March 2, 2022, to $224.02 on March 3, 2022 (post-earnings release). In the next one month or so, Snowflake's stock price declined further, closing at $213.88 as of April 7, 2022.SNOW's shares performed poorly because investors were unsatisfied with the company's fiscal 2023 (YE January 31) revenue growth guidance. Based on the midpoint of Snowflake's management, the company expected its revenue to increase by +66% in FY 2023. This implied a substantial slowdown in SNOW's top line expansion, as the company's sales grew by +106% in fiscal 2022.Snowflake attributed the weaker-than-expected revenue growth guidance for FY 2023 to platform performance improvements, which will provide more value to its clients. SNOW acknowledged at the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media & Telecom Conference on March 8, 2022, that \"every performance improvement we do, we may have a revenue hit,\" but it stressed that \"those customers are consuming more\" in around half a year's time.In the subsequent two sections of the article, I will touch on the similarities and the differences between Palantir and Snowflake.Do Snowflake And Palantir Share The Same Market?Snowflake and Palantir do share the same market to a large extent.A December 2020research report published by Harris Williams classified both PLTR and SNOW as infrastructure software companies. More specifically, the investment bank placed these two companies in the \"data\" sub-segment of the infrastructure software sector alongside other listed companies like Splunk (SPLK) and Alteryx (AYX), among others.Harris Williams'Definition Of The Data Sub-Segment Of The Infrastructure Software SectorHarris WilliamsIn a blog post published on November 11, 2020, Palantir describes itself as a \"software company\" which builds \"digital infrastructure for data-driven operations.\" This provides support for Harris Williams' categorization of PLTR as an infrastructure company that belongs in the data sub-category.In summary, both companies operate in the infrastructure software market. This is also where the similarities between PLTR and SNOW end, as I highlight in the next section.How Do Snowflake And Palantir Differ?Referring to PLTR's November 2020 blog post (which I referred to in the preceding section) again, Palantir mentioned that it plays the role of \"data processor.\" PLTR emphasized that its platforms \"allow organizations to better manage\" data \"by bringing the right data to the people\" and enabling \"them to take data-driven decisions\" and \"conduct sophisticated analytic.\"In contrast, Snowflake's cloud data platform, known as Data Cloud, is mainly focused on data warehousing and data sharing; and it partners with other companies to offer solutions such as data analytics to its clients, as per the chart below.SNOW's Data Cloud Platform And Partnerships With Other Data Analytics CompaniesSnowflakeI touch on the two companies' growth prospects in the long run in the next section.What Are Snowflake And Palantir's Long-Term Outlooks?Both Snowflake and Palantir have long growth runways.Interactive Data Trends (IDC) has forecast that new data created will expand at a CAGR of +23%, from 64.1ZB in 2020 to 175ZB in 2025, according to January 31, 2022, article published in CDO Trends. As more data gets created, it is natural that this will boost demand for data warehousing, sharing, processing, and analytics going forward. This will be positive for both PLTR and SNOW.PLTR and SNOW are expected to deliver robust top-line growth and profit margin expansion over the next few years. Snowflake will grow its revenue at a faster pace compared with Palantir, but the former's profitability will still be inferior to that of the latter.According to consensus sell-side financial estimates sourced fromS&P Capital IQ, Snowflake's sales are forecasted to increase by a forward four-year CAGR of +57.0%. Over the same period, Palantir's top line is predicted to grow by a slower CAGR of +34.5%, which is still pretty decent. In terms of profitability, Wall Street expects PLTR's normalized net profit margin to widen from 20.0% in 2021 to 26.8% by 2025. In comparison, SNOW's normalized net profit margin is forecasted to improve from 0.3% in fiscal 2022 (YE January 31 or approximating calendar year 2021) to 9.1% in FY 2026.SNOW is a pioneer and leading player in the cloud data warehousing space, which explains its strong revenue growth. But Snowflake's profit margins are low on an absolute basis and inferior to that of PLTR as well. A key factor contributing to Snowflake's modest profitability is the company's dependence on third-party vendors such as Microsoft's (MSFT) Azure and Amazon's (AMZN) AWS. In my July 20, 2021,article for SNOW, I noted that the company's key suppliers of public cloud services are also the company's competitors and \"have a big impact on Snowflake's path to profitability.\" This is the most significant downside risk for SNOW.On the other hand, a key concern for Palantir has been its reliance on government organizations. This implies that the company's revenue can be negatively impacted when the government's budget shrinks. But there have been encouraging signs with respect to client (commercial customers versus government clients) diversification in recent quarters. PTLR's commercial segment has been rapidly growing in recent quarters, as its commercial revenue growth went from +28% YOY and +37% YOY in Q2 2021 and Q3 2021, respectively, to +47% YOY in Q4 2021.In comparison, Palantir's government revenue increased by a slower +26% YOY in the fourth quarter of last year. Also, as I mentioned in an earlier section of my article, Palantir has invested significantly in commercial sales headcount so as to further support the growth of the commercial segment.In a nutshell, both companies' long-term outlooks are decent. But PLTR has struck a better balance between top-line growth and profitability compared with SNOW, as evidenced by the consensus financial forecasts.Is SNOW Or PLTR Stock A Better Buy?PLTR stock is a better buy. Palantir boasts superior profit margins, and Snowflake is growing its top line at a much faster pace. But the gap in valuations between the two is huge; PLTR and SNOW are valued by the market at consensus forward next twelve months' Enterprise Value-to-Revenue multiples of 11.9 times and 30.7 times, respectively, according toS&P Capital IQ. Taking into account the difference in the two companies' valuations and future financial forecasts, I view Palantir as the more appealing investment candidate of the two.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":507,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015506480,"gmtCreate":1649502212051,"gmtModify":1676534522326,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/T\">$AT&amp;T Inc(T)$</a>communications&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/T\">$AT&amp;T Inc(T)$</a>communications&nbsp;","text":"$AT&T Inc(T)$communications","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/156f38b04fcfb11f9fa7737d9d6c2bb7","width":"1080","height":"3064"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015506480","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":292,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9019527200,"gmtCreate":1648611621200,"gmtModify":1676534364917,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>good prospect","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/GOLD\">$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$</a>good prospect","text":"$Barrick Gold Corp(GOLD)$good prospect","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/7d3f0de987a14a187cf62e6d40999177","width":"1080","height":"3064"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9019527200","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":472,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9035712518,"gmtCreate":1647680438564,"gmtModify":1676534258275,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"It is one's opinion","listText":"It is one's opinion","text":"It is one's opinion","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9035712518","repostId":"1184059964","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1184059964","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1647651682,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1184059964?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-19 09:01","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1184059964","media":"TheStreet","summary":"One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a closer look.</p><p>As the equities market shows signs that it has finally found its footing (fingers crossed), one vocal Wall Street analyst has given a “bright green light” for Apple stock to climb further.</p><p>Today, the Apple Maven reviews Wedbush’s stance on AAPL, still its top tech pick. Could analyst Dan Ives be right that Apple stock and some of its peers have bottomed for the year?</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fd834b5930cc8484f73b322c50b95c91\" tg-width=\"1240\" tg-height=\"827\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Figure 1: Apple Stock: Bright Green Light To Buy, Says One Analyst</span></p><p><b>Interest rate hikes underway</b></p><p>Mr. Ives’ key catalyst this week has been the Federal Reserve’s announcement on monetary policy. In a move that has been widely anticipated, the US central bank is raising short-term interest rates by 25 basis points. Six more hikes are expected in 2022.</p><p>I explained yesterday that the bullish reaction to the rate bump can be counterintuitive. Shouldn’t higher interest be a drag for tech and growth stocks?</p><p>The key here is that the markets do not usually react to what is happening right at this moment. Rather, it tends to look forward a few months and anticipate future events.</p><p>Dan Ives seems to agree with me that, rather than causing concern, the start of the rate hike campaign has been felt as a relief. Finally, monetary policy will begin to tighten, and investors can slowly start to worry about something other than rampant inflation.</p><p>This is very much what happened in early November of last year. When the Fed announced the start of the tapering process (that is, the winding down of the Bank’s bond purchase program), the Nasdaq immediately rallied — although enthusiasm lasted barely two months.</p><p>Therefore, yes, I believe that the macroeconomics events of the week were a positive for Apple stock. If “left alone” (i.e., absent market-level shocks and concerns), I think that AAPL share price will tend to rise due to the company’s strong fundamentals and execution.</p><p><b>Has AAPL bottomed?</b></p><p>While I think that Apple stock will be worth much more several years down the road, the harder question to answer is whether shares have seen the worst of 2022.</p><p>Any realistic analyst or investor must leave the door open for further share price weakness. I still think it is a bit too early to say, with much conviction, that the early-year selloff in the markets has completely run its course.</p><p>But here’s one thing that I can do: look at the historical data to understand what could happen next. Barron’s has done some of the work for us.</p><p>According to the publication, citing Dow Jones Market Data in an email that landed in my inbox last evening:</p><blockquote>“The start of a Fed tightening is not necessarily bad for stocks. There have been five rate-raising cycles since 1990, and the major stock indexes ended<i>higher</i>a year after the first rate increase 80% of the time.”</blockquote><p>In isolation, this figure is not particularly impressive, since the S&amp;P 500 has produced positive returns for the year 80% of the time in the past 3 decades. But at least, the observation suggests that recent rate hikes have not been any more likely to drag the performance of the stock market.</p><p>I then looked at Apple stock itself. Keep in mind that AAPL dropped as much as 17% from its all-time high, with the YTD bottom being reached as recently as March 14.</p><p>In the iPhone era, i.e. since 2007, Apple shares dropped at least this much a few times: certainly during the Great Recession of 2008, but also in 2013-2014, 2017-2018, and during the more recent COVID-19 bear market.</p><p>Whenever a 17%-plus selloff happened, Apple managed to produce outstanding average returns of 56% one year later! While, in rare instances, share price continued to decline after the 17% drawdown, the stock was in positive territory a year later 92% of the time.</p><p>Check out the histogram below, which shows the distribution of one-year forward returns after Apple stock dipped 17% of more from a peak, since 2007:</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d0028f6b3627c6e01dbd676d5158e65\" tg-width=\"823\" tg-height=\"494\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Figure 2: AAPL: 1-year return after 17%+ selloff.</span></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: Bright Green Light to Buy, Key Analyst Says\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-03-19 09:01 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/apple-stock-bright-green-light-to-buy-says-one-analyst><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a closer look.As the equities market shows signs that it has finally found its footing (fingers ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/apple-stock-bright-green-light-to-buy-says-one-analyst\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/apple/stock/apple-stock-bright-green-light-to-buy-says-one-analyst","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1184059964","content_text":"One analyst thinks that Apple stock may have finally found its 2022 bottom. The Apple Maven takes a closer look.As the equities market shows signs that it has finally found its footing (fingers crossed), one vocal Wall Street analyst has given a “bright green light” for Apple stock to climb further.Today, the Apple Maven reviews Wedbush’s stance on AAPL, still its top tech pick. Could analyst Dan Ives be right that Apple stock and some of its peers have bottomed for the year?Figure 1: Apple Stock: Bright Green Light To Buy, Says One AnalystInterest rate hikes underwayMr. Ives’ key catalyst this week has been the Federal Reserve’s announcement on monetary policy. In a move that has been widely anticipated, the US central bank is raising short-term interest rates by 25 basis points. Six more hikes are expected in 2022.I explained yesterday that the bullish reaction to the rate bump can be counterintuitive. Shouldn’t higher interest be a drag for tech and growth stocks?The key here is that the markets do not usually react to what is happening right at this moment. Rather, it tends to look forward a few months and anticipate future events.Dan Ives seems to agree with me that, rather than causing concern, the start of the rate hike campaign has been felt as a relief. Finally, monetary policy will begin to tighten, and investors can slowly start to worry about something other than rampant inflation.This is very much what happened in early November of last year. When the Fed announced the start of the tapering process (that is, the winding down of the Bank’s bond purchase program), the Nasdaq immediately rallied — although enthusiasm lasted barely two months.Therefore, yes, I believe that the macroeconomics events of the week were a positive for Apple stock. If “left alone” (i.e., absent market-level shocks and concerns), I think that AAPL share price will tend to rise due to the company’s strong fundamentals and execution.Has AAPL bottomed?While I think that Apple stock will be worth much more several years down the road, the harder question to answer is whether shares have seen the worst of 2022.Any realistic analyst or investor must leave the door open for further share price weakness. I still think it is a bit too early to say, with much conviction, that the early-year selloff in the markets has completely run its course.But here’s one thing that I can do: look at the historical data to understand what could happen next. Barron’s has done some of the work for us.According to the publication, citing Dow Jones Market Data in an email that landed in my inbox last evening:“The start of a Fed tightening is not necessarily bad for stocks. There have been five rate-raising cycles since 1990, and the major stock indexes endedhighera year after the first rate increase 80% of the time.”In isolation, this figure is not particularly impressive, since the S&P 500 has produced positive returns for the year 80% of the time in the past 3 decades. But at least, the observation suggests that recent rate hikes have not been any more likely to drag the performance of the stock market.I then looked at Apple stock itself. Keep in mind that AAPL dropped as much as 17% from its all-time high, with the YTD bottom being reached as recently as March 14.In the iPhone era, i.e. since 2007, Apple shares dropped at least this much a few times: certainly during the Great Recession of 2008, but also in 2013-2014, 2017-2018, and during the more recent COVID-19 bear market.Whenever a 17%-plus selloff happened, Apple managed to produce outstanding average returns of 56% one year later! While, in rare instances, share price continued to decline after the 17% drawdown, the stock was in positive territory a year later 92% of the time.Check out the histogram below, which shows the distribution of one-year forward returns after Apple stock dipped 17% of more from a peak, since 2007:Figure 2: AAPL: 1-year return after 17%+ selloff.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":573,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3573703375513385","authorId":"3573703375513385","name":"JonLucky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/15afb66e92e4e4d6d1a8e9b7854e9d5e","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3573703375513385","authorIdStr":"3573703375513385"},"content":"green 🍏 🤔😄","text":"green 🍏 🤔😄","html":"green 🍏 🤔😄"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":193645574,"gmtCreate":1620786859998,"gmtModify":1704348384298,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Can sustain?&nbsp;","listText":"Can sustain?&nbsp;","text":"Can sustain?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/193645574","repostId":"1192265758","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1095,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":107912764,"gmtCreate":1620438542758,"gmtModify":1704343696295,"author":{"id":"3573644992811813","authorId":"3573644992811813","name":"JadeS","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1e6f301e7632a6460b2c962cd5d56f91","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3573644992811813","authorIdStr":"3573644992811813"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"A joke that make you rich","listText":"A joke that make you rich","text":"A joke that make you rich","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/107912764","repostId":"1192861382","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":905,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}