Profile - To The Moon

Kyeno

Posts · 64Posts · 64
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-12-05
  Dip again Haiz..
  Tesla Slid Over 3% in Morning Trading Though It Denied the Rumor That It Will Cut Model Y Output at Shanghai Plant By Over 20%
  Tesla Motors slid over 3% in morning trading.Tesla plans to cut December output of the Model Y at it
  Tesla Slid Over 3% in Morning Trading Though It Denied the Rumor That It Will Cut Model Y Output at Shanghai Plant By Over 20%
  364 1
  1
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-07-19
  let the FSD bloom
  Tesla (TSLA) Releases FSD Beta 10.13
  Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta version 10.13 update has been released to vehicl
  Tesla (TSLA) Releases FSD Beta 10.13
  286 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-05-03
  $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Hold
  598 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-04-28
  Don't think he could get Coca Cola This time round
  Musk Tweets He’ll Buy Coca-Cola Next
  Elon Musk's addiction to continuous attention shows no signs of slowing down.The $Tesla(TSLA)$ CEO and the world’s richest man sent out another headline-grabbing tweet late Wednesday.Earlier this week
  Musk Tweets He’ll Buy Coca-Cola Next
  425 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-04-17
  Good entry now
  Is Tesla a Safe Stock to Buy Now?
  Tesla as a company has good prospects, but owning the stock comes with some risks.
  Is Tesla a Safe Stock to Buy Now?
  490 Comment
  5
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-04-08
  $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Hold , good things deserved the wait
  575 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-04-07
  Apple
  AMD Vs. Apple Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?
  SummaryThe recent news for AMD and Apple that caught investors' attention were the new $8 billion sh
  AMD Vs. Apple Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?
  179 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-04-05
  $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Diamond hand 5 years
  454 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-04-03
  $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$hold
  412 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- KyenoKyeno
  ·2022-04-03
  good
  Three Energy Firms That Should Buy Back Stock and Four That Shouldn't
  Oil and gas producers tend to exercise poor timing in executing stock buybacks, Wells Fargo analyst
  Three Energy Firms That Should Buy Back Stock and Four That Shouldn't
  497 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4097887764268680","uuid":"4097887764268680","gmtCreate":1634786296670,"gmtModify":1636888716580,"name":"Kyeno","pinyin":"kyeno","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":5,"headSize":26,"tweetSize":64,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.07.19","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"60.21%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.05.20","exceedPercentage":"80.56%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9967953994,"gmtCreate":1670252805818,"gmtModify":1676538330036,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Dip again&nbsp; Haiz..","listText":"Dip again&nbsp; Haiz..","text":"Dip again Haiz..","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9967953994","repostId":"1113243487","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1113243487","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1670251786,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1113243487?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-05 22:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla Slid Over 3% in Morning Trading Though It Denied the Rumor That It Will Cut Model Y Output at Shanghai Plant By Over 20%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1113243487","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Tesla Motors slid over 3% in morning trading.Tesla plans to cut December output of the Model Y at it","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> slid over 3% in morning trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d253f97a12cb28f844b952335e2e81e\" tg-width=\"653\" tg-height=\"528\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Tesla plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% compared to November, two people with knowledge of the matter said on Monday.</p><p>However, the company said that the message was false.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla Slid Over 3% in Morning Trading Though It Denied the Rumor That It Will Cut Model Y Output at Shanghai Plant By Over 20%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla Slid Over 3% in Morning Trading Though It Denied the Rumor That It Will Cut Model Y Output at Shanghai Plant By Over 20%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-12-05 22:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla Motors</a> slid over 3% in morning trading.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d253f97a12cb28f844b952335e2e81e\" tg-width=\"653\" tg-height=\"528\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Tesla plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% compared to November, two people with knowledge of the matter said on Monday.</p><p>However, the company said that the message was false.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1113243487","content_text":"Tesla Motors slid over 3% in morning trading.Tesla plans to cut December output of the Model Y at its Shanghai plant by more than 20% compared to November, two people with knowledge of the matter said on Monday.However, the company said that the message was false.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":364,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9075607418,"gmtCreate":1658189806034,"gmtModify":1676536118780,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"let the FSD bloom&nbsp;","listText":"let the FSD bloom&nbsp;","text":"let the FSD bloom","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9075607418","repostId":"2252075256","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2252075256","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1658187583,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2252075256?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-19 07:39","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Tesla (TSLA) Releases FSD Beta 10.13","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2252075256","media":"StreetInsider","summary":"Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta version 10.13 update has been released to vehicl","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta version 10.13 update has been released to vehicles. One of the earliest reports have observed the update in a 2021 Model Y assembled at the company’s Gigafactory in Texas. A good portion of the update’s release notes has also been shared online.</p><p>CEO Elon Musk remarked last week that FSD Beta 10.13 should handle some tough left turns. Musk also remarked that the recent 10.x updates of FSD Beta are already “mostly at v11” in terms of their capabilities, though FSD Beta v11 itself should still be released sometime next month.</p><p>As previously stated by Elon Musk, FSD Beta 10.13’s release notes directly reference beta tester Chuck Cook’s unprotected left turn, as well as other notable improvements on false positives and false slowdowns around crosswalks.</p><p>FSD Beta v10.13 Release Notes</p><ul><li>Improved decision making for unprotected left turns using better estimation of ego’s interaction with other objects through the maneuver.</li><li>Improved stopping pose while yielding for crossing objects at “Chuck Cook style” unprotected left turns by utilizing the median safety regions.</li><li>Made speed profile more comfortable when creeping for visibility, to allow for smoother stops when protecting for potentially occluded objects.</li><li>Enabled creeping for visibility at any intersection where objects might cross ego’s path, regardless of presence of traffic controls.</li><li>Improved lane position error by 5% and lane recall by 12%…</li><li>Improved lane position error of crossing and merging lanes by 22% by adding long-range skip connections and a more powerful trunk to the network architecture.</li><li>Improved pedestrian and bicyclist velocity error by 17%, especially when ego is making a turn, by improving the onboard trajectory estimation used as input to the neural network.</li><li>Improved animal detection recall by 34% and decreased false positives by 8% by doubling the size of the auto-labeled training set.</li><li>Improved detection recall of far away crossing vehicles by 4% by tuning the loss function used during training and improving label quality.</li><li>Improved the “is parked” attribute for vehicles by 5% by adding 20% more examples to the training set.</li><li>Upgraded the occupancy network to detect dynamic objects and improved performance by adding a video module, tuning the loss function, and adding 37k new clips to the training set.</li><li>Reduced false slowdowns around crosswalks by better classification of pedestrians and bicyclists as not intending to interact with ego.</li><li>Reduced false lane changes for cones or blockages by preferring gentle offsetting in-lane where appropriate.</li><li>Improved in-lane positioning on wide residential roads.</li><li>Improved object future path prediction in scenarios with high yaw rate.</li><li>Improved speed limit sign accuracy on digital speed limits by 29%, on signs with difficult relevance by 23%, on 3-digit speeds by 39%, and on speed limit end signs by 62%. Neural network was trained with 84% more examples in the training set and with architectural changes which allocated more compute in the network head.</li></ul></body></html>","source":"highlight_streetinsider","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tesla (TSLA) Releases FSD Beta 10.13</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTesla (TSLA) Releases FSD Beta 10.13\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-19 07:39 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20335804><strong>StreetInsider</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta version 10.13 update has been released to vehicles. One of the earliest reports have observed the update in a 2021 Model Y assembled at the company’...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20335804\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.streetinsider.com/dr/news.php?id=20335804","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2252075256","content_text":"Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) Full Self-Driving (FSD) Beta version 10.13 update has been released to vehicles. One of the earliest reports have observed the update in a 2021 Model Y assembled at the company’s Gigafactory in Texas. A good portion of the update’s release notes has also been shared online.CEO Elon Musk remarked last week that FSD Beta 10.13 should handle some tough left turns. Musk also remarked that the recent 10.x updates of FSD Beta are already “mostly at v11” in terms of their capabilities, though FSD Beta v11 itself should still be released sometime next month.As previously stated by Elon Musk, FSD Beta 10.13’s release notes directly reference beta tester Chuck Cook’s unprotected left turn, as well as other notable improvements on false positives and false slowdowns around crosswalks.FSD Beta v10.13 Release NotesImproved decision making for unprotected left turns using better estimation of ego’s interaction with other objects through the maneuver.Improved stopping pose while yielding for crossing objects at “Chuck Cook style” unprotected left turns by utilizing the median safety regions.Made speed profile more comfortable when creeping for visibility, to allow for smoother stops when protecting for potentially occluded objects.Enabled creeping for visibility at any intersection where objects might cross ego’s path, regardless of presence of traffic controls.Improved lane position error by 5% and lane recall by 12%…Improved lane position error of crossing and merging lanes by 22% by adding long-range skip connections and a more powerful trunk to the network architecture.Improved pedestrian and bicyclist velocity error by 17%, especially when ego is making a turn, by improving the onboard trajectory estimation used as input to the neural network.Improved animal detection recall by 34% and decreased false positives by 8% by doubling the size of the auto-labeled training set.Improved detection recall of far away crossing vehicles by 4% by tuning the loss function used during training and improving label quality.Improved the “is parked” attribute for vehicles by 5% by adding 20% more examples to the training set.Upgraded the occupancy network to detect dynamic objects and improved performance by adding a video module, tuning the loss function, and adding 37k new clips to the training set.Reduced false slowdowns around crosswalks by better classification of pedestrians and bicyclists as not intending to interact with ego.Reduced false lane changes for cones or blockages by preferring gentle offsetting in-lane where appropriate.Improved in-lane positioning on wide residential roads.Improved object future path prediction in scenarios with high yaw rate.Improved speed limit sign accuracy on digital speed limits by 29%, on signs with difficult relevance by 23%, on 3-digit speeds by 39%, and on speed limit end signs by 62%. Neural network was trained with 84% more examples in the training set and with architectural changes which allocated more compute in the network head.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":286,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9061190315,"gmtCreate":1651581590482,"gmtModify":1676534930193,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Hold&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Hold&nbsp;","text":"$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Hold","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/81a0317623cd0328c9b41d47fbf942cc","width":"1242","height":"2448"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9061190315","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":598,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9060854589,"gmtCreate":1651127565017,"gmtModify":1676534855680,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Don't think he could get Coca Cola This time round","listText":"Don't think he could get Coca Cola This time round","text":"Don't think he could get Coca Cola This time round","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9060854589","repostId":"1188662887","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188662887","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1651113201,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188662887?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-28 10:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Musk Tweets He’ll Buy Coca-Cola Next","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188662887","media":"TheStreet","summary":"Elon Musk's addiction to continuous attention shows no signs of slowing down.The $Tesla(TSLA)$ CEO and the world’s richest man sent out another headline-grabbing tweet late Wednesday.Earlier this week","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Elon Musk&#39;s addiction to continuous attention shows no signs of slowing down.</p><p>The <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a> CEO and the world’s richest man sent out another headline-grabbing tweet late Wednesday.</p><p>Earlier this week, Musk won an agreement from <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TWTR\">Twitter’s </a> board for him to buy the social media company for $44 billion. The deal won the blessing of Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey.</p><p>Since then, Musk has offered a series of controversial tweets, seemingly unable to give up the thrill of being the constant center of attention of much of the business and governmental worlds.</p><p>In particular, he’s harped on so-called freedom of speech problems at Twitter, raising concerns that he might reinstate former president Donald Trump on the platform. Trump was permanently banned from Twitter for fears he would incite even more violence in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection.</p><p>Five people died as a result of the violent attempt by Trump supporters to take over the capital and stop the counting of the electoral votes and Trump was impeached for a second time as a result.</p><p>Though Musk calls himself a &#34;free speech absolutist,&#34; the Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech protections in the constitution do not extend to &#34;yelling &#39;fire&#39; in a crowded theater.&#34;</p><p><b>Old Coke</b>?</p><p>Not content, however, Musk lobbed out another wild idea Wednesday.</p><p>What else to make of Musk’s latest tweet in which he says “Next I’m buying Coca-Cola to put the cocaine back in.”</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6b0613746a77f511e650965d65a2463e\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"204\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Venerable <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KO\">Coca-Cola</a> was once made using cocaine, but the drug was removed from the recipe at the beginning of the 20th century, before the drink became a global phenomenon.</p><p>Acquiring Coca-Cola would be a much bigger task for Musk than Twitter, as its market capitalization is currently about $288 billion, equivalent to Musk’s entire net worth on any given day.</p><p>There’s another wrinkle that could get in the way as well, since Coca-Cola’s largest single shareholder is Warren Buffett, who holds about 9% of the soft drink maker through his <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK.A\">Berkshire-Hathaway </a> investment vehicle.</p><p>Buffett made his first purchases of Coca-Cola in the wake of the 1987 stock market crash and has profited handsomely over the years.</p><p>Unlike Musk, Buffett generally takes a hands off approach to any companies he buys or holds large stakes in.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Musk Tweets He’ll Buy Coca-Cola Next</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nMusk Tweets He’ll Buy Coca-Cola Next\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-28 10:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/investing/musk-tweets-hell-buy-coca-cola-next><strong>TheStreet</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Elon Musk's addiction to continuous attention shows no signs of slowing down.The Tesla CEO and the world’s richest man sent out another headline-grabbing tweet late Wednesday.Earlier this week, Musk ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/musk-tweets-hell-buy-coca-cola-next\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"KO":"可口可乐","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/investing/musk-tweets-hell-buy-coca-cola-next","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188662887","content_text":"Elon Musk's addiction to continuous attention shows no signs of slowing down.The Tesla CEO and the world’s richest man sent out another headline-grabbing tweet late Wednesday.Earlier this week, Musk won an agreement from Twitter’s  board for him to buy the social media company for $44 billion. The deal won the blessing of Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey.Since then, Musk has offered a series of controversial tweets, seemingly unable to give up the thrill of being the constant center of attention of much of the business and governmental worlds.In particular, he’s harped on so-called freedom of speech problems at Twitter, raising concerns that he might reinstate former president Donald Trump on the platform. Trump was permanently banned from Twitter for fears he would incite even more violence in the wake of the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection.Five people died as a result of the violent attempt by Trump supporters to take over the capital and stop the counting of the electoral votes and Trump was impeached for a second time as a result.Though Musk calls himself a \"free speech absolutist,\" the Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech protections in the constitution do not extend to \"yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater.\"Old Coke?Not content, however, Musk lobbed out another wild idea Wednesday.What else to make of Musk’s latest tweet in which he says “Next I’m buying Coca-Cola to put the cocaine back in.”Venerable Coca-Cola was once made using cocaine, but the drug was removed from the recipe at the beginning of the 20th century, before the drink became a global phenomenon.Acquiring Coca-Cola would be a much bigger task for Musk than Twitter, as its market capitalization is currently about $288 billion, equivalent to Musk’s entire net worth on any given day.There’s another wrinkle that could get in the way as well, since Coca-Cola’s largest single shareholder is Warren Buffett, who holds about 9% of the soft drink maker through his Berkshire-Hathaway  investment vehicle.Buffett made his first purchases of Coca-Cola in the wake of the 1987 stock market crash and has profited handsomely over the years.Unlike Musk, Buffett generally takes a hands off approach to any companies he buys or holds large stakes in.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9083779518,"gmtCreate":1650164443039,"gmtModify":1676534660663,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good entry now&nbsp;","listText":"Good entry now&nbsp;","text":"Good entry now","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9083779518","repostId":"2227986491","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2227986491","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1650153489,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2227986491?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-17 07:58","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Tesla a Safe Stock to Buy Now?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2227986491","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Tesla as a company has good prospects, but owning the stock comes with some risks.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Tesla</b> ( TSLA -3.65% ) is a company not easily ignored. Customers seem to love the company&#39;s well-designed electric vehicles (EVs) while the bulls seem quite pleased with the 33% stock price rise in the last 12 months. On the other end, the bears are very skeptical of the sustainability of its outsized stock price run. After all, Tesla stock delivered more than a 15-fold return in the last five years.</p><p>But for potential investors thinking about buying the stock now, it is crucial to consider whether it is safe to invest in Tesla today. While that is not going to be an easy exercise, investors should at least consider these two questions about the company and its stock.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/42bdaade247c7cea04b918d57eb73d34\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"466\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Image source: Getty Images.</p><h2><b>1. Is Tesla a durable business?</b></h2><p>Tesla has reported some solid financials lately. After delivering its first profitable year in 2020, Tesla exceeded that performance in 2021. It delivered a record 936,222 EVs to customers, grew revenue and net profit by 73% and 665%, respectively, and expanded free cash flow by 80% to $5 billion.</p><p>But note that the last paragraph started out by using the word &#34;lately.&#34; It&#39;s useful to also be aware that Tesla had never delivered a profitable year until 2020. It has been on the brink of bankruptcy a few times, most recently from 2017 to 2019. But as the worldwide transition from combustion engines into electric engines gained steam, Tesla was favorably positioned to capture the pent-up demand. And it did, as is evident by its solid numbers.</p><p>While the 2021 result was remarkable, it is still an outlier more than a norm. The biggest issue is that two profitable years provide little assurance that Tesla can sustain that in the coming years. As the car industry is highly cyclical, an economic downturn (such as a recession) will cause consumers to tighten their belts. When that happens, average folks tend to delay their purchase of high-value items like a car, which could reduce industry volume. We still do not know how Tesla will perform in such an environment.</p><p>On top of that, the EV race has intensified in recent years. While Tesla is still the dominant player -- with a 21% global market share in 2021, according to Autocar -- incumbents like <b>General Motors</b> and <b>Ford Motor Company</b> have big plans to ramp up their production. Tesla also faces competition from Chinese car companies like <b>BYD</b> and <b>Nio</b>. The former, backed by Warren Buffett, sold 593,745 EVs in 2021. BYD also announced that it would stop producing combustion engine vehicles to focus on EVs and plug-in hybrids.</p><p>In short, Tesla must execute flawlessly in the coming years to maintain its market share and stay profitable. While we do not know whether the company can sustain its strong execution, there is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AONE.U\">one</a> thing we do know for sure: Gone are the days when Tesla had the whole EV market to itself.</p><h2><b>2. Does Tesla stock offer a margin of safety?</b></h2><p>Ask any investor how to make money in the stock market, and the usual reply will be to buy a stock when the price is low and sell when the price is high. However, this argument is incomplete since an investor should also consider the intrinsic value of the stock. The key is to buy when the stock price is lower than the intrinsic value (and sell when it is above).</p><p>But estimating intrinsic value is not a simple task. Not only are there many methods to calculate the intrinsic value of a company, but every investor will use different variables to compute. It is fair to say that every investor will arrive at a different intrinsic value for the same company.</p><p>Enter: margin of safety. The idea is that when investors buy a stock at a price materially lower than its intrinsic value, they have room for errors in their estimation of its value. Even if they make mistakes, they generally lose little money since they buy the stock cheaply.</p><p>So is Tesla&#39;s stock cheap enough today to offer a margin of safety to investors? Let us consider a few simple metrics. As of writing, Tesla has a price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-book (P/B), and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 21, 35, and 209. Comparatively, General Motors&#39; P/S, P/B, and P/E ratios are 0.5, 1, and 5.9, respectively.</p><p>Tesla bulls will immediately cry foul, claiming that Tesla is fundamentally a different company from GM. While I agree with them that Tesla is not an average company, my argument is this: Is it worth 30 to 40 times more than GM? Or put it differently, is one Tesla equivalent to 30 to 40 GMs? To me, the answer is probably not.</p><h2><b>Back to the original question: Is Tesla stock safe to buy?</b></h2><p>There is no doubt that Tesla is a company with promising prospects. It is a leader in the EV industry and has significant investments in potentially major industries like autonomous vehicles, renewable energy, and others.</p><p>Still, I don&#39;t think it&#39;s safe to buy Tesla stock now with your hard-earned money. One reason is the company just turned profitable in 2020. It would need a few more profitable years before investors can safely assume the turnaround is permanent. Besides, its valuation is not cheap, which offers a very little margin of safety for investors.</p><p>So unless investors are looking for some adrenaline rush, they will be better off staying from the stock. And even if they are looking for such excitement, they can consider buying a Tesla car instead.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Tesla a Safe Stock to Buy Now?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Tesla a Safe Stock to Buy Now?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-17 07:58 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/16/is-tesla-a-safe-stock-to-buy-now/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Tesla ( TSLA -3.65% ) is a company not easily ignored. Customers seem to love the company's well-designed electric vehicles (EVs) while the bulls seem quite pleased with the 33% stock price rise in ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/16/is-tesla-a-safe-stock-to-buy-now/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4099":"汽车制造商","TSLA":"特斯拉","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/04/16/is-tesla-a-safe-stock-to-buy-now/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2227986491","content_text":"Tesla ( TSLA -3.65% ) is a company not easily ignored. Customers seem to love the company's well-designed electric vehicles (EVs) while the bulls seem quite pleased with the 33% stock price rise in the last 12 months. On the other end, the bears are very skeptical of the sustainability of its outsized stock price run. After all, Tesla stock delivered more than a 15-fold return in the last five years.But for potential investors thinking about buying the stock now, it is crucial to consider whether it is safe to invest in Tesla today. While that is not going to be an easy exercise, investors should at least consider these two questions about the company and its stock.Image source: Getty Images.1. Is Tesla a durable business?Tesla has reported some solid financials lately. After delivering its first profitable year in 2020, Tesla exceeded that performance in 2021. It delivered a record 936,222 EVs to customers, grew revenue and net profit by 73% and 665%, respectively, and expanded free cash flow by 80% to $5 billion.But note that the last paragraph started out by using the word \"lately.\" It's useful to also be aware that Tesla had never delivered a profitable year until 2020. It has been on the brink of bankruptcy a few times, most recently from 2017 to 2019. But as the worldwide transition from combustion engines into electric engines gained steam, Tesla was favorably positioned to capture the pent-up demand. And it did, as is evident by its solid numbers.While the 2021 result was remarkable, it is still an outlier more than a norm. The biggest issue is that two profitable years provide little assurance that Tesla can sustain that in the coming years. As the car industry is highly cyclical, an economic downturn (such as a recession) will cause consumers to tighten their belts. When that happens, average folks tend to delay their purchase of high-value items like a car, which could reduce industry volume. We still do not know how Tesla will perform in such an environment.On top of that, the EV race has intensified in recent years. While Tesla is still the dominant player -- with a 21% global market share in 2021, according to Autocar -- incumbents like General Motors and Ford Motor Company have big plans to ramp up their production. Tesla also faces competition from Chinese car companies like BYD and Nio. The former, backed by Warren Buffett, sold 593,745 EVs in 2021. BYD also announced that it would stop producing combustion engine vehicles to focus on EVs and plug-in hybrids.In short, Tesla must execute flawlessly in the coming years to maintain its market share and stay profitable. While we do not know whether the company can sustain its strong execution, there is one thing we do know for sure: Gone are the days when Tesla had the whole EV market to itself.2. Does Tesla stock offer a margin of safety?Ask any investor how to make money in the stock market, and the usual reply will be to buy a stock when the price is low and sell when the price is high. However, this argument is incomplete since an investor should also consider the intrinsic value of the stock. The key is to buy when the stock price is lower than the intrinsic value (and sell when it is above).But estimating intrinsic value is not a simple task. Not only are there many methods to calculate the intrinsic value of a company, but every investor will use different variables to compute. It is fair to say that every investor will arrive at a different intrinsic value for the same company.Enter: margin of safety. The idea is that when investors buy a stock at a price materially lower than its intrinsic value, they have room for errors in their estimation of its value. Even if they make mistakes, they generally lose little money since they buy the stock cheaply.So is Tesla's stock cheap enough today to offer a margin of safety to investors? Let us consider a few simple metrics. As of writing, Tesla has a price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-book (P/B), and price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 21, 35, and 209. Comparatively, General Motors' P/S, P/B, and P/E ratios are 0.5, 1, and 5.9, respectively.Tesla bulls will immediately cry foul, claiming that Tesla is fundamentally a different company from GM. While I agree with them that Tesla is not an average company, my argument is this: Is it worth 30 to 40 times more than GM? Or put it differently, is one Tesla equivalent to 30 to 40 GMs? To me, the answer is probably not.Back to the original question: Is Tesla stock safe to buy?There is no doubt that Tesla is a company with promising prospects. It is a leader in the EV industry and has significant investments in potentially major industries like autonomous vehicles, renewable energy, and others.Still, I don't think it's safe to buy Tesla stock now with your hard-earned money. One reason is the company just turned profitable in 2020. It would need a few more profitable years before investors can safely assume the turnaround is permanent. Besides, its valuation is not cheap, which offers a very little margin of safety for investors.So unless investors are looking for some adrenaline rush, they will be better off staying from the stock. And even if they are looking for such excitement, they can consider buying a Tesla car instead.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":490,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9015030474,"gmtCreate":1649388715605,"gmtModify":1676534504335,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Hold , good things deserved the wait","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Hold , good things deserved the wait","text":"$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Hold , good things deserved the wait","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c16249fc255882a5921c315ddd3ddaa6","width":"1242","height":"2448"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9015030474","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":575,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9012858118,"gmtCreate":1649308143332,"gmtModify":1676534489793,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Apple","listText":"Apple","text":"Apple","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9012858118","repostId":"1173962736","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1173962736","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649289798,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1173962736?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-07 08:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD Vs. Apple Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1173962736","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThe recent news for AMD and Apple that caught investors' attention were the new $8 billion sh","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>The recent news for AMD and Apple that caught investors&#39; attention were the new $8 billion share repurchase program and the rumored decline in iPhone SE production for Q2, respectively.</li><li>AMD&#39;s shares have underperformed Apple by a wide margin year-to-date in 2022.</li><li>I view Apple as the Buy of the two stocks, and I am particularly positive on the potential launch of hardware subscriptions for AAPL.</li><li>Looking for more investing ideas like this one? Get them exclusively at Asia Value &amp; Moat Stocks.</li></ul><p>Elevator Pitch</p><p>I am of the view that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is a better buy as compared to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMD). I previously wrote about AAPL and AMD in earlier articles published onFebruary24, 2022andJanuary 31, 2022, respectively. My analysis finds that Apple is in a better position to maintain or expand its current valuation multiples as compared to AMD. Recent speculation about lower iPhone SE production for AAPL is not a major worry, and I see the potential introduction of hardware subscriptions as a key re-rating catalyst for Apple&#39;s shares.</p><p>AMD And Apple Stock Key Metrics</p><p>Recent developments for AMD and Apple deserve attention, and it is relevant to evaluate certain key metrics disclosed for these two companies in the past few months.</p><p>On February 24, 2022, AMDrevealedthat the company&#39;s &#34;board of directors approved a new $8 billion share repurchase program.&#34; As of the date of this announcement, AMD also still had $1 billion remaining from its prior share buyback authorization announced in May 2021. The new $8 billion share buyback program is quite significant representing approximately 4.6% of AMD&#39;s market capitalization, and it is usually good when companies return more capital to their shareholders.</p><p>But things are not as straightforward as it sounds on paper. AMD&#39;s new share repurchase program is likely initiated with the purpose of offsetting the dilution associated with the recent acquisition of Xilinx. In the February 24, 2022 announcement, AMD also acknowledged that it intends to buy back more of its own shares with the aim of both &#34;offsetting dilution from stock issuances and reducing share count over time.&#34;</p><p>Two weeks prior to the share buyback announcement, AMD confirmed on February 14, 2022 that the company&#39;s takeover of Xilinx has been completed. Based on my estimates, AMD&#39;s shares outstanding (excluding the effects of any share repurchases) will increase by approximately +35% as this transaction is entirely funded by the issuance of shares.</p><p>In my previous January 31, 2022 update for AMD, I noted that the company&#39;s &#34;growth for FY 2022 could be diluted as a result of the Xilinx deal.&#34; My view is supported by the work of other sell-side analysts as well. A February 11, 2022 sell-side report (not publicly available) titled &#34;Updated XLNX Accretion Analysis Ahead of the Deal Close&#34; published by Raymond James Financial (RJF) estimates &#34;about $0.43 of dilution to 2022 earnings&#34; for AMD. This is because the dilution effects of the increased share count &#34;exceeds the accretion from adding Xilinx earnings (which has grown at a slower rate vs. AMD).&#34;</p><p>Although the $8 billion new share repurchase program will help to partially offset the dilution effects relating to the Xilinx acquisition, this deal will still have a negative impact on AMD&#39;s short-term financial performance.</p><p>Separately, the most notable metric relating to Apple is the company&#39;s estimated (or speculated) production volume for its key products.</p><p>On March 28, 2022<i>Seeking Alpha News</i>publishedan article citing a<i>Nikkei Asia</i>report which claimed that Apple &#34;is cutting 20% of its planned iPhone SE output for the next quarter (2Q 2022 in calendar year terms).&#34;</p><p>In my opinion, I think that there are three reasons why investors shouldn&#39;t be unduly worried even if such speculation about AAPL&#39;s iPhone SE production cut turns out to be true.</p><p>Firstly, it could be simply a case of Apple prioritizing the production of specific key products over others, as it did in the past. In my prior November 12, 2021articleon Apple, I analyzed why AAPL &#34;reduced the production of iPads&#34; in consideration of &#34;long lead times for iPhone 13&#34; and expectations of weaker demand for iPads.&#34;</p><p>Secondly, iPhone SE should not account for a meaningful proportion of Apple&#39;s sales. Analysts from<i>IDC</i>estimatethat the recently launched iPhone SE 3 could possibly contribute a modest 10% of the company&#39;s total shipments for iPhones.</p><p>Thirdly, my analysis of Apple&#39;s historical quarterly revenue in recent years suggests that the company&#39;s revenue is typically higher in the second half of the calendar year vis-a-vis the first half. This is likely attributable to the launch of the new iPhone flagship model in September/October and holiday season purchases. As such, Q2 2021 is not a peak season for Apple&#39;s product sales, so even if production falls below expectations, this shouldn&#39;t be a major concern.</p><p>In the subsequent sections of the current article, I touch on the historical share price performance and the outlook for both AMD and Apple.</p><p>Does AMD Or Apple Perform Better?</p><p>Apple&#39;s shares have performed much better than AMD in 2022 thus far.</p><p><b>2022 Year-to-date Stock Price Performance For AMD And Apple</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6bd9e03105594699fd285f8a0f82990\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"221\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Apple&#39;s stock price decreased by -1.8% in 2022 year-to-date, which is even better than the -4.3% decline for the S&amp;P 500 over the same period. In contrast, AMD&#39;s share price has already fallen by -24.8% in the first three months or so of this year.</p><p>One factor that accounts for AMD&#39;s inferior share price performance vis-a-vis Apple is that the short-term negative effects of the recent Xilinx acquisition might be a greater concern for investors as compared to the potential reduction in production volumes for Apple, which I explained earlier.</p><p>Another factor is that the valuation de-rating for AMD has been much more severe. Notably, Apple and AMD are currently valued by the market at consensus forward next twelve months&#39; normalized P/E multiples of 28.0 times and 26.8 times, respectively based on<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i>data and their last traded share prices as of April 1, 2022. But AMD traded at 47.9 times forward P/E at the beginning of 2022, while the market valued AAPL at a more reasonable forward P/E of 32.0 times as of January 3, 2022.</p><p>Is AMD Or Apple&#39;s Market Capitalization Growing Faster?</p><p>AMD&#39;s market capitalization has been growing much faster than that of Apple in the past 10 years. This holds true, even if one does the same comparison for theone-year, three-year and five-year periods.</p><p><b>The Relative Growth In The Market Capitalizations Of AMD And Apple In Percentage Terms For The Past Decade</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/08b0b2c3cdf6c0777e684ca3da267ca0\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"221\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>It is a different story, when one compares the market capitalization of the two listed companies in absolute terms. Apple is approximately 16 times as large as AMD with regards to market capitalization.</p><p><b>A Comparison Of The Market Capitalizations Of AMD And Apple In Absolute Terms</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ebab4db9006a7f45086b9db5ac8a99c6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"221\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>Of course, it is the future that matters, rather than what has happened in the past. In the next section, I discuss the outlook and growth prospects for Apple and AMD.</p><p>Will AMD Be Worth More Than Apple In The Future?</p><p>In my view, it is highly unlikely that AMD&#39;s market capitalization can exceed that of Apple in the foreseeable future. More importantly, I think that Apple&#39;s shares should outperform AMD in the near term.</p><p>Sell-side consensus data sourced from<i>S&amp;P Capital IQ</i>data suggests that AMD is expected to generate a normalized net profit of $11.1 billion in fiscal 2026, while Apple is forecast to deliver normalized earnings of $146.6 billion in FY 2026. In other words, this implies that if AAPL is valued by the market at 25 times P/E in 2026, AMD will have to trade at a P/E ratio of 330 times to equal Apple&#39;s market capitalization. This implies that there is a very low probability that AMD will be worth more than Apple in the next five years.</p><p>Separately, as I mentioned earlier in this article, both stocks are now trading at forward P/E multiples in the mid-to-high twenties percentage level. For the next one year, I also expect Apple to be valued by the market at a relatively higher P/E multiple than AMD, and do better than the latter in terms of share price performance.</p><p>In the case of AMD, there has been a substantial valuation de-rating for high-flying, high-growth tech stocks in recent months, and it will be challenging for AMD to trade back up to 40-60 times P/E levels that it used to trade at in 2020 and 2021. Moreover, the dilutive effects of the Xilinx deal will put a cap on the potential earnings growth for AMD this year.</p><p>On the other hand, Apple is well-positioned to continue trading at its current P/E multiples in the high-twenties level, and a further expansion in its P/E multiples to the low-to-mid thirties can&#39;t be ruled out.</p><p>Specifically, AAPL&#39;s plans for hardware subscriptions could be a major boost to its valuations. On March 23, 2022,<i>Seeking Alpha News</i>highlightedthat Apple &#34;is reportedly working on a subscription plan to make owning iPhones and other hardware, such as Macs, similar to paying a monthly app fee&#34; citing a<i>Bloomberg</i>report. Although Apple has yet to officially release details on this new strategy, this could possibly be a game changer for the company.</p><p>Apple&#39;s forward P/E multiple has re-rated significantly from the low-teens levels in the 2017-2019 period to above 20 times in the past two years. A key driver of this positive valuation re-rating has been an increasing proportion of high-margin and recurring revenues in recent years.</p><p>If AAPL makes the shift to hardware subscriptions, it could help to lower the financial burden of owning more Apple hardware products. This might translate to higher hardware sales and also increased services revenue. With more consumers owning multiple Apple hardware products, there are also even more &#34;touch-points&#34; for Apple to cross-sell other high-margin services, which supports further valuation re-rating for AAPL.</p><p>Is AMD Or AAPL Stock A Better Buy?</p><p>AAPL stock is a better Buy than AMD in my opinion. As explained above, I think it is challenging for AMD&#39;s shares to see a positive re-rating any time soon. On the other hand, Apple should be able to maintain or expand its valuation multiples going forward thanks to an increasing proportion of recurring services revenue.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD Vs. Apple Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD Vs. Apple Stock: Which Is The Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-07 08:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4499912-amd-vs-apple-stock-better-buy><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThe recent news for AMD and Apple that caught investors' attention were the new $8 billion share repurchase program and the rumored decline in iPhone SE production for Q2, respectively.AMD's ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4499912-amd-vs-apple-stock-better-buy\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4499912-amd-vs-apple-stock-better-buy","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1173962736","content_text":"SummaryThe recent news for AMD and Apple that caught investors' attention were the new $8 billion share repurchase program and the rumored decline in iPhone SE production for Q2, respectively.AMD's shares have underperformed Apple by a wide margin year-to-date in 2022.I view Apple as the Buy of the two stocks, and I am particularly positive on the potential launch of hardware subscriptions for AAPL.Looking for more investing ideas like this one? Get them exclusively at Asia Value & Moat Stocks.Elevator PitchI am of the view that Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) is a better buy as compared to Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMD). I previously wrote about AAPL and AMD in earlier articles published onFebruary24, 2022andJanuary 31, 2022, respectively. My analysis finds that Apple is in a better position to maintain or expand its current valuation multiples as compared to AMD. Recent speculation about lower iPhone SE production for AAPL is not a major worry, and I see the potential introduction of hardware subscriptions as a key re-rating catalyst for Apple's shares.AMD And Apple Stock Key MetricsRecent developments for AMD and Apple deserve attention, and it is relevant to evaluate certain key metrics disclosed for these two companies in the past few months.On February 24, 2022, AMDrevealedthat the company's \"board of directors approved a new $8 billion share repurchase program.\" As of the date of this announcement, AMD also still had $1 billion remaining from its prior share buyback authorization announced in May 2021. The new $8 billion share buyback program is quite significant representing approximately 4.6% of AMD's market capitalization, and it is usually good when companies return more capital to their shareholders.But things are not as straightforward as it sounds on paper. AMD's new share repurchase program is likely initiated with the purpose of offsetting the dilution associated with the recent acquisition of Xilinx. In the February 24, 2022 announcement, AMD also acknowledged that it intends to buy back more of its own shares with the aim of both \"offsetting dilution from stock issuances and reducing share count over time.\"Two weeks prior to the share buyback announcement, AMD confirmed on February 14, 2022 that the company's takeover of Xilinx has been completed. Based on my estimates, AMD's shares outstanding (excluding the effects of any share repurchases) will increase by approximately +35% as this transaction is entirely funded by the issuance of shares.In my previous January 31, 2022 update for AMD, I noted that the company's \"growth for FY 2022 could be diluted as a result of the Xilinx deal.\" My view is supported by the work of other sell-side analysts as well. A February 11, 2022 sell-side report (not publicly available) titled \"Updated XLNX Accretion Analysis Ahead of the Deal Close\" published by Raymond James Financial (RJF) estimates \"about $0.43 of dilution to 2022 earnings\" for AMD. This is because the dilution effects of the increased share count \"exceeds the accretion from adding Xilinx earnings (which has grown at a slower rate vs. AMD).\"Although the $8 billion new share repurchase program will help to partially offset the dilution effects relating to the Xilinx acquisition, this deal will still have a negative impact on AMD's short-term financial performance.Separately, the most notable metric relating to Apple is the company's estimated (or speculated) production volume for its key products.On March 28, 2022Seeking Alpha Newspublishedan article citing aNikkei Asiareport which claimed that Apple \"is cutting 20% of its planned iPhone SE output for the next quarter (2Q 2022 in calendar year terms).\"In my opinion, I think that there are three reasons why investors shouldn't be unduly worried even if such speculation about AAPL's iPhone SE production cut turns out to be true.Firstly, it could be simply a case of Apple prioritizing the production of specific key products over others, as it did in the past. In my prior November 12, 2021articleon Apple, I analyzed why AAPL \"reduced the production of iPads\" in consideration of \"long lead times for iPhone 13\" and expectations of weaker demand for iPads.\"Secondly, iPhone SE should not account for a meaningful proportion of Apple's sales. Analysts fromIDCestimatethat the recently launched iPhone SE 3 could possibly contribute a modest 10% of the company's total shipments for iPhones.Thirdly, my analysis of Apple's historical quarterly revenue in recent years suggests that the company's revenue is typically higher in the second half of the calendar year vis-a-vis the first half. This is likely attributable to the launch of the new iPhone flagship model in September/October and holiday season purchases. As such, Q2 2021 is not a peak season for Apple's product sales, so even if production falls below expectations, this shouldn't be a major concern.In the subsequent sections of the current article, I touch on the historical share price performance and the outlook for both AMD and Apple.Does AMD Or Apple Perform Better?Apple's shares have performed much better than AMD in 2022 thus far.2022 Year-to-date Stock Price Performance For AMD And AppleSeeking AlphaApple's stock price decreased by -1.8% in 2022 year-to-date, which is even better than the -4.3% decline for the S&P 500 over the same period. In contrast, AMD's share price has already fallen by -24.8% in the first three months or so of this year.One factor that accounts for AMD's inferior share price performance vis-a-vis Apple is that the short-term negative effects of the recent Xilinx acquisition might be a greater concern for investors as compared to the potential reduction in production volumes for Apple, which I explained earlier.Another factor is that the valuation de-rating for AMD has been much more severe. Notably, Apple and AMD are currently valued by the market at consensus forward next twelve months' normalized P/E multiples of 28.0 times and 26.8 times, respectively based onS&P Capital IQdata and their last traded share prices as of April 1, 2022. But AMD traded at 47.9 times forward P/E at the beginning of 2022, while the market valued AAPL at a more reasonable forward P/E of 32.0 times as of January 3, 2022.Is AMD Or Apple's Market Capitalization Growing Faster?AMD's market capitalization has been growing much faster than that of Apple in the past 10 years. This holds true, even if one does the same comparison for theone-year, three-year and five-year periods.The Relative Growth In The Market Capitalizations Of AMD And Apple In Percentage Terms For The Past DecadeSeeking AlphaIt is a different story, when one compares the market capitalization of the two listed companies in absolute terms. Apple is approximately 16 times as large as AMD with regards to market capitalization.A Comparison Of The Market Capitalizations Of AMD And Apple In Absolute TermsSeeking AlphaOf course, it is the future that matters, rather than what has happened in the past. In the next section, I discuss the outlook and growth prospects for Apple and AMD.Will AMD Be Worth More Than Apple In The Future?In my view, it is highly unlikely that AMD's market capitalization can exceed that of Apple in the foreseeable future. More importantly, I think that Apple's shares should outperform AMD in the near term.Sell-side consensus data sourced fromS&P Capital IQdata suggests that AMD is expected to generate a normalized net profit of $11.1 billion in fiscal 2026, while Apple is forecast to deliver normalized earnings of $146.6 billion in FY 2026. In other words, this implies that if AAPL is valued by the market at 25 times P/E in 2026, AMD will have to trade at a P/E ratio of 330 times to equal Apple's market capitalization. This implies that there is a very low probability that AMD will be worth more than Apple in the next five years.Separately, as I mentioned earlier in this article, both stocks are now trading at forward P/E multiples in the mid-to-high twenties percentage level. For the next one year, I also expect Apple to be valued by the market at a relatively higher P/E multiple than AMD, and do better than the latter in terms of share price performance.In the case of AMD, there has been a substantial valuation de-rating for high-flying, high-growth tech stocks in recent months, and it will be challenging for AMD to trade back up to 40-60 times P/E levels that it used to trade at in 2020 and 2021. Moreover, the dilutive effects of the Xilinx deal will put a cap on the potential earnings growth for AMD this year.On the other hand, Apple is well-positioned to continue trading at its current P/E multiples in the high-twenties level, and a further expansion in its P/E multiples to the low-to-mid thirties can't be ruled out.Specifically, AAPL's plans for hardware subscriptions could be a major boost to its valuations. On March 23, 2022,Seeking Alpha Newshighlightedthat Apple \"is reportedly working on a subscription plan to make owning iPhones and other hardware, such as Macs, similar to paying a monthly app fee\" citing aBloombergreport. Although Apple has yet to officially release details on this new strategy, this could possibly be a game changer for the company.Apple's forward P/E multiple has re-rated significantly from the low-teens levels in the 2017-2019 period to above 20 times in the past two years. A key driver of this positive valuation re-rating has been an increasing proportion of high-margin and recurring revenues in recent years.If AAPL makes the shift to hardware subscriptions, it could help to lower the financial burden of owning more Apple hardware products. This might translate to higher hardware sales and also increased services revenue. With more consumers owning multiple Apple hardware products, there are also even more \"touch-points\" for Apple to cross-sell other high-margin services, which supports further valuation re-rating for AAPL.Is AMD Or AAPL Stock A Better Buy?AAPL stock is a better Buy than AMD in my opinion. As explained above, I think it is challenging for AMD's shares to see a positive re-rating any time soon. On the other hand, Apple should be able to maintain or expand its valuation multiples going forward thanks to an increasing proportion of recurring services revenue.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":179,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9016343347,"gmtCreate":1649133841684,"gmtModify":1676534457566,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Diamond hand 5 years&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/PLTR\">$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$</a>Diamond hand 5 years&nbsp;","text":"$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$Diamond hand 5 years","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/49bf07524a66ee1fc34af0f73ee8e656","width":"1125","height":"3737"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9016343347","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":454,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9018367241,"gmtCreate":1648978551731,"gmtModify":1676534431280,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>hold&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>hold&nbsp;","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$hold","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/71807626e84f19a43b89f1ee95f83b87","width":"1242","height":"2448"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9018367241","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":412,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9018367321,"gmtCreate":1648978477042,"gmtModify":1676534431272,"author":{"id":"4097887764268680","authorId":"4097887764268680","name":"Kyeno","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d5becccf9434d4b95145e28591d97b5","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4097887764268680","authorIdStr":"4097887764268680"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"good","listText":"good","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9018367321","repostId":"2224320917","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2224320917","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1648946067,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2224320917?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-03 08:34","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Three Energy Firms That Should Buy Back Stock and Four That Shouldn't","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2224320917","media":"Barron's","summary":"Oil and gas producers tend to exercise poor timing in executing stock buybacks, Wells Fargo analyst ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Oil and gas producers tend to exercise poor timing in executing stock buybacks, Wells Fargo analyst Nitin Kumar says, and investors &#34;should be concerned about explorer and producer management teams using cash cows from temporarily elevated commodity prices to repurchase shares that are on multiyear highs,&#34; according to the latest issue of <i>Barron&#39;s</i>.</p><p>But buybacks can still work for some companies whose stocks still do not fully reflect the large run-up in oil prices, Kumar says, pointing to <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CTRA\">Coterra Energy </a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CNX\">CNX Resources </a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CDEV\">Centennial Resource Development</a>.</p><p>The analyst says Coterra should keep buying back shares, largely because the stock does not fully reflect the high price of natural gas, although its current authorization allows it to repurchase only ~6% of the float.</p><p>CNX also scores near the top of Kumar&#39;s list, as its stock also does not yet fully reflect high gas prices; its current authorization allows it to buy back up to 30% of its float.</p><p>CDEV also is well positioned to buy back shares, and has authorization to buy back ~20% of its float.</p><p>On the other hand, Kumar says <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AR\">Antero Resources</a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PXD\">Pioneer Natural Resources </a>, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DVN\">Devon Energy </a> and <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EQT\">EQT</a> should hold off on buybacks for now, as the risk-reward for the four looks less favorable at current prices.</p><p>Centennial shares jumped 8% on Friday as Stifel noted improved drilling efficiency and strong shareholder returns in upgrading to Buy.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1638401102509","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Three Energy Firms That Should Buy Back Stock and Four That Shouldn't</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThree Energy Firms That Should Buy Back Stock and Four That Shouldn't\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-04-03 08:34 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/news/3820139-three-energy-firms-that-should-buy-back-stock-and-four-that-shouldnt-barrons><strong>Barron's</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Oil and gas producers tend to exercise poor timing in executing stock buybacks, Wells Fargo analyst Nitin Kumar says, and investors \"should be concerned about explorer and producer management teams ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3820139-three-energy-firms-that-should-buy-back-stock-and-four-that-shouldnt-barrons\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EQT":"EQT能源","PXD":"先锋自然资源","CTRA":"Coterra Energy Inc.","CNX":"康索尔能源","BK4213":"石油与天然气的勘探与生产","DVN":"德文能源"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/news/3820139-three-energy-firms-that-should-buy-back-stock-and-four-that-shouldnt-barrons","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2224320917","content_text":"Oil and gas producers tend to exercise poor timing in executing stock buybacks, Wells Fargo analyst Nitin Kumar says, and investors \"should be concerned about explorer and producer management teams using cash cows from temporarily elevated commodity prices to repurchase shares that are on multiyear highs,\" according to the latest issue of Barron's.But buybacks can still work for some companies whose stocks still do not fully reflect the large run-up in oil prices, Kumar says, pointing to Coterra Energy , CNX Resources  and Centennial Resource Development.The analyst says Coterra should keep buying back shares, largely because the stock does not fully reflect the high price of natural gas, although its current authorization allows it to repurchase only ~6% of the float.CNX also scores near the top of Kumar's list, as its stock also does not yet fully reflect high gas prices; its current authorization allows it to buy back up to 30% of its float.CDEV also is well positioned to buy back shares, and has authorization to buy back ~20% of its float.On the other hand, Kumar says Antero Resources, Pioneer Natural Resources , Devon Energy  and EQT should hold off on buybacks for now, as the risk-reward for the four looks less favorable at current prices.Centennial shares jumped 8% on Friday as Stifel noted improved drilling efficiency and strong shareholder returns in upgrading to Buy.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":497,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}