Profile - To The Moon

Tiger7989

Posts · 167Posts · 167
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-06-09
  Ok
  Netflix And Roku? Interesting Deal, But Unlikely To Happen
  SummaryShares of Roku are up 11% due to speculation that Netflix may acquire the streaming platform.
  Netflix And Roku? Interesting Deal, But Unlikely To Happen
  555 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-06-03
  $Boeing(BA)$ok
  321 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-06-03
  Ok
  U.S. Job Gains in May Seen Slowing to 13-Month Low of 328,000
  Rising U.S. interest rates and the prospect of slower economic growth in the months ahead suggests h
  U.S. Job Gains in May Seen Slowing to 13-Month Low of 328,000
  450 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-05-27
  $Unity Software Inc.(U)$ok
  371 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-05-27
  Ok
  Alibaba Earnings: Back Up The Truck
  SummaryAlibaba just released its Q4 earnings, which beat on both revenue and adjusted EPS.Expectatio
  Alibaba Earnings: Back Up The Truck
  595 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-05-21
  Ok
  It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?
  As the broader market continues to fall, some investors may view the EV leader's stock slump as a buying opportunity. Are they right?
  It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?
  561 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-05-21
  $NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$ok
  420 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-05-18
  Rubblish
  Sea Limited: Could Be Stuck Here For A While
  SummarySea Limited reported its FQ1 earnings results that beat the consensus estimates on revenue an
  Sea Limited: Could Be Stuck Here For A While
  386 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-05-16
  Ok
  S&P 500 Falls on Monday As It Struggles to Rebound From a 6-Week Slide
  S&P 500 fell on Monday as the market attempts to rebound from a relentless sell-off that’s punished
  S&P 500 Falls on Monday As It Struggles to Rebound From a 6-Week Slide
  725 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- Tiger7989Tiger7989
  ·2022-05-16
  $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ok
  373 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4106154086615460","uuid":"4106154086615460","gmtCreate":1643183559723,"gmtModify":1643183559723,"name":"Tiger7989","pinyin":"tiger7989","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":0,"tweetSize":167,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.10.23","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9058001758,"gmtCreate":1654747380174,"gmtModify":1676535504169,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9058001758","repostId":"1152277365","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1152277365","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1654746121,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1152277365?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-09 11:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Netflix And Roku? Interesting Deal, But Unlikely To Happen","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1152277365","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryShares of Roku are up 11% due to speculation that Netflix may acquire the streaming platform.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Shares of Roku are up 11% due to speculation that Netflix may acquire the streaming platform.</li><li>Netflix risks losing its focus as a content publisher if it also wants to become an advertising company.</li><li>Roku will no longer be a neutral CTV advertising outlet if the merger takes place.</li><li>The deal could be highly dilutive to Netflix shareholders as Netflix will need external financing and Roku isn&#39;t a profitable business.</li><li>I see a better path for Netflix to stay focused on creating the most engaging content in the streaming space.</li></ul><p>Shares of Roku, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROKU) are up almost 11% on speculation that Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX) may be looking to acquire the streaming company with more than 60 million households. While a potential merger between both companies could make sense from a vertical integration standpoint, I believe it is unlikely to happen for several reasons.</p><p>First, Netflix&#39;s position as a content publisher requires massive investments (e.g., $17 billion in 2022) to keep customers engaged. By diverting its attention to becoming an advertising platform, Netflix risks allocating less resources to producing the best films and series to compete against the likes of Disney+, HBO Max, and other AVOD offerings. In 1Q22, Netflix lost 200,000 subscribers and guided another 2 million subs loss in 2Q22.</p><p>As ARPU becomes a key metric following subs loss, Netflix is looking to explore an ad-supported tier and raise prices on its 100 million users who share passwords. In an inflationary environment, consumers are likely to react to Netflix&#39;s price hikes by either canceling the service or trade down to a lower-priced tier. As a result, content must be nothing short of spectacular just to keep users from leaving, and Netflix cannot fully devote itself to its core activity if it also wants to become an advertising company.</p><p>Second, Roku will no longer be perceived as a neutral platform (though it does have the Roku Channel which competes with other AVOD providers) if Netflix becomes the owner of the TV OS operator. It would be very difficult to imagine a Netflix-owned Roku to ask for ad inventory from any scaled SVOD or AVOD services such as Disney+ and Peacock, as Netflix essentially competes for the same eyeballs. Roku does have a history with Netflix given it was an internal project that got spun out of Netflix in 2008, but the spinoff took place out of Netflix&#39;s concern that having its own streaming platform would impact the distribution of its streaming app.</p><p>Third, the deal doesn&#39;t make much financial sense in an increasingly challenging environment where investors are looking for profits more than anything else. Roku is not a profitable business, as the company guided 4% adjusted EBITDA margin in 2022, implying a negative operating and net margin. The company had a market cap of ~$12 billion before the merger headline emerged vs. Netflix&#39;s $88 billion. Assuming a 30% premium on Roku, Netflix would be paying $15.6 billion, or almost 18% of its market cap, for Roku. Given Netflix has $6 billion of cash and $14.5 billion of long-term debt, it will need external firepower to materialize the deal either through more debt or share issuance. Obviously, this will be dilutive to Netflix shareholders.</p><p>In short, the deal does look interesting at face value but is unlikely to take place in my view. Netflix management has shown interest in offering an ad-supported tier, but it would be surprising to investors if it wants to go as far as transforming itself from a pure-play SVOD player to a CTV advertising platform. In short, I see a better path for the company to stay focused as a world-class publisher of critically acclaimed series such as <i>Ozark</i>and<i>Stranger Things</i>.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Netflix And Roku? Interesting Deal, But Unlikely To Happen</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNetflix And Roku? Interesting Deal, But Unlikely To Happen\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-06-09 11:42 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517194-netflix-and-roku-interesting-deal-but-unlikely-to-happen><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryShares of Roku are up 11% due to speculation that Netflix may acquire the streaming platform.Netflix risks losing its focus as a content publisher if it also wants to become an advertising ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517194-netflix-and-roku-interesting-deal-but-unlikely-to-happen\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"NFLX":"奈飞","ROKU":"Roku Inc"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4517194-netflix-and-roku-interesting-deal-but-unlikely-to-happen","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1152277365","content_text":"SummaryShares of Roku are up 11% due to speculation that Netflix may acquire the streaming platform.Netflix risks losing its focus as a content publisher if it also wants to become an advertising company.Roku will no longer be a neutral CTV advertising outlet if the merger takes place.The deal could be highly dilutive to Netflix shareholders as Netflix will need external financing and Roku isn't a profitable business.I see a better path for Netflix to stay focused on creating the most engaging content in the streaming space.Shares of Roku, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROKU) are up almost 11% on speculation that Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ:NFLX) may be looking to acquire the streaming company with more than 60 million households. While a potential merger between both companies could make sense from a vertical integration standpoint, I believe it is unlikely to happen for several reasons.First, Netflix's position as a content publisher requires massive investments (e.g., $17 billion in 2022) to keep customers engaged. By diverting its attention to becoming an advertising platform, Netflix risks allocating less resources to producing the best films and series to compete against the likes of Disney+, HBO Max, and other AVOD offerings. In 1Q22, Netflix lost 200,000 subscribers and guided another 2 million subs loss in 2Q22.As ARPU becomes a key metric following subs loss, Netflix is looking to explore an ad-supported tier and raise prices on its 100 million users who share passwords. In an inflationary environment, consumers are likely to react to Netflix's price hikes by either canceling the service or trade down to a lower-priced tier. As a result, content must be nothing short of spectacular just to keep users from leaving, and Netflix cannot fully devote itself to its core activity if it also wants to become an advertising company.Second, Roku will no longer be perceived as a neutral platform (though it does have the Roku Channel which competes with other AVOD providers) if Netflix becomes the owner of the TV OS operator. It would be very difficult to imagine a Netflix-owned Roku to ask for ad inventory from any scaled SVOD or AVOD services such as Disney+ and Peacock, as Netflix essentially competes for the same eyeballs. Roku does have a history with Netflix given it was an internal project that got spun out of Netflix in 2008, but the spinoff took place out of Netflix's concern that having its own streaming platform would impact the distribution of its streaming app.Third, the deal doesn't make much financial sense in an increasingly challenging environment where investors are looking for profits more than anything else. Roku is not a profitable business, as the company guided 4% adjusted EBITDA margin in 2022, implying a negative operating and net margin. The company had a market cap of ~$12 billion before the merger headline emerged vs. Netflix's $88 billion. Assuming a 30% premium on Roku, Netflix would be paying $15.6 billion, or almost 18% of its market cap, for Roku. Given Netflix has $6 billion of cash and $14.5 billion of long-term debt, it will need external firepower to materialize the deal either through more debt or share issuance. Obviously, this will be dilutive to Netflix shareholders.In short, the deal does look interesting at face value but is unlikely to take place in my view. Netflix management has shown interest in offering an ad-supported tier, but it would be surprising to investors if it wants to go as far as transforming itself from a pure-play SVOD player to a CTV advertising platform. In short, I see a better path for the company to stay focused as a world-class publisher of critically acclaimed series such as OzarkandStranger Things.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":555,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050747411,"gmtCreate":1654252621533,"gmtModify":1676535420453,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BA\">$Boeing(BA)$</a>ok","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/BA\">$Boeing(BA)$</a>ok","text":"$Boeing(BA)$ok","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/71d387835aa05ac514407193a6302da3","width":"1080","height":"3501"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050747411","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":321,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9050744659,"gmtCreate":1654252396671,"gmtModify":1676535420421,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9050744659","repostId":"2240243020","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2240243020","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1654246478,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2240243020?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-06-03 16:54","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"U.S. Job Gains in May Seen Slowing to 13-Month Low of 328,000","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2240243020","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Rising U.S. interest rates and the prospect of slower economic growth in the months ahead suggests h","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Rising U.S. interest rates and the prospect of slower economic growth in the months ahead suggests hiring is also likely to wane -- and that&#39;s what Wall Street expects in May.</p><h2>Here&#39;s what to watch in the employment report on Friday morning:</h2><h2>Wall Street forecast</h2><p>The number of new jobs the U.S. created in May is expected to slow to a 13-month low of 328,000, according to a poll of economists by The Wall Street Journal.</p><p>By comparison, the economy has added at least 400,000 jobs a month in the past year, and its gained an average of 518,000 a month in 2022.</p><p>Yet signs of slower hiring are starting to appear. Some large companies have put hiring freezes in place, a Federal Reserve survey found. And an ADP employment report showed the smallest job creation in May since the start of the pandemic.</p><p>&#34;We expect job growth to remain on an upward trajectory,&#34; said chief U.S. economist Rubeela Farooqi of High Freqeuncy Economics, &#34;but the pace islikely to slow as the Fed continues to raise rates over coming months.&#34;</p><p>The bigger problem may still be a major labor shortage, however. Lots of companies that want to hire still say they can&#39;t find enough qualified workers.</p><p>The May report could also bring a statistical quirk.</p><p>It&#39;s usually the second biggest month of hiring in the entire year, but if the raw increase falls short of what the government expects, the seasonal adjustments tend to make the May jobs figures look a lot worse.</p><h2>Jobs by industry</h2><p>Hiring in interest-rate sensitive industries such as housing and finance are likely to slow, especially after strong increases earlier in the year. There&#39;s less demand for construction workers and real estate agents as home sales taper off.</p><p>Ditto for retailers and shippers as consumers cut back on purchase of goods in the face of high inflation.</p><p>Employment could rise in tourism and travel, however, as the summer vacation season approaches and Americans shift more spending to services and away from goods.</p><h2>Unemployment rate</h2><p>Wall Street  expects the U.S. unemployment rate to drop to 3.5% from 3.6% and match the pre-pandemic low in 2020. Before that, the last time the jobless rate was as low was in 1968.</p><p>How &#34;tight&#34; is the labor market? If unemployment falls below 3.4%, it would mark the smallest rate since 1953.</p><h2>Growing labor force</h2><p>The size of the labor force is expanding again, but it hasn&#39;t returned to pre-pandemic  levels.</p><p>High inflation and a faltering stock market could spur more people to look for work, economists say, but probably not enough to ease the worst labor shortage in decades.</p><p>The share of the working-age population in the labor force stood at 62.2% in April, leaving it more than a full point below the pre-Covid high. That&#39;s the equivalent of about 1.5 million missing workers.</p><h2>Worker pay</h2><p>The labor shortage has helped boost the average wage by 5.5% over the past year to $31.85 an hour, marking the biggest increase since the early 1980s.</p><p>Economists forecast another sizable 0.4% increase in wages in May, but there are hints that pay gains are starting to wane. A slower economy and slower hiring would almost assure it.</p><p>Even the big increase in pay, however, is not enough to keep up with inflation. The cost of living has jumped 8.3% in the past year.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>U.S. Job Gains in May Seen Slowing to 13-Month Low of 328,000</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nU.S. Job Gains in May Seen Slowing to 13-Month Low of 328,000\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-06-03 16:54</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Rising U.S. interest rates and the prospect of slower economic growth in the months ahead suggests hiring is also likely to wane -- and that&#39;s what Wall Street expects in May.</p><h2>Here&#39;s what to watch in the employment report on Friday morning:</h2><h2>Wall Street forecast</h2><p>The number of new jobs the U.S. created in May is expected to slow to a 13-month low of 328,000, according to a poll of economists by The Wall Street Journal.</p><p>By comparison, the economy has added at least 400,000 jobs a month in the past year, and its gained an average of 518,000 a month in 2022.</p><p>Yet signs of slower hiring are starting to appear. Some large companies have put hiring freezes in place, a Federal Reserve survey found. And an ADP employment report showed the smallest job creation in May since the start of the pandemic.</p><p>&#34;We expect job growth to remain on an upward trajectory,&#34; said chief U.S. economist Rubeela Farooqi of High Freqeuncy Economics, &#34;but the pace islikely to slow as the Fed continues to raise rates over coming months.&#34;</p><p>The bigger problem may still be a major labor shortage, however. Lots of companies that want to hire still say they can&#39;t find enough qualified workers.</p><p>The May report could also bring a statistical quirk.</p><p>It&#39;s usually the second biggest month of hiring in the entire year, but if the raw increase falls short of what the government expects, the seasonal adjustments tend to make the May jobs figures look a lot worse.</p><h2>Jobs by industry</h2><p>Hiring in interest-rate sensitive industries such as housing and finance are likely to slow, especially after strong increases earlier in the year. There&#39;s less demand for construction workers and real estate agents as home sales taper off.</p><p>Ditto for retailers and shippers as consumers cut back on purchase of goods in the face of high inflation.</p><p>Employment could rise in tourism and travel, however, as the summer vacation season approaches and Americans shift more spending to services and away from goods.</p><h2>Unemployment rate</h2><p>Wall Street  expects the U.S. unemployment rate to drop to 3.5% from 3.6% and match the pre-pandemic low in 2020. Before that, the last time the jobless rate was as low was in 1968.</p><p>How &#34;tight&#34; is the labor market? If unemployment falls below 3.4%, it would mark the smallest rate since 1953.</p><h2>Growing labor force</h2><p>The size of the labor force is expanding again, but it hasn&#39;t returned to pre-pandemic  levels.</p><p>High inflation and a faltering stock market could spur more people to look for work, economists say, but probably not enough to ease the worst labor shortage in decades.</p><p>The share of the working-age population in the labor force stood at 62.2% in April, leaving it more than a full point below the pre-Covid high. That&#39;s the equivalent of about 1.5 million missing workers.</p><h2>Worker pay</h2><p>The labor shortage has helped boost the average wage by 5.5% over the past year to $31.85 an hour, marking the biggest increase since the early 1980s.</p><p>Economists forecast another sizable 0.4% increase in wages in May, but there are hints that pay gains are starting to wane. A slower economy and slower hiring would almost assure it.</p><p>Even the big increase in pay, however, is not enough to keep up with inflation. The cost of living has jumped 8.3% in the past year.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2240243020","content_text":"Rising U.S. interest rates and the prospect of slower economic growth in the months ahead suggests hiring is also likely to wane -- and that's what Wall Street expects in May.Here's what to watch in the employment report on Friday morning:Wall Street forecastThe number of new jobs the U.S. created in May is expected to slow to a 13-month low of 328,000, according to a poll of economists by The Wall Street Journal.By comparison, the economy has added at least 400,000 jobs a month in the past year, and its gained an average of 518,000 a month in 2022.Yet signs of slower hiring are starting to appear. Some large companies have put hiring freezes in place, a Federal Reserve survey found. And an ADP employment report showed the smallest job creation in May since the start of the pandemic.\"We expect job growth to remain on an upward trajectory,\" said chief U.S. economist Rubeela Farooqi of High Freqeuncy Economics, \"but the pace islikely to slow as the Fed continues to raise rates over coming months.\"The bigger problem may still be a major labor shortage, however. Lots of companies that want to hire still say they can't find enough qualified workers.The May report could also bring a statistical quirk.It's usually the second biggest month of hiring in the entire year, but if the raw increase falls short of what the government expects, the seasonal adjustments tend to make the May jobs figures look a lot worse.Jobs by industryHiring in interest-rate sensitive industries such as housing and finance are likely to slow, especially after strong increases earlier in the year. There's less demand for construction workers and real estate agents as home sales taper off.Ditto for retailers and shippers as consumers cut back on purchase of goods in the face of high inflation.Employment could rise in tourism and travel, however, as the summer vacation season approaches and Americans shift more spending to services and away from goods.Unemployment rateWall Street  expects the U.S. unemployment rate to drop to 3.5% from 3.6% and match the pre-pandemic low in 2020. Before that, the last time the jobless rate was as low was in 1968.How \"tight\" is the labor market? If unemployment falls below 3.4%, it would mark the smallest rate since 1953.Growing labor forceThe size of the labor force is expanding again, but it hasn't returned to pre-pandemic  levels.High inflation and a faltering stock market could spur more people to look for work, economists say, but probably not enough to ease the worst labor shortage in decades.The share of the working-age population in the labor force stood at 62.2% in April, leaving it more than a full point below the pre-Covid high. That's the equivalent of about 1.5 million missing workers.Worker payThe labor shortage has helped boost the average wage by 5.5% over the past year to $31.85 an hour, marking the biggest increase since the early 1980s.Economists forecast another sizable 0.4% increase in wages in May, but there are hints that pay gains are starting to wane. A slower economy and slower hiring would almost assure it.Even the big increase in pay, however, is not enough to keep up with inflation. The cost of living has jumped 8.3% in the past year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":450,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9025825475,"gmtCreate":1653660907598,"gmtModify":1676535322940,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/U\">$Unity Software Inc.(U)$</a>ok","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/U\">$Unity Software Inc.(U)$</a>ok","text":"$Unity Software Inc.(U)$ok","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/5ede367364e95a6679b218409779a6c9","width":"1080","height":"3402"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9025825475","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":371,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9025822685,"gmtCreate":1653660819147,"gmtModify":1676535322894,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9025822685","repostId":"2238387186","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2238387186","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1653660205,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2238387186?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-27 22:03","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Alibaba Earnings: Back Up The Truck","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2238387186","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummaryAlibaba just released its Q4 earnings, which beat on both revenue and adjusted EPS.Expectatio","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Alibaba just released its Q4 earnings, which beat on both revenue and adjusted EPS.</li><li>Expectations were low heading into the release.</li><li>At this point, BABA has gotten beaten down to the point of absurdity.</li><li>In this article I dissect Alibaba&#39;s Q4 earnings release and explain why I&#39;m still long despite all the challenges.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fb3d9594de3e32459d994aa3977dc753\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>Michael Loccisano/Getty Images Entertainment</span></p><p><b>Alibaba Group Holding Limited</b> (NYSE:BABA) just released its fourth quarter earnings. The release beat expectations on revenue as well as on EPS. The $3 billion year-over-year increase in revenue showed that BABA was able to crankout strong sales growth even amid China’s lockdowns and other macroeconomic headwinds.</p><p>Alibaba had a lot of things working in its favor going into its Q2 release. The company had negative earnings in the prior year quarter, which meant that the comparisons were soft this time around. The company was caught off guard by some lockdowns in major Chinese cities, but it wasn’t until Q2 (Alibaba’s fiscal Q1) that they became truly widespread. Additionally, BABA enjoyed a significant increase in web traffic in Q4 across virtually all of its online channels. Despite these two factors working in BABA’s favor, analysts still cut estimates repeatedly throughout the quarter, leading to weak expectations.</p><p>So, Alibaba had many advantages heading into this release. Which is why it was not surprising that earnings beat expectations. In Q4, Alibaba put most of its 2021 tech crackdown damage behind it. We’re beginning to see the effects of that today.</p><p>With a solid fourth quarter under its belt, Alibaba has a good foundation to build from. While the upcoming quarterly release is likely to be weak due to China’s heavy Q2 lockdowns, BABA will once again have soft comparisons in the September quarter. This lends credence to the idea that 2022 will be the year when Alibaba recovers–although the process may take longer than we initially thought.</p><p><b>Earnings Recap</b></p><p>For the fourth quarter, Alibaba delivered strong earnings, beating on both the top and bottom lines. Some highlights include:</p><ul><li><p>Revenue: $32.1 billion, up 9% (beat by $3 billion);</p></li><li><p>Operating income: $2.6 billion;</p></li><li><p>GAAP earnings: $-2.5 billion;</p></li><li><p>Adjusted earnings: $3.1 billion;</p></li><li><p>Diluted EPS: $1.25, down 23% (beat by $0.16);</p></li><li><p>Operating cash flow: $-1.1 billion.</p></li></ul><p>Pretty strong results, all things considered. Even with lockdowns taking place in the fourth quarter, Alibaba managed to grow its revenue by billions of dollars.</p><p>A few metrics in the release were particularly surprising, such as the 8% growth in core commerce. Going into the release, many investors expected the core eCommerce segment to weigh on results, as China was going through lockdowns in Q4. In past quarters, that segment underperformed relative to the cloud segment. This time around, that trend reversed. In Q4, Alibaba Cloud lost its biggest customer, which resulted in the segment growing by only 21%. Alibaba Cloud has long been considered a major potential growth driver for BABA, so its comparative under-performance in Q4 was a disappointment.</p><p>The cloud segment is worth exploring in detail. In the earnings release, BABA said that “a top customer” cut out its use of Alibaba cloud due to slowing demand in China. It did not specify the identity of the customer. The customer also apparently ceased using Alibaba Cloud in its international business, though it declined to say why. According to Alibaba, cloud growth would have been 29% had this customer not stopped using the service.</p><p>So, although Alibaba Cloud growth decelerated significantly in Q4, there is reason to think that it will pick up again. The 29% growth that Alibaba Cloud would have delivered had this customer still been in the picture would have been commensurate with past quarters, meaning that BABA would not have experienced deceleration. If Alibaba can get that customer back, then its growth could accelerate in the near future.</p><p><b>Competitors’ Results</b></p><p>To truly understand Alibaba’s Q4 results, we need to check in on how the company’s competitors have been doing. It’s well known that China’s government wants to increase competition in the tech sector, and this has been cited as a headwind for Alibaba. Given this, it makes sense to look at some of BABA’s competitors’ recent releases. Armed with this information, we can gauge how much of an advantage or disadvantage BABA has going forward.</p><p>First, let’s look at <b>JD.com, Inc.</b> (JD). JD’s earnings release was mixed. Revenue beat expectations, growing 18%, as did adjusted earnings. GAAP earnings, on the other hand, missed by a pretty wide margin, coming in at $-0.29, compared to $-0.02 expected. It wasn’t a great release, but the growth in revenue shows that one of BABA’s competitors is increasing its presence in the market. That could be thought of as a negative for BABA.</p><p>Next up we have <b>Pinduoduo Inc.</b> (PDD). PDD’s most recent release showed its slowest revenue growth in years. Coming in at 3%, the company’s revenue decelerated dramatically. That was definitely a positive for Alibaba. Pinduoduo’s popular group purchase model in agricultural goods could have made it a real competitor to BABA had it branched out into more product categories. Now that PDD’s growth is slowing down, it looks like the possible competitive threat has eased off. (<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/NW/1123192288\" target=\"_blank\">Pinduoduo has announced its quarterly results</a>)</p><p><b>Valuation</b></p><p>Alibaba’s Q4 results are particularly encouraging when we consider them along with the company’s valuation. Alibaba’s recent earnings beat expectations, yet the company’s stock is still very cheap, boasting valuation multiples like:</p><ul><li><p>Adjusted P/E: 9.5;</p></li><li><p>GAAP P/E: 21.9;</p></li><li><p>Price/sales: 1.69;</p></li><li><p>Price/book: 1.44;</p></li><li><p>Price/operating cash flow: 8.</p></li></ul><p>The above metrics strongly hint at a company that may be undervalued. BABA is, quite frankly, priced like it’s going out of business. Its price/book multiple is approaching a level where the company would be trading below the value of assets, net of debt, if its stock went much lower. In fact, Alibaba could reach the point where it’s trading below book value this quarter if its stock portfolio increases in value.</p><p>Alibaba is known to hold a lot of stocks and other marketable securities on its balance sheet. In recent quarters, this factor has been reducing the company’s GAAP earnings, as GAAP accounting rules state that you have to subtract mark-to-market losses on securities from net income, even if the losses weren’t realized. It’s a peculiar accounting rule that Warren Buffett has criticized due to it producing “earnings” that don’t reflect operating performance. It is true that mark-to-market accounting produces earnings that have nothing to do with business performance. However, this exact same factor could push BABA’s assets and earnings higher in the future, leading to an even lower price/book multiple and even greater perceived undervaluation.</p><p><b>Risks and Challenges</b></p><p>As we’ve seen, Alibaba is a strong player in China’s eCommerce industry that just put out a better-than-expected earnings release. Its stock is also very cheap. Taking all of this together, one gets the sense of a great value.</p><p>However, there are several risks and challenges to keep in mind, including:</p><ul><li><p><b>June quarter earnings.</b>It’s quite likely that Alibaba’s June quarter earnings will be weak. There were at least two full months of severe lockdowns in several Chinese cities in Q1. At the peak, more than 400 million Chinese citizens were locked down. There were some lockdowns in the just-reported quarter, but they weren’t as strict, and they didn’t affect as many people. There are already early signs that the Q2 lockdowns hit BABA pretty hard. BABA’s web traffic severely declined in April after rising in March. This suggests that, possibly, Chinese citizens were spending less money due to lockdown-induced supply constraints, or income loss.</p></li><li><p><b>Lockdowns.</b>Related to the June quarter earnings release is the prospect of Chinese lockdowns in general. China still officially maintains a “Zero COVID policy” which means that it is willing to use lockdowns to combat even small numbers of cases. This can lead to less retail spending when it occurs, which is a bad thing for online retail platforms like the ones BABA operates.</p></li><li><p><b>A renewed tech regulation.</b>China’s tech regulation was the biggest single factor behind Alibaba’s crash in 2021. The regulation resulted in BABA taking a $2.8 billion fine, a tax hike, and a host of other challenges. At the start of this year, it was looking like the regulation was still ongoing. The government was just about to launch a new inquiry into Ant Group when the COVID outbreak hit and the anti-trust inquiries were put on hold. Since then, China’s policy has been to support the markets rather than pressure them. However, there is always the possibility that the regulation will flare up again. If it does, it could cost BABA some money.</p></li><li><p><b>The macro climate.</b>China’s macroeconomic environment could be considered a short term risk factor for Alibaba. China’s retail spending growth was -11% in April. It could continue to be negative if China continues to pursue its aggressive stance on COVID. Additionally, China will face softer export growth should the U.S. enter the recession that many expect, and is still dealing with the economic fallout from the collapse of Evergrande. Taking all of these factors together, we get a picture of a decidedly challenging macroeconomic environment.</p></li></ul><p>If you’re considering taking a position in Alibaba, you’ll want to give the risk factors above a good hard mulling over. To my mind, BABA stock is a good value, because the stock is cheap and the company has a good competitive position. But a stock facing this many risk factors isn’t for everyone. It has been a volatile ride so far, and probably will be for the foreseeable future.</p><p>As for me, I plan to continue holding BABA. For an investor with a long time horizon, there are few better deals in the market today. A lot of people in this market speak of <b>Meta Platforms, Inc.</b> (FB) as a value stock, yet its multiples areall higher than BABA’sdespite it having slower revenue growth. Alibaba is the kind of rock bottom bargain you rarely see anywhere other than China, which is why I remain long this stock despite all of the risk factors it faces.</p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Alibaba Earnings: Back Up The Truck</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAlibaba Earnings: Back Up The Truck\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-27 22:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4514639-alibaba-earnings-back-up-the-truck><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryAlibaba just released its Q4 earnings, which beat on both revenue and adjusted EPS.Expectations were low heading into the release.At this point, BABA has gotten beaten down to the point of ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4514639-alibaba-earnings-back-up-the-truck\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BABA":"阿里巴巴","09988":"阿里巴巴-W"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4514639-alibaba-earnings-back-up-the-truck","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"2238387186","content_text":"SummaryAlibaba just released its Q4 earnings, which beat on both revenue and adjusted EPS.Expectations were low heading into the release.At this point, BABA has gotten beaten down to the point of absurdity.In this article I dissect Alibaba's Q4 earnings release and explain why I'm still long despite all the challenges.Michael Loccisano/Getty Images EntertainmentAlibaba Group Holding Limited (NYSE:BABA) just released its fourth quarter earnings. The release beat expectations on revenue as well as on EPS. The $3 billion year-over-year increase in revenue showed that BABA was able to crankout strong sales growth even amid China’s lockdowns and other macroeconomic headwinds.Alibaba had a lot of things working in its favor going into its Q2 release. The company had negative earnings in the prior year quarter, which meant that the comparisons were soft this time around. The company was caught off guard by some lockdowns in major Chinese cities, but it wasn’t until Q2 (Alibaba’s fiscal Q1) that they became truly widespread. Additionally, BABA enjoyed a significant increase in web traffic in Q4 across virtually all of its online channels. Despite these two factors working in BABA’s favor, analysts still cut estimates repeatedly throughout the quarter, leading to weak expectations.So, Alibaba had many advantages heading into this release. Which is why it was not surprising that earnings beat expectations. In Q4, Alibaba put most of its 2021 tech crackdown damage behind it. We’re beginning to see the effects of that today.With a solid fourth quarter under its belt, Alibaba has a good foundation to build from. While the upcoming quarterly release is likely to be weak due to China’s heavy Q2 lockdowns, BABA will once again have soft comparisons in the September quarter. This lends credence to the idea that 2022 will be the year when Alibaba recovers–although the process may take longer than we initially thought.Earnings RecapFor the fourth quarter, Alibaba delivered strong earnings, beating on both the top and bottom lines. Some highlights include:Revenue: $32.1 billion, up 9% (beat by $3 billion);Operating income: $2.6 billion;GAAP earnings: $-2.5 billion;Adjusted earnings: $3.1 billion;Diluted EPS: $1.25, down 23% (beat by $0.16);Operating cash flow: $-1.1 billion.Pretty strong results, all things considered. Even with lockdowns taking place in the fourth quarter, Alibaba managed to grow its revenue by billions of dollars.A few metrics in the release were particularly surprising, such as the 8% growth in core commerce. Going into the release, many investors expected the core eCommerce segment to weigh on results, as China was going through lockdowns in Q4. In past quarters, that segment underperformed relative to the cloud segment. This time around, that trend reversed. In Q4, Alibaba Cloud lost its biggest customer, which resulted in the segment growing by only 21%. Alibaba Cloud has long been considered a major potential growth driver for BABA, so its comparative under-performance in Q4 was a disappointment.The cloud segment is worth exploring in detail. In the earnings release, BABA said that “a top customer” cut out its use of Alibaba cloud due to slowing demand in China. It did not specify the identity of the customer. The customer also apparently ceased using Alibaba Cloud in its international business, though it declined to say why. According to Alibaba, cloud growth would have been 29% had this customer not stopped using the service.So, although Alibaba Cloud growth decelerated significantly in Q4, there is reason to think that it will pick up again. The 29% growth that Alibaba Cloud would have delivered had this customer still been in the picture would have been commensurate with past quarters, meaning that BABA would not have experienced deceleration. If Alibaba can get that customer back, then its growth could accelerate in the near future.Competitors’ ResultsTo truly understand Alibaba’s Q4 results, we need to check in on how the company’s competitors have been doing. It’s well known that China’s government wants to increase competition in the tech sector, and this has been cited as a headwind for Alibaba. Given this, it makes sense to look at some of BABA’s competitors’ recent releases. Armed with this information, we can gauge how much of an advantage or disadvantage BABA has going forward.First, let’s look at JD.com, Inc. (JD). JD’s earnings release was mixed. Revenue beat expectations, growing 18%, as did adjusted earnings. GAAP earnings, on the other hand, missed by a pretty wide margin, coming in at $-0.29, compared to $-0.02 expected. It wasn’t a great release, but the growth in revenue shows that one of BABA’s competitors is increasing its presence in the market. That could be thought of as a negative for BABA.Next up we have Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD). PDD’s most recent release showed its slowest revenue growth in years. Coming in at 3%, the company’s revenue decelerated dramatically. That was definitely a positive for Alibaba. Pinduoduo’s popular group purchase model in agricultural goods could have made it a real competitor to BABA had it branched out into more product categories. Now that PDD’s growth is slowing down, it looks like the possible competitive threat has eased off. (Pinduoduo has announced its quarterly results)ValuationAlibaba’s Q4 results are particularly encouraging when we consider them along with the company’s valuation. Alibaba’s recent earnings beat expectations, yet the company’s stock is still very cheap, boasting valuation multiples like:Adjusted P/E: 9.5;GAAP P/E: 21.9;Price/sales: 1.69;Price/book: 1.44;Price/operating cash flow: 8.The above metrics strongly hint at a company that may be undervalued. BABA is, quite frankly, priced like it’s going out of business. Its price/book multiple is approaching a level where the company would be trading below the value of assets, net of debt, if its stock went much lower. In fact, Alibaba could reach the point where it’s trading below book value this quarter if its stock portfolio increases in value.Alibaba is known to hold a lot of stocks and other marketable securities on its balance sheet. In recent quarters, this factor has been reducing the company’s GAAP earnings, as GAAP accounting rules state that you have to subtract mark-to-market losses on securities from net income, even if the losses weren’t realized. It’s a peculiar accounting rule that Warren Buffett has criticized due to it producing “earnings” that don’t reflect operating performance. It is true that mark-to-market accounting produces earnings that have nothing to do with business performance. However, this exact same factor could push BABA’s assets and earnings higher in the future, leading to an even lower price/book multiple and even greater perceived undervaluation.Risks and ChallengesAs we’ve seen, Alibaba is a strong player in China’s eCommerce industry that just put out a better-than-expected earnings release. Its stock is also very cheap. Taking all of this together, one gets the sense of a great value.However, there are several risks and challenges to keep in mind, including:June quarter earnings.It’s quite likely that Alibaba’s June quarter earnings will be weak. There were at least two full months of severe lockdowns in several Chinese cities in Q1. At the peak, more than 400 million Chinese citizens were locked down. There were some lockdowns in the just-reported quarter, but they weren’t as strict, and they didn’t affect as many people. There are already early signs that the Q2 lockdowns hit BABA pretty hard. BABA’s web traffic severely declined in April after rising in March. This suggests that, possibly, Chinese citizens were spending less money due to lockdown-induced supply constraints, or income loss.Lockdowns.Related to the June quarter earnings release is the prospect of Chinese lockdowns in general. China still officially maintains a “Zero COVID policy” which means that it is willing to use lockdowns to combat even small numbers of cases. This can lead to less retail spending when it occurs, which is a bad thing for online retail platforms like the ones BABA operates.A renewed tech regulation.China’s tech regulation was the biggest single factor behind Alibaba’s crash in 2021. The regulation resulted in BABA taking a $2.8 billion fine, a tax hike, and a host of other challenges. At the start of this year, it was looking like the regulation was still ongoing. The government was just about to launch a new inquiry into Ant Group when the COVID outbreak hit and the anti-trust inquiries were put on hold. Since then, China’s policy has been to support the markets rather than pressure them. However, there is always the possibility that the regulation will flare up again. If it does, it could cost BABA some money.The macro climate.China’s macroeconomic environment could be considered a short term risk factor for Alibaba. China’s retail spending growth was -11% in April. It could continue to be negative if China continues to pursue its aggressive stance on COVID. Additionally, China will face softer export growth should the U.S. enter the recession that many expect, and is still dealing with the economic fallout from the collapse of Evergrande. Taking all of these factors together, we get a picture of a decidedly challenging macroeconomic environment.If you’re considering taking a position in Alibaba, you’ll want to give the risk factors above a good hard mulling over. To my mind, BABA stock is a good value, because the stock is cheap and the company has a good competitive position. But a stock facing this many risk factors isn’t for everyone. It has been a volatile ride so far, and probably will be for the foreseeable future.As for me, I plan to continue holding BABA. For an investor with a long time horizon, there are few better deals in the market today. A lot of people in this market speak of Meta Platforms, Inc. (FB) as a value stock, yet its multiples areall higher than BABA’sdespite it having slower revenue growth. Alibaba is the kind of rock bottom bargain you rarely see anywhere other than China, which is why I remain long this stock despite all of the risk factors it faces.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":595,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9021752516,"gmtCreate":1653106008735,"gmtModify":1676535225951,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9021752516","repostId":"2236012808","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2236012808","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1653089869,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2236012808?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-21 07:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2236012808","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"As the broader market continues to fall, some investors may view the EV leader's stock slump as a buying opportunity. Are they right?","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut <b>Tesla</b> have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-high inflation, the Fed&#39;s consequent move to raise interest rates, and concerns about the war between Russia and Ukraine, the stock market has been in quite the frenzy.</p><p>Many high-growth stocks, Tesla included, have been humbled lately as investors seek protection by shifting their attention to value companies and safer assets. CEO Elon Musk&#39;s move to potentially acquire <b>Twitter</b> certainly hasn&#39;t aided the company&#39;s case, either. With uncertainty around whether or not the deal will actually close, investors have raced to dump shares of the EV leader.</p><p>But in terms of fundamentals, Tesla continues to look dominant. The company is rapidly expanding its business on all fronts and has strengthened its balance sheet and cash generation in the process. With the stock down almost 40% year to date, should investors pull the trigger on buying Tesla today?</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ecb47944e9c0966d2182e999d9a81cba\"/><span>Image source: Getty Images.</span></p><h2>Fundamentals aren&#39;t the problem</h2><p>In a quarter when investors weren&#39;t sure what to expect due to COVID-19-related shutdowns at Tesla&#39;s Shanghai factory, the EV leader delivered, and it delivered big. The company&#39;s $18.8 billion in total sales, which climbed 81% year over year, beat Wall Street expectations by $918 million. Likewise, its non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.22, equal to 246% growth, crushed consensus estimates by a whopping 42%.</p><p>To top off a record quarter, the Musk-led enterprise grew total production and vehicle deliveries by a respective 69% and 68%, producing 305,407 vehicles and delivering 310,048. Per management&#39;s guidance, investors can expect the company to achieve 50% average annual growth in deliveries over a multi-year time horizon. In fiscal 2022, analysts are modeling a top line and adjusted bottom line of $86.5 billion and $12.32/share, translating to robust year-over-year ascents of 61% and 82%, respectively.</p><p>Amid such incredible growth, the company&#39;s balance sheet and cash generation are equally thriving. In its latest quarter, the EV commander revealed that total debt excluding vehicle and energy product financing fell below $100 million. The company is manifesting the &#34;cash is king&#34; mantra as well: In the first quarter, free cash flow surged an astonishing 660% to $2.2 billion. Provided that the global EV market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% through 2028 to nearly $1 trillion, it could be said with exceedingly high confidence that Tesla is poised for more success in the coming years.</p><h2>Tesla&#39;s valuation is still high</h2><p>Even without context, though, Tesla&#39;s valuation is extremely high. The stock is trading at 98.2 times earnings at the moment, an extremely lofty multiple even post-correction.</p><p>Comparing the EV behemoth to other automobile manufacturers further underscores its expensive stock price. As seen in the below chart, competitors <b>General Motors </b>(GM 0.81%), <b>Ford</b> (F 0.55%), and <b>Toyota </b>(TM 0.26%) have price-to-earnings multiples of 6.2, 4.6, and 7.9, respectively. Whether or not Tesla deserves a premium valuation is a frequent debate among the bulls and the bears. However, it&#39;s rather indisputable that the EV stock is richly priced. It would take a major share price collapse for Tesla to truly be considered cheap.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4664e23d164238b9ae09f5957b8e89b9\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"387\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>TSLA PE Ratio data by YCharts</span></p><h2>Should investors buy the stock now?</h2><p>Tesla&#39;s pullback has certainly grabbed my attention -- the company is the unequivocal pacesetter in the EV market, an industry that is still in the earlier innings of development. That said, the company&#39;s valuation isn&#39;t exactly attractive yet, and it would take far more downward pressure to make the stock appear cheap. Investors should keep a close eye on Tesla moving forward, as there&#39;s surely a chance it&#39;ll continue on a downward path in the periods ahead.</p><p>While it&#39;s a fantastic company and a sure winner in the EV space, I don&#39;t suggest buying the stock just yet. Take advantage of the recent tech sell-off and look for other companies that carry more enticing valuations today.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>It's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIt's Down Almost 40% Year to Date -- Should Investors Buy Tesla Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-21 07:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut Tesla have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/05/20/its-down-almost-40-year-to-date-should-investors-b/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2236012808","content_text":"After joining the $1 trillion market capitalization club at the end of 2021, shares of electric vehicle (EV) juggernaut Tesla have shifted into reverse. Between macroeconomic headwinds like 40-year-high inflation, the Fed's consequent move to raise interest rates, and concerns about the war between Russia and Ukraine, the stock market has been in quite the frenzy.Many high-growth stocks, Tesla included, have been humbled lately as investors seek protection by shifting their attention to value companies and safer assets. CEO Elon Musk's move to potentially acquire Twitter certainly hasn't aided the company's case, either. With uncertainty around whether or not the deal will actually close, investors have raced to dump shares of the EV leader.But in terms of fundamentals, Tesla continues to look dominant. The company is rapidly expanding its business on all fronts and has strengthened its balance sheet and cash generation in the process. With the stock down almost 40% year to date, should investors pull the trigger on buying Tesla today?Image source: Getty Images.Fundamentals aren't the problemIn a quarter when investors weren't sure what to expect due to COVID-19-related shutdowns at Tesla's Shanghai factory, the EV leader delivered, and it delivered big. The company's $18.8 billion in total sales, which climbed 81% year over year, beat Wall Street expectations by $918 million. Likewise, its non-GAAP earnings per share of $3.22, equal to 246% growth, crushed consensus estimates by a whopping 42%.To top off a record quarter, the Musk-led enterprise grew total production and vehicle deliveries by a respective 69% and 68%, producing 305,407 vehicles and delivering 310,048. Per management's guidance, investors can expect the company to achieve 50% average annual growth in deliveries over a multi-year time horizon. In fiscal 2022, analysts are modeling a top line and adjusted bottom line of $86.5 billion and $12.32/share, translating to robust year-over-year ascents of 61% and 82%, respectively.Amid such incredible growth, the company's balance sheet and cash generation are equally thriving. In its latest quarter, the EV commander revealed that total debt excluding vehicle and energy product financing fell below $100 million. The company is manifesting the \"cash is king\" mantra as well: In the first quarter, free cash flow surged an astonishing 660% to $2.2 billion. Provided that the global EV market is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 25% through 2028 to nearly $1 trillion, it could be said with exceedingly high confidence that Tesla is poised for more success in the coming years.Tesla's valuation is still highEven without context, though, Tesla's valuation is extremely high. The stock is trading at 98.2 times earnings at the moment, an extremely lofty multiple even post-correction.Comparing the EV behemoth to other automobile manufacturers further underscores its expensive stock price. As seen in the below chart, competitors General Motors (GM 0.81%), Ford (F 0.55%), and Toyota (TM 0.26%) have price-to-earnings multiples of 6.2, 4.6, and 7.9, respectively. Whether or not Tesla deserves a premium valuation is a frequent debate among the bulls and the bears. However, it's rather indisputable that the EV stock is richly priced. It would take a major share price collapse for Tesla to truly be considered cheap.TSLA PE Ratio data by YChartsShould investors buy the stock now?Tesla's pullback has certainly grabbed my attention -- the company is the unequivocal pacesetter in the EV market, an industry that is still in the earlier innings of development. That said, the company's valuation isn't exactly attractive yet, and it would take far more downward pressure to make the stock appear cheap. Investors should keep a close eye on Tesla moving forward, as there's surely a chance it'll continue on a downward path in the periods ahead.While it's a fantastic company and a sure winner in the EV space, I don't suggest buying the stock just yet. Take advantage of the recent tech sell-off and look for other companies that carry more enticing valuations today.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":561,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9021752130,"gmtCreate":1653105973020,"gmtModify":1676535225932,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>ok","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/NVDA\">$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$</a>ok","text":"$NVIDIA Corp(NVDA)$ok","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b68ae70ad84ad5ea180f9cfea78b4174","width":"1080","height":"3501"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9021752130","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":420,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9023966518,"gmtCreate":1652850187034,"gmtModify":1676535174965,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Rubblish&nbsp;","listText":"Rubblish&nbsp;","text":"Rubblish","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9023966518","repostId":"1153428621","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1153428621","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1652842376,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1153428621?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-18 10:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Sea Limited: Could Be Stuck Here For A While","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1153428621","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"SummarySea Limited reported its FQ1 earnings results that beat the consensus estimates on revenue an","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>Sea Limited reported its FQ1 earnings results that beat the consensus estimates on revenue and EPS. It was a relief as SE stock was battered over the past six months.</li><li>However, we are concerned over Garena&#39;s slowing growth. Furthermore, Shopee&#39;s guidance range was also widened due to inflation, and macro headwinds.</li><li>The company is also still unprofitable, even as it scales Shopee up rapidly to improve efficiencies. We think the stock is likely to move sideways in FY22.</li><li>We reiterate our Hold rating with a PT of $90, as the risk/reward profile remains challenging.</li></ul><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/26cab61823fda76d16cfb3535ff09044\" tg-width=\"1080\" tg-height=\"720\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty Images</span></p><p><b>Investment Thesis</b></p><p>Sea Limited (NYSE:SE) reported its FQ1 earnings card to some fanfare as investors cheered its better than expected results. Sea reported revenue and EPS ahead of consensus estimates in Q1. However, the company also tempered investors&#39; expectations in its e-commercearm, Shopee, as it widened its guidance range. Notably, the company sees potential headwinds emanating from higher inflation, macro risks, and the reopening of the Southeast Asian economies.</p><p>Our analysis of the consensus estimates suggests that they have been revised downwards due to the lackluster performances from its US e-commerce peers recently. We think the beat was reassuring. But, Sea Limited is charting a new (slower growth) phase that could be challenging to execute, given the macro and micro headwinds. Therefore, we believe the stock is likely to trade within a consolidation range throughout FY22 as the market parses its execution.</p><p>Furthermore, our price action analysis indicates that the stock could still face a potential &#34;ultimate&#34; bottom test, with several layers of resistance to impede its re-rating. As a result, we reiterate our Hold rating on SE stock for now, with a price target (PT) of $90 (implied upside of 12.5% at writing).</p><p><b>Beat Consensus, But Widened Guidance Range for Shopee</b></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e8a7704f72e766a15a2d2733f7897f5\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"395\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Sea Limited revenue change % and Adj. EBITDA margins % consensus estimates (S&amp;P Capital IQ)</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f3d6670b3d974edffc1909d983ebcd93\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Sea Limited EPS consensus estimates (S&amp;P Capital IQ)</span></p><p>Sea reported revenue of $2.9B, up 64.4% YoY (Vs. Consensus estimates of $2.86B, up 62.1% YoY). Notably, it reported a lower than expected loss on GAAP and adjusted EPS terms. Sea posted GAAP EPS of -$1.04 (Vs. consensus estimates of -$1.40) and adjusted EPS of -$0.80 (Vs. consensus estimates of -$1.22).</p><p>Although the sequential revenue growth deceleration was concerning, we were satisfied with the inflection seen in its EPS metrics. As a result, we believe that the consensus estimates (from FQ2 onwards) could be revised subsequently to reflect Sea&#39;s stronger than estimated profitability performance.</p><p>Management also remains optimistic about achieving its original guidance of adjusted EBITDA profitability in Shopee (excluding HQ costs) in its key markets in FY22. Notably, it also emphasized that it could achieve adjusted EBITDA profitability (including HQ costs) by the end of FY23. We think the commentary is constructive on its path to adjusted profitability despite slowing topline growth.</p><p><b>But, Critical Headwinds Linger On</b></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f8b6126ec41787241accfb794f54ccc8\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Garena Bookings (Company filings)</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1243335c57855547c7641b796d1081bc\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"395\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Garena Adj. EBITDA share of bookings % (Company filings)</span></p><p>Its cash cow Garena continues to experience slowing growth as the economies reopen. Moreover, Sea also highlighted its growth had been impacted by its ban in India. As a result, Garena&#39;s Bookings growth slumped into negative territory, at -27% YoY in FQ1. Notably, management was reticent on whether they expected the slowdown to be structural or short-term. It asked for more time to observe the trends, given the shroud created by the reopening cadence. Sea Group CEO Forrest Li accentuated (edited):</p><blockquote>As we navigate this pace of moderation, we are focused on user base stabilization. We saw some preliminary signs that this is starting to bear fruit with the monthly user trends for Free Fire beginning to show some early signs of stabilizing towards the end of the first quarter. While these are encouraging signs, the longer-term impact of reopening around online gaming and Free Fire specifically remains to be seen, and we will continue to focus on user engagement and user base stabilization. (Sea Limited&#39;s FQ1&#39;22 earnings call)</blockquote><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e0fb058a98afc51f86f3275b6d83c3c6\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"398\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Shopee GMV (Company filings)</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a63c23ec808375677775cd285af8ccd1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"396\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>Shopee Adj. EBITDA per order (Company filings)</span></p><p>Therefore, with a slowing cash cow funding Shopee&#39;s growth, the market was justifiably concerned about the impact of Sea&#39;s loss-making e-commerce unit. But, management reiterated that Shopee has continued to gain operating leverage as it expands its higher-margin services in transaction-based fees and advertising. Furthermore, it also continues to gain operating efficiencies in scale even as its gross orders fell from $2B in FQ4 to $1.9B in FQ1.</p><p>As seen above, Shopee&#39;s adjusted EBITDA loss per order improved to -$0.40 in FQ1. However, we remained concerned with its e-commerce guidance as management widened its guidance range. Sea Limited&#39;s revised FY22 guidance sees Shopee posts revenue between $8.5B to $9.1B. It was revised from its previous guidance of $8.9B to $9.1B. At the midpoint of its guidance, Shopee is expected to post revenue of $8.8B (up 71% YoY), down from $9B (up 75.7% YoY).</p><p>Consequently, with slower topline growth, it could impact Shopee&#39;s ability to deliver its path to adjusted EBITDA profitability. Therefore, we urge investors to carefully monitor its progress over the next few quarters.</p><p><b>Is SE Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold?</b></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/68e160bab52e333ab5bd2c9e405e6e1e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"356\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>SE stock price chart (TradingView)</span></p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5aeb26499ca7ab95050570f7f3f8efaf\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"384\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><span>SE stock NTM FCF yields % and NTM normalized P/E (TIKR)</span></p><p>SE stock still trades at negative normalized P/E and FCF yields. Therefore, investors must have high conviction over the company&#39;s ability to scale up Shopee while turning the corner in Garena. While Sea Money has made encouraging progress, we think it&#39;s not significant enough to move the needle. Garena and Shopee will continue to drive the momentum in SE stock in the near term.</p><p>In addition, our price action analysis of SE stock shows badly damaged technicals, filled with a series of astute bull traps. Furthermore, these traps are also overlaid with several critical layers of resistance that could impede SE stock&#39;s recovery momentum moving forward.</p><p>While we don&#39;t think investors should bail out of SE stock now, we don&#39;t see a well-balanced risk/reward profile now for SE stock either. Therefore, we urge investors to bide their time and wait for a consolidation phase before adding exposure.</p><p>We <i>reiterate our Hold rating on SE stock</i> with a PT of $90.</p><p></p></body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Sea Limited: Could Be Stuck Here For A While</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSea Limited: Could Be Stuck Here For A While\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-05-18 10:52 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512628-sea-limited-could-be-stuck-here-for-a-while><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummarySea Limited reported its FQ1 earnings results that beat the consensus estimates on revenue and EPS. It was a relief as SE stock was battered over the past six months.However, we are concerned ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512628-sea-limited-could-be-stuck-here-for-a-while\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4512628-sea-limited-could-be-stuck-here-for-a-while","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1153428621","content_text":"SummarySea Limited reported its FQ1 earnings results that beat the consensus estimates on revenue and EPS. It was a relief as SE stock was battered over the past six months.However, we are concerned over Garena's slowing growth. Furthermore, Shopee's guidance range was also widened due to inflation, and macro headwinds.The company is also still unprofitable, even as it scales Shopee up rapidly to improve efficiencies. We think the stock is likely to move sideways in FY22.We reiterate our Hold rating with a PT of $90, as the risk/reward profile remains challenging.kokkai/iStock Unreleased via Getty ImagesInvestment ThesisSea Limited (NYSE:SE) reported its FQ1 earnings card to some fanfare as investors cheered its better than expected results. Sea reported revenue and EPS ahead of consensus estimates in Q1. However, the company also tempered investors' expectations in its e-commercearm, Shopee, as it widened its guidance range. Notably, the company sees potential headwinds emanating from higher inflation, macro risks, and the reopening of the Southeast Asian economies.Our analysis of the consensus estimates suggests that they have been revised downwards due to the lackluster performances from its US e-commerce peers recently. We think the beat was reassuring. But, Sea Limited is charting a new (slower growth) phase that could be challenging to execute, given the macro and micro headwinds. Therefore, we believe the stock is likely to trade within a consolidation range throughout FY22 as the market parses its execution.Furthermore, our price action analysis indicates that the stock could still face a potential \"ultimate\" bottom test, with several layers of resistance to impede its re-rating. As a result, we reiterate our Hold rating on SE stock for now, with a price target (PT) of $90 (implied upside of 12.5% at writing).Beat Consensus, But Widened Guidance Range for ShopeeSea Limited revenue change % and Adj. EBITDA margins % consensus estimates (S&P Capital IQ)Sea Limited EPS consensus estimates (S&P Capital IQ)Sea reported revenue of $2.9B, up 64.4% YoY (Vs. Consensus estimates of $2.86B, up 62.1% YoY). Notably, it reported a lower than expected loss on GAAP and adjusted EPS terms. Sea posted GAAP EPS of -$1.04 (Vs. consensus estimates of -$1.40) and adjusted EPS of -$0.80 (Vs. consensus estimates of -$1.22).Although the sequential revenue growth deceleration was concerning, we were satisfied with the inflection seen in its EPS metrics. As a result, we believe that the consensus estimates (from FQ2 onwards) could be revised subsequently to reflect Sea's stronger than estimated profitability performance.Management also remains optimistic about achieving its original guidance of adjusted EBITDA profitability in Shopee (excluding HQ costs) in its key markets in FY22. Notably, it also emphasized that it could achieve adjusted EBITDA profitability (including HQ costs) by the end of FY23. We think the commentary is constructive on its path to adjusted profitability despite slowing topline growth.But, Critical Headwinds Linger OnGarena Bookings (Company filings)Garena Adj. EBITDA share of bookings % (Company filings)Its cash cow Garena continues to experience slowing growth as the economies reopen. Moreover, Sea also highlighted its growth had been impacted by its ban in India. As a result, Garena's Bookings growth slumped into negative territory, at -27% YoY in FQ1. Notably, management was reticent on whether they expected the slowdown to be structural or short-term. It asked for more time to observe the trends, given the shroud created by the reopening cadence. Sea Group CEO Forrest Li accentuated (edited):As we navigate this pace of moderation, we are focused on user base stabilization. We saw some preliminary signs that this is starting to bear fruit with the monthly user trends for Free Fire beginning to show some early signs of stabilizing towards the end of the first quarter. While these are encouraging signs, the longer-term impact of reopening around online gaming and Free Fire specifically remains to be seen, and we will continue to focus on user engagement and user base stabilization. (Sea Limited's FQ1'22 earnings call)Shopee GMV (Company filings)Shopee Adj. EBITDA per order (Company filings)Therefore, with a slowing cash cow funding Shopee's growth, the market was justifiably concerned about the impact of Sea's loss-making e-commerce unit. But, management reiterated that Shopee has continued to gain operating leverage as it expands its higher-margin services in transaction-based fees and advertising. Furthermore, it also continues to gain operating efficiencies in scale even as its gross orders fell from $2B in FQ4 to $1.9B in FQ1.As seen above, Shopee's adjusted EBITDA loss per order improved to -$0.40 in FQ1. However, we remained concerned with its e-commerce guidance as management widened its guidance range. Sea Limited's revised FY22 guidance sees Shopee posts revenue between $8.5B to $9.1B. It was revised from its previous guidance of $8.9B to $9.1B. At the midpoint of its guidance, Shopee is expected to post revenue of $8.8B (up 71% YoY), down from $9B (up 75.7% YoY).Consequently, with slower topline growth, it could impact Shopee's ability to deliver its path to adjusted EBITDA profitability. Therefore, we urge investors to carefully monitor its progress over the next few quarters.Is SE Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold?SE stock price chart (TradingView)SE stock NTM FCF yields % and NTM normalized P/E (TIKR)SE stock still trades at negative normalized P/E and FCF yields. Therefore, investors must have high conviction over the company's ability to scale up Shopee while turning the corner in Garena. While Sea Money has made encouraging progress, we think it's not significant enough to move the needle. Garena and Shopee will continue to drive the momentum in SE stock in the near term.In addition, our price action analysis of SE stock shows badly damaged technicals, filled with a series of astute bull traps. Furthermore, these traps are also overlaid with several critical layers of resistance that could impede SE stock's recovery momentum moving forward.While we don't think investors should bail out of SE stock now, we don't see a well-balanced risk/reward profile now for SE stock either. Therefore, we urge investors to bide their time and wait for a consolidation phase before adding exposure.We reiterate our Hold rating on SE stock with a PT of $90.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":386,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9029906532,"gmtCreate":1652710192626,"gmtModify":1676535146273,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9029906532","repostId":"1128913632","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128913632","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1652708005,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1128913632?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-05-16 21:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"S&P 500 Falls on Monday As It Struggles to Rebound From a 6-Week Slide","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128913632","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"S&P 500 fell on Monday as the market attempts to rebound from a relentless sell-off that’s punished ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>S&amp;P 500 fell on Monday as the market attempts to rebound from a relentless sell-off that’s punished tech stocks and pushed the broader index to the brink of a bear market.</p><p>Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average were 38 points lower. S&amp;P 500 futures dipped 0.3% after the benchmark nearly fell into a bear market last week before a Friday rebound. Nasdaq-100 futures slipped 0.3%.</p><p>After a long spate of selling, markets rebounded on Friday, with the Dow rising 466.36 points and the S&amp;P 500 climbing 2.39%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 3.82% and posted its strongest one-day gain since November 2020.</p><p>But major averages still posted steep losses for the week and are undergoing an intense sell-off as the Federal Reserve attempts to tamp down inflation with aggressive rate hikes. The Dow’s 7-week losing streak is its worst since 2001. The S&amp;P 500 just posted its first 6-week losing streak since June 2011.</p><p>Some analysts believe those declines may soon point to an attractive entry point for the broader market index, based on a long-term perspective.</p><p>“The S&amp;P 500 is quickly approaching a level that, historically, has indicated that future growth concerns are priced in,” Citi analyst Scott Chronert wrote in a note.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 sits 16% off its record high, while the Nasdaq Composite is down more than 27% as investors hit growth stocks trading with lofty valuations the hardest as interest rates spiked.</p><p>Those names rebounded on Friday and some looked set for some more gains in Monday’s session. Amazon and Tesla were both in the green in premarket trading. Apple, which fell into a bear market at one point last week, was also indicated higher.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>S&P 500 Falls on Monday As It Struggles to Rebound From a 6-Week Slide</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nS&P 500 Falls on Monday As It Struggles to Rebound From a 6-Week Slide\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-05-16 21:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>S&amp;P 500 fell on Monday as the market attempts to rebound from a relentless sell-off that’s punished tech stocks and pushed the broader index to the brink of a bear market.</p><p>Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average were 38 points lower. S&amp;P 500 futures dipped 0.3% after the benchmark nearly fell into a bear market last week before a Friday rebound. Nasdaq-100 futures slipped 0.3%.</p><p>After a long spate of selling, markets rebounded on Friday, with the Dow rising 466.36 points and the S&amp;P 500 climbing 2.39%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 3.82% and posted its strongest one-day gain since November 2020.</p><p>But major averages still posted steep losses for the week and are undergoing an intense sell-off as the Federal Reserve attempts to tamp down inflation with aggressive rate hikes. The Dow’s 7-week losing streak is its worst since 2001. The S&amp;P 500 just posted its first 6-week losing streak since June 2011.</p><p>Some analysts believe those declines may soon point to an attractive entry point for the broader market index, based on a long-term perspective.</p><p>“The S&amp;P 500 is quickly approaching a level that, historically, has indicated that future growth concerns are priced in,” Citi analyst Scott Chronert wrote in a note.</p><p>The S&amp;P 500 sits 16% off its record high, while the Nasdaq Composite is down more than 27% as investors hit growth stocks trading with lofty valuations the hardest as interest rates spiked.</p><p>Those names rebounded on Friday and some looked set for some more gains in Monday’s session. Amazon and Tesla were both in the green in premarket trading. Apple, which fell into a bear market at one point last week, was also indicated higher.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128913632","content_text":"S&P 500 fell on Monday as the market attempts to rebound from a relentless sell-off that’s punished tech stocks and pushed the broader index to the brink of a bear market.Futures tied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average were 38 points lower. S&P 500 futures dipped 0.3% after the benchmark nearly fell into a bear market last week before a Friday rebound. Nasdaq-100 futures slipped 0.3%.After a long spate of selling, markets rebounded on Friday, with the Dow rising 466.36 points and the S&P 500 climbing 2.39%. The Nasdaq Composite jumped 3.82% and posted its strongest one-day gain since November 2020.But major averages still posted steep losses for the week and are undergoing an intense sell-off as the Federal Reserve attempts to tamp down inflation with aggressive rate hikes. The Dow’s 7-week losing streak is its worst since 2001. The S&P 500 just posted its first 6-week losing streak since June 2011.Some analysts believe those declines may soon point to an attractive entry point for the broader market index, based on a long-term perspective.“The S&P 500 is quickly approaching a level that, historically, has indicated that future growth concerns are priced in,” Citi analyst Scott Chronert wrote in a note.The S&P 500 sits 16% off its record high, while the Nasdaq Composite is down more than 27% as investors hit growth stocks trading with lofty valuations the hardest as interest rates spiked.Those names rebounded on Friday and some looked set for some more gains in Monday’s session. Amazon and Tesla were both in the green in premarket trading. Apple, which fell into a bear market at one point last week, was also indicated higher.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":725,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9029906317,"gmtCreate":1652710151339,"gmtModify":1676535146247,"author":{"id":"4106154086615460","authorId":"4106154086615460","name":"Tiger7989","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4106154086615460","authorIdStr":"4106154086615460"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>ok","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/TSLA\">$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$</a>ok","text":"$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ok","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c5a4236ff2dc0ebfeb784a472af84a99","width":"1080","height":"3402"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9029906317","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":373,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}