Apple Killed Its Car Project. Tesla's Stock Barely Budged


The $Apple(AAPL)$   car is, apparently, no more. Shares of $Ford(F)$  , $General Motors(GM)$  , and Tesla barely reacted. There is good reason for that.

On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that Apple was abandoning its long-gestating car project in favor of working more on generative AI. Bloomberg cited internal documents. Apple didn't respond to a request for comment about the report.

The threat of an Apple car has loomed large over the industry for a long time. It even has its own Wikipedia page outlining all the reports and rumors that have surfaced over the past eight-plus years. Over that span, there hasn't been much detail, let alone a prototype shown at an auto show.

The Apple car was ultimately supposed to morph into a self-driving electric vehicle -- a threat to Tesla, as well as anyone else that makes cars. By that logic, no Apple car should be good for the existing auto industry. The report even got a reaction from Tesla CEO Elon Musk. He tweeted a salute and cigarette on Tuesday afternoon.

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$   stock, however, barely budged, remaining near the lows of the day and closing up about 0.2% at almost $200 a share. Ford and GM shares also closed higher, by 0.4% and nearly 1%, respectively.

The S&P 500 and $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$   rose 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively.

It might be a surprising reaction for some investors who think one of the world's most valuable companies -- that generates roughly as much free cash flow annually as the entire global auto industry -- getting into cars was a big deal.

While an Apple car might have been disruptive, it was always a low-probability event. The odds of an Apple car ever hitting roads were always very low -- they might have gone from 10% to 0% on Tuesday. What's more, if an Apple car ever were created it wouldn't have arrived on roads until late in the decade, at the earliest.

The reasons an Apple car was a low-probability event are myriad. For starters, automotive profit margins aren't very attractive. Competition is fierce. Most of the value is derived from the hardware portion of the car -- not the operating system. Building cars is also capital-intensive, and the process doesn't lend itself well to outsourced manufacturing.

Even potentially big events won't move stocks if they were unlikely to ever happen.



@TigerStars  @CaptainTiger  @TigerWire  @Daily_Discussion  @Tiger_chat  @Tiger_comments  @MillionaireTiger  

# 💰 Stocks to watch today?(19 Dec)

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

  • Top
  • Latest
empty
No comments yet