1. Policy Support and Its Market Impact
The Trump administration’s move to take a 10 per cent equity stake in USA Rare Earth as part of a US$1.6 billion package is a significant vote of confidence for the domestic rare earth supply chain. The funding includes both equity and debt support geared towards developing mining and magnet processing capacity in the United States. This is the largest federal investment into a rare earth company to date and underscores rare earths’ strategic importance for defence, EVs, renewable energy and advanced technology industries.
USAR’s shares jumped sharply on the news, reflecting investors’ view that government backing materially de-risks development and enhances long-term prospects.
Recent technical indicators suggest the stock is extended and may see a pullback or consolidation before establishing a new base.
This follows a pattern where rare earth and critical mineral stocks rallied on signals of ongoing government support and supply chain diversification away from China’s dominance.
2. Upside Potential: Does It Still Exist?
Broadly yes, but timing and valuation matter.
Reasons there remains upside:
Strategic necessity: Rare earth metals and magnets are indispensable for EV motors, wind turbines, precision electronics and defence systems. Western governments are intensifying efforts to build local supply chains.
Policy follow-through: The United States has already taken stakes in MP Materials and other critical minerals assets, and further deals are reportedly in planning.
Demand growth: Global electrification and tech adoption underpin long-term demand for rare earths beyond near-term market sentiment.
Risks and headwinds to consider:
Rare earth projects, particularly new mines, are capital-intensive and long-dated. Production from Round Top (USAR’s project) is not expected until the late 2020s, which introduces execution risk and requires disciplined project management.
Federal backing can trigger valuation compression on spikes and lead to profit-taking. Stocks extended far above technical buy points may be vulnerable to retracement.
China still dominates rare earth processing, and geopolitical dynamics remain fluid.
Overall, if the sector continues to see meaningful, structured policy execution and project delivery, there likely remains significant upside on a multi-year horizon, especially for companies that transition from development to production.
3. Early-Stage Developers vs Established Producers: A Comparative View
Early-Stage Developers (USAR, Critical Metals, others)
Pros
Often offer higher growth potential because their valuations reflect future rather than current output.
Can benefit disproportionately from strategic government support and supply chain prioritisation.
If they successfully reach commercial production and processing integration, they can capture premium pricing.
Cons
Execution risk is real: project delays, financing cost increases, permitting challenges and capital requirements can weigh on returns.
Market valuations can be volatile and sentiment-driven.
Established Producers (MP Materials)
Pros
Already generating revenue and operating at scale (e.g. Mountain Pass, the only US rare earth mine and processing facility).
Government stake and contracts, such as Pentagon backing, reduce risk and strengthen the balance sheet.
Less binary execution risk relative to greenfield developers.
Cons
Growth rates may moderate once current expansion phases settle.
Commentary
For investors with a longer timeframe and higher risk tolerance, a blend of both segments can make sense. Established producers like MP Materials provide a foundation with actual production and earnings, while select early-stage developers offer asymmetric upside if they successfully commercialise their assets. However, caution is advisable on valuation extremes and trading-range breakouts that lack solid fundamental catalysts.
4. Investment Strategy Considerations
Short to medium term
Monitor earnings, project execution updates, and government announcements closely.
Be disciplined about entry points, especially if stocks are extended above technical support levels.
Long term
Prioritise companies with clear pathways to production, diversified revenue streams and strong balance sheets.
Consider the broader ecosystem, including magnet production and downstream integration.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
