1. How to view Tesla’s FSD today
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving is best understood as a highly advanced driver-assistance system, not yet a true autonomous solution.
Strengths
Industry-leading real-world data advantage, measured in billions of driven miles
Strong end-to-end neural network architecture
Rapid iteration speed via over-the-air updates
Clear long-term ambition to remove human supervision
Structural limitations
Camera-only approach increases edge-case risk
No redundancy via lidar or radar, which regulators favour
Still requires driver supervision in all jurisdictions
Safety validation remains statistical rather than deterministic
In short, FSD is technically impressive but commercially premature. Its value today lies more in optionality than realised autonomy revenue.
2. Is NVIDIA Thor a threat to Tesla’s robotaxi vision?
NVIDIA’s Thor platform, unveiled by Jensen Huang, is not a direct attack on Tesla. It is something more subtle and arguably more dangerous.
What Thor actually does
A full-stack autonomous compute platform
Designed for OEMs who do not want to build in-house AI
Combines perception, planning, simulation, and safety validation
Integrates naturally with lidar, radar, and HD maps
With partners such as Mercedes-Benz, BYD, and Lucid, Nvidia is effectively becoming the “Android of autonomy”.
Why this matters for Tesla
Tesla remains vertically integrated, which limits ecosystem scale
Nvidia enables many OEMs to reach near-FSD functionality without Tesla’s risk profile
Regulators tend to prefer Nvidia-style redundancy and validation frameworks
Robotaxi fleets prioritise reliability and certification over ideology
Thor does not kill Tesla’s robotaxi ambition, but it compresses Tesla’s technological lead and raises the bar for regulatory acceptance.
3. Is Tesla a dip-buying opportunity?
This depends on what you believe Tesla ultimately becomes.
Case for buying the dip
Long-term upside remains asymmetric if autonomy succeeds
FSD optionality is still under-priced if robotaxis materialise
Tesla retains brand, manufacturing, and data advantages
Market reaction may be overstating near-term competitive risk
Case for caution
Autonomy monetisation timeline keeps slipping
Nvidia-enabled OEMs reduce Tesla’s uniqueness
Valuation still embeds autonomy success
Regulatory delays could cap multiple expansion
Bottom line
Tesla FSD is a powerful but unfinished system, still one regulatory breakthrough away from true autonomy.
NVIDIA Thor is not about beating Tesla head-on, but about enabling everyone else to catch up faster and more safely.
Tesla’s dip is attractive only if you are long-term and conviction-driven. It is not a low-risk tactical trade.
In practical terms, Tesla is shifting from a “clear autonomy leader” narrative to a high-beta autonomy option. That explains both the volatility and the opportunity.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
