U missed a very important point. Apple Brand alone is one matric that couldn't valued by P/E. Consumer pays for Apple because it's Apple. They don't pays for Google because it's google, they just happens to be google (Samsung phone, pc browser etc)
Apple Vs. Google: There's A Clear Winner
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- FattAgain69·2022-07-14By saying that, you are missing out on another point. If you are paying for something (whether directly or indirectly) without knowing it, that thing is probably worth more in overall usage.LikeReport
- Azerone.Kee·2022-07-14yes, people pay for Apple because it's Apple, anyway, end up the results show in the balance sheet, it's where the investors should look into and make their evaluation.LikeReport
- Beli·2022-07-14Very true. Apple is within reach too.LikeReport