If SpaceX ever decides to list publicly in the US, were not talking about just another IPO.

We're talking about the IPO.

The kind that doesn't just break records, it rewrites how markets price the future.

Why This IPO Would Be Different?

Most IPOs are about monetising an existing business.

SpaceX is different. It isa platform on top of multiple exponential bets:

- Launch dominance (Falcon 9, Starship)

- Satellite infrastructure (Starlink)

- Long-term: logistics beyond Earth

---------

This isnt a“company going public.”

It's the financialisation of a space economy backbone.

If you try to benchmark it against traditional aerospace like Boeing or Lockheed Martin, you’re already thinking too small.

The closer comparison?

A mix of telecom + cloud + defense + logistics + deep tech.

The Valuation Question: $500B? $1T?

We got to be grounded, the moment this IPO hits, valuation discipline goes out the window. Why?

Because:

- Starlink alone is already a global cash engine

- Launch costs are structurally lower than anyone else

- Barriers to entry are borderline insurmountable

- If markets are willing to price software at insane multiples, what happens when you get:

- Recurring revenue (Starlink) + physical monopoly (launch) + future optionality (Mars, point-to-point logistics)?

Therefore  trillion-dollar IPO doesn't sound crazy anymore.

The Shockwave Effect on Space Stocks

Now here’s where it gets interesting for current investors.

Companies like:

$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$  

$AST SpaceMobile, Inc.(ASTS)$  

$Planet Labs Pbc(PL)$  

$Intuitive Machines(LUNR)$  

won't be ignored. They'll be repriced overnight.

Scenario 1: Rising Tide Lifts All Boats

If SpaceX lists at a massive valuation:

Investors rotate into the entire space sector

Multiples expand across the board

Smaller players get “sympathy premiums”

This is the NVIDIA effect, but for space.

Scenario 2: The Gravity Effect

But there's another side.

SpaceX could:

Suck in capital from smaller names

Expose how far ahead it actually is

Force investors to rethink risk vs dominance

In that case, weaker players get crushed, while only the best-in-class survive.

Where Each Player Stands

Let's talk about positioning:

Rocket Lab

The closest to a mini-SpaceX. End-to-end capability, strong execution. Still early, but credible. One of my ppersonal favourite.

AST SpaceMobile

Binary bet. If it works, it's revolutionary. If not, it's dead money.

Planet Labs

Data play. Less hype, more enterprise. Quiet compounder if execution holds.

Intuitive Machines

Niche but strategic. Tied to NASA and lunar economy bets.

The Bigger Picture: This Isn't About an IPO

This is about capital markets catching up to reality.

Space is no longer speculative.

It's becoming infrastructure.

The same way:

Railways defined the 1800s

Oil defined the 1900s

Internet defined the 2000s

Space infrastructure might define the next 50 years.

And SpaceX?

That's the first real attempt at owning the entire stack.

Are you investing in space as a them, or are you betting on who actually wins it?

# Space X US stock listing, the largest IPO listing in history!

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

  • Top
  • Latest
empty
No comments yet