MayLP

    • MayLPMayLP
      ·10-07 17:41
      $Linde PLC(LIN)$   1️⃣ Why am I making this trade now? I’m adding Linde now because I want more exposure beyond tech while still owning a high-quality business with strong pricing power, recurring demand and long-term growth. The recent entry at $456.50 gives me a reasonable starting point, and the 7.33% unrealised gain is a good early confirmation that the timing wasn’t too aggressive. 2️⃣ What’s my plan from here? I’m not looking to trade this for a quick profit. I plan to hold and let the business compound over the long term. If the share price pulls back meaningfully without a change in fundamentals, I’m open to adding. If valuation becomes excessive or the business thesis weakens, I’ll reassess rather than hold. 
      1.40KComment
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·09-21
      591Comment
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·09-21
      769Comment
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·09-12
      If oil reaches US$100 a barrel, producers and oil-exporting countries are likely to benefit from higher revenue and stronger cash flow. Energy stocks, oilfield-service companies and some commodity-linked businesses could also gain. The losers would include airlines, logistics firms, chemical manufacturers and other businesses with high fuel costs. Consumers may face more expensive petrol, transport, food and everyday goods. Oil-importing countries could also see wider trade deficits and greater inflation pressure. For my portfolio, I would avoid making a sudden concentrated bet on oil. Will consider maintaining some exposure to energy for diversification while favouring financially strong companies. Will also keep a balance of defensive sectors, dividend-paying stocks and cash, since highe
      1.29K1
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·08-12
      1.49KComment
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·08-09
      Agree, focus on companies with strong fundamentals, margins, balance sheet strength, cash reserves and moats. Good to diversify into strong companies in other sectors too.
      @Joeljp:
      Initially, the recent global stock market pullback sent shockwaves through technology and semiconductor sectors, with big drawdowns across key chipmakers and tech indexes, including Micron Technology (MU) dropping over 41% and SanDisk Corp (SNDK) plummeting over 57%. However, upon a closer look, after the initial shock, it can be seen that sector rotation is in play. While the semiconductor index $iShares Semiconductor ETF $iShares Semiconductor ETF(SOXX)$ fell, other sectors remain resilient. This is evidently shown on the heat map upon a closer observation. The recent strong earnings and double digits moves for $Microsoft(MSFT)$ and $Amazon.com(AMZ
      Initially, the recent global stock market pullback sent shockwaves through technology and semiconductor sectors, with big drawdowns across key chipmakers and tech indexes, including Micron Technology (MU) dropping over 41% and SanDisk Corp (SNDK) plummeting over 57%. However, upon a closer look, after the initial shock, it can be seen that sector rotation is in play. While the semiconductor index $iShares Semiconductor ETF $iShares Semiconductor ETF(SOXX)$ fell, other sectors remain resilient. This is evidently shown on the heat map upon a closer observation. The recent strong earnings and double digits moves for $Microsoft(MSFT)$ and $Amazon.com(AMZ
      1.24KComment
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·08-07
      I don't think every technology stock should be treated the same during a market sell-off. Some businesses have strong earnings and cash flow behind them, while others depend heavily on very high future expectations. $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ is the one I would treat with more caution. The company has enormous potential in electric vehicles, autonomous driving, robotics and AI, but the share price also reflects a lot of that future potential. If expectations around robotaxis or Optimus are delayed, the stock could fall sharply even if the underlying business remains healthy. For me, Tesla has more characteristics of a bubble-risk stock because investors are paying heavily for future growth that has not fully materialised yet.
      3.59K2
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·08-06
      1.11KComment
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·02-05
      B) Overreaction. Agree with Jensen Huang that AI is more like an efficiency layer than a full replacement. Just like we didn’t rebuild Excel from scratch when new technology appeared, AI will be added into existing tools to make them faster and easier to use. The software that will survive are the ones people already depend on every day, such as spreadsheets, design tools, and business systems, because they are deeply built into how work gets done. Weaker or nice-to-have apps may disappear, since AI can easily copy what they do. In the end, AI doesn’t replace everything, it strengthens the most important software and quietly pushes out the rest.
      3.49KComment
      Report
    • MayLPMayLP
      ·2024-07-24
      Congratulations to Tiger for the 10th Anniversary! 👍
      5.77KComment
      Report
       
       
       
       

      Most Discussed