Profile - To The Moon

jjkhow

Posts · 4Posts · 4
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- jjkhowjjkhow
  ·2022-11-18
  Emmm...
  Fed’s Bullard Says More Hikes Needed to Get to Restrictive Level
  Policy rules that he presents show 5%-7% restrictive ratesTightening has had limited effect on infla
  Fed’s Bullard Says More Hikes Needed to Get to Restrictive Level
  568 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- jjkhowjjkhow
  ·2022-05-21
  Okay thanks
  3 Growth Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Rise 70% or More
  Find out why the pros on Wall Street expect great things from these beaten-down growth stocks.
  3 Growth Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Rise 70% or More
  423 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- jjkhowjjkhow
  ·2022-05-21
  Hope better
  U.S. Stocks Opened Higher and Went Lower in Morning Trading, Nasdaq Slid Nearly 1%
  U.S. stocks opened higher and went lower in morning trading. Nasdaq slid 0.91%, while Dow Jones, S&P
  U.S. Stocks Opened Higher and Went Lower in Morning Trading, Nasdaq Slid Nearly 1%
  391 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- jjkhowjjkhow
  ·2022-04-28
  Okay
  Upstart Stock Is Getting a Dose of Reality With Another Downgrade
  @PenelopeHood：
  Investors in Upstart Holdings(NASDAQ:UPST) $Upstart Holdings, Inc.(UPST)$ are increasingly curious to know where the stock’s price is headed. But the market is providing plenty of mixed messages. There’s plenty of upside based on the average consensus price target of $188. Given that shares currently trade for less than $80 the narrative is to simply buy, be patient, and wait for the inevitable returns. That’s easier said than done. Especially when shares drop by 9% as they did on April 20. The reason that Upstart Holdings is again faltering is that Jefferies analyst John Hechtlowered his pricefrom $158 to $85 for UPST stock. That news was behind a paywall so I don’t have access to the precise logic that led Hecht to sl
  Upstart Stock Is Getting a Dose of Reality With Another Downgrade
  485 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
No followers yet

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574333010749788","uuid":"3574333010749788","gmtCreate":1611239342454,"gmtModify":1653082345370,"name":"jjkhow","pinyin":"jjkhow","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9df51cda3d040fe3a68efab96bbef88e","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":6,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":3,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.18","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.09.30","exceedPercentage":"93.09%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-2","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Executive Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $300,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9d20b23f1b6335407f882bc5c2ad12c0","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ada3b4533518ace8404a3f6dd192bd29","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/177f283ba21d1c077054dac07f88f3bd","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"80.19%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.03.23","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9963580090,"gmtCreate":1668725985911,"gmtModify":1676538101637,"author":{"id":"3574333010749788","authorId":"3574333010749788","name":"jjkhow","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9df51cda3d040fe3a68efab96bbef88e","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574333010749788","authorIdStr":"3574333010749788"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Emmm...","listText":"Emmm...","text":"Emmm...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9963580090","repostId":"1101225329","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1101225329","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1668692266,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1101225329?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-11-17 21:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed’s Bullard Says More Hikes Needed to Get to Restrictive Level","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1101225329","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Policy rules that he presents show 5%-7% restrictive ratesTightening has had limited effect on infla","content":"<html><head></head><body><ul><li>Policy rules that he presents show 5%-7% restrictive rates</li><li>Tightening has had limited effect on inflation so far, he says</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1df3fa84ee0ce74fcc1806893b9021a7\" tg-width=\"800\" tg-height=\"533\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>James Bullard</span></p><p>Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard urged policymakers to raise interest rates further, saying the level will need to be higher to meet the central bank’s goal to be “sufficiently restrictive” to bring down inflation.</p><p>“Even under these generous assumptions, the policy rate is not yet in a zone that may be considered sufficiently restrictive,” Bullard said Thursday in Louisville, Kentucky at an event hosted by Greater Louisville Inc. “To attain a sufficiently restrictive level, the policy rate will need to be increased further.”</p><p>Bullard presented charts showing a sufficiently restrictive rate might be between about 5% and 7%, though he didn’t spell out in his prepared remarks what rate level he favored. The calculation used different versions of a Taylor Rule, a popular monetary policy guideline developed by Stanford University’s John Taylor. That compares with the current 3.75% to 4% target level of the Fed’s benchmark rate, which it reached earlier this month.</p><p>The St. Louis Fed leader, who has been among the more hawkish of policy makers this year, was the latest central banker to call for additional action. The Fed raised rates by 75 basis points on Nov. 2 for the fourth straight time as part of its most aggressive tightening since the 1980s to curb an inflation rate at a four-decade high.</p><p>“Thus far, the change in the monetary-policy stance appears to have had only limited effects on observed inflation, but market pricing suggests disinflation is expected in 2023,” Bullard said.</p><p>Bullard in his prepared comments didn’t say whether he would favor a 50 or 75 basis-point move at the Fed’s Dec. 13-14 meeting. A number of his colleagues have called for a downshift in the size of the next rate increase following last week’s consumer price report, which showed a softening in core consumer goods inflation.</p><p>“It is possible that increased financial stress could develop,” Bullard said. However, the transparency with which these policy rate increases have been delivered, along with forward guidance, “seems to have allowed for a relatively orderly transition to a higher level of interest rates so far,” he said.</p><p>Bullard said the St. Louis Fed’s financial stress index is so far indicating a relatively low level of financial stress, despite the sharp increase in rates this year.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed’s Bullard Says More Hikes Needed to Get to Restrictive Level</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed’s Bullard Says More Hikes Needed to Get to Restrictive Level\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-11-17 21:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-17/fed-s-bullard-says-more-hikes-needed-to-get-to-restrictive-level?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Policy rules that he presents show 5%-7% restrictive ratesTightening has had limited effect on inflation so far, he saysJames BullardFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard urged ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-17/fed-s-bullard-says-more-hikes-needed-to-get-to-restrictive-level?srnd=premium\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-17/fed-s-bullard-says-more-hikes-needed-to-get-to-restrictive-level?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1101225329","content_text":"Policy rules that he presents show 5%-7% restrictive ratesTightening has had limited effect on inflation so far, he saysJames BullardFederal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President James Bullard urged policymakers to raise interest rates further, saying the level will need to be higher to meet the central bank’s goal to be “sufficiently restrictive” to bring down inflation.“Even under these generous assumptions, the policy rate is not yet in a zone that may be considered sufficiently restrictive,” Bullard said Thursday in Louisville, Kentucky at an event hosted by Greater Louisville Inc. “To attain a sufficiently restrictive level, the policy rate will need to be increased further.”Bullard presented charts showing a sufficiently restrictive rate might be between about 5% and 7%, though he didn’t spell out in his prepared remarks what rate level he favored. The calculation used different versions of a Taylor Rule, a popular monetary policy guideline developed by Stanford University’s John Taylor. That compares with the current 3.75% to 4% target level of the Fed’s benchmark rate, which it reached earlier this month.The St. Louis Fed leader, who has been among the more hawkish of policy makers this year, was the latest central banker to call for additional action. The Fed raised rates by 75 basis points on Nov. 2 for the fourth straight time as part of its most aggressive tightening since the 1980s to curb an inflation rate at a four-decade high.“Thus far, the change in the monetary-policy stance appears to have had only limited effects on observed inflation, but market pricing suggests disinflation is expected in 2023,” Bullard said.Bullard in his prepared comments didn’t say whether he would favor a 50 or 75 basis-point move at the Fed’s Dec. 13-14 meeting. A number of his colleagues have called for a downshift in the size of the next rate increase following last week’s consumer price report, which showed a softening in core consumer goods inflation.“It is possible that increased financial stress could develop,” Bullard said. However, the transparency with which these policy rate increases have been delivered, along with forward guidance, “seems to have allowed for a relatively orderly transition to a higher level of interest rates so far,” he said.Bullard said the St. Louis Fed’s financial stress index is so far indicating a relatively low level of financial stress, despite the sharp increase in rates this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":568,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9021507974,"gmtCreate":1653081180698,"gmtModify":1676535218538,"author":{"id":"3574333010749788","authorId":"3574333010749788","name":"jjkhow","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9df51cda3d040fe3a68efab96bbef88e","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574333010749788","authorIdStr":"3574333010749788"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okay thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Okay thanks&nbsp;","text":"Okay thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9021507974","repostId":"2236009402","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2236009402","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1653059008,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236009402?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-20 23:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Growth Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Rise 70% or More","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236009402","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"Find out why the pros on Wall Street expect great things from these beaten-down growth stocks.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>This has been an absolutely rotten year to be a growth stock investor. The <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/EEME\">iShares</a> S&amp;P 500 Growth <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFF\">Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|ETF</a></b> has fallen a staggering 26% this year.</p><p>But the dark clouds hanging over the market are lined with silver for patient investors who stick with terrific businesses like <b>Roku</b>, <b>SoFi Technologies</b>, and <b>Matterport</b>. That&#39;s because a stock market scorned for growth stocks in general has driven shares of these former market darlings down to prices they can easily bounce back from.</p><h2>Roku</h2><p>Roku shares are down about 80% from the peak they reached last summer. Analysts on Wall Street who follow the company expect a swift rebound. The average price target for Roku represents a 70% premium over recent prices.</p><p>Now that the stay-at-home orders meant to blunt the spread of the coronavirus are no longer in play, Roku stock has lost a lot of its luster. The stock&#39;s dive isn&#39;t due to poor performance. First-quarter revenue soared 28% year over year. That&#39;s especially impressive because at the beginning of the previous-year period, hardly anyone had been vaccinated yet.</p><p>Roku added 1.1 million accounts in the first quarter and ended March with 61.3 million in total. As more advertisers shift their budgets away from linear broadcasting and toward ad-supported video-on-demand (AVOD), those accounts are becoming more valuable. On a trailing-12-month basis, average revenue soared 34% year over year to $42.91 per user.</p><p>You need a streaming stick or a Roku-enabled television to be an active user, so the company tries to encourage their uptake by keeping these devices relatively inexpensive. Supply chain shortages are leading to losses from the manufacturing side of Roku&#39;s operation, but this is most likely a temporary problem.</p><p>As a practice, targeted advertising on connected televisions is still in its early days. The investments Roku is making to gain a leading share of the AVOD market could pay off many times over for patient shareholders.</p><h2>SoFi Technologies</h2><p>SoFi shares rocketed higher after the company&#39;s stock market debut in late 2020. Unfortunately, it has fallen about 70% from last year&#39;s high-water mark.</p><p>Analysts who keep tabs on SoFi think the up-and-coming consumer-focused bank can regain some of those losses. The consensus price target for SoFi represents a 64% premium over its price now.</p><p>Like many fintech stocks, SoFi has been under an unusual amount of pressure because nobody really knows if the company can succeed in a rising interest rate environment. Investors are also concerned about the ongoing student loan moratorium because SoFi cut its teeth refinancing student loans and this is still part of the company&#39;s overall operation.</p><p>Thanks to the rapid growth and diversification of SoFi&#39;s revenue sources, the persistent student loan moratorium hardly makes a dent. In the first quarter, SoFi&#39;s total customer base shot up by 408,000 members to reach 3.9 million.</p><p>The integrated application keeps encouraging customers to engage with multiple products including mortgages, credit cards, and retirement accounts. SoFi customers began using 689,000 new products in the first quarter, bringing the total up to 5.9 million.</p><p>In addition to an expanding customer base, SoFi owns Galileo, which provides the financial industry&#39;s most popular tools for setting up new accounts and implementing payment systems. With multiple growth engines pushing it forward, investors who hold this stock could come out miles ahead over the long run.</p><h2>Matterport</h2><p>Matterport shares are down 84% from the high-water mark they set last fall. Wall Street analysts expect a rebound up ahead. The consensus target for this metaverse stock is 76% above recent prices.</p><p>Matterport helps individuals and organizations create digital twins of real-world spaces, and its popularity is surging. The company finished the first quarter with 562,000 subscribers, which was 70% more than it had a year earlier.</p><p>Matterport allows its lowest-tier subscribers to use their smartphones to make basic maps of their homes and offices for free. Now the company has 7.3 million spaces under management, which is many times more than all of its competitors combined.</p><p>In the first quarter, Matterport signed a deal with Midland Holdings. This is a giant residential real estate broker in China that intends to create virtual 3D experiences for its entire portfolio of properties. It&#39;s probably just a matter of time before digital twins are a standard feature of real estate listings everywhere. With a commanding lead in this burgeoning industry, this stock has a chance to explode higher in the years to come.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Growth Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Rise 70% or More</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Growth Stocks Wall Street Thinks Could Rise 70% or More\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-20 23:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/3-growth-stocks-wall-street-thinks-could-rise-64-o/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>This has been an absolutely rotten year to be a growth stock investor. The iShares S&P 500 Growth Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|ETF has fallen a staggering 26% this year.But the dark clouds hanging...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/3-growth-stocks-wall-street-thinks-could-rise-64-o/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SOFI":"SoFi Technologies Inc.","MTTR":"Matterport, Inc.","ROKU":"Roku Inc"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/3-growth-stocks-wall-street-thinks-could-rise-64-o/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236009402","content_text":"This has been an absolutely rotten year to be a growth stock investor. The iShares S&P 500 Growth Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF|ETF has fallen a staggering 26% this year.But the dark clouds hanging over the market are lined with silver for patient investors who stick with terrific businesses like Roku, SoFi Technologies, and Matterport. That's because a stock market scorned for growth stocks in general has driven shares of these former market darlings down to prices they can easily bounce back from.RokuRoku shares are down about 80% from the peak they reached last summer. Analysts on Wall Street who follow the company expect a swift rebound. The average price target for Roku represents a 70% premium over recent prices.Now that the stay-at-home orders meant to blunt the spread of the coronavirus are no longer in play, Roku stock has lost a lot of its luster. The stock's dive isn't due to poor performance. First-quarter revenue soared 28% year over year. That's especially impressive because at the beginning of the previous-year period, hardly anyone had been vaccinated yet.Roku added 1.1 million accounts in the first quarter and ended March with 61.3 million in total. As more advertisers shift their budgets away from linear broadcasting and toward ad-supported video-on-demand (AVOD), those accounts are becoming more valuable. On a trailing-12-month basis, average revenue soared 34% year over year to $42.91 per user.You need a streaming stick or a Roku-enabled television to be an active user, so the company tries to encourage their uptake by keeping these devices relatively inexpensive. Supply chain shortages are leading to losses from the manufacturing side of Roku's operation, but this is most likely a temporary problem.As a practice, targeted advertising on connected televisions is still in its early days. The investments Roku is making to gain a leading share of the AVOD market could pay off many times over for patient shareholders.SoFi TechnologiesSoFi shares rocketed higher after the company's stock market debut in late 2020. Unfortunately, it has fallen about 70% from last year's high-water mark.Analysts who keep tabs on SoFi think the up-and-coming consumer-focused bank can regain some of those losses. The consensus price target for SoFi represents a 64% premium over its price now.Like many fintech stocks, SoFi has been under an unusual amount of pressure because nobody really knows if the company can succeed in a rising interest rate environment. Investors are also concerned about the ongoing student loan moratorium because SoFi cut its teeth refinancing student loans and this is still part of the company's overall operation.Thanks to the rapid growth and diversification of SoFi's revenue sources, the persistent student loan moratorium hardly makes a dent. In the first quarter, SoFi's total customer base shot up by 408,000 members to reach 3.9 million.The integrated application keeps encouraging customers to engage with multiple products including mortgages, credit cards, and retirement accounts. SoFi customers began using 689,000 new products in the first quarter, bringing the total up to 5.9 million.In addition to an expanding customer base, SoFi owns Galileo, which provides the financial industry's most popular tools for setting up new accounts and implementing payment systems. With multiple growth engines pushing it forward, investors who hold this stock could come out miles ahead over the long run.MatterportMatterport shares are down 84% from the high-water mark they set last fall. Wall Street analysts expect a rebound up ahead. The consensus target for this metaverse stock is 76% above recent prices.Matterport helps individuals and organizations create digital twins of real-world spaces, and its popularity is surging. The company finished the first quarter with 562,000 subscribers, which was 70% more than it had a year earlier.Matterport allows its lowest-tier subscribers to use their smartphones to make basic maps of their homes and offices for free. Now the company has 7.3 million spaces under management, which is many times more than all of its competitors combined.In the first quarter, Matterport signed a deal with Midland Holdings. This is a giant residential real estate broker in China that intends to create virtual 3D experiences for its entire portfolio of properties. It's probably just a matter of time before digital twins are a standard feature of real estate listings everywhere. With a commanding lead in this burgeoning industry, this stock has a chance to explode higher in the years to come.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":423,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9021504756,"gmtCreate":1653081100075,"gmtModify":1676535218522,"author":{"id":"3574333010749788","authorId":"3574333010749788","name":"jjkhow","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9df51cda3d040fe3a68efab96bbef88e","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574333010749788","authorIdStr":"3574333010749788"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Hope better&nbsp;","listText":"Hope better&nbsp;","text":"Hope better","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9021504756","repostId":"1190645914","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190645914","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1653060803,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190645914?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-20 23:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. Stocks Opened Higher and Went Lower in Morning Trading, Nasdaq Slid Nearly 1%","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190645914","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stocks opened higher and went lower in morning trading. Nasdaq slid 0.91%, while Dow Jones, S&P","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks opened higher and went lower in morning trading. Nasdaq slid 0.91%, while Dow Jones, S&amp;P 500 slid 0.69% and 0.74% separately. <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/22a2e636433516c77f04710dd7e29052\" tg-width=\"517\" tg-height=\"122\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Stocks Opened Higher and Went Lower in Morning Trading, Nasdaq Slid Nearly 1%</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Stocks Opened Higher and Went Lower in Morning Trading, Nasdaq Slid Nearly 1%\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-20 23:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>U.S. stocks opened higher and went lower in morning trading. Nasdaq slid 0.91%, while Dow Jones, S&amp;P 500 slid 0.69% and 0.74% separately. <img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/22a2e636433516c77f04710dd7e29052\" tg-width=\"517\" tg-height=\"122\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190645914","content_text":"U.S. stocks opened higher and went lower in morning trading. Nasdaq slid 0.91%, while Dow Jones, S&P 500 slid 0.69% and 0.74% separately.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":391,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9060910738,"gmtCreate":1651095530324,"gmtModify":1676534846432,"author":{"id":"3574333010749788","authorId":"3574333010749788","name":"jjkhow","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/9df51cda3d040fe3a68efab96bbef88e","crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574333010749788","authorIdStr":"3574333010749788"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9060910738","repostId":"9087796854","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9087796854,"gmtCreate":1651050435911,"gmtModify":1676534840879,"author":{"id":"9000000000000427","authorId":"9000000000000427","name":"PenelopeHood","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fe619b28a9ab446bf388e9aadd75bb65","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"9000000000000427","authorIdStr":"9000000000000427"},"themes":[],"title":"Upstart Stock Is Getting a Dose of Reality With Another Downgrade","htmlText":"Investors in&nbsp;Upstart Holdings(NASDAQ:UPST) <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">$Upstart Holdings, Inc.(UPST)$</a> are increasingly curious to know where the stock’s price is headed. But the market is providing plenty of mixed messages. There’s plenty of upside based on the average consensus price target of $188. Given that shares currently trade for less than $80 the narrative is to simply buy, be patient, and wait for the inevitable returns. That’s easier said than done. Especially when shares drop by 9% as they did on April 20. The reason that Upstart Holdings is again faltering is that&nbsp;Jefferies&nbsp;analyst John Hechtlowered his pricefrom $158 to $85 for UPST stock. That news was behind a paywall so I don’t have access to the precise logic that led Hecht to sl","listText":"Investors in&nbsp;Upstart Holdings(NASDAQ:UPST) <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">$Upstart Holdings, Inc.(UPST)$</a> are increasingly curious to know where the stock’s price is headed. But the market is providing plenty of mixed messages. There’s plenty of upside based on the average consensus price target of $188. Given that shares currently trade for less than $80 the narrative is to simply buy, be patient, and wait for the inevitable returns. That’s easier said than done. Especially when shares drop by 9% as they did on April 20. The reason that Upstart Holdings is again faltering is that&nbsp;Jefferies&nbsp;analyst John Hechtlowered his pricefrom $158 to $85 for UPST stock. That news was behind a paywall so I don’t have access to the precise logic that led Hecht to sl","text":"Investors in Upstart Holdings(NASDAQ:UPST) $Upstart Holdings, Inc.(UPST)$ are increasingly curious to know where the stock’s price is headed. But the market is providing plenty of mixed messages. There’s plenty of upside based on the average consensus price target of $188. Given that shares currently trade for less than $80 the narrative is to simply buy, be patient, and wait for the inevitable returns. That’s easier said than done. Especially when shares drop by 9% as they did on April 20. The reason that Upstart Holdings is again faltering is that Jefferies analyst John Hechtlowered his pricefrom $158 to $85 for UPST stock. That news was behind a paywall so I don’t have access to the precise logic that led Hecht to sl","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9087796854","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":485,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"followers","isTTM":true}