The bigger opportunity isn’t simply building a smarter chatbot. It’s turning AI into an execution layer between consumer intent and transactions. Muse could eventually search, compare, book, purchase and complete tasks on a user’s behalf. Google, meanwhile, already controls a huge amount of commercial intent through Search and Gemini.
META’s biggest advantage is distribution: billions of users already live inside its ecosystem. But I wouldn’t mistake Morgan Stanley’s $30T opportunity estimate for $30T of revenue. The real investment test is adoption → retention → frequency → transactions → monetization.
If Muse becomes habitual, META could unlock a powerful new business model. If not, it remains expensive optionality.
So my view: META for upside, GOOGL for resilience, and both for exposure to the long-term agentic-AI shift.
@AI_FocusedTrader [龇牙]
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
