Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon

Motley Fool2022-12-10

Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

584

Report

Comment（43）

MBE
·2022-12-12
Ok
Reply
3
Report
Desmond669
·2022-12-12
Buy?
Reply
2
Report
Weylin
·2022-12-12
amazon!
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Desmond669:
  Lol
  2022-12-12
  Reply
  Report
- Kenny77:
  Nice
  2022-12-12
  Reply
  Report
Seah CL
·2022-12-12
K
Reply
2
Report
MIe
·2022-12-12
Microsoft and Amazon buy dip
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Kiki19:
  K
  2022-12-13
  Reply
  Report
- YBK:
  👍
  2022-12-12
  Reply
  Report
- mac0racle:
  Buy both
  2022-12-12
  Reply
  Report
Alvin1975
·2022-12-11
Both
Reply
3
Report
MLFL
·2022-12-11
👋
Reply
5
Report
来人
·2022-12-11
Ok
Reply
4
Report
jllwang
·2022-12-11
Interesting comparison
Reply
2
Report
Bull1973
·2022-12-11
Ok
Reply
2
Report
sk27
·2022-12-11
Both
Reply
2
Report
Cheria
·2022-12-11
Both are good blue chips stock
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Ahlec:
  just whether we hv chips
  2022-12-11
  Reply
  Report
Deonc
·2022-12-11
Ok
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- IamZhong:
  ok
  2022-12-11
  Reply
  Report
VonCat
·2022-12-11
Thanks
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- Smallbee:
  Ok
  2022-12-11
  Reply
  Report
Deonc
·2022-12-11
Ok
Reply
3
Report
ZhejiangKiwi
·2022-12-11
Given their advantages, it's hard to say which one is better. I guess it might be a reasonable idea to invest both Amazon and Microsoft if possible.
Reply
4
Report
ArcherWG
·2022-12-11
$Microsoft(MSFT)$
Reply
4
Report
UTOtrader
·2022-12-11
T
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- UTOtraderReplying toFirework peh:
  yeah
  2022-12-12
  Reply
  Report
- Firework peh:
  Yes
  2022-12-11
  Reply
  Report
- YYKTAN:
  ok
  2022-12-11
  Reply
  Report
YJ Lee
·2022-12-11
Ok
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Tigor:
  Ok
  2022-12-11
  Reply
  Report
Seah CL
·2022-12-11
K
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- pjetan:
  👌🏻
  2022-12-12
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2290238146","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","media":"Motley Fool","content":"<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"AMZN","symbol_name":"亚马逊","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","article_id":"2290238146","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"fool_stock","name":"Motley Fool"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"fool.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"AMZN":"亚马逊","MSFT":"微软"},"translate_title":"更好的购买：微软对亚马逊","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AMZN":0.9,"MSFT":0.9},"content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9923888654,"gmtCreate":1670824093079,"gmtModify":1676538441209,"author":{"id":"3586406638423368","authorId":"3586406638423368","name":"MBE","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/819dcae50fc62e5a41b7d625052bd116","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3586406638423368","idStr":"3586406638423368"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923888654","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9923159730,"gmtCreate":1670812629520,"gmtModify":1676538438519,"author":{"id":"3562118563279867","authorId":"3562118563279867","name":"Desmond669","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e2484115c94d3471cb46f20ea7598b4a","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3562118563279867","idStr":"3562118563279867"},"htmlText":"Buy?","listText":"Buy?","text":"Buy?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923159730","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9923346060,"gmtCreate":1670804824050,"gmtModify":1676538435685,"author":{"id":"4121552442152242","authorId":"4121552442152242","name":"Weylin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/392e8172dc6bc3136dd0fcdae79f2df7","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4121552442152242","idStr":"4121552442152242"},"htmlText":"amazon!&nbsp;","listText":"amazon!&nbsp;","text":"amazon!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923346060","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105170014,"gmtCreate":1670812623538,"gmtModify":1670812636995,"authorId":3562118563279867,"author":{"id":3562118563279867,"idStr":"3562118563279867","authorId":3562118563279867,"name":"Desmond669","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e2484115c94d3471cb46f20ea7598b4a","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.05.31","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9923346060,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Lol</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Lol</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Lol</span>"},{"id":105168032,"gmtCreate":1670807818093,"gmtModify":1670807831036,"authorId":3553679778150469,"author":{"id":3553679778150469,"idStr":"3553679778150469","authorId":3553679778150469,"name":"Kenny77","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/77c5e512c4b7983d3f3075d8ec4c2f2d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9923346060,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Nice</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Nice</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Nice</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9923331129,"gmtCreate":1670799951662,"gmtModify":1676538433915,"author":{"id":"4102135564535180","authorId":"4102135564535180","name":"Seah CL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/970bca7b04e85a42a2c8eabed7ec96d0","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4102135564535180","idStr":"4102135564535180"},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923331129","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9923976835,"gmtCreate":1670796449428,"gmtModify":1676538433128,"author":{"id":"3577182936341023","authorId":"3577182936341023","name":"MIe","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f84d87792f02cf78e80ee34979fd31e5","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3577182936341023","idStr":"3577182936341023"},"htmlText":"Microsoft and Amazon buy dip","listText":"Microsoft and Amazon buy dip","text":"Microsoft and Amazon buy dip","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923976835","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105187764,"gmtCreate":1670918716688,"gmtModify":1670918729407,"authorId":4097387260130260,"author":{"id":4097387260130260,"idStr":"4097387260130260","authorId":4097387260130260,"name":"Kiki19","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/1330ce44324f235bf8d1fd1b32e7b559","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9923976835,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">K</span>"},{"id":105168894,"gmtCreate":1670810050918,"gmtModify":1670810065129,"authorId":4101263222280420,"author":{"id":4101263222280420,"idStr":"4101263222280420","authorId":4101263222280420,"name":"YBK","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9923976835,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"👍","text":"👍","html":"👍"},{"id":105166151,"gmtCreate":1670800733191,"gmtModify":1670800746730,"authorId":4105682868479180,"author":{"id":4105682868479180,"idStr":"4105682868479180","authorId":4105682868479180,"name":"mac0racle","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/4dc37b66a531fcae6a5c31754d48f122","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.11.15","exceedPercentage":"60.64%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9923976835,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Buy both</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Buy both</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Buy both</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9923041185,"gmtCreate":1670765402547,"gmtModify":1676538429723,"author":{"id":"3573788625955643","authorId":"3573788625955643","name":"Alvin1975","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/beba0668af2d109b87221754e75935b3","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3573788625955643","idStr":"3573788625955643"},"htmlText":"Both","listText":"Both","text":"Both","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923041185","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9923063565,"gmtCreate":1670758106057,"gmtModify":1676538428724,"author":{"id":"4115684828159522","authorId":"4115684828159522","name":"MLFL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1d7ab965a9728265436a2d2a8db471ce","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4115684828159522","idStr":"4115684828159522"},"htmlText":"👋&nbsp;","listText":"👋&nbsp;","text":"👋","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923063565","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9923005728,"gmtCreate":1670743762564,"gmtModify":1676538427235,"author":{"id":"3575544575320394","authorId":"3575544575320394","name":"来人","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0af89587decbb8a1d3e1596adc29cb98","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575544575320394","idStr":"3575544575320394"},"htmlText":"Ok&nbsp;","listText":"Ok&nbsp;","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9923005728","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929750390,"gmtCreate":1670735763010,"gmtModify":1676538426033,"author":{"id":"3567745604737709","authorId":"3567745604737709","name":"jllwang","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/366d7ae96d4681048d49130306d50c5d","vip":1,"crmLevel":8,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3567745604737709","idStr":"3567745604737709"},"htmlText":"Interesting comparison&nbsp;","listText":"Interesting comparison&nbsp;","text":"Interesting comparison","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929750390","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929736570,"gmtCreate":1670729155990,"gmtModify":1676538424632,"author":{"id":"3584680402793671","authorId":"3584680402793671","name":"Bull1973","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/866d29bf88ff7363d121a5ccc6028aae","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3584680402793671","idStr":"3584680402793671"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929736570","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929449847,"gmtCreate":1670724171489,"gmtModify":1676538423326,"author":{"id":"3582018187984085","authorId":"3582018187984085","name":"sk27","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9eff7bdabcd1448e80d9f4881925e9bb","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3582018187984085","idStr":"3582018187984085"},"htmlText":"Both","listText":"Both","text":"Both","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929449847","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929426104,"gmtCreate":1670722861908,"gmtModify":1676538422831,"author":{"id":"3576631507527148","authorId":"3576631507527148","name":"Cheria","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3576631507527148","idStr":"3576631507527148"},"htmlText":"Both are good blue chips stock","listText":"Both are good blue chips stock","text":"Both are good blue chips stock","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929426104","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105161423,"gmtCreate":1670753198292,"gmtModify":1670753208832,"authorId":4091753544363040,"author":{"id":4091753544363040,"idStr":"4091753544363040","authorId":4091753544363040,"name":"Ahlec","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/81afb03fdd19de870e28208208ff7909","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9929426104,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"just whether we hv <u>chips</u>","text":"just whether we hv <u>chips</u>","html":"just whether we hv <u>chips</u>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929428532,"gmtCreate":1670722824127,"gmtModify":1676538422816,"author":{"id":"3569316529855154","authorId":"3569316529855154","name":"Deonc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d9aa45dd2eb58357f6477dcfb99d1415","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3569316529855154","idStr":"3569316529855154"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929428532","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105157637,"gmtCreate":1670725143501,"gmtModify":1670725156332,"authorId":3573377839632850,"author":{"id":3573377839632850,"idStr":"3573377839632850","authorId":3573377839632850,"name":"IamZhong","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e52a0b5ff1390e09fa1d349bc20337b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9929428532,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929463164,"gmtCreate":1670721895459,"gmtModify":1676538422365,"author":{"id":"4089724341685130","authorId":"4089724341685130","name":"VonCat","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23efc0e286d39d8ff1b8acd611c62b45","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4089724341685130","idStr":"4089724341685130"},"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929463164","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105156936,"gmtCreate":1670722848462,"gmtModify":1670722861859,"authorId":3581671299867390,"author":{"id":3581671299867390,"idStr":"3581671299867390","authorId":3581671299867390,"name":"Smallbee","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/624f1d971432a90dd2c2736f31f8984f","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.97%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9929463164,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929413002,"gmtCreate":1670720224507,"gmtModify":1676538421768,"author":{"id":"3569316529855154","authorId":"3569316529855154","name":"Deonc","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d9aa45dd2eb58357f6477dcfb99d1415","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3569316529855154","idStr":"3569316529855154"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929413002","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929409095,"gmtCreate":1670716690117,"gmtModify":1676538420860,"author":{"id":"4118059011082232","authorId":"4118059011082232","name":"ZhejiangKiwi","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/6b109ba50f825835c17bb800ba364160","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4118059011082232","idStr":"4118059011082232"},"htmlText":"Given their advantages, it's hard to say which one is better. I guess it might be a reasonable idea to invest both Amazon and Microsoft if possible.&nbsp;","listText":"Given their advantages, it's hard to say which one is better. I guess it might be a reasonable idea to invest both Amazon and Microsoft if possible.&nbsp;","text":"Given their advantages, it's hard to say which one is better. I guess it might be a reasonable idea to invest both Amazon and Microsoft if possible.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929409095","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929546319,"gmtCreate":1670714585232,"gmtModify":1676538420400,"author":{"id":"3581837121803380","authorId":"3581837121803380","name":"ArcherWG","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/38e40c44fababa6849ceb15dfe8931a3","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581837121803380","idStr":"3581837121803380"},"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/MSFT\">$Microsoft(MSFT)$&nbsp;</a><v-v data-views=\"0\"></v-v>","text":"$Microsoft(MSFT)$","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929546319","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929543809,"gmtCreate":1670714295001,"gmtModify":1676538420316,"author":{"id":"3574547619690492","authorId":"3574547619690492","name":"UTOtrader","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82be6befb29ac8516e463638d3f659d5","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574547619690492","idStr":"3574547619690492"},"htmlText":"T","listText":"T","text":"T","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929543809","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105166141,"gmtCreate":1670800663739,"gmtModify":1670800676902,"authorId":3574547619690492,"author":{"id":3574547619690492,"idStr":"3574547619690492","authorId":3574547619690492,"name":"UTOtrader","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82be6befb29ac8516e463638d3f659d5","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.86%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":3557460658824677,"repliedAuthor":{"id":3557460658824677,"idStr":"3557460658824677","authorId":3557460658824677,"name":"Firework peh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9873e8ddb08004279796752daf19a999","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.08.19","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"objectId":9929543809,"type":1,"supId":105155819,"prevId":105156091,"content":"<u>yeah</u>","text":"<u>yeah</u>","html":"<u>yeah</u>"},{"id":105156091,"gmtCreate":1670721171776,"gmtModify":1670721185117,"authorId":3557460658824677,"author":{"id":3557460658824677,"idStr":"3557460658824677","authorId":3557460658824677,"name":"Firework peh","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9873e8ddb08004279796752daf19a999","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.08.19","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9929543809,"type":1,"supId":105155819,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Yes</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Yes</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Yes</span>"},{"id":105155819,"gmtCreate":1670720430148,"gmtModify":1670720442858,"authorId":3586858995147972,"author":{"id":3586858995147972,"idStr":"3586858995147972","authorId":3586858995147972,"name":"YYKTAN","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9c7bf12299d79e1cacc0c24919b7a3c","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9929543809,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"ok","text":"ok","html":"ok"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929558273,"gmtCreate":1670713231592,"gmtModify":1676538420105,"author":{"id":"4108816210230400","authorId":"4108816210230400","name":"YJ Lee","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4108816210230400","idStr":"4108816210230400"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929558273","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105155166,"gmtCreate":1670716827155,"gmtModify":1670716839914,"authorId":3576205711622421,"author":{"id":3576205711622421,"idStr":"3576205711622421","authorId":3576205711622421,"name":"Tigor","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d0d1df7e56518091a1d5b91db7fd0df","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9929558273,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">Ok</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9929559452,"gmtCreate":1670713003776,"gmtModify":1676538420034,"author":{"id":"4102135564535180","authorId":"4102135564535180","name":"Seah CL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/970bca7b04e85a42a2c8eabed7ec96d0","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"4102135564535180","idStr":"4102135564535180"},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9929559452","repostId":2290238146,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2290238146","pubTimestamp":1670638098,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2290238146?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-12-10 10:08","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2290238146","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These two giants have one area where they compete against each other.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Two of the largest companies globally are <b>Microsoft</b> and <b>Amazon</b>. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.</p><p>Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let&#39;s find out.</p><h2>A common offering is the future for both</h2><p>These two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon&#39;s e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft&#39;s Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.</p><p>However, the most important segment for both companies&#39; future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft&#39;s Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Company</th><th>Rank</th><th>Market Share</th></tr><tr><td><b>Amazon</b></td><td>1st</td><td>34%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Microsoft</b></td><td>2nd</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td><b>Alphabet </b>(Google Cloud)</td><td>3rd</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Synergy Research Group.</p><p>That&#39;s a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.</p><p>Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That&#39;s impressive considering that Amazon&#39;s trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft&#39;s was $203 billion. It&#39;s an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.</p><p>Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft&#39;s non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon&#39;s AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft&#39;s revenue.</p><p>However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it&#39;s Amazon&#39;s only profitable segment right now.</p><p>At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft&#39;s favor.</p><h2>Amazon is the better value</h2><p>However, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn&#39;t profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn&#39;t going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon&#39;s commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn&#39;t possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11b2c6b09932649414501fa819d125f\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"449\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>MSFT PS Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><p>Microsoft&#39;s price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it&#39;s been over the past couple of years. Microsoft&#39;s execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.</p><p>Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as <b>Walmart</b>), you&#39;d get a valuation like this below.</p><table border=\"1\"><tbody><tr><th>Amazon Segment</th><th>Trailing-12-Month Revenue</th><th>Segment Price-to-Sales Ratio</th><th>Segment Market Cap</th></tr><tr><td>AWS</td><td>$76.5 billion</td><td>9.4</td><td>$719.1 billion</td></tr><tr><td>Commerce</td><td>$425.7 billion</td><td>0.7</td><td>$298.0 billion</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Data source: Amazon and YCharts.</p><p>Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.</p><p>Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There&#39;s a lot of uncertainty with Amazon&#39;s commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Better Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nBetter Buy: Microsoft vs. Amazon\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-12-10 10:08 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"MSFT":"微软","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/12/09/better-buy-microsoft-vs-amazon/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2290238146","content_text":"Two of the largest companies globally are Microsoft and Amazon. Combined, they have brought in $705 billion in revenue over the past 12 months, but that number pales in comparison to the growth trajectories both companies are on.Is there an advantage that either stock has that investors should pinpoint? Or are they both evenly matched? Let's find out.A common offering is the future for bothThese two businesses hardly needs an introduction. Amazon's e-commerce platform has become the go-to place for nearly all shopping needs. Microsoft's Office products are standard for most computers, and it has a consumer product segment offering laptops and gaming consoles.However, the most important segment for both companies' future may well be cloud computing. Microsoft's Azure and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are the industry leaders, each maintaining an impressive market share.CompanyRankMarket ShareAmazon1st34%Microsoft2nd21%Alphabet (Google Cloud)3rd11%Data source: Synergy Research Group.That's a commanding lead over third-place Google Cloud. Additionally, each saw impressive revenue growth, with AWS rising 27% and Microsoft rising 35% year over year in their latest quarters. That growth is expected to continue for some time. Precedence Research expects the industry to grow at a compound annual rate of 17.4% from 2022 to 2030, eventually reaching a $1.6 trillion market.Say Amazon and Microsoft can retain their current market share in cloud computing. This would put potential 2030 revenue for this segment at $544 billion for Amazon and $336 billion for Microsoft. That's impressive considering that Amazon's trailing-12-month revenue was $502 billion and Microsoft's was $203 billion. It's an opportunity for massive growth apart from their other businesses.Looking at it another way, that $336 billion would be more than double Microsoft's non-Azure revenue today, by my estimate. By comparison, the projected $554 billion for Amazon's AWS business would be just a little over 30% more than its non-AWS revenue today. So cloud computing could have a much bigger impact down the road for Microsoft's revenue.However, on the bottom line, cloud computing could be more meaningful for Amazon, because AWS has a higher margin than the e-commerce revenue. In fact, it's Amazon's only profitable segment right now.At Amazon, AWS is also funding other business segments. At Microsoft, Azure is complementary. This skews the future outlook in Microsoft's favor.Amazon is the better valueHowever, stock valuation also has a role to play. Amazon isn't profitable, while Microsoft is, so comparing earnings or free cash flow isn't going to yield a helpful comparison. Plus, Amazon's commerce business is inherently low margin, even when profitable. So a direct comparison isn't possible. However, we can value each company in its own way.MSFT PS Ratio data by YChartsMicrosoft's price-to-earnings ratio of 27.5 is rich although not quite as expensive as it's been over the past couple of years. Microsoft's execution and consistency have earned it its premium, but the company must continue to execute at a high level to maintain its valuation.Moving to Amazon, if we value its AWS business at 9.4 times sales (the same as Microsoft) and its retail business at 0.7 times sales (the same as Walmart), you'd get a valuation like this below.Amazon SegmentTrailing-12-Month RevenueSegment Price-to-Sales RatioSegment Market CapAWS$76.5 billion9.4$719.1 billionCommerce$425.7 billion0.7$298.0 billionData source: Amazon and YCharts.Adding those two segments together gives Amazon a theoretical valuation of $1.017 trillion, yet the stock is valued at $960 billion. This shows that it is potentially undervalued.Over the long run, premium valuations can be overcome by solid execution and growth -- something Microsoft has demonstrated. Because of that, I think Microsoft is the better buy today although Amazon is still a strong company too. There's a lot of uncertainty with Amazon's commerce business, and so that gives Microsoft the edge.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":105165838,"gmtCreate":1670798981644,"gmtModify":1670798994554,"authorId":3581854579020344,"author":{"id":3581854579020344,"idStr":"3581854579020344","authorId":3581854579020344,"name":"pjetan","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dbe4c402957fcc269723fb9e3c423c2","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9929559452,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"<span class=\"s1\">👌🏻</span>","text":"<span class=\"s1\">👌🏻</span>","html":"<span class=\"s1\">👌🏻</span>"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":584,"commentSize":43,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":2,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}