To The Moon

Nvidia Inc ( $NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$) has received a lot of attention in the Year To Date (YTD). As an earlier article indicated, the company's stock was labeled a key member of America's "Magnificent Seven", i.e., one of seven stocks subjected to intense investor crowding relative to, say, the other 493 constituents of the S&P 500. This crowding did have some hand in the stock's meteoric 217% price increase in the YTD.

However, as other articles have indicated, high valuations generally divorce the stock's valuation from the company's business performance. While Nvidia isn't exempt from this truism, it must be said that the latest Q2 earnings release at least somewhat justifies why the company is so well-regarded.

Line Item Trends

The company's latest earnings release relative to that of past full years clearly highlights the company's excellent performance:

The company's Compute & Networking segment - which encompasses its "Data Center" accelerated computing platform, networking, automotive vehicle services, robotics and other embedded platforms, enterprise solutions and cryptocurrency mining processors (CMP) - has witnessed a sea change by accounting for nearly 74% of the company's revenues in the first half of the year (H1 '24), which is a significant rise from 47% in FY '21. "Data Center" alone accounts for 70% of the company's revenue as opposed to 40% in FY '21 and has delivered nearly as much revenue in these past six months than it did in the entirety of FY 23. At this stage, Nvidia isn't just a company for gamers.

The company’s Graphics segment - which encompasses Graphical Processing Units (GPUs) for gaming and related services, enterprise visualization services, metaverse and 3D internet applications - has halved its revenue share from nearly 53% in FY '21 to 26% in H1 '24. Gaming remains the major driver of this segment.

While the revenue share contribution from "Graphics" is largely trending to be around par relative to the previous year, "Compute & Networking" is trending strongly above par. Virtually every subsegment is above 50% in H1 '24 versus the previous year, with "Data Center" ahead by several full lengths.

Some media coverage immediately after the earnings release indicates that the company's "automotive" subsegments - once touted by CEO Jenson Huang as the company's "next billion-dollar business" - haven't done quite as well as it did in the previous quarter. Forward outlook is cloudy due to downward revisions of sales forecasts for high-end vehicles in the coming two quarters. Among those affected are NIO and XPeng - major clients of Nvidia's in China's crowded automobile market. This is to be expected: as the last article indicated, China is undergoing a quiet economic crisis.

Note: NIO and XPeng's prospects and inherent potential were also discussed in a recent article. Click here to read more.

Be that as it may, the "Automotive" segment has performed above par in H1 '24. Even with a slowdown, it can be expected to close somewhere around par by the end of the year. Furthermore, it bears noting that "Data Center" seems poised to go from strength to strength: with the GH200 Grace Hopper Superchip for complex AI and HPC workloads shipping in Q2, the universal data center GPU L40S made available in a broad range of platforms, and the release of the server reference design MGX for the quick buildout of server variations for AI, HPC and Omniverse applications, the company is developing consistent client-oriented support capabilities that will likely secure dedicated clients who could turn into legacy customers in the future.

Despite these factors and the hype around earnings, market players are rather cool to affording the company's stock any further tailwinds. The reason: no stock exists in a vacuum and virtually no large-ticket investor is a single-ticker player.

Cool Hands in the Market

An examination of traded volumes of the company's stock versus its price over the past seven years reveal some interesting evolutions in market player trends:

• H2 2016 through Q1 2017 saw very high volumes of the stock traded with relatively little effect on the stock's performance. This is highly suggestive of a "strong disaggregated convergence", i.e., while there was a high variety of players - institutional, tactical and retail - the overall consensus price remained quite tight.

• Q3 2017 through Q4 2020 saw relatively low to moderate traded volumes with a "weak disaggregated divergence", i.e., players differed on consensus price but with an upward trajectory largely commensurate with decent earnings (no surprises here: the company has traditionally been a decent earner).

• Q1 2021 through Q4 2021 saw relatively low volumes of the stock traded with a "strong disaggregated convergence" primarily due to retail and tactical investors driving up the hype around the stock on the back of strong earnings.

• Q1 2022 through Q3 2022 saw relatively low traded volumes with a "strong aggregated convergence" as large volumes of retail investors exited, tactical players turned bearish and institutional investors held steady.

• Q4 2022 through Q2 2023 was the stock's "Magnificent Seven" phase through "strong aggregated convergence": AI hype brought in a (relatively) small contingent of retail investors at a time when most continued to stay out of markets, tactical investor strategies and (initial) institutional investor buy-ins.

 In Q3, i.e., weeks before the Q2 update rolled in, institutional investors (typically long-term holders) indicated a move towards sector rotation (which was also discussed in a recent article) while tactical players and retail investors both continued to remain in play. Nonetheless, given that institutional investors are periodic bulk drivers of volume and framers of outlook, the stock's trajectory begins to find growing resistance.

Overall outlook among tactical investors is fairly balanced. In the 30-day outlook, the Put-Call Ratio was nearly perfectly balanced at 1. On the day after (i.e. the 25th), this changed:

The 10-day Put Call Ratio edged up less bullish/more balanced from 0.7338 to 0.8433 while the 30-day outlook went up to 1.3519 (i.e. quite bearish).

The idea that Nvidia would rise (given its now-customary strong earnings) and then rationalize on account of sector rotation seems to be the prevalent outlook among short sellers: overall short interest perked up in the month of August and the weeks leading up to the earnings release.

One reason for institutional caution is the relative overvaluation of the company's stock relative to its peers:

While it's certainly true that Nvidia's strong performance affords it a certain premium relative to its peers, what's also true is that its peers have burnished their own niche within the electronics ecosystem. Nvidia trends substantially above the average in terms of price ratios. Institutional investment into a sector is sensitive to overvaluation as it displaces weightings away from other constituents and creates concentration risk.

All in all, without substantial retail investor hype, cooler heads have begun to prevail in the market with a distinct disinclination to push the hype further skywards.

The Economy

In addition to the aforementioned headwinds from China, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell indicated on Friday (i.e. the day after the earnings release) that inflation is well above the Fed's comfort and gave little indication that they will be easing rates any time soon:

“We are prepared to raise rates further if appropriate, and intend to hold policy at a restrictive level until we are confident that inflation is moving sustainably down toward our objective.”

The data-driven approach to battling inflation plaguing the American consumer as opposed to guaranteeing market stability is a return to form for the Federal Reserve. While the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) is no longer displaying the historical Year-on-Year (YoY) highs exhibited a little over a year ago, there are early indications of YoY increases resuming an upward climb again.

The ongoing rate hike schedule has been creating new opportunities (with decreased downside risk) for institutional investors in the fixed income market. Earlier this month, Franklin Templeton highlighted the growing attractiveness of the fixed income market via instruments such as:

• Corporate bonds that show solid fundamentals on account of current leverage, interest coverage, free cash flow and amortization schedules being at stronger levels than in the recent past.

• High-yield bonds that offer a bridge for investors between the typical risk/return profiles of fixed income and equity, with yields near 8.5% and some capital appreciation potential.

• Private credit in the form of highly diversified pool of mostly senior secured loans that offer yields ranging from 11.5% to 12.5%, strong risk-adjusted returns, lower leverage and tighter terms in exchange for some illiquidity.

The volatility inherent in overvaluation imputes a higher risk relative to the risk/reward balance in the higher tiers of the fixed income market. With higher rates also come higher interest payment from new U.S. Treasury issuances; this has helped increase the attractiveness of at least a section of the government bond market for some institutional investors (such as Nvidia itself).

In Conclusion

Investment in AI-relevant infrastructure is increasingly necessary to rationalize operational costs and structurally improve operational efficiency. It can be expected that the "Compute & Networking" segment will continue to be the primary breadwinner for the company. Its peers will undoubtedly be taking notes on integration best practices and advances.

With some institutional capital potentially shifting to other asset classes and equity-oriented capital intent on sector rotation, there's a tangible possibility that the company's price ratios will continue to rationalize until the company's stock evolves from being a member of the "Magnificent Seven" to being a bellwether of the global economic machinery.

The ongoing rationalization of the stock is no reflection on the performance of the company. In fact, rationalization might even make the company's stock an even more attractive choice for long-term investment. The fact that the stock already pays a dividend when so many other tech companies don't is a mark of the company's eligibility for such considerations. All in all, it's a great company to own but the stock does carry a high degree of overvaluation risk.

Professional investors interested in monetizing the stock’s trajectory can consider NVD3 for a 3X daily-rebalanced exposure on the upside of the stock while $LS -3X SHORT NVIDIA (NVDA) ETP(NV3S.UK)$ does the same for the downside. For opportunities in US government debt, there is $LS 5X LONG 20+ YEAR TREASURY BOND ETP(TLT5.UK)$ which gives a 5X exposure to the upside of the iShares 20 Plus Year Treasury Bond ETF ( $iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF(TLT)$) or TL5S which does the same on the downside. Similarly, there is IEF5 which gives a 5X exposure to the upside of the iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF ( $iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF(IEF)$) while IE5S does the same on the downside.

For broader articles that deep-dives in business and culture in Asia, visit asianomics.substack.com. The latest article discusses the massive potential inherent within recycling for less developed countries seeking to get a foothold in the rare earth minerals ecosystem. Other articles discuss overblown valuations of Korea’s EV Battery Sector, the probable effect of China’s chipmaking metal export curbs, India’s jet engine boom, and many other topics.