Jonathan Lo's Playbook: Price Is What You Pay, Value Is What You Get
Speaker: Jonathan Lo, Investment Representative at Tiger Brokers Singapore, on how fundamental analysis helps investors tell a stock's price from its value, and how to read a balance sheet in two quick checks.
[About the Speaker] Jonathan Lo is an Investment Representative at Tiger Brokers (Singapore). With nearly 20 years of practical trading and investment experience, he interprets markets through multi-asset, macro-directed long-short strategies expressed through equities and options.
[The Hook] Stock A trades at $20. Stock B trades at $25. Which one do you buy? Most people go for the cheaper one. Then the speaker added the details: A is a company in trouble that needs to raise funds and is issuing new shares to pay off debt. B is pricier, but pays a regular $5 dividend. Suddenly the answer isn't so obvious. "Price is what you pay, value is what you get," Buffett's line, was the thread of the whole session.
[Why Fundamental Analysis?]
This session is the third in Tiger's seminar series, after Foundations of Trading and Technical Analysis. The goal of fundamental analysis is to help you separate price from value. A friend telling you a $100 stock is "too expensive" and a $20 stock is "cheap" is comparing prices, not values.
The starting toolkit is simple: financial ratios. Listed companies report quarterly or half-yearly, and three statements matter most:
-
Balance sheet: what the company owns and owes. Assets minus liabilities gives shareholders' equity, roughly what you are paying for when you buy a share
-
Income statement: how well revenue turns into profit
-
Cash flow statement: how cash moves in and out
[Check 1: Can the Company Pay Its Bills?]
The current ratio = current assets ÷ current liabilities. Below 1, the company may struggle to meet its short-term obligations, because liabilities exceed assets.
The slide shows two companies, both with a current ratio of 0.80. But look inside: Company A holds only $5,000 in cash and $80,000 in inventory, while Company B holds $30,000 in cash and $50,000 in receivables. The same ratio can hide very different situations. That is why the speaker said that once a ratio looks off, you "look deeper into why."
[Check 2: How Much Leverage Is It Using?]
The debt-to-equity ratio = total debt ÷ shareholders' equity.
In the slide's example, total debt of $163,000 against equity of $37,000 gives 4.41x. At first glance, a high ratio signals greater financial risk. But some businesses are simply structured that way. The speaker's advice: compare companies within the same sector. Line up ten peers and you will typically see a couple at the low end, most clustered together, and one outlier. That outlier may be using heavy leverage to chase growth. Ratios are relative.
[Key Takeaways]
-
A cheaper price is not a cheaper stock. Value depends on what you get for the price.
-
A current ratio below 1 is a flag, not a verdict. Look inside the numbers.
-
Compare within a sector. A D/E ratio means little in isolation.
[Call to Action 🎯]
-
Open the balance sheet of a stock you own and work out its current ratio and D/E ratio.
-
Find two peers in the same sector and compare.
-
Drop a comment: which of your holdings looks different once you compare it with its peers?
Markets are always moving - and sometimes, the best move is knowing what works for you.
With Treasury yields, oil prices and rate expectations keeping markets on edge this week, investors are once again thinking carefully about where to position next. There’s no one-size-fits-all choice in investing — and the same goes for Tiger Merch. This month’s hot picks are in, featuring the Tiger Toiletry Bag, Universal Travel Adapter, Tiger Umbrella and more favourites chosen by fellow Tigers.
Explore the Monthly Hot Picks in Tiger Coin Mall, now 12% OFF for a limited time.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

巴菲特有一句经典名言:「价格是你付出的,价值是你得到的。」一只20美元的股票不一定比25美元的股票便宜,关键是公司有没有赚钱能力、财务是否健康,以及未来有没有发展潜力。
基本面分析主要看三份财务报表:
1. 资产负债表: 了解公司拥有多少资产、欠多少债。
2. 损益表: 检查营业额和净利润是否持续增长。
3. 现金流量表: 判断公司是否真正赚到现金。
其中,有两个重要指标必须学会:
第一,流动比率(Current Ratio)
公式:流动资产÷流动负债。
主要判断公司有没有能力偿还短期债务。一般低于1需要特别留意,但不能单凭这个数字判断公司好坏,还要检查现金、存货和应收账款。
第二,负债权益比率(Debt-to-Equity Ratio)
公式:总债务÷股东权益。
用来衡量公司借债经营的程度。比率越高,通常财务风险越大。不过,不同行业的负债结构不同,必须与同行比较。
我的投资观点是,选股不能只看股价便宜,也不能只看公司利润高。必须深入研究企业的资产、负债、现金和赚钱能力。
总结:真正好的股票,不是价格最低的股票,而是财务健康、负债合理、持续赚钱,而且目前估值合理的公司。买入之前,先了解公司,再决定价格是否值得。
Investors often focus too much on share prices, P/E ratios and potential upside, while overlooking what is happening behind the balance sheet.
For me, the current ratio and debt-to-equity ratio are not just accounting indicators; they reveal how much financial pressure a company is carrying. A business with weak liquidity may eventually need to issue new shares, diluting existing shareholders. Meanwhile, excessive leverage can turn a temporary business slowdown into a serious financial problem.
However, low debt does not automatically mean a good investment either. The real question is whether management can generate sustainable returns from its capital.
Ultimately, I would rather own a reasonably valued business with strong cash flow and a healthy balance sheet than chase a seemingly cheap stock with hidden financial risks.
@TigerClub [龇牙]
流动比率和负债权益比率是很实用的初步筛选工具,但我认为不能只看数字大小。
例如,两家公司流动比率都是0.8,一家主要持有存货,另一家拥有更多现金,实际偿债能力可能完全不同。
同样,**高负债不一定代表坏公司,低负债也不一定代表好投资**,还要结合行业特点、利息支出和现金流判断。
我个人会特别关注三个指标:**自由现金流、净负债水平和ROIC(投入资本回报率)**。
因为企业不仅需要活下来,还要证明它能持续创造超过资本成本的回报。
**我的投资原则是:先看财务安全性,再看盈利质量,最后判断估值是否合理。**
真正的安全边际,不是买入价格最低的股票,而是以合理价格买入财务健康、能够持续创造价值的企业!🐯
One holding that looks quite different when I compare it with its peers is OKLO.
Within the energy sector, I look at companies such as Vistra (VST), Constellation Energy (CEG) and Oklo. Although all three are connected to the growing demand for electricity, their business models and risk profiles are very different.
⚡ VST and CEG are more established energy businesses with existing power generation operations and revenue streams. Their valuations are supported by operating assets and electricity demand.
🚀 OKLO, on the other hand, is a much more speculative growth investment. Its potential is linked to advanced nuclear technology, future