SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom

352
Comment
3

SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom

Seeking Alpha2022-10-12

SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

352

Report

Comment

CaseyLKC
·2022-10-13
Good to know
Reply
Like
Report
Swordmerlin
·2022-10-13
Ok
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- JackTL:
  ho
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
- snowpine2005:
  ok
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
RK888
·2022-10-13
👍
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- RK888:
  👍
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
andrew123
·2022-10-13
Omg
Reply
3
Report
ericbqlee
·2022-10-13
🙂
Reply
5
Report
SPOT_ON
·2022-10-13
Ok
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- k1wong:
  k
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
Llim
·2022-10-13
Like
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- GeorgeOr:
  ok
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
- DL97:
  Likezzz
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
FatKid
·2022-10-13
K
Reply
3
Report
FatKid
·2022-10-13
K
Reply
2
Report
Anntatkuah
·2022-10-13
Good
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- AudTKH:
  K
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
Seah CL
·2022-10-13
K
Reply
2
Report
逢場作戲又一日
·2022-10-13
Great
Reply
2
Report
chubbyfatty
·2022-10-12
.
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- FatKid:
  .
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
NPC69
·2022-10-12
K
Reply
3
Report
Pepermintpat
·2022-10-12
🙌 YES! Sqqq way to go! Till end Oct...[Thinking]
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- koolgalReplying toPepermintpat:
  👌👌👌
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
- Pepermintpat:
  🤝cool
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
- koolgal:
  Same idea as you 😍😍😍
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
J1000
·2022-10-12
K
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- Ktkw:
  sure
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
- J1000:
  K
  2022-10-12
  Reply
  Report
My.t
·2022-10-12
Thanks
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- DonWang:
  H
  2022-10-12
  Reply
  Report
Shirley Soh
·2022-10-12
Ok
Reply
3
Report
xiaobaii
·2022-10-12
like & comment
Reply
6
Report
Fold Replies
- kenong62:
  ok done
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
- BettyT:
  Yes okay
  2022-10-13
  Reply
  Report
- ckww:
  Sure
  2022-10-12
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1118065931?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1118065931","market":"other","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","media":"Seeking Alpha","content":"<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"SQQQ","symbol_name":"纳指三倍做空ETF","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","article_id":"1118065931","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"translate_title":"SQQQ指标仍然表明熊市底部","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"SQQQ":0.9},"content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":null,"is_publish_highlight":null,"is_publish_live":null,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9980018035,"gmtCreate":1665617052327,"gmtModify":1676537635127,"author":{"id":"4091363089250230","authorId":"4091363089250230","name":"CaseyLKC","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Good to know","listText":"Good to know","text":"Good to know","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980018035","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9980010371,"gmtCreate":1665616635493,"gmtModify":1676537635021,"author":{"id":"3582338758553096","authorId":"3582338758553096","name":"Swordmerlin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1f836008e90c916e86b10677e7b767fd","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980010371","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104326165,"gmtCreate":1665619434948,"gmtModify":1665625111563,"authorId":3581557493426416,"author":{"id":3581557493426416,"authorId":3581557493426416,"name":"JackTL","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/851801800e7dc3457e5e60048a987880","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9980010371,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">ho</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">ho</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">ho</span>"},{"id":104325292,"gmtCreate":1665617175456,"gmtModify":1665617179023,"authorId":4104801378187350,"author":{"id":4104801378187350,"authorId":4104801378187350,"name":"snowpine2005","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/30cc314b08db312a03020e5b08d11966","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9980010371,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9980030974,"gmtCreate":1665615386999,"gmtModify":1676537634698,"author":{"id":"3584063721837527","authorId":"3584063721837527","name":"RK888","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c94493ec39af6df82d06fcfa8afb3483","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980030974","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104324900,"gmtCreate":1665615395122,"gmtModify":1665615398370,"authorId":3584063721837527,"author":{"id":3584063721837527,"authorId":3584063721837527,"name":"RK888","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c94493ec39af6df82d06fcfa8afb3483","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9980030974,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">👍</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">👍</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">👍</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9980091006,"gmtCreate":1665614687905,"gmtModify":1676537634505,"author":{"id":"3576260758860416","authorId":"3576260758860416","name":"andrew123","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f3e049e64de259e717c6e652c0aca653","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c5ceab71416b120bab4604c0754b52a","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Omg","listText":"Omg","text":"Omg","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980091006","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9980002370,"gmtCreate":1665613897691,"gmtModify":1676537634312,"author":{"id":"4101424154342900","authorId":"4101424154342900","name":"ericbqlee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"🙂","listText":"🙂","text":"🙂","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980002370","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9980001231,"gmtCreate":1665613676623,"gmtModify":1676537634246,"author":{"id":"3582922989777578","authorId":"3582922989777578","name":"SPOT_ON","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/080f029371339d9db26930961de6adb1","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980001231","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104324826,"gmtCreate":1665615039864,"gmtModify":1665615043373,"authorId":3574996050082067,"author":{"id":3574996050082067,"authorId":3574996050082067,"name":"k1wong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f9f3b0884767b721ac5720e7a17adeba","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"60.89%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9980001231,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>k</u>","text":"<u>k</u>","html":"<u>k</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9980003134,"gmtCreate":1665613609529,"gmtModify":1676537634209,"author":{"id":"4105239963331670","authorId":"4105239963331670","name":"Llim","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ebdd6aa492c9d80d8a2c1a18334bff87","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9980003134","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104324796,"gmtCreate":1665614856369,"gmtModify":1665614859620,"authorId":3570922030489337,"author":{"id":3570922030489337,"authorId":3570922030489337,"name":"GeorgeOr","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/590cc7dd964e0cf6e057302728902b7b","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9980003134,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"},{"id":104324474,"gmtCreate":1665613805163,"gmtModify":1665613808766,"authorId":3581595210484952,"author":{"id":3581595210484952,"authorId":3581595210484952,"name":"DL97","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5df17e476ae735a64e7017b160d3935","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9980003134,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Likezzz</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Likezzz</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Likezzz</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917779739,"gmtCreate":1665612172621,"gmtModify":1676537633891,"author":{"id":"4090418903913760","authorId":"4090418903913760","name":"FatKid","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f6692ab34697d0d2f7947fa3f34c6421","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917779739","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917779830,"gmtCreate":1665612162620,"gmtModify":1676537633883,"author":{"id":"4090418903913760","authorId":"4090418903913760","name":"FatKid","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f6692ab34697d0d2f7947fa3f34c6421","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917779830","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917744131,"gmtCreate":1665611800523,"gmtModify":1676537633785,"author":{"id":"3581541811460037","authorId":"3581541811460037","name":"Anntatkuah","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9ac42750b3afcc0927351b8d56381615","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917744131","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104324324,"gmtCreate":1665613128875,"gmtModify":1665613132069,"authorId":3575582076363736,"author":{"id":3575582076363736,"authorId":3575582076363736,"name":"AudTKH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e4905e1cd622b8faa04ad4125cd04a83","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917744131,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917743214,"gmtCreate":1665610764638,"gmtModify":1676537633632,"author":{"id":"4102135564535180","authorId":"4102135564535180","name":"Seah CL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/970bca7b04e85a42a2c8eabed7ec96d0","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917743214","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917723812,"gmtCreate":1665590469536,"gmtModify":1676537632939,"author":{"id":"3555043402922696","authorId":"3555043402922696","name":"逢場作戲又一日","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6a5fbf2ceb7c7ee0399d41e6348dadf7","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4c5ceab71416b120bab4604c0754b52a","crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Great","listText":"Great","text":"Great","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917723812","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917729982,"gmtCreate":1665590298846,"gmtModify":1676537632898,"author":{"id":"3582026286427071","authorId":"3582026286427071","name":"chubbyfatty","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":".","listText":".","text":".","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917729982","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104324182,"gmtCreate":1665612154015,"gmtModify":1665612157521,"authorId":4090418903913760,"author":{"id":4090418903913760,"authorId":4090418903913760,"name":"FatKid","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f6692ab34697d0d2f7947fa3f34c6421","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917729982,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">.</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">.</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">.</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917787244,"gmtCreate":1665588160788,"gmtModify":1676537632432,"author":{"id":"3584779133668268","authorId":"3584779133668268","name":"NPC69","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/47e7ac55312ae8dd1c9e7cb92adad089","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917787244","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917785901,"gmtCreate":1665587771303,"gmtModify":1676537632352,"author":{"id":"4109504542406510","authorId":"4109504542406510","name":"Pepermintpat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0804feddbf156f8e808003b7ca831628","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a8758340a08196056f8bc1e54805193","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"🙌 YES! Sqqq way to go! Till&nbsp;end Oct...[Thinking]&nbsp;","listText":"🙌 YES! Sqqq way to go! Till&nbsp;end Oct...[Thinking]&nbsp;","text":"🙌 YES! Sqqq way to go! Till end Oct...[Thinking]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917785901","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104331326,"gmtCreate":1665638169446,"gmtModify":1665638172830,"authorId":3559581955535845,"author":{"id":3559581955535845,"authorId":3559581955535845,"name":"koolgal","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c05274d88ffc0434623e57350c52c70a","vip":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2-1","templateUuid":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2","name":"Monthly Top Contributor","description":"Top 3 Contributors with the most and best Editor's Picks every month","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0cad6192443c33dca826a001250fbd4","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ccd98c646815ce7610b0df338e060cc","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/TW/9000980585","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.02","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2003},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[{"badgeId":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8-1","templateUuid":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8","name":"Star Contributor","description":"Have published 3 or more picked posts, and have published at least one picked post and participated in comments within 30 days","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1866dcf97a73be1c330f85862546aedc","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4f5c5fa8e2c7683bb5a7fce8753ee456","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/activity/market/2023/star-contributors/","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.19","individualDisplayEnabled":1,"backgroundColor":{"dark":"#675a37","tint":"#f9ebc2"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#ffffff","tint":"#ab7a0e"},"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2007}]},"repliedAuthorId":4109504542406510,"repliedAuthor":{"id":4109504542406510,"authorId":4109504542406510,"name":"Pepermintpat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0804feddbf156f8e808003b7ca831628","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.16%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"objectId":9917785901,"type":1,"supId":104330026,"prevId":104330952,"content":"👌👌👌","text":"👌👌👌","html":"👌👌👌"},{"id":104330952,"gmtCreate":1665637147254,"gmtModify":1665637151029,"authorId":4109504542406510,"author":{"id":4109504542406510,"authorId":4109504542406510,"name":"Pepermintpat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0804feddbf156f8e808003b7ca831628","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.16%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917785901,"type":1,"supId":104330026,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">🤝cool</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">🤝cool</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">🤝cool</span>"},{"id":104330026,"gmtCreate":1665631519979,"gmtModify":1665631523461,"authorId":3559581955535845,"author":{"id":3559581955535845,"authorId":3559581955535845,"name":"koolgal","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c05274d88ffc0434623e57350c52c70a","vip":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2-1","templateUuid":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2","name":"Monthly Top Contributor","description":"Top 3 Contributors with the most and best Editor's Picks every month","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0cad6192443c33dca826a001250fbd4","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ccd98c646815ce7610b0df338e060cc","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/TW/9000980585","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.02","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2003},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[{"badgeId":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8-1","templateUuid":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8","name":"Star Contributor","description":"Have published 3 or more picked posts, and have published at least one picked post and participated in comments within 30 days","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1866dcf97a73be1c330f85862546aedc","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4f5c5fa8e2c7683bb5a7fce8753ee456","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/activity/market/2023/star-contributors/","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.05.19","individualDisplayEnabled":1,"backgroundColor":{"dark":"#675a37","tint":"#f9ebc2"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#ffffff","tint":"#ab7a0e"},"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2007}]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917785901,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Same idea as you 😍😍😍","text":"Same idea as you 😍😍😍","html":"Same idea as you 😍😍😍"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917788323,"gmtCreate":1665587376462,"gmtModify":1676537632269,"author":{"id":"3563859164285775","authorId":"3563859164285775","name":"J1000","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58eb627eb6216a78e97316abffb5a391","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917788323","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104323477,"gmtCreate":1665598355431,"gmtModify":1665598359276,"authorId":3564917665277560,"author":{"id":3564917665277560,"authorId":3564917665277560,"name":"Ktkw","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c3b319f06c5f5672546acc9d6f02dec1","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.06","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917788323,"type":1,"supId":104322614,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>sure</u>","text":"<u>sure</u>","html":"<u>sure</u>"},{"id":104322614,"gmtCreate":1665587384772,"gmtModify":1665587388168,"authorId":3563859164285775,"author":{"id":3563859164285775,"authorId":3563859164285775,"name":"J1000","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58eb627eb6216a78e97316abffb5a391","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.06.20","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917788323,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917783639,"gmtCreate":1665587081921,"gmtModify":1676537632222,"author":{"id":"4108946201265690","authorId":"4108946201265690","name":"My.t","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/f0f142f324c18e07df30deed64be1cdb","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917783639","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104322909,"gmtCreate":1665589441788,"gmtModify":1665589444959,"authorId":3570713544395478,"author":{"id":3570713544395478,"authorId":3570713544395478,"name":"DonWang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b97d42de04d4d3d4de6f46997504db14","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917783639,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">H</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">H</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">H</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917461002,"gmtCreate":1665566215407,"gmtModify":1676537628490,"author":{"id":"4100664503126340","authorId":"4100664503126340","name":"Shirley Soh","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/784ec5f33096066f43c22d219e548bac","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":1},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917461002","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9917482382,"gmtCreate":1665564459346,"gmtModify":1676537628183,"author":{"id":"3571345352614779","authorId":"3571345352614779","name":"xiaobaii","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0},"htmlText":"like &amp; comment&nbsp;","listText":"like &amp; comment&nbsp;","text":"like & comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9917482382","repostId":1118065931,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1118065931","pubTimestamp":1665588181,"share":"https://www.laohu8.com/m/news/1118065931?lang=&edition=full","pubTime":"2022-10-12 23:23","market":"us","language":"en","title":"SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1118065931","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of tha","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>This is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.</li><li>Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.</li><li>Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.</li><li>This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.</li></ul><p>This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&amp;P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.</p><p>Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.</p><p><b>The Price Action Of SQQQ</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0b21c91ab30cba11b2c91733d7b36f50\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>NAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)</p><p>It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.</p><p><b>SQQQ Shares Outstanding</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/741e2ff0a5538721b31a4558f7f1dd8f\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>SQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)</p><p>Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&amp;P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.</p><p>This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.</p><p>The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.</p><p><b>Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear Funds</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e4d9caebbc203c047a7ac3ef781dd31\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Proshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)</p><p>The ProShares &#34;bull to bear&#34; asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.</p><p>It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.</p><p>What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&amp;P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.</p><p><b>An Important Caveat</b></p><p>While I&#39;m not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSQQQ Metrics Still Indicate A Bear Market Bottom\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-10-12 23:23 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4545915-sqqq-metrics-still-indicate-a-bear-market-bottom","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1118065931","content_text":"SummaryThis is a follow up to an earlier SQQQ article I wrote on August 1st. While the timing of that first article was poor, current metrics still support the conclusion.Short term traders in SQQQ have a proven history of good timing. They are generally net buyers of this triple short fund at tops and net sellers at lows.Because of this, the 39% decline in SQQQ shares outstanding since the market top in August indicates we are probably at an intermediate term market bottom.This is supported by the current ratio of total assets in ProShares bull and bear funds, which acts as a contrary opinion indicator. It implies too many investors currently expect prices to go lower.This is a follow-up article to an article written on August 1st titled: Massive Buying In SQQQ Indicates A Bear Market Bottom. There is no doubt the timing of the article was bad since the S&P 500 has fallen 11.6% since publication and the price of SQQQ has gone from $39.89 to $59.07 up 48%. A short-term trader would have clearly benefitted by going opposite the recommendation. That said, we still believe current metrics in SQQQ indicate we are in the area of bear market lows. I want to reiterate that we are using SQQQ metrics to help determine long-term market trends, not short-term trading.Let’s go over the basic numbers to see what they currently show.The Price Action Of SQQQNAV of SQQQ(Michael McDonald)It is clear from this five-year chart that SQQQ is for short-term traders, it is not for long-term investors. Since 2018, the fund is down 97%. The 3X leverage of the fund is what produces the large, short-term price changes that some short-term traders desire.SQQQ Shares OutstandingSQQQ Shares Outstanding vs the SPY(Michael McDonald)Plotting shares outstanding of SQQQ against the S&P 500 shows rather good timing by short-term traders who use this ETF. It shows, on a relative basis, the greatest number of shares outstanding occurring at short-term market tops and fewer outstanding shares at short-term bottoms, after prices have fallen.This means that more people are entering the fund than leaving it as prices reach highs, then, after prices have fallen, more traders are leaving the fund than entering it. This fact is pointed to by the five black line arrows, and it was not clear at the time of the first article.The recent large drop from 133,951,000 shares outstanding on August 18th to 81,451,000 shares last Friday – a decline of 39% (indicated by the last arrow on the right) - appears to suggest there is a high probability we are at an intermediate term market low.Market Low Confirmed By The Ratio Of Assets In ProShares Bull And Bear FundsProshare Bull-Bear Asset Ratio(Michael McDonald)The ProShares \"bull to bear\" asset ratio is another way we measure investor sentiment. It takes the dollar value in all the ProShares bull funds and divides it by the dollar value of all the bear funds. At the market top in December there was over 10 times more money in bullish ProShares ETFs than bear market ETFs. It is now down to a little over two.It’s a contrary opinion indicator. For example, it clearly shows the surge of money into ProShares bull funds from September to December of last year, right before the start of the bear market. The ratio went from 6.5 to 10.5. Extremely bad timing.What’s important now is that the asset ratio went to new lows as the S&P returned to the price lows of May. Notice the broken green lines in the graph. It’s flat for stocks and slanted lower for the asset ratio. This means that even more ProShares investors believe the market’s headed lower than at the May low. This again is what you want to see if you’re a contrarian. It suggests stock prices should move higher over at least the intermediate term.An Important CaveatWhile I'm not so worried about the American economy dragging down the stock market, I am worried about the risk of a global financial crisis doing it, triggered by the actions of narrow-minded central bankers focused on just their own economy. While central banks are looking after their own economies, no agency is looking after the well-being of the entire global financial system. This is a serious issue, which I explain in the ArticleI just wrote on the Puts and Calls ratio.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104323980,"gmtCreate":1665611228835,"gmtModify":1665611231973,"authorId":3574928367638029,"author":{"id":3574928367638029,"authorId":3574928367638029,"name":"kenong62","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/37fd00bd8cea11b8aa1aed6d9ddd9413","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917482382,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok done","text":"ok done","html":"ok done"},{"id":104323487,"gmtCreate":1665598639414,"gmtModify":1665598642848,"authorId":3580536610076415,"author":{"id":3580536610076415,"authorId":3580536610076415,"name":"BettyT","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a4dfe2f455acd2af7629f83ce30e20c","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917482382,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Yes okay</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Yes okay</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Yes okay</span>"},{"id":104322562,"gmtCreate":1665586985198,"gmtModify":1665586989050,"authorId":3581586523786578,"author":{"id":3581586523786578,"authorId":3581586523786578,"name":"ckww","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bc2cc1ef6533d547201ce880e7c04b9c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9917482382,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>Sure</u>","text":"<u>Sure</u>","html":"<u>Sure</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":352,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":3,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}