$GameStop(GME)$Form 8-K that was submitted to the SEC will NOT show over voting. Excess votesrecieved by the company responsible for collectingthem will be normalized. 


For example if the float was 100 and 200 votes were recieved, each vote will be evaluated as 0.5. The votes counted on the form is for shares held and transacted before April 15. Many shares have been bought since then. Institutions did not vote in the last meeting, and will likely not vote this time. 


Voter turnout this time was near 100%. It is likely that the votes were indeed normalized as above. It also means that it is highly likely that votes exceeded the float count. 

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment17

  • Top
  • Latest
  • 李育儒
    ·2021-06-10
    Can insiders like RC Ventures, George E Sherman etc. vote (for themselves)?
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • 偷吃战神Replying toApeluvBanana
      Because stupid people like me didnt Manage to vote due to stupidity [Angry][Angry]
      2021-06-15
      Reply
      Report
    • ApeluvBanana
      After clarification, insider Votes are likely to be executed and included in the 55m value. we are looking at a 71% turnout. it was 67% in 2020. i think those values could be adjusted Possibly due to
      2021-06-10
      Reply
      Report
    • ApeluvBanana
      On going investigation. I personally find it hard to believe after all the hype about voting, That Retail only managed to make a difference of 5%.
      2021-06-10
      Reply
      Report
    View more 1 comments
  • Limerencee
    ·2021-06-10
    It just means that more votes than float were received. Wes Christian (a professional) said it's normal to "massage" the total vote count for publishing in K-8 filings.

    No way 100% ppl voted.

    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Dem0171c
      latest
      2021-06-15
      Reply
      Report
  • Kehao
    ·2021-06-10
    Thanks for info! Buckle up!
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • Dem0171c
      latest
      2021-06-15
      Reply
      Report
  • ___ _
    ·2021-06-10
    how are they going to tackle the naked short issue then
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • SSMHReplying to___ _
      agreed.
      2021-06-11
      Reply
      Report
    • ___ _Replying toSSMH
      heard that SEC has taken 4 years just to handle a previous case in this.  seriously wonder how screw up the market is.  
      2021-06-11
      Reply
      Report
    • SSMH
      Crypto dividend, DTCC regulation etc. RC had a plan since Day 1 to get rid of the naked shorts. Trust the process!
      2021-06-11
      Reply
      Report
  • ___ _
    ·2021-06-10
    so our votes mean nothing? [晕]
    Reply
    Report
    Fold Replies
    • nuttywalnut
      The SEC has called for GME to Voluntarily assist in investigations in possible fraud in the securities trading. the actual vote count might help
      2021-06-10
      Reply
      Report
    • ___ _Replying tonuttywalnut
      thanks for the input.  hate that we obedient apes did all we could to get it voted.  hope our effort means something to the course
      2021-06-10
      Reply
      Report
  • Hcee
    ·2021-06-18
    Buckle up and Keep calm buy more GME
    Reply
    Report