75 or 100bps? more volatility

1
Comment
Favorite

luckyone
2022-07-16

75 or 100bps? more volatility in market?...

Fed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July

(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve's most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored ano

Fed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":9076797836,"tweetId":"9076797836","gmtCreate":1657900916125,"gmtModify":1676536079591,"author":{"id":4092804429669710,"authorId":4092804429669710,"authorIdStr":"4092804429669710","name":"luckyone","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/60d38c93f979ee6d7d1472ed871b083d","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>75 or 100bps? more volatility in market?...</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>75 or 100bps? more volatility in market?...</p></body></html>","text":"75 or 100bps? more volatility in market?...","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9076797836","repostId":1161904983,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1161904983","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1657842124,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1161904983?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-07-15 07:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1161904983","media":"Reuters","summary":"(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve's most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored ano","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve&#39;s most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored another 75-basis-point interest rate increase at the U.S. central bank&#39;s policy meeting this month, not the bigger rate hike traders had raced to price in after a report Wednesday showed inflation was accelerating.</p><p>The remarks from Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard hit home, with markets swiftly reversing course to reflect the pair&#39;s preference, though still assigning about a 45% chance to a full percentage-point rate hike.</p><p>Waller, speaking at the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho, said he would lean toward a larger hike if incoming data on retail sales or housing shows demand is not slowing fast enough to bring inflation down, or if inflation expectations worsened.</p><p>But, he said, &#34;markets may have gotten ahead of themselves a little bit yesterday.&#34;</p><p>Despite the &#34;major league disappointment&#34; of this week&#39;s report showing inflation rose 9.1% in June from a year earlier, an &#34;ugly&#34; number was what he had expected, and only cemented his own view that a 75-basis point rate hike at the Fed&#39;s July 26-27 meeting would be appropriate.</p><p>&#34;You don&#39;t want to, really, overdo the rate hikes,&#34; he said, noting that a three-quarters-percentage-point increase is still &#34;huge&#34; and shows the Fed is serious about bringing inflation back down to its 2% target.</p><p>&#34;Don&#39;t say, because you are not going to 100, you are not doing your job,&#34; he said.</p><p>Bullard, in an interview with Japanese financial newspaper Nikkei released on Thursday, also said that he does not back a larger increase for now.</p><p>&#34;So far, we&#39;ve framed this mostly as 50 versus 75 at this meeting,&#34; Bullard said. &#34;I think 75 has a lot of virtue to it.&#34;</p><p>Asked if the Fed&#39;s policy rate, currently in a range of 1.5-1.75%, could exceed 4% by year end, Bullard said: &#34;I suppose it&#39;s possible,&#34; but cautioned that would require data on inflation to continue coming in in &#34;an adverse way.&#34;</p><p>Waller likewise said further moves beyond July based on the data, adding that he would support restricting demand with further rate increases until core inflation, excluding volatile food and energy prices, starts to fall.</p><p>Because the labor market is very strong and data does not show signs of it weakening, he said a &#34;soft landing&#34; for the economy is &#34;very plausible&#34; and a recession -- inconceivable currently with the unemployment rate at 3.6%-- can be avoided.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Hawks Say They Want 75 Basis Point Rate Hike in July\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-15 07:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve&#39;s most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored another 75-basis-point interest rate increase at the U.S. central bank&#39;s policy meeting this month, not the bigger rate hike traders had raced to price in after a report Wednesday showed inflation was accelerating.</p><p>The remarks from Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard hit home, with markets swiftly reversing course to reflect the pair&#39;s preference, though still assigning about a 45% chance to a full percentage-point rate hike.</p><p>Waller, speaking at the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho, said he would lean toward a larger hike if incoming data on retail sales or housing shows demand is not slowing fast enough to bring inflation down, or if inflation expectations worsened.</p><p>But, he said, &#34;markets may have gotten ahead of themselves a little bit yesterday.&#34;</p><p>Despite the &#34;major league disappointment&#34; of this week&#39;s report showing inflation rose 9.1% in June from a year earlier, an &#34;ugly&#34; number was what he had expected, and only cemented his own view that a 75-basis point rate hike at the Fed&#39;s July 26-27 meeting would be appropriate.</p><p>&#34;You don&#39;t want to, really, overdo the rate hikes,&#34; he said, noting that a three-quarters-percentage-point increase is still &#34;huge&#34; and shows the Fed is serious about bringing inflation back down to its 2% target.</p><p>&#34;Don&#39;t say, because you are not going to 100, you are not doing your job,&#34; he said.</p><p>Bullard, in an interview with Japanese financial newspaper Nikkei released on Thursday, also said that he does not back a larger increase for now.</p><p>&#34;So far, we&#39;ve framed this mostly as 50 versus 75 at this meeting,&#34; Bullard said. &#34;I think 75 has a lot of virtue to it.&#34;</p><p>Asked if the Fed&#39;s policy rate, currently in a range of 1.5-1.75%, could exceed 4% by year end, Bullard said: &#34;I suppose it&#39;s possible,&#34; but cautioned that would require data on inflation to continue coming in in &#34;an adverse way.&#34;</p><p>Waller likewise said further moves beyond July based on the data, adding that he would support restricting demand with further rate increases until core inflation, excluding volatile food and energy prices, starts to fall.</p><p>Because the labor market is very strong and data does not show signs of it weakening, he said a &#34;soft landing&#34; for the economy is &#34;very plausible&#34; and a recession -- inconceivable currently with the unemployment rate at 3.6%-- can be avoided.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1161904983","content_text":"(Reuters) - Two of the Federal Reserve's most hawkish policymakers on Thursday said they favored another 75-basis-point interest rate increase at the U.S. central bank's policy meeting this month, not the bigger rate hike traders had raced to price in after a report Wednesday showed inflation was accelerating.The remarks from Fed Governor Christopher Waller and St. Louis Fed President James Bullard hit home, with markets swiftly reversing course to reflect the pair's preference, though still assigning about a 45% chance to a full percentage-point rate hike.Waller, speaking at the Rocky Mountain Economic Summit in Victor, Idaho, said he would lean toward a larger hike if incoming data on retail sales or housing shows demand is not slowing fast enough to bring inflation down, or if inflation expectations worsened.But, he said, \"markets may have gotten ahead of themselves a little bit yesterday.\"Despite the \"major league disappointment\" of this week's report showing inflation rose 9.1% in June from a year earlier, an \"ugly\" number was what he had expected, and only cemented his own view that a 75-basis point rate hike at the Fed's July 26-27 meeting would be appropriate.\"You don't want to, really, overdo the rate hikes,\" he said, noting that a three-quarters-percentage-point increase is still \"huge\" and shows the Fed is serious about bringing inflation back down to its 2% target.\"Don't say, because you are not going to 100, you are not doing your job,\" he said.Bullard, in an interview with Japanese financial newspaper Nikkei released on Thursday, also said that he does not back a larger increase for now.\"So far, we've framed this mostly as 50 versus 75 at this meeting,\" Bullard said. \"I think 75 has a lot of virtue to it.\"Asked if the Fed's policy rate, currently in a range of 1.5-1.75%, could exceed 4% by year end, Bullard said: \"I suppose it's possible,\" but cautioned that would require data on inflation to continue coming in in \"an adverse way.\"Waller likewise said further moves beyond July based on the data, adding that he would support restricting demand with further rate increases until core inflation, excluding volatile food and energy prices, starts to fall.Because the labor market is very strong and data does not show signs of it weakening, he said a \"soft landing\" for the economy is \"very plausible\" and a recession -- inconceivable currently with the unemployment rate at 3.6%-- can be avoided.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":450,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":37,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}