Share your opinion about this

Like
Comment
Favorite

Share your opinion about this news…

Nvidia's Rebound from Its Correction Only Makes the Stock More Dangerous to Buy

Semiconductor stocks are bubbling and could lose 40% of their value. Parallels to the top of the internet bubble are too obvious to ignore.That's the implication of recent research into market bubbles and their eventual bursting. The research suggests it's "nearly certain" that, at some point in the next two years, the market value of Nvidia , as well as the semiconductor industry generally, will be down 40%.When an industry's trailing two-year alpha - the margin by which it beats the market - is 100 percentage points, according to the researchers' calculations, the probability of a crash is 53%. It grows to 76% when the alpha is 125 percentage points, and to 80% when the alpha is 150 percentage points. Above that, a crash becomes "nearly certain.". We may be seeing something similar today in investor reaction to Nvidia's recent correction - which saw the company's stock drop 16.1% on an intraday basis in just two trading sessions. Though it's impossible to know how many investors are

Nvidia's Rebound from Its Correction Only Makes the Stock More Dangerous to Buy

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":320999567065312,"tweetId":"320999567065312","gmtCreate":1719377075029,"gmtModify":1719377078905,"author":{"id":4087270675600580,"idStr":"4087270675600580","authorId":4087270675600580,"authorIdStr":"4087270675600580","name":"Viboon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5d09f36a9730d96a3396498f4bc5453b","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":15,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Share your opinion about this news…</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Share your opinion about this news…</p></body></html>","text":"Share your opinion about this news…","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/320999567065312","repostId":2446753798,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2446753798","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1719368133,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2446753798?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2024-06-26 10:15","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Nvidia's Rebound from Its Correction Only Makes the Stock More Dangerous to Buy","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2446753798","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Semiconductor stocks are bubbling and could lose 40% of their value. Parallels to the top of the internet bubble are too obvious to ignore.That's the implication of recent research into market bubbles and their eventual bursting. The research suggests it's \"nearly certain\" that, at some point in the next two years, the market value of Nvidia , as well as the semiconductor industry generally, will be down 40%.When an industry's trailing two-year alpha - the margin by which it beats the market - is 100 percentage points, according to the researchers' calculations, the probability of a crash is 53%. It grows to 76% when the alpha is 125 percentage points, and to 80% when the alpha is 150 percentage points. Above that, a crash becomes \"nearly certain.\". We may be seeing something similar today in investor reaction to Nvidia's recent correction - which saw the company's stock drop 16.1% on an intraday basis in just two trading sessions. Though it's impossible to know how many investors are ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Parallels to the top of the internet bubble are too obvious to ignore.</p><p>Nvidia Corp.&#39;s recent dive into correction territory is most likely the beginning of something far more serious for Nvidia and other semiconductor stocks.</p><p>That&#39;s the implication of recent research into market bubbles and their eventual bursting. The research suggests it&#39;s &#34;nearly certain&#34; that, at some point in the next two years, the market value of Nvidia <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a>, as well as the semiconductor industry generally, will be down 40%.</p><p>This forecast emerges from research conducted by Robin Greenwood and Andrei Shleifer of Harvard University, and Yang You of the University of Hong Kong. Their study, entitled &#34;Bubbles For Fama,&#34; was published in the Journal of Financial Economics. They found that the more an industry outperforms the S&amp;P 500 SPX over the trailing two years, the greater the likelihood it will crash. The researchers define a crash to be a 40% drop over the subsequent two years.</p><p>When an industry&#39;s trailing two-year alpha - the margin by which it beats the market - is 100 percentage points, according to the researchers&#39; calculations, the probability of a crash is 53%. It grows to 76% when the alpha is 125 percentage points, and to 80% when the alpha is 150 percentage points. Above that, a crash becomes &#34;nearly certain.&#34;</p><p>The semiconductor industry&#39;s trailing two-year alpha currently is just shy of 200 percentage points. Nvidia&#39;s is more than 600 percentage points.</p><h3 id=\"id_4198568696\">Dot-com bubble 2.0</h3><p>The parallels to the bursting of the internet bubble are obvious, since in the late 1990s several dot-com stocks far outpaced the S&amp;P 500 and then crashed. There&#39;s another parallel with the March 2000 top of that bubble that is less obvious, however: Investors reacted to the initial correction off that top as a buying opportunity. That is a hallmark of a major top, according to contrarian analysis.</p><p>Consider the average recommended equity exposure in March 2000 among a subset of Nasdaq-focused short-term stock-market timers. (This average is what&#39;s reported in the Hulbert Nasdaq Newsletter Sentiment Index, or HNNSI.) Instead of falling in the wake of the Nasdaq Composite&#39;s COMP initial 10% correction from its bull-market high, the HNNSI actually grew more than 30 percentage points. That meant that investor bullishness had reached exuberant levels. We all know what happened next.</p><p>We may be seeing something similar today in investor reaction to Nvidia&#39;s recent correction - which saw the company&#39;s stock drop 16.1% on an intraday basis in just two trading sessions. Though it&#39;s impossible to know how many investors are treating this correction as a buying opportunity, it&#39;s clear from my review of the investment blogosphere that a considerable number of them are doing so.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nvidia's Rebound from Its Correction Only Makes the Stock More Dangerous to Buy</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNvidia's Rebound from Its Correction Only Makes the Stock More Dangerous to Buy\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2024-06-26 10:15</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Parallels to the top of the internet bubble are too obvious to ignore.</p><p>Nvidia Corp.&#39;s recent dive into correction territory is most likely the beginning of something far more serious for Nvidia and other semiconductor stocks.</p><p>That&#39;s the implication of recent research into market bubbles and their eventual bursting. The research suggests it&#39;s &#34;nearly certain&#34; that, at some point in the next two years, the market value of Nvidia <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a>, as well as the semiconductor industry generally, will be down 40%.</p><p>This forecast emerges from research conducted by Robin Greenwood and Andrei Shleifer of Harvard University, and Yang You of the University of Hong Kong. Their study, entitled &#34;Bubbles For Fama,&#34; was published in the Journal of Financial Economics. They found that the more an industry outperforms the S&amp;P 500 SPX over the trailing two years, the greater the likelihood it will crash. The researchers define a crash to be a 40% drop over the subsequent two years.</p><p>When an industry&#39;s trailing two-year alpha - the margin by which it beats the market - is 100 percentage points, according to the researchers&#39; calculations, the probability of a crash is 53%. It grows to 76% when the alpha is 125 percentage points, and to 80% when the alpha is 150 percentage points. Above that, a crash becomes &#34;nearly certain.&#34;</p><p>The semiconductor industry&#39;s trailing two-year alpha currently is just shy of 200 percentage points. Nvidia&#39;s is more than 600 percentage points.</p><h3 id=\"id_4198568696\">Dot-com bubble 2.0</h3><p>The parallels to the bursting of the internet bubble are obvious, since in the late 1990s several dot-com stocks far outpaced the S&amp;P 500 and then crashed. There&#39;s another parallel with the March 2000 top of that bubble that is less obvious, however: Investors reacted to the initial correction off that top as a buying opportunity. That is a hallmark of a major top, according to contrarian analysis.</p><p>Consider the average recommended equity exposure in March 2000 among a subset of Nasdaq-focused short-term stock-market timers. (This average is what&#39;s reported in the Hulbert Nasdaq Newsletter Sentiment Index, or HNNSI.) Instead of falling in the wake of the Nasdaq Composite&#39;s COMP initial 10% correction from its bull-market high, the HNNSI actually grew more than 30 percentage points. That meant that investor bullishness had reached exuberant levels. We all know what happened next.</p><p>We may be seeing something similar today in investor reaction to Nvidia&#39;s recent correction - which saw the company&#39;s stock drop 16.1% on an intraday basis in just two trading sessions. Though it&#39;s impossible to know how many investors are treating this correction as a buying opportunity, it&#39;s clear from my review of the investment blogosphere that a considerable number of them are doing so.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU2286300806.USD":"Allianz Cyber Security AT Acc USD","IE0009356076.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0256863811.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY \"A\" INC","IE00B7KXQ091.USD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Inc USD","LU0348723411.USD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL HI-TECH GROWTH \"A\" (USD) INC","LU1571399168.USD":"ALLSPRING GLOBAL LONG/SHORT EQUITY \"IP\" (USD) ACC","BK4549":"软银资本持仓","LU1599440770.SGD":"FIDELITY GLOBAL DIVIDEND \"A\" (SGDHDG) INC","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","IE0034235295.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0109391861.USD":"富兰克林美国机遇基金A Acc","IE00B19Z9505.USD":"美盛-美国大盘成长股A Acc","IE00BJJMRX11.SGD":"Janus Henderson Balanced A Acc SGD","IE0004445239.USD":"JANUS HENDERSON US FORTY \"A2\" (USD) ACC","LU0053666078.USD":"摩根大通基金-美国股票A（离岸）美元","LU0079474960.USD":"联博美国增长基金A","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","GB00BDT5M118.USD":"天利环球扩展Alpha基金A Acc","BK4554":"元宇宙及AR概念","BK4532":"文艺复兴科技持仓","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU0061474960.USD":"天利环球焦点基金AU Acc","NVDA":"英伟达","LU0353189680.USD":"富国美国全盘成长基金Cl A Acc","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4567":"ESG概念","IE00BKDWB100.SGD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A5H\" (SGDHDG) ACC","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","LU0353189763.USD":"ALLSPRING  US ALL CAP GROWTH FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","LU1066051498.USD":"HSBC GIF GLOBAL EQUITY VOLATILITY FOCUSED \"AM2\" (USD) INC","IE00B1BXHZ80.USD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - US Appreciation A Acc USD","LU0868494617.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU0316494557.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL FUNDAMENTAL STRATEGIES \"A\" ACC","LU0061475181.USD":"THREADNEEDLE (LUX) AMERICAN \"AU\" (USD) ACC","IE0034235188.USD":"PINEBRIDGE GLOBAL FOCUS EQUITY \"A\" (USD) ACC"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2446753798","content_text":"Parallels to the top of the internet bubble are too obvious to ignore.Nvidia Corp.'s recent dive into correction territory is most likely the beginning of something far more serious for Nvidia and other semiconductor stocks.That's the implication of recent research into market bubbles and their eventual bursting. The research suggests it's \"nearly certain\" that, at some point in the next two years, the market value of Nvidia $(NVDA)$, as well as the semiconductor industry generally, will be down 40%.This forecast emerges from research conducted by Robin Greenwood and Andrei Shleifer of Harvard University, and Yang You of the University of Hong Kong. Their study, entitled \"Bubbles For Fama,\" was published in the Journal of Financial Economics. They found that the more an industry outperforms the S&P 500 SPX over the trailing two years, the greater the likelihood it will crash. The researchers define a crash to be a 40% drop over the subsequent two years.When an industry's trailing two-year alpha - the margin by which it beats the market - is 100 percentage points, according to the researchers' calculations, the probability of a crash is 53%. It grows to 76% when the alpha is 125 percentage points, and to 80% when the alpha is 150 percentage points. Above that, a crash becomes \"nearly certain.\"The semiconductor industry's trailing two-year alpha currently is just shy of 200 percentage points. Nvidia's is more than 600 percentage points.Dot-com bubble 2.0The parallels to the bursting of the internet bubble are obvious, since in the late 1990s several dot-com stocks far outpaced the S&P 500 and then crashed. There's another parallel with the March 2000 top of that bubble that is less obvious, however: Investors reacted to the initial correction off that top as a buying opportunity. That is a hallmark of a major top, according to contrarian analysis.Consider the average recommended equity exposure in March 2000 among a subset of Nasdaq-focused short-term stock-market timers. (This average is what's reported in the Hulbert Nasdaq Newsletter Sentiment Index, or HNNSI.) Instead of falling in the wake of the Nasdaq Composite's COMP initial 10% correction from its bull-market high, the HNNSI actually grew more than 30 percentage points. That meant that investor bullishness had reached exuberant levels. We all know what happened next.We may be seeing something similar today in investor reaction to Nvidia's recent correction - which saw the company's stock drop 16.1% on an intraday basis in just two trading sessions. Though it's impossible to know how many investors are treating this correction as a buying opportunity, it's clear from my review of the investment blogosphere that a considerable number of them are doing so.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":181,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":30,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}