Profile - To The Moon

CT73

Posts · 6Posts · 6
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- CT73CT73
  ·2021-05-31
  Good luck
  U.S. movie theaters remove mask mandate for vaccinated people
  LOS ANGELES, May 28 (Reuters) - Masks are no longer required at the three main movie theater chains
  U.S. movie theaters remove mask mandate for vaccinated people
  151 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- CT73CT73
  ·2021-05-25
  ??
  Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth
  MW Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth By Wallace Witkow
  Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth
  219 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- CT73CT73
  ·2021-05-13
  Let’s go!!
  EV stocks rose in premarket trading Thursday
  (May 13) EV stocks rose in premarket trading.XPEV up 4% premarket on robust growth in top-line and r
  EV stocks rose in premarket trading Thursday
  319 1
  4
  Share
  Report
- CT73CT73
  ·2021-05-11
  ??lets go
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  507 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report
- CT73CT73
  ·2021-05-10
  Good riddance
  The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga
  It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and i
  The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga
  402 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report
- CT73CT73
  ·2021-05-09
  ?
  The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga
  It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and i
  The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga
  310 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report
No following yet

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3579659821549664","uuid":"3579659821549664","gmtCreate":1618803041659,"gmtModify":1621913115938,"name":"CT73","pinyin":"ct73","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38eee18b1821fcb36c385ac9122e8298","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":2,"tweetSize":6,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-1","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Debut Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e4d0ca1da0456dc7894c946d44bf9ab","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f2f65e8ce4cfaae8db2bea9b127f58b","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5948a31b6edf154422335b265235809","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.09.17","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":110125251,"gmtCreate":1622432693973,"gmtModify":1704184340699,"author":{"id":"3579659821549664","authorId":"3579659821549664","name":"CT73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38eee18b1821fcb36c385ac9122e8298","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3579659821549664","authorIdStr":"3579659821549664"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good luck","listText":"Good luck","text":"Good luck","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/110125251","repostId":"2139861684","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2139861684","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1622239370,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2139861684?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-29 06:02","market":"us","language":"en","title":"U.S. movie theaters remove mask mandate for vaccinated people","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2139861684","media":"Reuters","summary":"LOS ANGELES, May 28 (Reuters) - Masks are no longer required at the three main movie theater chains ","content":"<html><body><p>LOS ANGELES, May 28 (Reuters) - Masks are no longer required at the three main movie theater chains in the United States for people who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus, according to updated guidelines on Friday.</p><p>   AMC Entertainment   , Cinemark    and Regal Cinemas    said on their websites that movie goers who are not fully vaccinated will be asked to continue wearing masks, and that other social-distancing measures and cleaning protocols will remain in place.</p><p>   \"In accordance with CDC guidelines, masks are not required for guests who are fully vaccinated,\" AMC said on its website, referring to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. \"If you are not fully vaccinated, we ask that you continue to wear a mask throughout the theater unless actively enjoying food or drinks.\"</p><p>   Similar updates to mask policy were made on Regal and Cinemark websites. All three chains said they would follow state and local mandates on mask wearing, which may be different from the CDC guidelines.</p><p>   The changes for movie theaters come two weeks after the CDC said that fully vaccinated people need not wear masks in any setting.</p><p>   Movie-going has begun ramping up in the United States after lengthy pandemic-related closures and a lack of new film releases.</p><p>   Movie studios and theater chains last week launched a \"big screen is back\" campaign, previewing a summer filled with blockbusters including the new \"Fast &amp; Furious\" movie and the superhero film \"Black Widow.\"  </p><p>   Hollywood studios are closely watching box office receipts for two major films being released this weekend - \"Cruella,\" a prequel story about the villain in \"101 Dalmatians,\" and the thriller \"A Quiet Place Part II.\"</p><p> (Reporting by Jill Serjeant; Editing by Will Dunham)</p><p>((jill.serjeant1@thomsonreuters.com; 310 491 7279;))</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. movie theaters remove mask mandate for vaccinated people</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. movie theaters remove mask mandate for vaccinated people\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-29 06:02</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><p>LOS ANGELES, May 28 (Reuters) - Masks are no longer required at the three main movie theater chains in the United States for people who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus, according to updated guidelines on Friday.</p><p>   AMC Entertainment   , Cinemark    and Regal Cinemas    said on their websites that movie goers who are not fully vaccinated will be asked to continue wearing masks, and that other social-distancing measures and cleaning protocols will remain in place.</p><p>   \"In accordance with CDC guidelines, masks are not required for guests who are fully vaccinated,\" AMC said on its website, referring to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. \"If you are not fully vaccinated, we ask that you continue to wear a mask throughout the theater unless actively enjoying food or drinks.\"</p><p>   Similar updates to mask policy were made on Regal and Cinemark websites. All three chains said they would follow state and local mandates on mask wearing, which may be different from the CDC guidelines.</p><p>   The changes for movie theaters come two weeks after the CDC said that fully vaccinated people need not wear masks in any setting.</p><p>   Movie-going has begun ramping up in the United States after lengthy pandemic-related closures and a lack of new film releases.</p><p>   Movie studios and theater chains last week launched a \"big screen is back\" campaign, previewing a summer filled with blockbusters including the new \"Fast &amp; Furious\" movie and the superhero film \"Black Widow.\"  </p><p>   Hollywood studios are closely watching box office receipts for two major films being released this weekend - \"Cruella,\" a prequel story about the villain in \"101 Dalmatians,\" and the thriller \"A Quiet Place Part II.\"</p><p> (Reporting by Jill Serjeant; Editing by Will Dunham)</p><p>((jill.serjeant1@thomsonreuters.com; 310 491 7279;))</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","CNK":"喜满客影城"},"source_url":"http://api.rkd.refinitiv.com/api/News/News.svc/REST/News_1/RetrieveStoryML_1","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2139861684","content_text":"LOS ANGELES, May 28 (Reuters) - Masks are no longer required at the three main movie theater chains in the United States for people who are fully vaccinated against the coronavirus, according to updated guidelines on Friday.   AMC Entertainment   , Cinemark    and Regal Cinemas    said on their websites that movie goers who are not fully vaccinated will be asked to continue wearing masks, and that other social-distancing measures and cleaning protocols will remain in place.   \"In accordance with CDC guidelines, masks are not required for guests who are fully vaccinated,\" AMC said on its website, referring to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. \"If you are not fully vaccinated, we ask that you continue to wear a mask throughout the theater unless actively enjoying food or drinks.\"   Similar updates to mask policy were made on Regal and Cinemark websites. All three chains said they would follow state and local mandates on mask wearing, which may be different from the CDC guidelines.   The changes for movie theaters come two weeks after the CDC said that fully vaccinated people need not wear masks in any setting.   Movie-going has begun ramping up in the United States after lengthy pandemic-related closures and a lack of new film releases.   Movie studios and theater chains last week launched a \"big screen is back\" campaign, previewing a summer filled with blockbusters including the new \"Fast & Furious\" movie and the superhero film \"Black Widow.\"     Hollywood studios are closely watching box office receipts for two major films being released this weekend - \"Cruella,\" a prequel story about the villain in \"101 Dalmatians,\" and the thriller \"A Quiet Place Part II.\" (Reporting by Jill Serjeant; Editing by Will Dunham)((jill.serjeant1@thomsonreuters.com; 310 491 7279;))","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":151,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":138349277,"gmtCreate":1621913003999,"gmtModify":1704364335408,"author":{"id":"3579659821549664","authorId":"3579659821549664","name":"CT73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38eee18b1821fcb36c385ac9122e8298","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3579659821549664","authorIdStr":"3579659821549664"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??","listText":"??","text":"??","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/138349277","repostId":"2138154656","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2138154656","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1621899240,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2138154656?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-25 07:34","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2138154656","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"MW Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth\n\n\n  By Wallace Witkow","content":"<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth\n</p>\n<p>\n  By Wallace Witkowski \n</p>\n<p>\n  Earnings preview: As supply shortages constrain hot gaming sales, server chips could determine beat or miss for chip maker \n</p>\n<p>\n  Nvidia Corp.'s fortunes for its upcoming earnings report appear to rest on data-center growth, as long-term supply shortages constrain gaming sales more severely. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Nvidia <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> is scheduled to report fiscal first-quarter results on Wednesday after the closing bell, and the Santa Clara, Calif.-based chip maker is looking to continue a record-breaking streak of results as the COVID-19 pandemic created more digital avenues of work and connection. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Those records are not limited to results, but share price too. So much so that the company recently announced its first stock split in 14 years after massive gains . Nvidia shares closed at a record high of $645.49 on April 15, and have gained 73% in the past 12 months. \n</p>\n<p>\n  With global chip-supply shortages a given over at least the next few quarters, analysts are keen on finding where growth areas exist at semiconductor companies. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Joseph Moore, who has an in-line rating, said expectations are very high and that Nvidia's data-center sales will be front and center. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"Revenue in gaming is completely supply constrained, with channel inventory remaining very lean,\" Moore said. \"We would assume there is upside in the data-center business given Nvidia's strong growth drivers and the recovery in the enterprise/cloud; the magnitude of that upside will be key.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  The reason data-center sales are more of a variable is that the lead times between orders and deliveries are much longer  . \n</p>\n<p>\n  What to expect \n</p>\n<p>\n  Earnings: Of the 33 analysts surveyed by FactSet, Nvidia on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of $3.29 a share, up from $2.49 a share expected at the beginning of the quarter and $1.80 a share reported a year ago. On Estimize, which crowdsources projections from hedge funds, academics and others, the average estimate calls for $2.69 a share \n</p>\n<p>\n  Revenue: Wall Street expects revenue of $5.4 billion from Nvidia, according to 32 analysts polled by FactSet. That's up from the $4.45 billion forecast at the beginning of the quarter, and the $3.08 billion Nvidia reported in the year-ago quarter. The average Estimize estimate is for $5.5 billion. In April, Nvidia upped its forecast . \n</p>\n<p>\n  Stock movement: During the quarter, which started on Feb. 1 and ended May 1, Nvidia shares rose 16%, while the PHLX Semiconductor Index  gained 8% over that period. Similarly, the S&amp;P 500 index  rose 13%, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  rose 7%. \n</p>\n<p>\n  What analysts are saying \n</p>\n<p>\n  Evercore ISI analyst C.J. Muse, who has an outperform rating, feels Nvidia is primed for another analyst consensus beat and outlook raise on high demand for its products. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"The major questions for investors are whether data-center revenues can reaccelerate higher and/or is gaming currently over-earning because of crypto-led demand,\" Muse said. \n</p>\n<p>\n  That crypto demand has been so significant that Nvidia recently announced  it is making its new gaming cards less attractive to cryptocurrency miners by hampering the features used for mining. \n</p>\n<p>\n  On the other hand, Oppenheimer analyst Rick Schafer, who has an outperform rating and a $700 price target, expects gaming to be the star of the report. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"We see broad upside (vs. original $5.3B outlook) led by gaming,\" Schafer said. \"We see upside again limited by supply tightness.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  As for the data center, Shafer said: \"We look for DC spend to accelerate into 2Q as hyperscalers move past capacity digestion.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya, who has a buy rating, said his $700 price target was based on \"Nvidia's superior long-term growth profile in large, underpenetrated markets.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  But that growth profile could be upset by the company's exposure to the PC market, competition in the data-center arena from Intel Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">$(INTC)$</a> and programmable logic-device companies, along with competition in the auto-chip market from microcontroller manufacturers. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Of the 39 analysts who cover Nvidia, 33 have buy ratings, four have hold ratings, and two have sell ratings, with an average price target of $663.88, according to FactSet. \n</p>\n<p>\n  -Wallace Witkowski; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  May 24, 2021 19:34 ET (23:34 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-25 07:34</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><font class=\"NormalMinus1\" face=\"Arial\">\n<p>\nMW Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth\n</p>\n<p>\n  By Wallace Witkowski \n</p>\n<p>\n  Earnings preview: As supply shortages constrain hot gaming sales, server chips could determine beat or miss for chip maker \n</p>\n<p>\n  Nvidia Corp.'s fortunes for its upcoming earnings report appear to rest on data-center growth, as long-term supply shortages constrain gaming sales more severely. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Nvidia <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">$(NVDA)$</a> is scheduled to report fiscal first-quarter results on Wednesday after the closing bell, and the Santa Clara, Calif.-based chip maker is looking to continue a record-breaking streak of results as the COVID-19 pandemic created more digital avenues of work and connection. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Those records are not limited to results, but share price too. So much so that the company recently announced its first stock split in 14 years after massive gains . Nvidia shares closed at a record high of $645.49 on April 15, and have gained 73% in the past 12 months. \n</p>\n<p>\n  With global chip-supply shortages a given over at least the next few quarters, analysts are keen on finding where growth areas exist at semiconductor companies. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSTLW\">Morgan Stanley</a> analyst Joseph Moore, who has an in-line rating, said expectations are very high and that Nvidia's data-center sales will be front and center. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"Revenue in gaming is completely supply constrained, with channel inventory remaining very lean,\" Moore said. \"We would assume there is upside in the data-center business given Nvidia's strong growth drivers and the recovery in the enterprise/cloud; the magnitude of that upside will be key.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  The reason data-center sales are more of a variable is that the lead times between orders and deliveries are much longer  . \n</p>\n<p>\n  What to expect \n</p>\n<p>\n  Earnings: Of the 33 analysts surveyed by FactSet, Nvidia on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of $3.29 a share, up from $2.49 a share expected at the beginning of the quarter and $1.80 a share reported a year ago. On Estimize, which crowdsources projections from hedge funds, academics and others, the average estimate calls for $2.69 a share \n</p>\n<p>\n  Revenue: Wall Street expects revenue of $5.4 billion from Nvidia, according to 32 analysts polled by FactSet. That's up from the $4.45 billion forecast at the beginning of the quarter, and the $3.08 billion Nvidia reported in the year-ago quarter. The average Estimize estimate is for $5.5 billion. In April, Nvidia upped its forecast . \n</p>\n<p>\n  Stock movement: During the quarter, which started on Feb. 1 and ended May 1, Nvidia shares rose 16%, while the PHLX Semiconductor Index  gained 8% over that period. Similarly, the S&amp;P 500 index  rose 13%, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  rose 7%. \n</p>\n<p>\n  What analysts are saying \n</p>\n<p>\n  Evercore ISI analyst C.J. Muse, who has an outperform rating, feels Nvidia is primed for another analyst consensus beat and outlook raise on high demand for its products. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"The major questions for investors are whether data-center revenues can reaccelerate higher and/or is gaming currently over-earning because of crypto-led demand,\" Muse said. \n</p>\n<p>\n  That crypto demand has been so significant that Nvidia recently announced  it is making its new gaming cards less attractive to cryptocurrency miners by hampering the features used for mining. \n</p>\n<p>\n  On the other hand, Oppenheimer analyst Rick Schafer, who has an outperform rating and a $700 price target, expects gaming to be the star of the report. \n</p>\n<p>\n  \"We see broad upside (vs. original $5.3B outlook) led by gaming,\" Schafer said. \"We see upside again limited by supply tightness.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  As for the data center, Shafer said: \"We look for DC spend to accelerate into 2Q as hyperscalers move past capacity digestion.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya, who has a buy rating, said his $700 price target was based on \"Nvidia's superior long-term growth profile in large, underpenetrated markets.\" \n</p>\n<p>\n  But that growth profile could be upset by the company's exposure to the PC market, competition in the data-center arena from Intel Corp. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">$(INTC)$</a> and programmable logic-device companies, along with competition in the auto-chip market from microcontroller manufacturers. \n</p>\n<p>\n  Of the 39 analysts who cover Nvidia, 33 have buy ratings, four have hold ratings, and two have sell ratings, with an average price target of $663.88, according to FactSet. \n</p>\n<p>\n  -Wallace Witkowski; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n</p>\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n<p>\n  <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/END\">$(END)$</a> Dow Jones Newswires\n</p>\n<p>\n  May 24, 2021 19:34 ET (23:34 GMT)\n</p>\n<p>\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n</p>\n</font></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"http://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2138154656","content_text":"MW Nvidia earnings: Amid gaming-card shortages, focus is on data-center growth\n\n\n  By Wallace Witkowski \n\n\n  Earnings preview: As supply shortages constrain hot gaming sales, server chips could determine beat or miss for chip maker \n\n\n  Nvidia Corp.'s fortunes for its upcoming earnings report appear to rest on data-center growth, as long-term supply shortages constrain gaming sales more severely. \n\n\n  Nvidia $(NVDA)$ is scheduled to report fiscal first-quarter results on Wednesday after the closing bell, and the Santa Clara, Calif.-based chip maker is looking to continue a record-breaking streak of results as the COVID-19 pandemic created more digital avenues of work and connection. \n\n\n  Those records are not limited to results, but share price too. So much so that the company recently announced its first stock split in 14 years after massive gains . Nvidia shares closed at a record high of $645.49 on April 15, and have gained 73% in the past 12 months. \n\n\n  With global chip-supply shortages a given over at least the next few quarters, analysts are keen on finding where growth areas exist at semiconductor companies. Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore, who has an in-line rating, said expectations are very high and that Nvidia's data-center sales will be front and center. \n\n\n  \"Revenue in gaming is completely supply constrained, with channel inventory remaining very lean,\" Moore said. \"We would assume there is upside in the data-center business given Nvidia's strong growth drivers and the recovery in the enterprise/cloud; the magnitude of that upside will be key.\" \n\n\n  The reason data-center sales are more of a variable is that the lead times between orders and deliveries are much longer  . \n\n\n  What to expect \n\n\n  Earnings: Of the 33 analysts surveyed by FactSet, Nvidia on average is expected to post adjusted earnings of $3.29 a share, up from $2.49 a share expected at the beginning of the quarter and $1.80 a share reported a year ago. On Estimize, which crowdsources projections from hedge funds, academics and others, the average estimate calls for $2.69 a share \n\n\n  Revenue: Wall Street expects revenue of $5.4 billion from Nvidia, according to 32 analysts polled by FactSet. That's up from the $4.45 billion forecast at the beginning of the quarter, and the $3.08 billion Nvidia reported in the year-ago quarter. The average Estimize estimate is for $5.5 billion. In April, Nvidia upped its forecast . \n\n\n  Stock movement: During the quarter, which started on Feb. 1 and ended May 1, Nvidia shares rose 16%, while the PHLX Semiconductor Index  gained 8% over that period. Similarly, the S&P 500 index  rose 13%, while the Nasdaq Composite Index  rose 7%. \n\n\n  What analysts are saying \n\n\n  Evercore ISI analyst C.J. Muse, who has an outperform rating, feels Nvidia is primed for another analyst consensus beat and outlook raise on high demand for its products. \n\n\n  \"The major questions for investors are whether data-center revenues can reaccelerate higher and/or is gaming currently over-earning because of crypto-led demand,\" Muse said. \n\n\n  That crypto demand has been so significant that Nvidia recently announced  it is making its new gaming cards less attractive to cryptocurrency miners by hampering the features used for mining. \n\n\n  On the other hand, Oppenheimer analyst Rick Schafer, who has an outperform rating and a $700 price target, expects gaming to be the star of the report. \n\n\n  \"We see broad upside (vs. original $5.3B outlook) led by gaming,\" Schafer said. \"We see upside again limited by supply tightness.\" \n\n\n  As for the data center, Shafer said: \"We look for DC spend to accelerate into 2Q as hyperscalers move past capacity digestion.\" \n\n\n  BofA Securities analyst Vivek Arya, who has a buy rating, said his $700 price target was based on \"Nvidia's superior long-term growth profile in large, underpenetrated markets.\" \n\n\n  But that growth profile could be upset by the company's exposure to the PC market, competition in the data-center arena from Intel Corp. $(INTC)$ and programmable logic-device companies, along with competition in the auto-chip market from microcontroller manufacturers. \n\n\n  Of the 39 analysts who cover Nvidia, 33 have buy ratings, four have hold ratings, and two have sell ratings, with an average price target of $663.88, according to FactSet. \n\n\n  -Wallace Witkowski; 415-439-6400; AskNewswires@dowjones.com \n\n\n \n\n\n$(END)$ Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n  May 24, 2021 19:34 ET (23:34 GMT)\n\n\n  Copyright (c) 2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":219,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":191712062,"gmtCreate":1620907315156,"gmtModify":1704350235363,"author":{"id":"3579659821549664","authorId":"3579659821549664","name":"CT73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38eee18b1821fcb36c385ac9122e8298","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3579659821549664","authorIdStr":"3579659821549664"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s go!!","listText":"Let’s go!!","text":"Let’s go!!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/191712062","repostId":"1180849253","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1180849253","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1620906843,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1180849253?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-13 19:54","market":"us","language":"en","title":"EV stocks rose in premarket trading Thursday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1180849253","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(May 13) EV stocks rose in premarket trading.XPEV up 4% premarket on robust growth in top-line and r","content":"<p>(May 13)&nbsp;EV stocks rose in premarket trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efec263084cf366fdea22338c7b5ce1f\" tg-width=\"333\" tg-height=\"206\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">XPEV up 4% premarket on robust growth in top-line and record-breaking vehicle deliveries.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>EV stocks rose in premarket trading Thursday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nEV stocks rose in premarket trading Thursday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-05-13 19:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(May 13)&nbsp;EV stocks rose in premarket trading.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efec263084cf366fdea22338c7b5ce1f\" tg-width=\"333\" tg-height=\"206\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">XPEV up 4% premarket on robust growth in top-line and record-breaking vehicle deliveries.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来","LI":"理想汽车","TSLA":"特斯拉","XPEV":"小鹏汽车"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1180849253","content_text":"(May 13) EV stocks rose in premarket trading.XPEV up 4% premarket on robust growth in top-line and record-breaking vehicle deliveries.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":319,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":199890220,"gmtCreate":1620693722960,"gmtModify":1704346785266,"author":{"id":"3579659821549664","authorId":"3579659821549664","name":"CT73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38eee18b1821fcb36c385ac9122e8298","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3579659821549664","authorIdStr":"3579659821549664"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"??lets go","listText":"??lets go","text":"??lets go","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/199890220","repostId":"1127589912","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":507,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":190143731,"gmtCreate":1620607962823,"gmtModify":1704345370361,"author":{"id":"3579659821549664","authorId":"3579659821549664","name":"CT73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38eee18b1821fcb36c385ac9122e8298","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3579659821549664","authorIdStr":"3579659821549664"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good riddance","listText":"Good riddance","text":"Good riddance","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/190143731","repostId":"1170905579","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170905579","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620462497,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1170905579?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-08 16:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170905579","media":"Yahoo Finance ","summary":"It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and i","content":"<p>It’s not this complicated.</p><p>Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have turned a temporary controversy into an ongoing fiasco. The social-media giant could have permanently banned then-President Donald Trump on Jan. 7, after he used the platform to lie about the 2020 election and praise rioters trying to seize control of the US Capitol the day before. Trump and his supporters would have squealed, but decisive action by Facebook would have left them no choice: Deal with it.</p><p>Instead, Facebook (FB) suspended Trump’s account “indefinitely,” while asking the company’s “oversight board”—a group of outside policy experts—to recommend a permanent solution. On May 5, the board “upheld” Facebook’s decision to exile Trump, but it alsodinged Facebook for the arbitrary application of vague standards. Instead of handing the company a simple answer, it told Facebook to come up with a permanent solution of its own within six months.</p><p>Have you ever watched an overwrought parent try to negotiate with a misbehaving five-year-old? Instead of telling the kid to stop being a brat, the parent tries to persuade the child why it’s important to stop being a brat, hoping the child will stop being a brat because he sees the light and learns an important life lesson in the process. You want to shout, “just tell him to stop it!”</p><p>This is what’s going on with Facebook and its oversight board. Facebook is trying to dodge responsibility for making a decision sure to be unpopular with some of its users. The oversight board, relishing its own perceived importance, issued an11,800 word communiquethat didn’t resolve anything. The real answer is painfully obvious: Facebook should permanently ban anybody who’s a chronic liar and violence inciter. Yet nobody in Faceworld can say it.</p><p>Let’s quickly review what’s really happening in the Facebook saga, by annotating the motives of the key players. It won’t take thousands of words.</p><p><b>Donald Trump.</b>He wants the largest possible audience for his propaganda, includinghis lies about the 2020 election being stolenfrom him. Trump is a wannabe despot whoclaims persecutionto distract followers from his aberrant behavior and his election losses. It also helps him raise money from gullible sympathizers. As a private-sector entity, Facebook has the right to boot users who cause the company trouble, which Trump clearly did. There’s no free speech or First Amendment issue at all, because Trump is still free to publish his own views on a platform of his own. If it were a free speech issue, Facebook could cite the First Amendment to declare it faces no obligation to publish anybody's views, just as a newspaper doesn't have to run government manifestoes. Trump's claim of “censorship” is ridiculous, but it obviously keeps him in the news and fires up his supporters.</p><p><b>The Trump cult.</b>Echoing Trump,other Republican politiciansclaim Facebook and other social-media sites single out conservatives for “censorship.” They’re mixing up cause and effect. Election lies and other disinformation are now a staple of the Trump wing of the Republican party, and these lies trigger retaliation by the companies hosting the offending accounts. If Trumpers lied less, social media would “censor” them less. Most of them know this, but “censorship” gives them a bogus cause that helps generate outrage among their followers and juice their own campaign contributions.</p><p><b>Mark Zuckerberg.</b>The Facebook CEO cares about making money above all, and there’s not necessarily anything wrong with that. Zuckerberg wants to outsource the decision about Trump so that he and the company don’t seem to be directly responsible for an outcome likely to anger millions of conservative Facebook users. He may also want to have plausible deniability the next time he testifies before Congress, so that when a Trump lackey such as Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) tries to pillory Zuckerberg for persecuting Trump, Zuckerberg can say, “it wasn’t me.” It’s not clear Facebook is actually losing money because of the Trump feud, but even if it is, Zuckerberg has miscalculated by failing to account for other damage caused by allowing the Trump debacle to fester.</p><p><b>Democrats.</b>They don’t like Facebook either, but Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other Facebook critics on the left have a different gripe:Facebook abuses user dataand hastoo much powerin the digital advertising market. Facebook has few friends in Congress, but it does have one important thing going for it: The company’s Republican and Democratic critics are so divided that they may never agree on any legislation that reins in the company’s power.</p><p>There’s only one way the Facebook-Trump saga can end: A permanent Trump ban. Trump will never stop lying, and any negotiated return to Facebook would only restart the cycle. Around the same time Facebook indefinitely banned Trump, Twitteraxed his account permanently. It didn’t drag out the decision or ask somebody else to decide for it. Twitter (TWTR) is no longer explaining or relitigating its Trump decision, which is where Facebook might be in a year or two. It has already taken too long.</p>","source":"yahoofinance_sg","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe real story of the Trump-Facebook saga\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-08 16:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-real-story-of-the-trump-facebook-saga-145941882.html><strong>Yahoo Finance </strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have turned a temporary controversy into an ongoing fiasco. The social-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-real-story-of-the-trump-facebook-saga-145941882.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-real-story-of-the-trump-facebook-saga-145941882.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170905579","content_text":"It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have turned a temporary controversy into an ongoing fiasco. The social-media giant could have permanently banned then-President Donald Trump on Jan. 7, after he used the platform to lie about the 2020 election and praise rioters trying to seize control of the US Capitol the day before. Trump and his supporters would have squealed, but decisive action by Facebook would have left them no choice: Deal with it.Instead, Facebook (FB) suspended Trump’s account “indefinitely,” while asking the company’s “oversight board”—a group of outside policy experts—to recommend a permanent solution. On May 5, the board “upheld” Facebook’s decision to exile Trump, but it alsodinged Facebook for the arbitrary application of vague standards. Instead of handing the company a simple answer, it told Facebook to come up with a permanent solution of its own within six months.Have you ever watched an overwrought parent try to negotiate with a misbehaving five-year-old? Instead of telling the kid to stop being a brat, the parent tries to persuade the child why it’s important to stop being a brat, hoping the child will stop being a brat because he sees the light and learns an important life lesson in the process. You want to shout, “just tell him to stop it!”This is what’s going on with Facebook and its oversight board. Facebook is trying to dodge responsibility for making a decision sure to be unpopular with some of its users. The oversight board, relishing its own perceived importance, issued an11,800 word communiquethat didn’t resolve anything. The real answer is painfully obvious: Facebook should permanently ban anybody who’s a chronic liar and violence inciter. Yet nobody in Faceworld can say it.Let’s quickly review what’s really happening in the Facebook saga, by annotating the motives of the key players. It won’t take thousands of words.Donald Trump.He wants the largest possible audience for his propaganda, includinghis lies about the 2020 election being stolenfrom him. Trump is a wannabe despot whoclaims persecutionto distract followers from his aberrant behavior and his election losses. It also helps him raise money from gullible sympathizers. As a private-sector entity, Facebook has the right to boot users who cause the company trouble, which Trump clearly did. There’s no free speech or First Amendment issue at all, because Trump is still free to publish his own views on a platform of his own. If it were a free speech issue, Facebook could cite the First Amendment to declare it faces no obligation to publish anybody's views, just as a newspaper doesn't have to run government manifestoes. Trump's claim of “censorship” is ridiculous, but it obviously keeps him in the news and fires up his supporters.The Trump cult.Echoing Trump,other Republican politiciansclaim Facebook and other social-media sites single out conservatives for “censorship.” They’re mixing up cause and effect. Election lies and other disinformation are now a staple of the Trump wing of the Republican party, and these lies trigger retaliation by the companies hosting the offending accounts. If Trumpers lied less, social media would “censor” them less. Most of them know this, but “censorship” gives them a bogus cause that helps generate outrage among their followers and juice their own campaign contributions.Mark Zuckerberg.The Facebook CEO cares about making money above all, and there’s not necessarily anything wrong with that. Zuckerberg wants to outsource the decision about Trump so that he and the company don’t seem to be directly responsible for an outcome likely to anger millions of conservative Facebook users. He may also want to have plausible deniability the next time he testifies before Congress, so that when a Trump lackey such as Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) tries to pillory Zuckerberg for persecuting Trump, Zuckerberg can say, “it wasn’t me.” It’s not clear Facebook is actually losing money because of the Trump feud, but even if it is, Zuckerberg has miscalculated by failing to account for other damage caused by allowing the Trump debacle to fester.Democrats.They don’t like Facebook either, but Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other Facebook critics on the left have a different gripe:Facebook abuses user dataand hastoo much powerin the digital advertising market. Facebook has few friends in Congress, but it does have one important thing going for it: The company’s Republican and Democratic critics are so divided that they may never agree on any legislation that reins in the company’s power.There’s only one way the Facebook-Trump saga can end: A permanent Trump ban. Trump will never stop lying, and any negotiated return to Facebook would only restart the cycle. Around the same time Facebook indefinitely banned Trump, Twitteraxed his account permanently. It didn’t drag out the decision or ask somebody else to decide for it. Twitter (TWTR) is no longer explaining or relitigating its Trump decision, which is where Facebook might be in a year or two. It has already taken too long.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":402,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":107490768,"gmtCreate":1620526924054,"gmtModify":1704344604453,"author":{"id":"3579659821549664","authorId":"3579659821549664","name":"CT73","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/38eee18b1821fcb36c385ac9122e8298","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3579659821549664","authorIdStr":"3579659821549664"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/107490768","repostId":"1170905579","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1170905579","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1620462497,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1170905579?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-05-08 16:28","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1170905579","media":"Yahoo Finance ","summary":"It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and i","content":"<p>It’s not this complicated.</p><p>Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have turned a temporary controversy into an ongoing fiasco. The social-media giant could have permanently banned then-President Donald Trump on Jan. 7, after he used the platform to lie about the 2020 election and praise rioters trying to seize control of the US Capitol the day before. Trump and his supporters would have squealed, but decisive action by Facebook would have left them no choice: Deal with it.</p><p>Instead, Facebook (FB) suspended Trump’s account “indefinitely,” while asking the company’s “oversight board”—a group of outside policy experts—to recommend a permanent solution. On May 5, the board “upheld” Facebook’s decision to exile Trump, but it alsodinged Facebook for the arbitrary application of vague standards. Instead of handing the company a simple answer, it told Facebook to come up with a permanent solution of its own within six months.</p><p>Have you ever watched an overwrought parent try to negotiate with a misbehaving five-year-old? Instead of telling the kid to stop being a brat, the parent tries to persuade the child why it’s important to stop being a brat, hoping the child will stop being a brat because he sees the light and learns an important life lesson in the process. You want to shout, “just tell him to stop it!”</p><p>This is what’s going on with Facebook and its oversight board. Facebook is trying to dodge responsibility for making a decision sure to be unpopular with some of its users. The oversight board, relishing its own perceived importance, issued an11,800 word communiquethat didn’t resolve anything. The real answer is painfully obvious: Facebook should permanently ban anybody who’s a chronic liar and violence inciter. Yet nobody in Faceworld can say it.</p><p>Let’s quickly review what’s really happening in the Facebook saga, by annotating the motives of the key players. It won’t take thousands of words.</p><p><b>Donald Trump.</b>He wants the largest possible audience for his propaganda, includinghis lies about the 2020 election being stolenfrom him. Trump is a wannabe despot whoclaims persecutionto distract followers from his aberrant behavior and his election losses. It also helps him raise money from gullible sympathizers. As a private-sector entity, Facebook has the right to boot users who cause the company trouble, which Trump clearly did. There’s no free speech or First Amendment issue at all, because Trump is still free to publish his own views on a platform of his own. If it were a free speech issue, Facebook could cite the First Amendment to declare it faces no obligation to publish anybody's views, just as a newspaper doesn't have to run government manifestoes. Trump's claim of “censorship” is ridiculous, but it obviously keeps him in the news and fires up his supporters.</p><p><b>The Trump cult.</b>Echoing Trump,other Republican politiciansclaim Facebook and other social-media sites single out conservatives for “censorship.” They’re mixing up cause and effect. Election lies and other disinformation are now a staple of the Trump wing of the Republican party, and these lies trigger retaliation by the companies hosting the offending accounts. If Trumpers lied less, social media would “censor” them less. Most of them know this, but “censorship” gives them a bogus cause that helps generate outrage among their followers and juice their own campaign contributions.</p><p><b>Mark Zuckerberg.</b>The Facebook CEO cares about making money above all, and there’s not necessarily anything wrong with that. Zuckerberg wants to outsource the decision about Trump so that he and the company don’t seem to be directly responsible for an outcome likely to anger millions of conservative Facebook users. He may also want to have plausible deniability the next time he testifies before Congress, so that when a Trump lackey such as Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) tries to pillory Zuckerberg for persecuting Trump, Zuckerberg can say, “it wasn’t me.” It’s not clear Facebook is actually losing money because of the Trump feud, but even if it is, Zuckerberg has miscalculated by failing to account for other damage caused by allowing the Trump debacle to fester.</p><p><b>Democrats.</b>They don’t like Facebook either, but Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other Facebook critics on the left have a different gripe:Facebook abuses user dataand hastoo much powerin the digital advertising market. Facebook has few friends in Congress, but it does have one important thing going for it: The company’s Republican and Democratic critics are so divided that they may never agree on any legislation that reins in the company’s power.</p><p>There’s only one way the Facebook-Trump saga can end: A permanent Trump ban. Trump will never stop lying, and any negotiated return to Facebook would only restart the cycle. Around the same time Facebook indefinitely banned Trump, Twitteraxed his account permanently. It didn’t drag out the decision or ask somebody else to decide for it. Twitter (TWTR) is no longer explaining or relitigating its Trump decision, which is where Facebook might be in a year or two. It has already taken too long.</p>","source":"yahoofinance_sg","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The real story of the Trump-Facebook saga</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe real story of the Trump-Facebook saga\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-05-08 16:28 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-real-story-of-the-trump-facebook-saga-145941882.html><strong>Yahoo Finance </strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have turned a temporary controversy into an ongoing fiasco. The social-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-real-story-of-the-trump-facebook-saga-145941882.html\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-real-story-of-the-trump-facebook-saga-145941882.html","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1170905579","content_text":"It’s not this complicated.Like other bumbling corporations reluctant to take a stand, Facebook and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have turned a temporary controversy into an ongoing fiasco. The social-media giant could have permanently banned then-President Donald Trump on Jan. 7, after he used the platform to lie about the 2020 election and praise rioters trying to seize control of the US Capitol the day before. Trump and his supporters would have squealed, but decisive action by Facebook would have left them no choice: Deal with it.Instead, Facebook (FB) suspended Trump’s account “indefinitely,” while asking the company’s “oversight board”—a group of outside policy experts—to recommend a permanent solution. On May 5, the board “upheld” Facebook’s decision to exile Trump, but it alsodinged Facebook for the arbitrary application of vague standards. Instead of handing the company a simple answer, it told Facebook to come up with a permanent solution of its own within six months.Have you ever watched an overwrought parent try to negotiate with a misbehaving five-year-old? Instead of telling the kid to stop being a brat, the parent tries to persuade the child why it’s important to stop being a brat, hoping the child will stop being a brat because he sees the light and learns an important life lesson in the process. You want to shout, “just tell him to stop it!”This is what’s going on with Facebook and its oversight board. Facebook is trying to dodge responsibility for making a decision sure to be unpopular with some of its users. The oversight board, relishing its own perceived importance, issued an11,800 word communiquethat didn’t resolve anything. The real answer is painfully obvious: Facebook should permanently ban anybody who’s a chronic liar and violence inciter. Yet nobody in Faceworld can say it.Let’s quickly review what’s really happening in the Facebook saga, by annotating the motives of the key players. It won’t take thousands of words.Donald Trump.He wants the largest possible audience for his propaganda, includinghis lies about the 2020 election being stolenfrom him. Trump is a wannabe despot whoclaims persecutionto distract followers from his aberrant behavior and his election losses. It also helps him raise money from gullible sympathizers. As a private-sector entity, Facebook has the right to boot users who cause the company trouble, which Trump clearly did. There’s no free speech or First Amendment issue at all, because Trump is still free to publish his own views on a platform of his own. If it were a free speech issue, Facebook could cite the First Amendment to declare it faces no obligation to publish anybody's views, just as a newspaper doesn't have to run government manifestoes. Trump's claim of “censorship” is ridiculous, but it obviously keeps him in the news and fires up his supporters.The Trump cult.Echoing Trump,other Republican politiciansclaim Facebook and other social-media sites single out conservatives for “censorship.” They’re mixing up cause and effect. Election lies and other disinformation are now a staple of the Trump wing of the Republican party, and these lies trigger retaliation by the companies hosting the offending accounts. If Trumpers lied less, social media would “censor” them less. Most of them know this, but “censorship” gives them a bogus cause that helps generate outrage among their followers and juice their own campaign contributions.Mark Zuckerberg.The Facebook CEO cares about making money above all, and there’s not necessarily anything wrong with that. Zuckerberg wants to outsource the decision about Trump so that he and the company don’t seem to be directly responsible for an outcome likely to anger millions of conservative Facebook users. He may also want to have plausible deniability the next time he testifies before Congress, so that when a Trump lackey such as Rep. Jim Jordan (R., Ohio) tries to pillory Zuckerberg for persecuting Trump, Zuckerberg can say, “it wasn’t me.” It’s not clear Facebook is actually losing money because of the Trump feud, but even if it is, Zuckerberg has miscalculated by failing to account for other damage caused by allowing the Trump debacle to fester.Democrats.They don’t like Facebook either, but Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other Facebook critics on the left have a different gripe:Facebook abuses user dataand hastoo much powerin the digital advertising market. Facebook has few friends in Congress, but it does have one important thing going for it: The company’s Republican and Democratic critics are so divided that they may never agree on any legislation that reins in the company’s power.There’s only one way the Facebook-Trump saga can end: A permanent Trump ban. Trump will never stop lying, and any negotiated return to Facebook would only restart the cycle. Around the same time Facebook indefinitely banned Trump, Twitteraxed his account permanently. It didn’t drag out the decision or ask somebody else to decide for it. Twitter (TWTR) is no longer explaining or relitigating its Trump decision, which is where Facebook might be in a year or two. It has already taken too long.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":310,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"following","isTTM":true}