1. China H200 ship-ups and catalyst potential
Plans to begin delivering H200 AI chips to China around mid-February 2026 are now widely reported. Initial shipments are expected to comprise roughly 5,000–10,000 module sets, equivalent to approximately 40,000–80,000 chips, subject to Chinese regulatory approval. The move follows a reversal in U.S. export policy that permits H200 sales to “approved customers” with a 25% revenue share for the U.S. government. These shipments would mark the first major resumption of Nvidia’s AI chip exports to China after prior bans.
From a demand perspective, the China market represents a meaningful addressable opportunity for Nvidia given the scale of AI adoption among hyperscalers and cloud providers there. Analysts estimate H200 sales could add materially to top-line revenue once fully implemented, although initial volumes will be modest relative to Nvidia’s global datacentre business and revenue depends on firm orders and local uptake.
Risk factors affecting sustainability of this catalyst
• Chinese government approval remains pending and could include conditions that limit volume or require bundling with local technology.
• Political and geopolitical tensions could prompt further restrictions or affect broader chip exports (e.g. Blackwell and Rubin series).
• Revenue contribution from early H200 shipments may be incremental and not transformative in isolation.
2. Can the rebound be sustained?
The immediate share-price reaction suggests investors are treating H200 China access as a positive catalyst rather than a one-off event. In addition to the China news, Nvidia’s broader AI growth narrative remains intact with strong demand for its data centre GPUs. Recent earnings results highlighted revenue beats and solid guidance in AI-driven segments.
That said, sustainability depends on execution across multiple fronts:
• Continued expansion of AI infrastructure demand outside China.
• Delivery and adoption of next-generation architectures (Blackwell and Rubin).
• Geopolitical stability around export controls affecting broader chip categories.
3. Valuation at current levels
Valuation assessments for Nvidia vary across models and analysts. Some key considerations:
• Undervalued perspectives: Intrinsic value models (DCF and relative) suggest Nvidia could be trading below fair value by around 10–25% based on long-term cash flow and earnings potential.
• Moderate overvaluation views: Other fundamental analyses indicate the stock may be modestly overvalued on some metrics relative to its recent price, or that high multiples reflect already priced-in growth expectations.
• P/E context: The company’s price-to-earnings ratio has eased from prior peaks and is now below its recent 12-month average, which some interpret as a sign that valuation pressure has softened.
Overall, at the current price point the range of valuation views suggests Nvidia is neither clearly cheap nor obviously overvalued in absolute terms. Its high growth profile and strong market position are well recognised, but valuation multiples still carry a premium relative to typical industrial peers due to expected future earnings expansion.
4. Strategic and macro considerations
Nvidia’s unique market share in high-performance AI accelerators supports a premium valuation. However, concentration risk on a few large data centre customers, competition from AMD and specialised local players, and broader macroeconomic or policy shifts could influence sentiment and sustainable growth, irrespective of the China catalyst.
Conclusion
The H200 China sales development is a positive directional catalyst but not a guarantee of a long-term share rally on its own. Whether the rebound is sustained will depend on execution, broader AI demand, geopolitical factors and how much of this potential is already priced into the current share price. From a valuation perspective, Nvidia exhibits characteristics of a high-growth technology leader, and several reputable models suggest it is reasonably valued or slightly undervalued on a long-term basis. However, given the premium multiples historically attached to its shares and elevated market expectations, it would be prudent to view current levels as fair rather than deeply discounted.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
