To The Moon

$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ 

⏳ #2026 Outlook: Locking in My Investment Time Capsule

High Conviction, Real Stakes, No Rewrites

This is not a prediction post.

This is a commitment post.

As we step into 2026, I’m locking in my market views knowing I’ll read this again one year from now — with no edits, no excuses, and no hindsight bias.

⸻

1️⃣ The sector / stock I’m most optimistic about in 2026 is:

AI Infrastructure & Execution-First Platforms

Not AI hype.

Not AI demos.

But AI that is already embedded into real workflows.

My highest conviction names reflect this:

• NVDA & AMD — AI doesn’t scale without compute. Period.

Demand volatility may exist, but long-term compute intensity is non-negotiable.

• PLTR — AI that actually runs operations, not just assists.

Government and enterprise adoption creates sticky, mission-critical revenue with high switching costs.

• META — quietly becoming one of the most efficient AI monetizers.

AI is improving ads, engagement, and margins simultaneously — a rare combination.

• TSLA — the market still underestimates the optionality.

Autonomy, robotics, and AI-driven manufacturing remain asymmetric upside bets.

This portfolio is positioned for a world where AI spend shifts from experimentation to infrastructure.

⸻

2️⃣ My three trading rules (non-negotiable):

① Winners are not trimmed just because they’re green

Big trends don’t compound in straight lines — but selling strength too early is the most expensive mistake in secular bull markets.

NVDA, PLTR, and TSLA are held because:

• Fundamentals keep validating

• Market leadership remains intact

• Narrative is backed by execution

I’d rather sit through volatility than exit structural winners prematurely.

⸻

② I size risk, not stories

Losses in names like SE and NIO are reminders that conviction without risk control is just optimism.

Every position must earn:

• Its capital

• Its patience

• Its opportunity cost

Bad price action + weak execution = no loyalty.

⸻

③ I use stability to stay aggressive

Positions like VOO and UNH are not return drags — they are volatility dampeners.

They allow me to:

• Hold high-beta names through drawdowns

• Avoid emotional de-risking

• Stay invested when others panic

Aggression without a base is gambling.

Structure enables conviction.

⸻

3️⃣ My investment return target for 2026 is:

🎯 25–35%, with volatility accepted but controlled

This is an active portfolio, not a passive benchmark hug.

My goal is to:

• Outperform indices meaningfully

• Let structural winners drive returns

• Accept drawdowns as the price of alpha

I’m not chasing perfection — I’m chasing repeatable edge.

⸻

🔥 What I Believe Most Investors Get Wrong Going Into 2026

• They confuse valuation compression with broken businesses

• They rotate too early out of winners

• They under-allocate to platforms with real operating leverage

Markets don’t reward comfort — they reward correct positioning.

⸻

🧠 The Question I Want Answered in 2027

When I read this one year later, I want to know:

• Did AI infrastructure continue to dominate capital flows?

• Did execution matter more than storytelling?

• Did I stay disciplined when volatility tested conviction?

This time capsule isn’t about being right on every stock —

It’s about whether my process held up under pressure.

⸻

📌 This is my 2026 benchmark.

No edits. No hindsight. Just accountability.

If markets rerate execution-first AI platforms, this portfolio is positioned.

If not — the lesson will still be valuable.

What are you locking into your 2026 time capsule?