Profile - To The Moon

Woogy

Hi I’m Pooh bear

Posts · 172Posts · 172
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-10-24
  Wow why?
  Hot Chinese ADRs Plunged in Morning Trading
  Hot chinese ADRs plunged in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Netease, Baidu, NIO, XPeng,
  Hot Chinese ADRs Plunged in Morning Trading
  298 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-07-02
  Day day eat and buy $Apple(AAPL)$
  354 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-07-02
  Noted
  The Dow Just Booked Its Worst First Half since 1962. What History Says about the Path Ahead
  This bear has claws.A bear market that began on the first trading day of 2022 drove down the S&P 500
  The Dow Just Booked Its Worst First Half since 1962. What History Says about the Path Ahead
  212 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-07-01
  Gg liao
  The S&P 500 Had Its Worst First Half Since 1970. What Comes Next
  The S&P 500 has posted its worst first half of a year since Richard Nixon’s presidency, and many inv
  The S&P 500 Had Its Worst First Half Since 1970. What Comes Next
  234 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-06-14
  Both also loss making REITs in my portfolio now.. ssssaaadddd [Facepalm] [Cry]
  Better Buy: Keppel DC REIT Vs Mapletree Industrial Trust
  It’s time to once again compare these two data-centre-heavy REITs to see which comes out on top.Indu
  Better Buy: Keppel DC REIT Vs Mapletree Industrial Trust
  457 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-06-08
  Okkk what is this la
  323 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-04-18
  $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$When issit time to go in?
  552 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-04-16
  $Cloudflare, Inc.(NET)$Roller coaster ride
  477 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-04-16
  $NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$Hah was too greedy
  379 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- WoogyWoogy
  ·2022-04-15
  $Baidu(BIDU)$Lai chi maggi mian
  516 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3577239452657382","uuid":"3577239452657382","gmtCreate":1614167491700,"gmtModify":1614748442629,"name":"Woogy","pinyin":"woogy","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"Hi I’m Pooh bear","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":28,"headSize":380,"tweetSize":172,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.11.23","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.06.07","exceedPercentage":"60.90%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.82%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9988038415,"gmtCreate":1666619014938,"gmtModify":1676537778701,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Wow why?","listText":"Wow why?","text":"Wow why?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9988038415","repostId":"1169376524","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1169376524","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1666618818,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1169376524?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-10-24 21:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Hot Chinese ADRs Plunged in Morning Trading","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1169376524","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Hot chinese ADRs plunged in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Netease, Baidu, NIO, XPeng,","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Hot chinese ADRs plunged in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Netease, Baidu, NIO, XPeng, Li Auto and Bilibili fell between 8% and 23%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f50abb539742a6a1d319f7a7b642677\" tg-width=\"460\" tg-height=\"716\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hot Chinese ADRs Plunged in Morning Trading</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHot Chinese ADRs Plunged in Morning Trading\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-10-24 21:40</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Hot chinese ADRs plunged in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Netease, Baidu, NIO, XPeng, Li Auto and Bilibili fell between 8% and 23%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2f50abb539742a6a1d319f7a7b642677\" tg-width=\"460\" tg-height=\"716\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1169376524","content_text":"Hot chinese ADRs plunged in morning trading. Alibaba, Pinduoduo, JD.com, Netease, Baidu, NIO, XPeng, Li Auto and Bilibili fell between 8% and 23%.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":298,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9044814057,"gmtCreate":1656730120879,"gmtModify":1676535885904,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Day day eat and buy&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>","listText":"Day day eat and buy&nbsp;<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>","text":"Day day eat and buy $Apple(AAPL)$","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3ad85653670e1af6de5ee53e4f329dde","width":"1170","height":"4224"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9044814057","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":354,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9044926855,"gmtCreate":1656692334477,"gmtModify":1676535878626,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Noted","listText":"Noted","text":"Noted","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9044926855","repostId":"2248685976","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2248685976","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1656668432,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2248685976?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-01 17:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Dow Just Booked Its Worst First Half since 1962. What History Says about the Path Ahead","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2248685976","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"This bear has claws.A bear market that began on the first trading day of 2022 drove down the S&P 500","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>This bear has claws.</p><p>A bear market that began on the first trading day of 2022 drove down the S&amp;P 500 for its worst first six months to a calendar year in 52 years as investors head into the second half fearing aggressive monetary tightening by the Federal Reserve and other major central banks could tip the economy into recession.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  fell 20.6% year-to-date through Thursday&#39;s close, marking its biggest first-half decline since a 21.1% fall in 1970, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The large-cap benchmark is down 21.1% from its record finish on Jan. 3. The index earlier this month first ended more than 20% below that early January record, confirming that the pandemic bull market -- as widely defined -- had ended on Jan. 3, marking the start of a bear.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has bounced around 3.2% off its 2022 low close of 3,666.77 set on June 16.</p><p>Read:These 10 stocks in the S&amp;P 500 have lost $4.1 trillion of investors&#39; money during the first half of 2022</p><p>Data compiled by Dow Jones Market Data shows that the S&amp;P 500 has bounced back after past first-half falls of 15% or more. The sample size, however, is small, with only five instances going back to 1932 (see table below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35eaa5fc92d1e15ba08af1ec94393bc4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"445\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The S&amp;P 500 did rise in each of those instances, with an average rise of 23.66% and a median rise of 15.25%.</p><p>Investors, however, may also want to pay attention to metrics around bear markets, particularly with the will-it-or-won&#39;t-it speculation around whether the Federal Reserve&#39;s aggressive tightening agenda will sink the economy into recession.</p><p>Indeed, an analysis by Wells Fargo Investment Institute found that recessions accompanied by a recession, on average, lasted 20 months and produced a negative 37.8% return. Bear markets outside a recession lasted 6 months on average -- nearly the length of the current episode -- and saw an average return of -28.9%. Taken together, the average bear market lasted an average of 16 month and produced a -35.1% return.</p><p>See:Presidential election cycle shows that stock market may bottom in the third quarter before rally in the fourth, analyst says</p><p>Other major indexes are also set to log historic first-half declines. The Dow Jones Industrial Average  fell 15.3% through Thursday, its worst first half since a 23.2% drop in 1962.</p><p>As the table below shows, the second-half performance for the blue-chip gauge after first-half declines of 10% or more are variable. The most recent incident, in 2008 during the worst of the financial crisis, saw the Dow drop another 22.68% in the second half of the year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a201b68c690ea36110bd9080287089b9\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"915\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>In the 15 instances, the Dow rallied in the second half two-thirds of the time, producing an average second-half rise of 4.45% and a median gain just shy of 7%.</p><p>The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite  dropped more than 29% for the first half, its largest such drop on record. There was little to go on when Dow Jones Market Data looked back at first-half drops of at least 20% for the gauge.</p><p>There were only two instances -- 2002 and 1973 -- and both saw the Nasdaq keep sliding over the remainder of the year, falling around 8.7% over the second half in both instances.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Dow Just Booked Its Worst First Half since 1962. What History Says about the Path Ahead</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Dow Just Booked Its Worst First Half since 1962. What History Says about the Path Ahead\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-01 17:40</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>This bear has claws.</p><p>A bear market that began on the first trading day of 2022 drove down the S&amp;P 500 for its worst first six months to a calendar year in 52 years as investors head into the second half fearing aggressive monetary tightening by the Federal Reserve and other major central banks could tip the economy into recession.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500  fell 20.6% year-to-date through Thursday&#39;s close, marking its biggest first-half decline since a 21.1% fall in 1970, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The large-cap benchmark is down 21.1% from its record finish on Jan. 3. The index earlier this month first ended more than 20% below that early January record, confirming that the pandemic bull market -- as widely defined -- had ended on Jan. 3, marking the start of a bear.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 has bounced around 3.2% off its 2022 low close of 3,666.77 set on June 16.</p><p>Read:These 10 stocks in the S&amp;P 500 have lost $4.1 trillion of investors&#39; money during the first half of 2022</p><p>Data compiled by Dow Jones Market Data shows that the S&amp;P 500 has bounced back after past first-half falls of 15% or more. The sample size, however, is small, with only five instances going back to 1932 (see table below).</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35eaa5fc92d1e15ba08af1ec94393bc4\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"445\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>The S&amp;P 500 did rise in each of those instances, with an average rise of 23.66% and a median rise of 15.25%.</p><p>Investors, however, may also want to pay attention to metrics around bear markets, particularly with the will-it-or-won&#39;t-it speculation around whether the Federal Reserve&#39;s aggressive tightening agenda will sink the economy into recession.</p><p>Indeed, an analysis by Wells Fargo Investment Institute found that recessions accompanied by a recession, on average, lasted 20 months and produced a negative 37.8% return. Bear markets outside a recession lasted 6 months on average -- nearly the length of the current episode -- and saw an average return of -28.9%. Taken together, the average bear market lasted an average of 16 month and produced a -35.1% return.</p><p>See:Presidential election cycle shows that stock market may bottom in the third quarter before rally in the fourth, analyst says</p><p>Other major indexes are also set to log historic first-half declines. The Dow Jones Industrial Average  fell 15.3% through Thursday, its worst first half since a 23.2% drop in 1962.</p><p>As the table below shows, the second-half performance for the blue-chip gauge after first-half declines of 10% or more are variable. The most recent incident, in 2008 during the worst of the financial crisis, saw the Dow drop another 22.68% in the second half of the year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a201b68c690ea36110bd9080287089b9\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"915\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>In the 15 instances, the Dow rallied in the second half two-thirds of the time, producing an average second-half rise of 4.45% and a median gain just shy of 7%.</p><p>The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite  dropped more than 29% for the first half, its largest such drop on record. There was little to go on when Dow Jones Market Data looked back at first-half drops of at least 20% for the gauge.</p><p>There were only two instances -- 2002 and 1973 -- and both saw the Nasdaq keep sliding over the remainder of the year, falling around 8.7% over the second half in both instances.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","OEX":"标普100","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","SH":"标普500反向ETF","SSO":"两倍做多标普500ETF","BK4581":"高盛持仓","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SPY":"标普500ETF","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4504":"桥水持仓","IVV":"标普500指数ETF","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF","SDS":"两倍做空标普500ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2248685976","content_text":"This bear has claws.A bear market that began on the first trading day of 2022 drove down the S&P 500 for its worst first six months to a calendar year in 52 years as investors head into the second half fearing aggressive monetary tightening by the Federal Reserve and other major central banks could tip the economy into recession.The S&P 500  fell 20.6% year-to-date through Thursday's close, marking its biggest first-half decline since a 21.1% fall in 1970, according to Dow Jones Market Data. The large-cap benchmark is down 21.1% from its record finish on Jan. 3. The index earlier this month first ended more than 20% below that early January record, confirming that the pandemic bull market -- as widely defined -- had ended on Jan. 3, marking the start of a bear.The S&P 500 has bounced around 3.2% off its 2022 low close of 3,666.77 set on June 16.Read:These 10 stocks in the S&P 500 have lost $4.1 trillion of investors' money during the first half of 2022Data compiled by Dow Jones Market Data shows that the S&P 500 has bounced back after past first-half falls of 15% or more. The sample size, however, is small, with only five instances going back to 1932 (see table below).The S&P 500 did rise in each of those instances, with an average rise of 23.66% and a median rise of 15.25%.Investors, however, may also want to pay attention to metrics around bear markets, particularly with the will-it-or-won't-it speculation around whether the Federal Reserve's aggressive tightening agenda will sink the economy into recession.Indeed, an analysis by Wells Fargo Investment Institute found that recessions accompanied by a recession, on average, lasted 20 months and produced a negative 37.8% return. Bear markets outside a recession lasted 6 months on average -- nearly the length of the current episode -- and saw an average return of -28.9%. Taken together, the average bear market lasted an average of 16 month and produced a -35.1% return.See:Presidential election cycle shows that stock market may bottom in the third quarter before rally in the fourth, analyst saysOther major indexes are also set to log historic first-half declines. The Dow Jones Industrial Average  fell 15.3% through Thursday, its worst first half since a 23.2% drop in 1962.As the table below shows, the second-half performance for the blue-chip gauge after first-half declines of 10% or more are variable. The most recent incident, in 2008 during the worst of the financial crisis, saw the Dow drop another 22.68% in the second half of the year.In the 15 instances, the Dow rallied in the second half two-thirds of the time, producing an average second-half rise of 4.45% and a median gain just shy of 7%.The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite  dropped more than 29% for the first half, its largest such drop on record. There was little to go on when Dow Jones Market Data looked back at first-half drops of at least 20% for the gauge.There were only two instances -- 2002 and 1973 -- and both saw the Nasdaq keep sliding over the remainder of the year, falling around 8.7% over the second half in both instances.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":212,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9045599148,"gmtCreate":1656633610784,"gmtModify":1676535866470,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gg liao","listText":"Gg liao","text":"Gg liao","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9045599148","repostId":"2248856462","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2248856462","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1656630900,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2248856462?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-01 07:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The S&P 500 Had Its Worst First Half Since 1970. What Comes Next","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2248856462","media":"Barrons","summary":"The S&P 500 has posted its worst first half of a year since Richard Nixon’s presidency, and many inv","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>The S&amp;P 500 has posted its worst first half of a year since Richard Nixon’s presidency, and many investors worry it has yet to hit bottom.</p><p>In the first six months of 2022, the widely followed large-cap index has tumbled 20.6% amid expectations of high inflation and a hawkish Federal Reserve, whose rate-hike plans could push the U.S. economy into recession. The last time the S&amp;P 500 fell this much in the first half was in 1970, according to Dow Jones markets data.</p><p>Investor sentiment has tumbled along with stock prices, and many market analysts expect the S&amp;P 500 to slide some more.The 12 bear markets since World War II—not including the current one—lasted an average of 10 months from market peak to trough, with an average drop of 34%.If the current bear market were to follow this pattern, it wouldn’t hit bottom until October.</p><p>Even so, a rebound, when it comes, could be dramatic. Markets tend to perform the best when investors are the gloomiest.</p><p>With its 20.6% loss year to date, the S&amp;P 500 posted its fourth-worst first-half performance on record, only behind 1932, 1962, and 1970, when it lost 45.4%, 23.5%, and 21.0%, respectively.</p><p>Other corners of the stock market are suffering even more. The small-cap benchmark Russell 2000 indexis down 24% year to date, its worst first half since inception in 1984. That is a much larger drop than the previous records—the 14% fall in the first half of 2020 due to the pandemic shock and the 10% loss in the first half of 2008 amid the global financial crisis.</p><p>Meanwhile, the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite has plunged 29.5% year to date, also the worst first half of a year on record since its inception in 1971. The sharp fall has outpaced the 25% drop in the first half of 2002 at the height of the dot-com bubble burst, and the 24% loss in the first half of 1973 after the U.S. stopped exchanging dollars for gold and saw a prolonged period of inflation.</p><p>Tech companies are experiencing a particularly steep dive, but there is hardly any corner of refuge in the stock market. The recession fear has pushed 10 out of 11 sectors into the red territory, led by consumer discretionary and communication services—things people often cut first when they need to tighten the belt. Consumer discretionary stocks in the S&amp;P 500 have fallen 33%, while communications services are down 30%.</p><p>Energy stocks were the only ones that posted gains in the first half on the back of soaring oil prices, but even that sector has lost its momentum since June. Although energy companies are still pocketing record profits today, traders are quite aware that a recession would drag down demand, curb oil prices, and cut into their earnings. The S&amp;P 500’s energy sector has tumbled 22% in the past three weeks, but still trades 28% higher than where it was at the beginning of the year.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c4e2b054b20b2cf34312e2f14d032869\" tg-width=\"996\" tg-height=\"647\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Although the overall market has performed better in the past two weeks, many are worried that things could take a worse turn in the second half of the year.</p><p>As of last week, 59% of investors were bearish about where the market is heading in the next six months, only 18% were bullish, according to a weekly sentiment survey from the American Association of Individual Investors. The bearish reading was the sixth highest since the survey started in 1987. At the beginning of June, just 37% were bearish while 32% remained bullish.</p><p>The fear of a lower market is largely due to anticipations of weaker earnings in the coming months. According to Bank of America’s global fund manager survey in June, 72% of investors expect global profits to worsen over the next 12 months, up 6 percentage points from May and the highest level since September 2008. Investors are telling companies to “play it safe” and strengthen their balance sheets, rather than increase capital expenditure or deliver share buybacks.</p><p>“The bear market will not be over until recession arrives or the risk of one is extinguished,” wrote Morgan Stanley chief U.S. equity strategist Mike Wilson last week. A full-fledged recession could push the S&amp;P 500 to bottom near 2900, or more than 23% below its current level, according to Wilson.</p><p>Other Wall Street giants have similar expectations. Goldman Sachs strategists said stocks are only pricing in a modest recession, leaving them open to a further worsening in expectations. Bank of America said the S&amp;P 500 could bottom as low as 3000 in a worst-case scenario.</p><p>If there is any silver lining to these dim expectations, it’s worth noting that investor sentiment is often a contrarian indicator. Historically, unusually bearish sentiment—a sign of fearand cautious behaviors—tends to be followed by above-average market returns, while overly bullish sentiment—a sign of greed and risk taking—is often followed by below-average returns.</p><p>Indeed, during previous years when the S&amp;P 500 was down at least 15% at the midway point of the year, the index has finished higher in the final six months every single time, with an average return of nearly 24%. “Although most investors probably don’t feel like that is possible in 2022, just remember history says a surprise bullish move is possible,” wrote LPL Financial chief market strategist Ryan Detrick last week.</p><p>Citianalysts, for one, believe the second half of the year could bring “low double digit upside” gains in the S&amp;P 500. The market has mostly priced in the Fed’s planned rate hikes and their effects on stock valuations, wrote the analysts in a research note last week. Any signs of economic slowdown could help alleviate concerns about inflation and more hawkish Fed moves.</p><p>Meanwhile, they believe that companies should have enough pricing power to pass the rising costs to consumers, which means margins might hold up better than expected. “Better-than-feared earnings and signs of peaking rates, combined with bearish investor positioning, support a positive [second half] risk/reward set up,” they wrote.</p><p>Although Citi has lowered its year-end target for the S&amp;P 500 to 4200 from 4700, it’s still much higher than many of its peers. The index finished at 3785.38 points after Thursday’s close.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1601382232898","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The S&P 500 Had Its Worst First Half Since 1970. What Comes Next</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe S&P 500 Had Its Worst First Half Since 1970. What Comes Next\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-01 07:15 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-sp500-1970-outlook-51656620380?mod=hp_LEAD_1><strong>Barrons</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The S&P 500 has posted its worst first half of a year since Richard Nixon’s presidency, and many investors worry it has yet to hit bottom.In the first six months of 2022, the widely followed large-cap...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-sp500-1970-outlook-51656620380?mod=hp_LEAD_1\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.barrons.com/articles/stock-market-sp500-1970-outlook-51656620380?mod=hp_LEAD_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2248856462","content_text":"The S&P 500 has posted its worst first half of a year since Richard Nixon’s presidency, and many investors worry it has yet to hit bottom.In the first six months of 2022, the widely followed large-cap index has tumbled 20.6% amid expectations of high inflation and a hawkish Federal Reserve, whose rate-hike plans could push the U.S. economy into recession. The last time the S&P 500 fell this much in the first half was in 1970, according to Dow Jones markets data.Investor sentiment has tumbled along with stock prices, and many market analysts expect the S&P 500 to slide some more.The 12 bear markets since World War II—not including the current one—lasted an average of 10 months from market peak to trough, with an average drop of 34%.If the current bear market were to follow this pattern, it wouldn’t hit bottom until October.Even so, a rebound, when it comes, could be dramatic. Markets tend to perform the best when investors are the gloomiest.With its 20.6% loss year to date, the S&P 500 posted its fourth-worst first-half performance on record, only behind 1932, 1962, and 1970, when it lost 45.4%, 23.5%, and 21.0%, respectively.Other corners of the stock market are suffering even more. The small-cap benchmark Russell 2000 indexis down 24% year to date, its worst first half since inception in 1984. That is a much larger drop than the previous records—the 14% fall in the first half of 2020 due to the pandemic shock and the 10% loss in the first half of 2008 amid the global financial crisis.Meanwhile, the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite has plunged 29.5% year to date, also the worst first half of a year on record since its inception in 1971. The sharp fall has outpaced the 25% drop in the first half of 2002 at the height of the dot-com bubble burst, and the 24% loss in the first half of 1973 after the U.S. stopped exchanging dollars for gold and saw a prolonged period of inflation.Tech companies are experiencing a particularly steep dive, but there is hardly any corner of refuge in the stock market. The recession fear has pushed 10 out of 11 sectors into the red territory, led by consumer discretionary and communication services—things people often cut first when they need to tighten the belt. Consumer discretionary stocks in the S&P 500 have fallen 33%, while communications services are down 30%.Energy stocks were the only ones that posted gains in the first half on the back of soaring oil prices, but even that sector has lost its momentum since June. Although energy companies are still pocketing record profits today, traders are quite aware that a recession would drag down demand, curb oil prices, and cut into their earnings. The S&P 500’s energy sector has tumbled 22% in the past three weeks, but still trades 28% higher than where it was at the beginning of the year.Although the overall market has performed better in the past two weeks, many are worried that things could take a worse turn in the second half of the year.As of last week, 59% of investors were bearish about where the market is heading in the next six months, only 18% were bullish, according to a weekly sentiment survey from the American Association of Individual Investors. The bearish reading was the sixth highest since the survey started in 1987. At the beginning of June, just 37% were bearish while 32% remained bullish.The fear of a lower market is largely due to anticipations of weaker earnings in the coming months. According to Bank of America’s global fund manager survey in June, 72% of investors expect global profits to worsen over the next 12 months, up 6 percentage points from May and the highest level since September 2008. Investors are telling companies to “play it safe” and strengthen their balance sheets, rather than increase capital expenditure or deliver share buybacks.“The bear market will not be over until recession arrives or the risk of one is extinguished,” wrote Morgan Stanley chief U.S. equity strategist Mike Wilson last week. A full-fledged recession could push the S&P 500 to bottom near 2900, or more than 23% below its current level, according to Wilson.Other Wall Street giants have similar expectations. Goldman Sachs strategists said stocks are only pricing in a modest recession, leaving them open to a further worsening in expectations. Bank of America said the S&P 500 could bottom as low as 3000 in a worst-case scenario.If there is any silver lining to these dim expectations, it’s worth noting that investor sentiment is often a contrarian indicator. Historically, unusually bearish sentiment—a sign of fearand cautious behaviors—tends to be followed by above-average market returns, while overly bullish sentiment—a sign of greed and risk taking—is often followed by below-average returns.Indeed, during previous years when the S&P 500 was down at least 15% at the midway point of the year, the index has finished higher in the final six months every single time, with an average return of nearly 24%. “Although most investors probably don’t feel like that is possible in 2022, just remember history says a surprise bullish move is possible,” wrote LPL Financial chief market strategist Ryan Detrick last week.Citianalysts, for one, believe the second half of the year could bring “low double digit upside” gains in the S&P 500. The market has mostly priced in the Fed’s planned rate hikes and their effects on stock valuations, wrote the analysts in a research note last week. Any signs of economic slowdown could help alleviate concerns about inflation and more hawkish Fed moves.Meanwhile, they believe that companies should have enough pricing power to pass the rising costs to consumers, which means margins might hold up better than expected. “Better-than-feared earnings and signs of peaking rates, combined with bearish investor positioning, support a positive [second half] risk/reward set up,” they wrote.Although Citi has lowered its year-end target for the S&P 500 to 4200 from 4700, it’s still much higher than many of its peers. The index finished at 3785.38 points after Thursday’s close.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":234,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9052435589,"gmtCreate":1655201851141,"gmtModify":1676535581618,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Both also loss making REITs in my portfolio now.. ssssaaadddd&nbsp;[Facepalm]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;","listText":"Both also loss making REITs in my portfolio now.. ssssaaadddd&nbsp;[Facepalm]&nbsp;[Cry]&nbsp;","text":"Both also loss making REITs in my portfolio now.. ssssaaadddd [Facepalm] [Cry]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9052435589","repostId":"1145528798","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1145528798","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1655201281,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1145528798?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-14 18:08","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Keppel DC REIT Vs Mapletree Industrial Trust","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1145528798","media":"The Smart Investor","summary":"It’s time to once again compare these two data-centre-heavy REITs to see which comes out on top.Indu","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>It’s time to once again compare these two data-centre-heavy REITs to see which comes out on top.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/85e52ec3c3d4146f1fc2856840f5cf60\" tg-width=\"800\" tg-height=\"533\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Industrial REITs have been a bastion of stability throughout the pandemic.</p><p>Of course, the important attribute that many of them have is strong tenants within their portfolio.</p><p>This fact has enabled many industrial REITs to pay out a dependable and consistent flow of dividends through good times and bad.</p><p>Within the industrial REIT space, it may be tough to choose between two REITs that seem to be equally good.</p><p>Take <b>Keppel DC REIT</b> (SGX: AJBU) and <b>Mapletree Industrial Trust</b> (SGX: ME8U), or MINT, for instance.</p><p>Both REITs have strong sponsors and diversified portfolios with long track records.</p><p>Keppel DC REIT owns 21 data centres across nine countries with assets under management (AUM) of S$3.5 billion.</p><p>MINT’s portfolio consists of 143 properties worth S$8.8 billion spread out over six property segments, of which data centres make up roughly 54% of the asset value.</p><p>We decided to place these two REITs side by side to see which looks more attractive as an investment.</p><p><b>Portfolio composition</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/70818eb10c77901ae0795052848c83c7\" tg-width=\"690\" tg-height=\"273\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>MINT has almost seven times the number of properties compared with Keppel DC REIT, at 143 versus 21.</p><p>The Mapletree REIT’s AUM is also more than double that of its smaller counterpart.</p><p>At the same time, investors should note that Keppel DC REIT owns just one type of specialised industrial asset – data centres.</p><p>This fact makes the REIT more vulnerable should any negative news impact the sector.</p><p>MINT, on the other hand, owns slightly more than half of its AUM in data centres while the rest is spread out among flatted factories, hi-tech buildings, and light industrial buildings.</p><p>This diversification is helpful as it provides investors with exposure to many different industrial property types.</p><p><b>Winner: MINT</b></p><p><b>Financial performance</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bdc83706b73cfb91805ae096da784662\" tg-width=\"688\" tg-height=\"297\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Turning to financial performance, MINT’s numbers trump Keppel DC REIT.</p><p>Gross revenue jumped by 35.5% year on year for its latest quarter while net property income (NPI) rose 35.3% year on year.</p><p>Distribution per unit (DPU), the key metric for income-focused investors, increased by 5.8% year on year.</p><p>Keppel DC REIT reported a muted performance with gross revenue and NPI falling by 0.9% and 1.4%, respectively.</p><p>DPU did manage to inch up 0.2% year on year but it fell short of what MINT had achieved.</p><p><b>Winner: MINT</b></p><p><b>Financial indicators</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e3f8f1c721a1f24f1c53f9594c543610\" tg-width=\"686\" tg-height=\"242\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>When it comes to financial metrics, Keppel DC REIT has the more favourable numbers.</p><p>Keppel DC REIT’s gearing level was a tad lower than MINT at 36.1% versus 38.4%.</p><p>The Keppel-backed REIT’s cost of debt was also lower at 1.8% compared with MINT’s 2.4%.</p><p>The interest coverage ratio was nearly double at 10 times versus 5.7 times, making Keppel DC REIT the clear winner on these metrics.</p><p><b>Winner: Keppel DC REIT</b></p><p>Operating metrics</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/56a0005de84510970cc0910ba2138cfd\" tg-width=\"687\" tg-height=\"215\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Next, we look at both portfolio occupancy and the weighted average lease expiry (WALE) for both REITs.</p><p>Keppel DC REIT has close to full occupancy at 98.7% as of 31 March 2022 while MINT’s portfolio occupancy stood at 94%.</p><p>With long leases, the data centre REIT also boasts a significantly longer WALE of 7.7 years compared with MINT’s 4.1 years.</p><p><b>Distribution yield</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3ff0efc2cbd64143932342545d74cefb\" tg-width=\"686\" tg-height=\"297\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Finally, we look at each REIT’s distribution yield.</p><p>MINT has a historical distribution yield of 5.5% while Keppel DC REIT’s forward distribution yield is 4.9%.</p><p>Of course, investors also need to factor in potential DPU boosts from acquisitions.</p><p>Keppel DC REIT has, on this front, made several yield-accretive acquisitions such as the purchase of a second data centre in London as well as an investment in M1’s bonds and preference shares.</p><p>MINT currently has three properties under redevelopment at the Kolam Ayer 2 cluster that will be completed by the first half of 2023.</p><p><b>Winner: MINT</b></p><p><b>Get Smart: Acquisition pipeline is another consideration</b></p><p>It appears that MINT is the more attractive REIT at the moment as it has a higher distribution yield and has also grown its DPU by a higher quantum.</p><p>However, one additional consideration is the property pipeline from each REIT’s sponsor that could potentially be injected as acquisitions.</p><p>Keppel DC REIT has more than S$2 billion worth of potential data centre assets for acquisitions from its sponsor <b>Keppel Corporation Limited</b> (SGX: BN4).</p><p>MINT has the right of first refusal for the sale of a 50% stake in Mapletree Rosewood Data Centre Trust from its sponsor Mapletree Investments Pte Ltd.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1602567310727","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Keppel DC REIT Vs Mapletree Industrial Trust</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Keppel DC REIT Vs Mapletree Industrial Trust\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-14 18:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/better-buy-keppel-dc-reit-vs-mapletree-industrial-trust-2/><strong>The Smart Investor</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It’s time to once again compare these two data-centre-heavy REITs to see which comes out on top.Industrial REITs have been a bastion of stability throughout the pandemic.Of course, the important ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/better-buy-keppel-dc-reit-vs-mapletree-industrial-trust-2/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ME8U.SI":"丰树工业信托","AJBU.SI":"吉宝数据中心房地产信托"},"source_url":"https://thesmartinvestor.com.sg/better-buy-keppel-dc-reit-vs-mapletree-industrial-trust-2/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1145528798","content_text":"It’s time to once again compare these two data-centre-heavy REITs to see which comes out on top.Industrial REITs have been a bastion of stability throughout the pandemic.Of course, the important attribute that many of them have is strong tenants within their portfolio.This fact has enabled many industrial REITs to pay out a dependable and consistent flow of dividends through good times and bad.Within the industrial REIT space, it may be tough to choose between two REITs that seem to be equally good.Take Keppel DC REIT (SGX: AJBU) and Mapletree Industrial Trust (SGX: ME8U), or MINT, for instance.Both REITs have strong sponsors and diversified portfolios with long track records.Keppel DC REIT owns 21 data centres across nine countries with assets under management (AUM) of S$3.5 billion.MINT’s portfolio consists of 143 properties worth S$8.8 billion spread out over six property segments, of which data centres make up roughly 54% of the asset value.We decided to place these two REITs side by side to see which looks more attractive as an investment.Portfolio compositionMINT has almost seven times the number of properties compared with Keppel DC REIT, at 143 versus 21.The Mapletree REIT’s AUM is also more than double that of its smaller counterpart.At the same time, investors should note that Keppel DC REIT owns just one type of specialised industrial asset – data centres.This fact makes the REIT more vulnerable should any negative news impact the sector.MINT, on the other hand, owns slightly more than half of its AUM in data centres while the rest is spread out among flatted factories, hi-tech buildings, and light industrial buildings.This diversification is helpful as it provides investors with exposure to many different industrial property types.Winner: MINTFinancial performanceTurning to financial performance, MINT’s numbers trump Keppel DC REIT.Gross revenue jumped by 35.5% year on year for its latest quarter while net property income (NPI) rose 35.3% year on year.Distribution per unit (DPU), the key metric for income-focused investors, increased by 5.8% year on year.Keppel DC REIT reported a muted performance with gross revenue and NPI falling by 0.9% and 1.4%, respectively.DPU did manage to inch up 0.2% year on year but it fell short of what MINT had achieved.Winner: MINTFinancial indicatorsWhen it comes to financial metrics, Keppel DC REIT has the more favourable numbers.Keppel DC REIT’s gearing level was a tad lower than MINT at 36.1% versus 38.4%.The Keppel-backed REIT’s cost of debt was also lower at 1.8% compared with MINT’s 2.4%.The interest coverage ratio was nearly double at 10 times versus 5.7 times, making Keppel DC REIT the clear winner on these metrics.Winner: Keppel DC REITOperating metricsNext, we look at both portfolio occupancy and the weighted average lease expiry (WALE) for both REITs.Keppel DC REIT has close to full occupancy at 98.7% as of 31 March 2022 while MINT’s portfolio occupancy stood at 94%.With long leases, the data centre REIT also boasts a significantly longer WALE of 7.7 years compared with MINT’s 4.1 years.Distribution yieldFinally, we look at each REIT’s distribution yield.MINT has a historical distribution yield of 5.5% while Keppel DC REIT’s forward distribution yield is 4.9%.Of course, investors also need to factor in potential DPU boosts from acquisitions.Keppel DC REIT has, on this front, made several yield-accretive acquisitions such as the purchase of a second data centre in London as well as an investment in M1’s bonds and preference shares.MINT currently has three properties under redevelopment at the Kolam Ayer 2 cluster that will be completed by the first half of 2023.Winner: MINTGet Smart: Acquisition pipeline is another considerationIt appears that MINT is the more attractive REIT at the moment as it has a higher distribution yield and has also grown its DPU by a higher quantum.However, one additional consideration is the property pipeline from each REIT’s sponsor that could potentially be injected as acquisitions.Keppel DC REIT has more than S$2 billion worth of potential data centre assets for acquisitions from its sponsor Keppel Corporation Limited (SGX: BN4).MINT has the right of first refusal for the sale of a 50% stake in Mapletree Rosewood Data Centre Trust from its sponsor Mapletree Investments Pte Ltd.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":457,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9051198210,"gmtCreate":1654649569230,"gmtModify":1676535485050,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okkk what is this la","listText":"Okkk what is this la","text":"Okkk what is this la","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/96ea68964ca006e9795adfe8c02f5c71","width":"1125","height":"1476"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051198210","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":323,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9081239899,"gmtCreate":1650244006736,"gmtModify":1676534676854,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPY\">$SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$</a>When issit time to go in?","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SPY\">$SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$</a>When issit time to go in?","text":"$SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$When issit time to go in?","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/503ba939acfc03efea7a1b85f7cabe97","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9081239899","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":552,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9083100819,"gmtCreate":1650075976458,"gmtModify":1676534642192,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NET\">$Cloudflare, Inc.(NET)$</a>Roller coaster ride","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NET\">$Cloudflare, Inc.(NET)$</a>Roller coaster ride","text":"$Cloudflare, Inc.(NET)$Roller coaster ride","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6d40e309c15987cfc6e1a1a78bc8c15f","width":"1125","height":"4149"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9083100819","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":477,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9083377611,"gmtCreate":1650075871302,"gmtModify":1676534642168,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>Hah was too greedy","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>Hah was too greedy","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$Hah was too greedy","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/640a39ced264d0a6205940f0b06a10e5","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9083377611","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":379,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9089640521,"gmtCreate":1649989752001,"gmtModify":1676534623882,"author":{"id":"3577239452657382","authorId":"3577239452657382","name":"Woogy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5c56113ccd7681dab9948c35b0aed144","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3577239452657382","authorIdStr":"3577239452657382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BIDU\">$Baidu(BIDU)$</a>Lai chi maggi mian","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BIDU\">$Baidu(BIDU)$</a>Lai chi maggi mian","text":"$Baidu(BIDU)$Lai chi maggi mian","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/08abc16b7a9ca8ea3ca5d2ab65e7738a","width":"1170","height":"2292"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":1,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9089640521","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":516,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}