Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants

1.15K
117
Favorite

Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants

Bloomberg2021-09-12

(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

1.15K

Report

Comment（117）

Henryee18
·2021-09-13
Definitely a great news for $Apple(AAPL)$!
Reply
2
Report
ASMH
·2021-09-13
Like
Reply
2
Report
Blading23
·2021-09-13
Read
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- Blading23:
  comment
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
sk5735
·2021-09-13
Good
Reply
2
Report
EHG
·2021-09-13
Like
Reply
3
Report
EHG
·2021-09-13
Like
Reply
Like
Report
Sphere
·2021-09-13
AAPL up!
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- Sphere:
  Up
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
Albaakbert
·2021-09-13
Tackle
Reply
1
Report
XguiX
·2021-09-13
Read
Reply
2
Report
JayTan
·2021-09-13
Like and comment pls
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- IQcute:
  done. like pls
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
- Stchua:
  Done
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
sylarspock
·2021-09-13
Good
Reply
4
Report
MN27
·2021-09-13
Like pls
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- sylarspock:
  Done
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
Syww
·2021-09-13
[Strong] [Strong]
Reply
6
Report
Sheryl04
·2021-09-13
Pls like
Reply
8
Report
Fold Replies
- koolgal:
  ??
  2021-09-14
  Reply
  Report
- US_watchlist:
  ok
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
Kucing
·2021-09-13
good
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- Kucing:
  good
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
- Kucing:
  good
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
Chimpsey
·2021-09-13
Okay
Reply
6
Report
Moolele
·2021-09-13
US like Sino problem solved?
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Chimpsey:
  solve that first
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
AngelaChan
·2021-09-13
Interesting ?
Reply
7
Report
Fold Replies
- MengKeng:
  just observe for a while as it might dip before rising
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
- AngelaChan:
  is this a buy call?
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
claratan
·2021-09-13
Wow ? ? ?
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- KopiSiewDai:
  ?
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report
天天有錢賺
·2021-09-13
Strong
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- 天天有錢賺:
  Good
  2021-09-13
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","id":"2166370857","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","media":"Bloomberg","content":"<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"yahoofinance","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"AAPL","symbol_name":"苹果","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","article_id":"2166370857","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"yahoofinance","name":"雅虎金融"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"yahoo.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"translate_title":"苹果的裁决为拜登应对科技巨头的誓言设置了障碍","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9,"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9},"content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","kind":"news","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":888673616,"gmtCreate":1631496316835,"gmtModify":1676530557006,"author":{"id":"3561088065415396","authorId":"3561088065415396","name":"Henryee18","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68e1124a4989ce380d6aa143a07b2620","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b7820dfed76481d8dc4de6ac5a7a136","crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3561088065415396","authorIdStr":"3561088065415396"},"htmlText":"Definitely a great news for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>!&nbsp;","listText":"Definitely a great news for <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$Apple(AAPL)$</a>!&nbsp;","text":"Definitely a great news for $Apple(AAPL)$!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888673616","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888601009,"gmtCreate":1631491309001,"gmtModify":1676530554784,"author":{"id":"3586939439858903","authorId":"3586939439858903","name":"ASMH","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8c22c3127769d9bb7b4e8d291d98433","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586939439858903","authorIdStr":"3586939439858903"},"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888601009","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888878105,"gmtCreate":1631490839107,"gmtModify":1676530554589,"author":{"id":"3565700003213382","authorId":"3565700003213382","name":"Blading23","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4cd7ba668d1c755bf79285b205abdfb2","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3565700003213382","authorIdStr":"3565700003213382"},"htmlText":"Read","listText":"Read","text":"Read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888878105","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5845810,"gmtCreate":1631490849634,"gmtModify":1663233786860,"authorId":3565700003213382,"author":{"id":3565700003213382,"idStr":"3565700003213382","authorId":3565700003213382,"name":"Blading23","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4cd7ba668d1c755bf79285b205abdfb2","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888878105,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>comment</u>","text":"<u>comment</u>","html":"<u>comment</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888844481,"gmtCreate":1631490585843,"gmtModify":1676530554489,"author":{"id":"3581741175905126","authorId":"3581741175905126","name":"sk5735","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/119fc82bddd3291f8c7e303167676732","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581741175905126","authorIdStr":"3581741175905126"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888844481","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888854601,"gmtCreate":1631490093603,"gmtModify":1676530554200,"author":{"id":"3586941861951066","authorId":"3586941861951066","name":"EHG","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28e4734e50f795c3218330cbb6c3e9a0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586941861951066","authorIdStr":"3586941861951066"},"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888854601","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888854155,"gmtCreate":1631490078877,"gmtModify":1676530554208,"author":{"id":"3586941861951066","authorId":"3586941861951066","name":"EHG","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/28e4734e50f795c3218330cbb6c3e9a0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3586941861951066","authorIdStr":"3586941861951066"},"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888854155","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888853639,"gmtCreate":1631489754321,"gmtModify":1676530554046,"author":{"id":"3573432013960035","authorId":"3573432013960035","name":"Sphere","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573432013960035","authorIdStr":"3573432013960035"},"htmlText":"AAPL up!","listText":"AAPL up!","text":"AAPL up!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888853639","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5845524,"gmtCreate":1631489759280,"gmtModify":1663233786734,"authorId":3573432013960035,"author":{"id":3573432013960035,"idStr":"3573432013960035","authorId":3573432013960035,"name":"Sphere","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888853639,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Up","text":"Up","html":"Up"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888822766,"gmtCreate":1631489327655,"gmtModify":1676530553946,"author":{"id":"3573197870935019","authorId":"3573197870935019","name":"Albaakbert","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38fb1a202f211aaf65a6b491072b884f","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573197870935019","authorIdStr":"3573197870935019"},"htmlText":"Tackle","listText":"Tackle","text":"Tackle","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888822766","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888828162,"gmtCreate":1631489199956,"gmtModify":1676530553874,"author":{"id":"4090558886965400","authorId":"4090558886965400","name":"XguiX","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4090558886965400","authorIdStr":"4090558886965400"},"htmlText":"Read","listText":"Read","text":"Read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888828162","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888823210,"gmtCreate":1631489033230,"gmtModify":1676530553826,"author":{"id":"3572397521268164","authorId":"3572397521268164","name":"JayTan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2df5c1d990871ccbfc0f26d4948532db","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c1eed764d9c7ff83dc093fbb9a96bc2","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3572397521268164","authorIdStr":"3572397521268164"},"htmlText":"Like and comment pls","listText":"Like and comment pls","text":"Like and comment pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888823210","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5845409,"gmtCreate":1631489292966,"gmtModify":1663233786048,"authorId":4092174983483640,"author":{"id":4092174983483640,"idStr":"4092174983483640","authorId":4092174983483640,"name":"IQcute","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b06a3be78c20359230ff855c40659944","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888823210,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"done. like <u>pls</u>","text":"done. like <u>pls</u>","html":"done. like <u>pls</u>"},{"id":5845347,"gmtCreate":1631489044566,"gmtModify":1663233784847,"authorId":3586774718687945,"author":{"id":3586774718687945,"idStr":"3586774718687945","authorId":3586774718687945,"name":"Stchua","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c6da38be819096178bf3d64e02165e0","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888823210,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done","text":"Done","html":"Done"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888865459,"gmtCreate":1631488720371,"gmtModify":1676530553756,"author":{"id":"3582677817626222","authorId":"3582677817626222","name":"sylarspock","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2ee7f5466dab8465d661a72c047672","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3582677817626222","authorIdStr":"3582677817626222"},"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888865459","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888865996,"gmtCreate":1631488687815,"gmtModify":1676530553733,"author":{"id":"3585973860502184","authorId":"3585973860502184","name":"MN27","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0a11b544b50a084b6af0533c0b412c51","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3585973860502184","authorIdStr":"3585973860502184"},"htmlText":"Like pls","listText":"Like pls","text":"Like pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888865996","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5845274,"gmtCreate":1631488731284,"gmtModify":1631891614813,"authorId":3582677817626222,"author":{"id":3582677817626222,"idStr":"3582677817626222","authorId":3582677817626222,"name":"sylarspock","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2ee7f5466dab8465d661a72c047672","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888865996,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Done","text":"Done","html":"Done"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888868275,"gmtCreate":1631488479397,"gmtModify":1676530553677,"author":{"id":"4087953623473280","authorId":"4087953623473280","name":"Syww","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/eb83576edbcfb98efcb33d606f168221","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4087953623473280","authorIdStr":"4087953623473280"},"htmlText":"[Strong]&nbsp;[Strong]&nbsp;","listText":"[Strong]&nbsp;[Strong]&nbsp;","text":"[Strong] [Strong]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888868275","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888861265,"gmtCreate":1631488402357,"gmtModify":1676530553661,"author":{"id":"3579263894255367","authorId":"3579263894255367","name":"Sheryl04","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cb46b4965d4b2d0792ca657332a149a5","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3579263894255367","authorIdStr":"3579263894255367"},"htmlText":"Pls like","listText":"Pls like","text":"Pls like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888861265","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5863002,"gmtCreate":1631597578286,"gmtModify":1663233857036,"authorId":3559581955535845,"author":{"id":3559581955535845,"idStr":"3559581955535845","authorId":3559581955535845,"name":"koolgal","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c05274d88ffc0434623e57350c52c70a","vip":2,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2-1","templateUuid":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2","name":"Monthly Top Contributor","description":"Top 3 Contributors with the most and best Editor's Picks every month","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0cad6192443c33dca826a001250fbd4","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ccd98c646815ce7610b0df338e060cc","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/TW/9000980585","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.04.02","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2003},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[{"badgeId":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8-1","templateUuid":"9427a906234c4b18a82ec3d7730b7fa8","name":"Star Contributor","description":"Have published 3 or more picked posts, and have published at least one picked post and participated in comments within 30 days","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1866dcf97a73be1c330f85862546aedc","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/4f5c5fa8e2c7683bb5a7fce8753ee456","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/activity/market/2023/star-contributors/","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.12.22","individualDisplayEnabled":1,"backgroundColor":{"dark":"#675a37","tint":"#f9ebc2"},"fontColor":{"dark":"#ffffff","tint":"#ab7a0e"},"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2007}]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888861265,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"??","text":"??","html":"??"},{"id":5845224,"gmtCreate":1631488536173,"gmtModify":1663233781546,"authorId":3581244873474125,"author":{"id":3581244873474125,"idStr":"3581244873474125","authorId":3581244873474125,"name":"US_watchlist","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c45e6bbe1cefb0fecde067a20b3c788f","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888861265,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>ok</u>","text":"<u>ok</u>","html":"<u>ok</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888860462,"gmtCreate":1631488099756,"gmtModify":1676530553541,"author":{"id":"3584520268259172","authorId":"3584520268259172","name":"Kucing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c4942db49a9ed9bfaecacc7837dec2f","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3584520268259172","authorIdStr":"3584520268259172"},"htmlText":"good&nbsp;","listText":"good&nbsp;","text":"good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888860462","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5845182,"gmtCreate":1631488139056,"gmtModify":1663233782143,"authorId":3584520268259172,"author":{"id":3584520268259172,"idStr":"3584520268259172","authorId":3584520268259172,"name":"Kucing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c4942db49a9ed9bfaecacc7837dec2f","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":"80.15%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888860462,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"good","text":"good","html":"good"},{"id":5845177,"gmtCreate":1631488122213,"gmtModify":1663233781429,"authorId":3584520268259172,"author":{"id":3584520268259172,"idStr":"3584520268259172","authorId":3584520268259172,"name":"Kucing","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3c4942db49a9ed9bfaecacc7837dec2f","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":"80.15%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888860462,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"good","text":"good","html":"good"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888883042,"gmtCreate":1631487363086,"gmtModify":1676530553336,"author":{"id":"3578111487107537","authorId":"3578111487107537","name":"Chimpsey","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab58cb989ba2205bb2646f1c4d97c579","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3578111487107537","authorIdStr":"3578111487107537"},"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888883042","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888816949,"gmtCreate":1631486509781,"gmtModify":1676530553164,"author":{"id":"4090105190802310","authorId":"4090105190802310","name":"Moolele","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35190aa5aecb0245091a30761db693d3","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f84d87792f02cf78e80ee34979fd31e5","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4090105190802310","authorIdStr":"4090105190802310"},"htmlText":"US like Sino problem solved?&nbsp;","listText":"US like Sino problem solved?&nbsp;","text":"US like Sino problem solved?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888816949","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5845056,"gmtCreate":1631487350842,"gmtModify":1663233783740,"authorId":3578111487107537,"author":{"id":3578111487107537,"idStr":"3578111487107537","authorId":3578111487107537,"name":"Chimpsey","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab58cb989ba2205bb2646f1c4d97c579","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888816949,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"solve that first","text":"solve that first","html":"solve that first"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888818983,"gmtCreate":1631486351642,"gmtModify":1676530553140,"author":{"id":"3581927959461394","authorId":"3581927959461394","name":"AngelaChan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89cd9fc4748e9cc19bd2df211f8ced9c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581927959461394","authorIdStr":"3581927959461394"},"htmlText":"Interesting ?","listText":"Interesting ?","text":"Interesting ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888818983","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5845338,"gmtCreate":1631488973106,"gmtModify":1631890135817,"authorId":3582668988155006,"author":{"id":3582668988155006,"idStr":"3582668988155006","authorId":3582668988155006,"name":"MengKeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/daf999525f61ba41d3c13b0ed728eb77","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.29","exceedPercentage":"60.01%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888818983,"type":1,"supId":5844941,"prevId":0,"content":"just observe for a while as it might dip before rising","text":"just observe for a while as it might dip before rising","html":"just observe for a while as it might dip before rising"},{"id":5844941,"gmtCreate":1631486417110,"gmtModify":1631890135805,"authorId":3581927959461394,"author":{"id":3581927959461394,"idStr":"3581927959461394","authorId":3581927959461394,"name":"AngelaChan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/89cd9fc4748e9cc19bd2df211f8ced9c","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888818983,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"is this a <u>b</u>uy call?","text":"is this a <u>b</u>uy call?","html":"is this a <u>b</u>uy call?"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888811876,"gmtCreate":1631486277895,"gmtModify":1676530553148,"author":{"id":"3573731928321338","authorId":"3573731928321338","name":"claratan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9c6bbdac9048ff2e4b740f272576e2be","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573731928321338","authorIdStr":"3573731928321338"},"htmlText":"Wow ? ? ?&nbsp;","listText":"Wow ? ? ?&nbsp;","text":"Wow ? ? ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888811876","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5844959,"gmtCreate":1631486515527,"gmtModify":1663233783456,"authorId":3558561602853794,"author":{"id":3558561602853794,"idStr":"3558561602853794","authorId":3558561602853794,"name":"KopiSiewDai","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ab70b8b90e252cfaab82742a3526cc1","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888811876,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"? <br>","text":"? <br>","html":"? <br>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":888810712,"gmtCreate":1631486030936,"gmtModify":1676530553068,"author":{"id":"3569157961325264","authorId":"3569157961325264","name":"天天有錢賺","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a87d6821c87a3f5345fd3b39e87a3710","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3569157961325264","authorIdStr":"3569157961325264"},"htmlText":"Strong","listText":"Strong","text":"Strong","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/888810712","repostId":2166370857,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2166370857","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1631414221,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2166370857?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-09-12 10:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2166370857","media":"Bloomberg","summary":" -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigat","content":"<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.</p>\n<p>The Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.</p>\n<p>Antitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.</p>\n<p>“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham &amp; Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”</p>\n<p>The Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”</p>\n<p>On Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.</p>\n<p>Apple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say</p>\n<p>U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.</p>\n<p>Yet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.</p>\n<p>One of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.</p>\n<p>U.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle</p>\n<p>“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”</p>\n<p>Still, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.</p>\n<p>“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”</p>","source":"yahoofinance","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Ruling Poses Hurdles for Biden’s Vow to Tackle Tech Giants\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-09-12 10:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOGL":"谷歌A","GOOG":"谷歌","AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apple-ruling-poses-hurdles-biden-123000668.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5f26f4a48f9cb3e29be4d71d3ba8c038","article_id":"2166370857","content_text":"(Bloomberg) -- U.S. antitrust officials investigating Apple Inc. face new hurdles after a judge rejected the bulk of Epic Games Inc.’s lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of thwarting competition laws with its tight grip over the App Store.\nThe Justice Department’s antitrust division has been investigating Apple over practices in the store, a probe that began during the Trump administration amid scrutiny of the country’s dominant tech platforms. The Biden administration is pressing forward with the investigation.\nAntitrust lawyers say Friday’s decision in the Epic lawsuit, while not fatal to the Justice Department’s inquiry, presents new challenges for the government because the judge said that Epic failed to establish that Apple’s conduct violates the Sherman Act, the federal law used to target monopolies.\n“It raises the bar to any Justice Department lawsuit,” said Joel Mitnick, an antitrust lawyer at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP who isn’t involved in the case. “Apple pretty much got a flat out victory on all the Sherman Act claims.”\nThe Biden administration has vowed to take on consolidation and anticompetitive conduct across the economy. President Joe Biden has put prominent tech critics in key positions and in a July executive order said he would combat the rise of dominant internet platforms, which he accused of using “their power to exclude market entrants, to extract monopoly profits, and to gather intimate personal information that they can exploit for their own advantage.”\nOn Capitol Hill, Democratic and Republic lawmakers are backing legislation that would give antitrust enforcers more power and impose new rules on app stores run by Apple and Alphabet Inc.’s Google.\nApple Ruling Underscores Need for App Store Bill, Lawmakers Say\nU.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said in her decision that Apple’s rules preventing app developers from alerting consumers about purchase options outside the App Store are anticompetitive, and she said Apple must let developers steer people to other payment methods.\nYet the judge ruled that Apple isn’t illegally monopolizing the market for mobile gaming transactions. She also rejected Epic’s case that Apple is engaging in unlawful restraint of trade, another element of federal antitrust law.\nOne of the challenges for the Justice Department, according to lawyers, is that Gonzalez Rogers said Apple’s restrictions imposed on developers are justified in order to protect security. She also said the market is two-sided, which presents courts with the difficulty of weighing harms on one side and benefits on the other, a framework established in a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision.\nU.S. Google Monopoly Case Could Hit Supreme Court AmEx Hurdle\n“The biggest thing that scares me about this opinion is the two-sided market complexity,” said John Newman, who teaches antitrust law at the University of Miami School of Law. “If this is a two-sided market, you can’t prove harm to just developers or harm to just consumers. You have to somehow prove net harm across all the different groups that interact through the platform.”\nStill, the decision doesn’t deliver a mortal blow to a potential Justice Department case, lawyers say. Even though Gonzalez Rogers said Apple doesn’t have monopoly power, she said the company “is near the precipice of substantial market power, or monopoly power.” The judge also wrote that Apple failed to justify the 30% commission it charges on transactions.\n“There’s a lot here to encourage an enforcer depending on what their investigation looks like,” said Sam Weinstein, who teaches antitrust law at Cardozo School of Law and is a former lawyer at the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “If I’m the government, I don’t look at this and think we’re out of business.”","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":5844889,"gmtCreate":1631486043790,"gmtModify":1663233780956,"authorId":3569157961325264,"author":{"id":3569157961325264,"idStr":"3569157961325264","authorId":3569157961325264,"name":"天天有錢賺","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a87d6821c87a3f5345fd3b39e87a3710","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":888810712,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<u>Good</u>","text":"<u>Good</u>","html":"<u>Good</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":1151,"commentSize":117,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}