1. $D-Wave Quantum Inc.(QBTS)$ 50% surge is due to earnings beat as a result of an one-time revenue realization. Future quarterly revenues are likely to fall back to normal.
2. $IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$ Q1 revenue did not double (compared to?). It is roughly the same YoY.
3. Your “Graphing the Surge” price graph is completely wrong.
QBTS Blasts Off 50%: Quantum Stocks Are Hot—Which One’s the Winner?
@xc__：
Quantum computing stocks are lighting up the market, and D-Wave Quantum ( $D-Wave Quantum Inc.(QBTS)$ ) just dropped a bombshell with a 50% surge. IonQ ( $IONQ Inc.(IONQ)$ ) isn’t far behind, flexing its muscles with a strong start, and with earnings season looming, the quantum hype is hitting fever pitch. So, which stock should you bank on, and is the quantum sector worth going all-in? Let’s unpack the madness, crunch the numbers, and crown a top pick. QBTS and IonQ: What’s Driving the Hype? QBTS’s 50% rocket ride isn’t just hot air. The company’s quantum annealing tech crushed a simulation that would’ve taken a supercomputer a million years, clocking it in minutes. That breakthrough, paired with a 509% revenue spike in Q1 2025, has investors buzzing. IonQ’s no slouch either—its Q1 revenue doubled to $7.6 million, fueled by a $54.5 million U.S. Air Force deal and a partnership with AstraZeneca for drug discovery. The sector’s awake, and these two are leading the charge. Earnings Season: Make or Break Moment Quantum stocks are gearing up for a pivotal earnings season. QBTS could ride its momentum with another blowout report, while IonQ’s raised $75-$95 million bookings guidance hints at big demand. Rigetti Computing (RGTI), a quieter player, might sneak in with upside from its government ties. Earnings could ignite the next surge—or expose cracks. Buckle up. My Top Pick: IonQ Takes the Crown IonQ’s my quantum champ, and here’s why. Its trapped-ion tech delivers unmatched precision, and tie-ups with Amazon, Microsoft, and Google Cloud give it a distribution edge QBTS and RGTI can’t touch. With $434 million in cash, IonQ’s got staying power, and its $54.5 million Air Force contract proves it’s not just talk. Analysts see it doubling to $9.50, and its tech roadmap screams long-term winner. QBTS is flashy, but IonQ’s the steady bet. The Quantum Showdown: By the Numbers Check out how QBTS, IonQ, and RGTI measure up: QBTS’s growth is wild, but its $200M market cap leaves it vulnerable. IonQ’s heftier valuation reflects its stability, while RGTI’s a middle-ground wildcard. Graphing the Surge QBTS’s spike steals the show, but IonQ’s climb looks sustainable. Heavy Bet on Quantum? Pump the Brakes Quantum computing’s a $12.6 billion dream by 2032, but it’s a gamble today. Losses are steep—QBTS bled $20.7 million in EBITDA last quarter, and IonQ’s profitability is distant. The tech’s revolutionary, but it’s early days with big risks. Diversify, don’t dive in headfirst—quantum’s a marathon, not a sprint. Final Call: Play It Smart QBTS’s 50% surge is a wake-up call, and IonQ’s my pick for its tech and stability. The sector’s sizzling, but a heavy bet’s too dicey. Grab a piece of the action, sure—but keep your portfolio balanced. What’s your move: IonQ, QBTS, or sitting it out? Let’s hear it! Disclaimer: Not financial advice. Do your homework—quantum’s volatile! 📢 Like, repost, and follow for daily updates on market trends and stock insights. 📝 Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions. 📌@Daily_Discussion @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerEvents @TigerWire
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
2
Report
Login to post
No comments yet