Can Tesla go down below 400$?-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community - To The Moon

1
Comment
Favorite

ZIONSOE
2022-05-17

Can Tesla go down below 400$?

Twitter CEO Fires Back at Elon Musk, Who Responds with Poop Emoji

Days after Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted that his $44 billion deal for Twitter Inc. was "temporarily on hold" as he looked into the prevalence of bot accounts on the service, Twitter's

Twitter CEO Fires Back at Elon Musk, Who Responds with Poop Emoji

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

1

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

Davidgoh18
·2022-05-17
nothing is impossible
Reply
Like
Report

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":9029185463,"tweetId":"9029185463","gmtCreate":1652746902553,"gmtModify":1676535152499,"author":{"id":4095548019553830,"idStr":"4095548019553830","authorId":4095548019553830,"authorIdStr":"4095548019553830","name":"ZIONSOE","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":29,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>Can Tesla go down below 400$?</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>Can Tesla go down below 400$?</p></body></html>","text":"Can Tesla go down below 400$?","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9029185463","repostId":2236268932,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2236268932","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1652746297,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/2236268932?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-05-17 08:11","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Twitter CEO Fires Back at Elon Musk, Who Responds with Poop Emoji","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236268932","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Days after Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted that his $44 billion deal for Twitter Inc. was \"temporarily on hold\" as he looked into the prevalence of bot accounts on the service, Twitter's ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Days after Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted that his $44 billion deal for Twitter Inc. was &#34;temporarily on hold&#34; as he looked into the prevalence of bot accounts on the service, Twitter&#39;s current leader sought to address how the company assesses spam activity.</p><p>Musk had taken issue with Twitter&#39;s (TWTR) public disclosures that spam accounts represent less than 5% of monetizable daily active users, and he had been floating the possibility of doing his own sampling to try to gauge the extent of spam accounts among the Twitter user base.</p><p>Musk&#39;s commentary prompted some Twitter users to agree with his assertion that bots make up a higher portion of Twitter activity than the company has been disclosing, based on their personal observations from time using the service, but Twitter Chief Executive Parag Agrawal threw cold water on the accuracy of amateur bot audits in a series of Monday tweets.</p><p>He noted that Twitter does &#34;multiple human reviews (in replicate) of thousands of accounts&#34; based on random samples and while taking into account data points that external reviewers wouldn&#39;t be able to access.</p><p>The latest explanation did not appear to sit well with Musk, who replied with a poop emoji and a suggestion that Twitter&#39;s bot activity impacts how advertisers can measure the value of their spending.</p><p>Twitter shares declined for the seventh straight trading session Monday, amid concerns that Musk&#39;s spam spat indicated that he could be interested in backing out of the deal or asking for a lower buyout price than the $54.20/share agreement he reached with the company&#39;s board of directors last month.</p><p>&#34;The stark reality for Twitter is that no other strategic/financial bidder will come near this deal and Musk knows that; which is why in a changing market and with Tesla<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> losing $300 billion of market cap since the deal we view the $44 billion Twitter deal as having less than a 50% to get done as of today,&#34; Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note to clients Monday.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Twitter CEO Fires Back at Elon Musk, Who Responds with Poop Emoji</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTwitter CEO Fires Back at Elon Musk, Who Responds with Poop Emoji\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-17 08:11</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Days after Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted that his $44 billion deal for Twitter Inc. was &#34;temporarily on hold&#34; as he looked into the prevalence of bot accounts on the service, Twitter&#39;s current leader sought to address how the company assesses spam activity.</p><p>Musk had taken issue with Twitter&#39;s (TWTR) public disclosures that spam accounts represent less than 5% of monetizable daily active users, and he had been floating the possibility of doing his own sampling to try to gauge the extent of spam accounts among the Twitter user base.</p><p>Musk&#39;s commentary prompted some Twitter users to agree with his assertion that bots make up a higher portion of Twitter activity than the company has been disclosing, based on their personal observations from time using the service, but Twitter Chief Executive Parag Agrawal threw cold water on the accuracy of amateur bot audits in a series of Monday tweets.</p><p>He noted that Twitter does &#34;multiple human reviews (in replicate) of thousands of accounts&#34; based on random samples and while taking into account data points that external reviewers wouldn&#39;t be able to access.</p><p>The latest explanation did not appear to sit well with Musk, who replied with a poop emoji and a suggestion that Twitter&#39;s bot activity impacts how advertisers can measure the value of their spending.</p><p>Twitter shares declined for the seventh straight trading session Monday, amid concerns that Musk&#39;s spam spat indicated that he could be interested in backing out of the deal or asking for a lower buyout price than the $54.20/share agreement he reached with the company&#39;s board of directors last month.</p><p>&#34;The stark reality for Twitter is that no other strategic/financial bidder will come near this deal and Musk knows that; which is why in a changing market and with Tesla<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$(TSLA)$</a> losing $300 billion of market cap since the deal we view the $44 billion Twitter deal as having less than a 50% to get done as of today,&#34; Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note to clients Monday.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4555":"新能源车","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4511":"特斯拉概念","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓","BK4099":"汽车制造商","BK4574":"无人驾驶","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","BK4551":"寇图资本持仓","BK4527":"明星科技股","BK4581":"高盛持仓"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236268932","content_text":"Days after Tesla Inc. Chief Executive Elon Musk tweeted that his $44 billion deal for Twitter Inc. was \"temporarily on hold\" as he looked into the prevalence of bot accounts on the service, Twitter's current leader sought to address how the company assesses spam activity.Musk had taken issue with Twitter's (TWTR) public disclosures that spam accounts represent less than 5% of monetizable daily active users, and he had been floating the possibility of doing his own sampling to try to gauge the extent of spam accounts among the Twitter user base.Musk's commentary prompted some Twitter users to agree with his assertion that bots make up a higher portion of Twitter activity than the company has been disclosing, based on their personal observations from time using the service, but Twitter Chief Executive Parag Agrawal threw cold water on the accuracy of amateur bot audits in a series of Monday tweets.He noted that Twitter does \"multiple human reviews (in replicate) of thousands of accounts\" based on random samples and while taking into account data points that external reviewers wouldn't be able to access.The latest explanation did not appear to sit well with Musk, who replied with a poop emoji and a suggestion that Twitter's bot activity impacts how advertisers can measure the value of their spending.Twitter shares declined for the seventh straight trading session Monday, amid concerns that Musk's spam spat indicated that he could be interested in backing out of the deal or asking for a lower buyout price than the $54.20/share agreement he reached with the company's board of directors last month.\"The stark reality for Twitter is that no other strategic/financial bidder will come near this deal and Musk knows that; which is why in a changing market and with Tesla$(TSLA)$ losing $300 billion of market cap since the deal we view the $44 billion Twitter deal as having less than a 50% to get done as of today,\" Wedbush analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note to clients Monday.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":663,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":24,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[{"id":101811504,"commentId":"101811504","gmtCreate":1652747825764,"gmtModify":1663249500137,"authorId":3569149523842919,"author":{"id":3569149523842919,"idStr":"3569149523842919","authorId":3569149523842919,"name":"Davidgoh18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/71f448e2dc5894b50df2e08bdf98ded4","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9029185463,"objectIdStr":"9029185463","type":1,"supId":0,"supIdStr":"0","prevId":0,"prevIdStr":"0","content":"nothing is impossible","text":"nothing is impossible","html":"nothing is impossible","likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"subComments":[],"verified":10,"allocateAmount":0,"commentType":"valid","coins":0,"score":0}],"hasMoreComment":true,"orderType":2}