To The Moon

TMTPOST -- Alibaba Group, the Chinese e-commerce and technology giant, is grappling with one of its most significant financial setbacks in recent years. Nearly all of its major investments in recent years have spiraled into massive losses, raising questions about its strategy of diversifying into sectors far beyond its e-commerce and cloud computing core.

In fact, the company’s sprawling investment portfolio, which includes high-profile acquisitions across various industries, is now being derided as a cautionary tale — with many insiders dubbing the company’s ventures as "traffic vampires," suggesting that Alibaba’s attempts to expand into new sectors are often marked by aggressive acquisition strategies that drain value from their targets rather than generate significant returns.

From sports franchises and retail giants to digital platforms, the once-ambitious investments have turned into financial quagmires. Alibaba, which at its peak was considered one of the world’s most influential and successful tech conglomerates, now finds itself caught in a web of disappointing returns. Here’s a closer look at some of e-commerce giant's most high-profile failures.

The $1.2 Billion Sports Gamble: Evergrande Football

One of the most striking examples of Alibaba’s miscalculated investments is its $1.2 billion stake in Evergrande Football Club, a Chinese soccer team backed byreal estate conglomerate Evergrande. Originally viewed as a move to establish Alibaba as a major player in the sports sector, the investment has turned into a colossal failure. Evergrande's inability to generate sustainable revenue from its football operations and the broader real estate collapse have rendered Alibaba's investment a major financial drain. Despite the football team’s early promise and initial excitement, the venture has failed to deliver any meaningful returns.

UCWeb: The $4.3 Billion Browbeaten Buyout

In 2014, Alibaba paid a staggering $4.3 billion for UCWeb, a mobile browser and content platform that was once a leader in China’s burgeoning internet landscape. However, over the years, UCWeb's fortunes have declined significantly. While it initially experienced significant growth, it soon fell behind competitors, particularly Tencent’s WeChat and Baidu’s mobile offerings. The anticipated returns from the acquisition have never materialized, and UCWeb now faces an uphill battle to remain relevant, rendering Alibaba’s investment a massive, ongoing financial loss. 

Ele.me: The $9.7 Billion Food Delivery Debacle

Alibaba’s $9.7 billion acquisition of Ele.me, one of China’s leading food delivery services, has also ended in failure. Despite Ele.me's large market share, the company has found it difficult to achieve profitability in the cutthroat food delivery space, facing intense competition from rivals like Meituan and Didi. Despite pouring resources into Ele.me and leveraging its vast logistics network, Alibaba has failed to achieve the expected returns. Ele.me continues to struggle with margin pressure and competitive headwinds, and the deal has been labeled a disaster by many market analysts.

The Retail Collapse: RT-Mart and Suning.com

Alibaba’s foray into offline retail has also faltered. In 2015, Alibaba made a major play in the physical retail space with the acquisition of Suning.com, one of China’s largest brick-and-mortar electronics and home appliance retailers, for a reported $3.1 billion. Despite initial enthusiasm about combining Alibaba's online prowess with Suning’s offline retail presence, the integration never came to fruition. Suning.com has since struggled to keep up with the rapid changes in China’s retail landscape, particularly as more consumers shift to online shopping. Alibaba’s stake in Suning continues to lose value, and the company’s involvement in the traditional retail space appears to have been a misguided move.

A similarly disappointing chapter came when Alibaba acquired a majority stake in RT-Mart, a popular supermarket chain, and made significant investments in hypermarkets. Despite hopes of revolutionizing China's offline retail market, the deal has not panned out as expected. With retail margins under pressure and consumer spending on the decline, the company’s investments in physical retail have largely been written off as losses.

Intime Retail: A $1.3 Billion Failure

Alibaba’s $1.3 billion acquisition of Intime Retail, a major Chinese department store chain, also faltered in spectacular fashion. The purchase, made in 2014, was meant to cement Alibaba’s presence in China’s growing retail sector. However, in the face of increasing competition from online shopping giants and changing consumer behavior, Intime’s physical stores struggled to compete. Alibaba eventually sold off its stake in the company to Youngor Group, at a loss. The sale of Intime was seen as a clear admission that Alibaba had overestimated the potential of brick-and-mortar retail.

Youku Tudou and the Decline of China’s Streaming Space

In 2015, Alibaba acquired a majority stake in Youku Tudou, a Chinese video streaming platform that was once China’s counterpart to global players like Netflix and YouTube. However, despite an initial wave of optimism surrounding the deal, Youku’s business model has struggled to generate profitability. The platform now lags behind rivals like Tencent Video and Baidu’s iQIYI, both of which have far outpaced Youku in terms of subscriber growth and content production.

The investment in Youku Tudou, which cost Alibaba billions, has been described as a strategic misstep that has failed to pay off. Youku’s struggles, coupled with its inability to monetize effectively, have left Alibaba with a substantial loss on the deal.

Xiami Music and the Failure of the Music Streaming Market

Alibaba’s attempt to enter the highly competitive Chinese music streaming market through the acquisition of Xiami Music also ended in failure. Despite initially positioning the platform as a competitor to Tencent’s dominant music streaming services, Xiami Music failed to gain traction and eventually faded into irrelevance. It became yet another casualty in Alibaba’s sprawling investment portfolio, marked by a lack of sustainability and poor monetization prospects. 

Meizu: A Smartphone Fiasco

Perhaps one of the most talked-about failures in recent years is Alibaba’s investment in Meizu, a Chinese smartphone brand that once showed great promise. In 2014, Alibaba acquired a stake in Meizu, which was riding a wave of popularity due to its affordable yet feature-rich smartphones. However, in the face of fierce competition from industry giants like OPPO and Vivo, Meizu’s growth stagnated, and its market share has since plummeted. Despite Alibaba’s involvement, Meizu was unable to maintain its early momentum, and the brand is now struggling to stay relevant in the cutthroat Chinese smartphone market.

Ofo: The $1 Billion Bike-Sharing Disaster

Perhaps the most emblematic of Alibaba’s failed investments is its support of Ofo, the bike-sharing startup that rose to prominence before crashing spectacularly. Alibaba was an early investor in Ofo, pouring millions of dollars into the platform as part of China’s larger bike-sharing boom. However, Ofo’s business model was flawed from the start, and the company failed to scale sustainably. The end result was a bitter bankruptcy that wiped out Alibaba’s investment. Ofo’s collapse has become a symbol of the dangers of pursuing unproven business models in the face of intense competition.

A Reckoning for Alibaba's Investment Strategy

As Alibaba continues to wrestle with the fallout from these disastrous investments, the company will likely be forced to reevaluate its approach. In recent months, there have been increasing calls for the company to focus more narrowly on its core strengths — e-commerce, cloud computing, and digital payments — while scaling back its aggressive acquisition strategy. 

Alibaba's diversification into non-core sectors has not paid off, and its stock price has felt the consequences. The company’s market value has declined as a result of the investment missteps, and it now faces mounting pressure to return to profitability. Whether it can rebound from these setbacks remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: its recent forays into unfamiliar industries have served as a stark reminder that even the biggest players can fall victim to the perils of diversification.

In the wake of these losses, Alibaba’s leadership must reassess whether it is best suited to double down on its established strengths or whether it will continue its expensive gamble with ventures that have failed to live up to their promise. For now, the road ahead looks uncertain, and Alibaba’s investors will be watching closely to see how the company charts its course in the years to come.