Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company
Short answer: yes, Al demand can plausibly sustain TSMC’s momentum into 2026, and the market is likely still underpricing the durability and depth of its Al exposure.
Can Al demand carry growth into 2026?
Several structural factors argue that this is not a one-cycle spike:
Foundry bottleneck advantage. Advanced nodes at 5nm, 3nm, and upcoming 2nm remain capacity-constrained. Al accelerators, custom ASICs, and high-end CPUs are all funnelled through TSMC with limited alternatives.
Multi-year capex visibility. Hyperscalers and Al platform leaders are committing to long-dated silicon roadmaps, not short-cycle inventory builds. This supports sustained wafer demand beyond 2025.
Broader Al diffusion. Demand is no longer limited to training GPUs. Inference, edge Al, networking silicon, and Al PCs all expand TSMC’s served market.
Even if headline Al growth moderates, the silicon intensity per dollar of compute continues to rise, which structurally favours TSMC.
Are margins signalling underappreciated Al exposure?
Yes, and this is the key point the market may still be slow to fully price in:
Margin mix is improving, not just volumes. Advanced-node pricing power and richer packaging requirements (CoWoS, advanced interposers) lift blended gross margins.
Operating leverage is accelerating. Once leading-edge fabs are filled, incremental wafers carry disproportionately high profit contribution.
Customer concentration cuts both ways. While dependence on Al leaders is often cited as a risk, it also means TSMC captures outsized economics when those customers race to outspend each other.
The result is that earnings sensitivity to Al demand is higher than revenue sensitivity, a dynamic that markets often lag in pricing.
What would change the bullish case?
The thesis would weaken only if:
Al capex meaningfully slows rather than rotates,
a credible advanced-node competitor emerges at scale, or
pricing power at 3nm and below erodes faster than expected.
At present, none of these are visible.
Bottom line
TSMC is not merely riding the Al cycle; it is structurally embedded in it. With margins expanding alongside revenue, the market appears to value TSMC more like a high-quality cyclical than a quasi-infrastructure asset for global Al compute. Into 2026, that misclassification suggests upside risk to long-term expectations rather than exhaustion.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
