A few fundamental elements that will dictate how hard the landing will be and reference always needs to reflect where the landing plateau will be. You certainly can't rely on just what the public media might be saying to you or government bodies for that matter, with Covid 19 being a prime example.  Base data in regards to trend lines and parabolic curves of the past booms and recessions always need to be considered and the data should include a 50 year cycle so relativity of the economic nature of that date and time allowing a plus/minus risk assessment of recent events and other pivotal elements such as interest and inflation rates, residential building consents, unemployment statistics and the like as well as cyclical risks facing the population at that point in time i.e. what's th

Pffff - it missed both EPS and Sales targets and now the subsidies for residential installs are likely all but a pipe dream there are many questions about the likelihood of increased future earnings in the winter solstice - good try selling ice to an Eskimo 🎃😂😂😂

I'm not sure about chopping off legs and arms as yet, but maybe it's the way of the world. My train of thought given Intels lost track walk is it needs guidance and structure to maximise its potential - so with a valuation so low now and cogs out of the wheelhouse why not go with a amalgamation of like minded ventures and use the best of both worlds to get some get go back on the table.  Herein comes what I'd consider the best potential option for Intel, whilst also benefiting the company that's got back on track with positive growth and better future prospects, whilst utilising the $5B Apollo offering to do the restructuring and get the ball rolling in a bigger and better way /- $Micron Technology(MU)$  Makes sense in my little pea brain, but possibly the logistics are too high