Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?

InvestorPlace2022-06-08

Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

206

Report

Comment（34）

kelly2128
·2022-06-08
Good
Reply
Like
Report
Tony Stark7
·2022-06-08
Apple
Reply
Like
Report
快乐快了
·2022-06-08
👍
Reply
1
Report
PBL77
·2022-06-08
Good
Reply
1
Report
JC888
·2022-06-08
Firstly both are from different sectors. Unsure how a apple-to-apple comparison could be carried out.If based on figures n stats then maybe. At the end, comparisons aside both are still on the recommendations lists. LOL - back at Square one.New Energy is not matured and pervasive enough to take over Old Energy. Hence old energy will remain for a long while. Just that war has exacerbated the price with Russian oil boycott.Song? The Power by Snap!.. Dance hit.. Dunno? YouTube it... Lol
Reply
17
Report
babengerix
·2022-06-08
For long term apple is proven for growth company
Reply
2
Report
Noob6
·2022-06-08
Ok
Reply
3
Report
Pluto891
·2022-06-08
waste of time in such comparison. Not even Apple to Apple. Both have advantages n disadvantages...
Reply
2
Report
neoh
·2022-06-08
Like
Reply
2
Report
mohjoejoejoe
·2022-06-08
Ok
Reply
1
Report
JeremyEe
·2022-06-08
Hi
Reply
1
Report
1nquisit0
·2022-06-08
Please like
Reply
2
Report
Jahme
·2022-06-08
Buyyyy
Reply
2
Report
Nana_seven
·2022-06-08
Pls like
Reply
2
Report
Yan99
·2022-06-08
Able to buy this share? Can advise .
Reply
2
Report
Yan99
·2022-06-08
Is this share able to buy?
Reply
1
Report
JY1980
·2022-06-08
Hi
Reply
1
Report
Siak
·2022-06-08
K
Reply
1
Report
Fadzli13
·2022-06-08
It is also very important to buy something you arefamiliar with. You must know more about the business that you are planning to buy a share in, be it Apple (or tech stocks) or the Energy Sector. You cannot go wrong with educating yourself before making an informed decision.
Reply
3
Report
Andrewinho
·2022-06-08
🍎🍎🍎
Reply
2
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1190815971","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","media":"InvestorPlace","content":"<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1606302653667","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"AAPL","symbol_name":"苹果","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","article_id":"1190815971","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"lsy1606302653667","name":"InvestorPlace"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"investorplace.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"translate_title":"苹果与能源行业：哪个更好买？","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9},"content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9051842693,"gmtCreate":1654672672712,"gmtModify":1676535489784,"author":{"id":"4097326744114730","authorId":"4097326744114730","name":"kelly2128","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4097326744114730","idStr":"4097326744114730"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051842693","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051843603,"gmtCreate":1654671828302,"gmtModify":1676535489696,"author":{"id":"4117111740956422","authorId":"4117111740956422","name":"Tony Stark7","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/ceb9295988694268dab00bc4ea19cf13","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4117111740956422","idStr":"4117111740956422"},"htmlText":"Apple","listText":"Apple","text":"Apple","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051843603","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051843013,"gmtCreate":1654671577932,"gmtModify":1676535489680,"author":{"id":"4094697156250480","authorId":"4094697156250480","name":"快乐快了","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4094697156250480","idStr":"4094697156250480"},"htmlText":"👍","listText":"👍","text":"👍","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051843013","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051849730,"gmtCreate":1654671566420,"gmtModify":1676535489674,"author":{"id":"4087190594214920","authorId":"4087190594214920","name":"PBL77","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ef4f93ba3e261ac276aef28c4467365","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4087190594214920","idStr":"4087190594214920"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051849730","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051857882,"gmtCreate":1654671072346,"gmtModify":1676535489634,"author":{"id":"3570103090255456","authorId":"3570103090255456","name":"JC888","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/f3e3c0218599fca5c4e265ddbee1fb32","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3570103090255456","idStr":"3570103090255456"},"htmlText":"Firstly both are from different sectors. Unsure how a apple-to-apple comparison could be carried out.If based on figures n stats then maybe.&nbsp;At the end, comparisons aside both are still on the recommendations lists. LOL - back at Square one.New Energy is not matured and pervasive enough to take over Old Energy. Hence old energy will remain for a long while. Just that&nbsp;war has exacerbated the price with&nbsp;Russian oil&nbsp;boycott.Song? The Power by Snap!.. Dance hit.. Dunno? YouTube it... Lol","listText":"Firstly both are from different sectors. Unsure how a apple-to-apple comparison could be carried out.If based on figures n stats then maybe.&nbsp;At the end, comparisons aside both are still on the recommendations lists. LOL - back at Square one.New Energy is not matured and pervasive enough to take over Old Energy. Hence old energy will remain for a long while. Just that&nbsp;war has exacerbated the price with&nbsp;Russian oil&nbsp;boycott.Song? The Power by Snap!.. Dance hit.. Dunno? YouTube it... Lol","text":"Firstly both are from different sectors. Unsure how a apple-to-apple comparison could be carried out.If based on figures n stats then maybe. At the end, comparisons aside both are still on the recommendations lists. LOL - back at Square one.New Energy is not matured and pervasive enough to take over Old Energy. Hence old energy will remain for a long while. Just that war has exacerbated the price with Russian oil boycott.Song? The Power by Snap!.. Dance hit.. Dunno? YouTube it... Lol","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":17,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051857882","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051855537,"gmtCreate":1654670667429,"gmtModify":1676535489567,"author":{"id":"3558871568126383","authorId":"3558871568126383","name":"babengerix","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9f23eaec9e66c7b3290ac06c73ba5b32","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3558871568126383","idStr":"3558871568126383"},"htmlText":"For long term apple is proven for growth company","listText":"For long term apple is proven for growth company","text":"For long term apple is proven for growth company","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051855537","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051855981,"gmtCreate":1654670507143,"gmtModify":1676535489550,"author":{"id":"3577433295437037","authorId":"3577433295437037","name":"Noob6","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/395476a9381e76bd4cd6eb8b78eddc5e","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3577433295437037","idStr":"3577433295437037"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051855981","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051855068,"gmtCreate":1654670504355,"gmtModify":1676535489472,"author":{"id":"3581937910767045","authorId":"3581937910767045","name":"Pluto891","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9963f2ef3d3ad2aff28340461d3d6d0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3581937910767045","idStr":"3581937910767045"},"htmlText":"waste of time in such comparison. Not even Apple to Apple. Both have advantages n disadvantages...","listText":"waste of time in such comparison. Not even Apple to Apple. Both have advantages n disadvantages...","text":"waste of time in such comparison. Not even Apple to Apple. Both have advantages n disadvantages...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051855068","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051852823,"gmtCreate":1654670404362,"gmtModify":1676535489465,"author":{"id":"3582285682937778","authorId":"3582285682937778","name":"neoh","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3582285682937778","idStr":"3582285682937778"},"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051852823","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051856708,"gmtCreate":1654670369804,"gmtModify":1676535489447,"author":{"id":"3570664633810000","authorId":"3570664633810000","name":"mohjoejoejoe","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3570664633810000","idStr":"3570664633810000"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051856708","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051858189,"gmtCreate":1654669666641,"gmtModify":1676535489409,"author":{"id":"3578016956086861","authorId":"3578016956086861","name":"JeremyEe","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e4251e60b7916b8816ebb7a4c9bd615c","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3578016956086861","idStr":"3578016956086861"},"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051858189","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051858386,"gmtCreate":1654669638845,"gmtModify":1676535489401,"author":{"id":"3553900041025922","authorId":"3553900041025922","name":"1nquisit0","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c22511f65f9157a35a7f105f2b1d9bf","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3553900041025922","idStr":"3553900041025922"},"htmlText":"Please like","listText":"Please like","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051858386","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051858093,"gmtCreate":1654669603112,"gmtModify":1676535489400,"author":{"id":"3577502940596690","authorId":"3577502940596690","name":"Jahme","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d07b4bec5131f225dae7aadbfebc0c02","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3577502940596690","idStr":"3577502940596690"},"htmlText":"Buyyyy","listText":"Buyyyy","text":"Buyyyy","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051858093","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051851110,"gmtCreate":1654669378830,"gmtModify":1676535489393,"author":{"id":"3575673754947065","authorId":"3575673754947065","name":"Nana_seven","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cbfa864cf0a3b766b4090b0ad3b67e69","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575673754947065","idStr":"3575673754947065"},"htmlText":"Pls like&nbsp;","listText":"Pls like&nbsp;","text":"Pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051851110","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051851353,"gmtCreate":1654669363472,"gmtModify":1676535489376,"author":{"id":"4088064092928860","authorId":"4088064092928860","name":"Yan99","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4088064092928860","idStr":"4088064092928860"},"htmlText":"Able to buy this share? Can advise .","listText":"Able to buy this share? Can advise .","text":"Able to buy this share? Can advise .","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051851353","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051853458,"gmtCreate":1654669293074,"gmtModify":1676535489366,"author":{"id":"4088064092928860","authorId":"4088064092928860","name":"Yan99","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4088064092928860","idStr":"4088064092928860"},"htmlText":"Is this share able to buy?","listText":"Is this share able to buy?","text":"Is this share able to buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051853458","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051853500,"gmtCreate":1654669291300,"gmtModify":1676535489366,"author":{"id":"3582667225966897","authorId":"3582667225966897","name":"JY1980","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c6f123e82a9a8b2f55744c343c13bbdc","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3582667225966897","idStr":"3582667225966897"},"htmlText":"Hi","listText":"Hi","text":"Hi","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051853500","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051853070,"gmtCreate":1654669101390,"gmtModify":1676535489350,"author":{"id":"3586817050833129","authorId":"3586817050833129","name":"Siak","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ed2639a3eeb56c6706ffb23a3d0059fd","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3586817050833129","idStr":"3586817050833129"},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051853070","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051859870,"gmtCreate":1654668996290,"gmtModify":1676535489343,"author":{"id":"4096599098888750","authorId":"4096599098888750","name":"Fadzli13","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/15e467ec92dd53b5422e77e7a427c1bf","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4096599098888750","idStr":"4096599098888750"},"htmlText":"It is also very important to buy something you arefamiliar with. You must know more about the business that you are planning to buy a share in, be it Apple (or tech stocks) or the Energy Sector.&nbsp;You cannot go wrong with educating yourself before making an informed decision.&nbsp;","listText":"It is also very important to buy something you arefamiliar with. You must know more about the business that you are planning to buy a share in, be it Apple (or tech stocks) or the Energy Sector.&nbsp;You cannot go wrong with educating yourself before making an informed decision.&nbsp;","text":"It is also very important to buy something you arefamiliar with. You must know more about the business that you are planning to buy a share in, be it Apple (or tech stocks) or the Energy Sector. You cannot go wrong with educating yourself before making an informed decision.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051859870","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9051827418,"gmtCreate":1654668655434,"gmtModify":1676535489295,"author":{"id":"3581563418944392","authorId":"3581563418944392","name":"Andrewinho","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3127e2bc40ab23064a5187a00a63e19b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581563418944392","idStr":"3581563418944392"},"htmlText":"🍎🍎🍎","listText":"🍎🍎🍎","text":"🍎🍎🍎","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9051827418","repostId":1190815971,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190815971","pubTimestamp":1654660130,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190815971?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-08 11:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190815971","media":"InvestorPlace","summary":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock i","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.</li><li>While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.</li><li>With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.</li></ul>On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&amp;P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.</body></html>","source":"lsy1606302653667","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Versus the Energy Sector: Which Is the Better Buy?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-08 11:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/>InvestorPlace</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nApple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6,...\n\n<a href=\"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://investorplace.com/2022/06/apple-aapl-stock-vs-the-energy-sector-which-is-the-better-buy/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190815971","content_text":"Apple(AAPL) launched a bunch of new products on Jun. 6.While the company is doing fine, AAPL stock is not, down over 15% in 2022.With this decline, the energy sector could be the better bet.On Jun. 6, Apple(NASDAQ:AAPL) held its Worldwide Developers Conference. The company introduced new versions of the MacBook laptop and several other interesting products. Despite the excitement these announcements always create, AAPL stock gained less than 1% on the day.The reality is that tech isn’t on the minds of buyers at the moment. That award goes to the energy sector. Gas prices over $5 will do that.Interestingly, Apple has a 6.5% weighting in the S&P 500, 170 basis points higher than the entire energy sector. At this point, Apple’s share price is trending lower. Meanwhile, the Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(NYSEARCA:XLE) is up 64.8% year-to-date (YTD).For now, energy stocks and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain the safer play. Here’s why.AAPL Stock Trades at 22x Forward EarningsApple’s average 2023 earnings per share estimate is $6.58. That’s 22.2x its 2023 earnings. If you go by the median 12-month target price of $190, analysts expect its trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple to be closer to 29x next year. That compares to a trailing P/E ratio of just less than 24x today.Even though it’s expensive, analysts seem to be saying that investors will continue to pay for quality. That makes sense.In the meantime, the 21 stocks in XLE have an average trailing 12-month P/E ratio of17.3and a forward P/E of 10.3, less than half Apple’s forward P/E. That doesn’t make sense.According to FactSet, energy stocks had an earnings growth rate of268%in Q1 2022, 6.4x higher than the materials sector, the second-highest sector for earnings growth. Despite a ton of money flowing into the energy sector, a company like Exxon Mobil(NYSE:XOM) still only trades at 10x its forward earnings. With XLE yielding 2.6% at the moment, you’re getting growth and income at a fraction of what you would pay for Apple.Two Possible Ways to Play ThisI’m the last person to suggest energy stocks are the way to go. I have been pessimistic about the oil and gas industry for many years. However, if the task at hand is getting blood from a stone — an apt description of the current equities markets — then XLE and the stocks held within this ETF are a smart bet right now.Yes, you’ve missed substantial gains — XLE had a total return of 53.3% in 2021 and 62.6% YTD with dividends included. However, given that stocks like XOM are trading at half their five-year average P/E, I would be hard-pressed to come up with a single argument against betting on energy stocks through the remainder of 2022 and into 2023.So, if you were thinking about placing a $5,000 bet on Apple, maybe you could put half of that into XLE and the remainder into AAPL stock. That’s one way to play this.A second way is to buy Berkshire Hathaway(NYSE:BRK-B). It owns 911.3 million shares of Apple, accounting for 39% of Berkshire’s $346 billion equity portfolio. In addition, Chevron(NYSE:CVX) is Berkshire’s third-largest holding, while Occidental Petroleum(NYSE:OXY) is the holding company’s seventh-largest position.The Bottom Line on AAPL StockIf you add 83.86 million warrants, Berkshire has to buy OXY stock at $59.62 a share. Warren Buffett owns or controls 21.6% of the oil and gas producer. It’s also a top 10 holding of XLE.Based on its current share price at the time of writing of $69.87, Berkshire’s OXY holdings would be worth $15.38 billion, which would vault it into the sixth spot, ahead of Kraft Heinz(NASDAQ:KHC).Either of my two suggestions makes sense at the present time. If you’re a risk-averse investor, I’d go for the Berkshire option. On the other hand, if you’re okay with a bit of risk, I’d consider doing the 50/50 AAPL/XLE split.Only aggressive investors ought to consider Apple stock at this point in the proceedings. I’m not sure we’ve seen the bottom just yet. Long-term, Apple remains a good core holding.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":206,"commentSize":34,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}