I find both strategies interesting, but I wouldn’t take the “100% win rate” literally. CNBC’s “Markets in Turmoil” makes sense psychologically — extreme fear often marks a bottom — but it’s based on limited historical context. Similarly, the
$S&P 500(.SPX)$ being higher a year later reflects long-term upward bias, not a guaranteed signal.
The $Cboe Volatility Index(VIX)$ 35/15 rule feels more practical since it measures market sentiment. High VIX shows panic, low VIX shows complacency, but I see it as a guideline rather than a strict rule — markets can stay fearful or calm longer than expected.
I wouldn’t rely on these strategies alone, but I’d use them as a sentiment overlay. For me, it’s about scaling in during fear, staying disciplined, and avoiding emotional moves, rather than trying to time the market perfectly.
@Tiger_chat @TigerStars @TigerClub @Tiger_comments
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Comments