It is the job of an auditor to audit regardless of the company situation. It's hard to imagine an established auditor can choose to fire itself ahead of a professional audit job well done. It's like a doctor who chooses to treat patients with simple ailments or an insurer who chooses to not insure certain group of people but only super healthy ones, or a lawyer who refuses to represent someone who is less than perfect or worst a judge who chooses not to uphold justice because it is going to be excruciating extremely complex case to rule. Ultimately, can an auditor walk away from it's duty by choosing a good company to audit and called that professional judgement? Has corporate professionalism deteriorated till it is hard to believe such a move by EY is anywhere close to a "professional judgement".
Super Micro Computer: Time And Patience Are Running Thin (Rating Downgrade)
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
