In the latest week, US-Iran negotiations remained deadlocked. On May 18, Trump said that the military action against Iran originally scheduled for May 19 would be postponed, indicating that the US-Iran standoff did not escalate further this week. At the same time, the US publicly stated that the talks with Iran had made “significant progress,” while also saying that a “Plan B” was already prepared, which suggests that the substantive differences between the two sides have not been resolved. In addition to the ongoing market pricing of disruptions stemming from the Middle East situation, investors are also closely watching the progress of SpaceX, Elon Musk’s space company, which could potentially stage the “largest IPO in history.” As of 3:00 p.m. on May 21, 2026, the weekly performance of

🚀 SpaceX’s S‑1 filing revealed Musk’s full control, $1.45B BTC reserves, and Starlink integration — a landmark IPO narrative. RKLB popped +5.47% on the news, but the bigger question is whether SpaceX’s entry marks the end of the small‑cap space story or the start of a new commercial era. ✨ My view: SpaceX’s IPO could reset valuations across the sector. I’d watch for rotation into broader space names, not just chase the headline. @JC888 @Barcode @Aqa @DiAngel @Shyon @ko

$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ space is the next big thing

Expecting to join

SpaceX filed its S-1. Road show June 5, $SpaceX(SPCX)$ target valuation $1.8 trillion. The filing runs hundreds of pages. The key question: which division makes money, which loses money, and which burns the most cash? SpaceX reports three segments: Space (launch), Connectivity (Starlink), and AI. These aren't parallel — they're vertical: rockets lower the cost of reaching orbit → satellites turn that capability into a billable subscription network → AI attempts to extend the platform into compute and real-time intelligence. 2025 Segment Summary & Annual Revenue Breakdown The read: Starlink makes money (38.8% op margin). Launch loses money (-16.1%). AI burns the most cash (-198.5% op margin + $12.7B CapEx). Launch revenue barely

Short answer: it is far more likely an opening chapter than an ending. But it changes how you should think about Rocket Lab. 1) SpaceX S-1 is not bearish for the sector If SpaceX is genuinely moving toward public markets, it does two things immediately: Forces institutional capital to price the entire space economy properly Validates that launch, satellites, and data infrastructure are no longer speculative niches That is typically bullish for listed peers, not destructive. 2) But it is bearish for lazy RKLB theses Let’s be direct. Many RKLB bulls relied on a “next SpaceX proxy” narrative. That breaks the moment SpaceX becomes investable. Capital that chased RKLB for scarcity may rotate. So RKLB must now stand on fundamentals, not comparison. 3) Where RKLB still has a real edge RKLB is not

The Astronomical Event of the Century: The Launch of SpaceX IPO 🌟🌟🌟The grandest event in modern market history is officially lifting off.  The public S-1 filing for the historic SpaceX IPO is happening today - May 21 2026, setting the stage for a record shattering June 12 debut. The sheer scale of this launch is utterly dizzying.  Led by a heavyweight banking syndicate featuring Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan Chase, Elon Musk's aerospace giant is looking to pull off a monumental USD 75 billion capital raise at an "out of this world" targeting valuation of USD 1.75 trillion to USD 2 trillion. This single IPO is poised to absolutely suck the oxygen out of the global listing pipeline, creating a historic liquidity event that dwarfs Saudi Aramco's legendary USD 29 b

SpaceX has filed for an IPO on Nasdaq, with the ticker symbol $SPCX. Lead Underwriters: $Goldman Sachs(GS)$ , $Morgan Stanley(MS)$ , $Bank of America(BAC)$ , $Citigroup(C)$ , and $JPMorgan Chase(JPM)$ This filing provides the first comprehensive overview of the merged company, comprising SpaceX, Starlink, X, and xAI. 2025 Revenue: $18.67 billion, a 30% increase 2025 Net Loss: $4.94 billion, compared to a profit of $791 million in 2024 2025 Capital Expenditures: $20.7 billion, of which $12.7 billion is for Artificial Intelligence Q1 Revenue: $4.694 billion Q1 Operating Loss: $1.943 billio

It is neither the end of Rocket Lab nor a clean “all-clear” signal. It is a reframing of the playing field. The S-1 from SpaceX does two important things at once. First, it removes ambiguity. The disclosure of full control, the tight integration with Starlink, and even the Bitcoin reserve signal that SpaceX is not just a launch company. It is a vertically integrated space platform with: launch (Falcon/Starship) infrastructure (Starlink) potentially defence and data layers That makes it far more comparable to a “space ecosystem monopoly” than a simple competitor. Second, it institutionalises the sector. Once SpaceX is publicly benchmarked, capital no longer treats space as speculative. It becomes allocatable. That is historically positive for second-tier players. Now, what does this mean fo

The stock market loves a hot IPO story, who doesn’t ? $Cerebras Systems(CBRS)$ IPO last week is a fine example. So far, no initial public offerings (IPOs) have generated more anticipation than SpaceX, with SPAX as its ticker is supposed to be SPAX (subjected to change) Reports that Elon Musk’s private space giant, with a possible valuation approaching $2 trillion, could file to go public by 12 Jun 2026 is really heating up momentum & sentiments and have investors dreaming about the next great wealth-building stock. This is inevitable, after all SpaceX - (1) dominates commercial launches, (2) owns the Starlink satellite network, and (3) sits at the center of the modern space economy. However, the reality of chasing big IPO hype, often does not

fear of missing out f.o m.o if there was ever a time to get swept up in the psychology trate know as FOMO was ever going to snag someone. The SPACE X IPO is happening next month, and I not normally susceptible to this phenomenon, but I think I won't be able to say that if I do get to by 5 000 USD, probably tt

🌟🌟🌟Can SpaceX become a satellite era of Amazon?  Yes $SpaceX(SPCX)$ is replicating Amazon's multi decade platform strategy with flawless execution. SpaceX spent the last decade doing the same thing in the sky while Amaxon does it on land. By mastering the self landing physics of Falcon 9 and scaling the massive steel framework, SpaceX captured a monopoly on space logistics.  It can launch payloads to orbit cheaper and faster than its rivals. If an enterprise wants space based cloud computing, it cannot bypass SpaceX infrastructure.   SpaceX has successfully positioned itself as the full stack of gatekeeper of the global space economy.

$One and one Green(YDDL)$ , a Philippines-based recycler holding a government-issued license to import and process hazardous waste as raw materials, today announced that it has executed a contract for the purchase of smelting equipment to support its previously announced production line in Metro Manila, Philippines. This production line is designed to process industrial hazardous waste streams, including electronic sludge, copper sludge, and nickel sludge. Commercial production is targeted for the second half of 2026. The smelting equipment will serve as the hardware backbone of the Company’s new production line, and to efficiently extract high-value metals such as copper, gold, and silver. The contract represents a direct follow-through on the Co

The valuation is certainly extremely overblown and even Tesla actually do not make better cars than BYD. They were just first movers. Similarly I would discount much of the hype such as Mars mining, AI data Centers in space etc and look at rocket launch as the primary revenue.

So Grok (the musk AI bot) has been shown to have poor usage rates by the US government, 3 out of 400 known examples of uses by the federal government. This will weigh down on expectations of the success of the AI part of spacex when it gets listed. Which further proves that AI as it is, is a gimmick and investors looking to pick up a piece of spacex have unrealistic views. The company will not succeed based on proper fundamentals and business dealings, but on the world's richest man having his hand in messing with world affairs, hoarding more wealth and being able to manipulate his stock prices. Spacex rockets being reusable has shook up the market, a huge win for the environment and a proof of concept that sustainability is a winning play, even on the biggest stage. But the company is sad