Haw Par Tiger Balm 3 Good 3 Red Flags - Forensic Deep Dive |🦖EP1523
Haw Par Tiger Balm 3 Good 3 Red Flags - Forensic Deep Dive |🦖EP1523
Haw Par sits on S$791M in cash yet pays a 2.37% yield — that is not conservative management, that is a structural income failure. The ICR of 185.9x eliminates every rate-risk argument, and the 0.87x Price-to-Book confirms the discount is real. But a sealed vault is not a dividend engine, and this forensic audit draws that line clearly.
For the 2026 investor navigating a 5,000-point STI, capital preservation is not enough if your income engine stalls below the risk-free threshold. The 1.37% T-Bill sets the floor, my forensic floor sits at 3.2%, and my minimum hurdle is 4.7% — Haw Par's 2.37% fails every single test. You are absorbing equity risk for a 0.91% spread over government paper, and that is not protection, that is negative carry dressed in blue-chip clothing.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
