Weekly S&P500 ChartStorm - The market correction has seen a -5.5% drawdown

Learnings and conclusions from this week’s charts: $S&P 500(.SPX)$ $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$ $Invesco QQQ(QQQ)$ $NASDAQ 100(NDX)$ $DJIA(.DJI)$ $GLOBAL X DOW 30® COVERED CALL ETF(DJIA)$

  • So far the market correction has seen a -5.5% drawdown.

  • Technicals remain tenuous (bearish divergence, break of the 50dma, breach of short-term support).

  • The correction comes from a starting point of very bullish sentiment.

  • Historically equal-weighted has beaten cap-weighted.

  • Companies are apparently getting better at M&A.

1. Markets in Turmoil

As of Friday’s close the drawdown so far for the S&P500 has been -5.5% off the closing high — albeit still positive YTD, and still above the 2021 high. Taking it into historical context, it’s only registering as noise at the moment..

2. Where-to From Here? 

Taking a glance at the technicals, given the previous bearish breadth divergence (lower high on the breadth indicator), drop below the 50-day moving average, and breach of short-term support around 5000 — I would say there is a decent chance of the index revisiting the 4800 level (albeit likely with a bounce along the way).

3. Sentiment Shifts

I previously highlighted this one as a short-term topping signal, a risk flag — and hey it worked! But now the question is: has it reset enough yet? Probably not, and so far the surveys haven’t moved much yet either. Part of the reason we call it a “correction” when the market falls is that it’s about correcting excess optimism, consensus thinking, and stretched valuations. It becomes a “healthy correction” when and if it corrects these unsustainable conditions without damaging the underlying bullish trend (…watch this space!)

4. Great Expectations

Echoing those points, this chart shows consumer surveyed expectations of the chance of higher stock prices. Clearly the mood is (or at least was) bullish. This was echoed in the NY Fed survey (which showed respondents the most bullish since mid-2021). Various other surveys (e.g. AAII) also showed heavy bullishness recently (50% bullish at the end of March).

5. Not Buying It

Recent data showed a multi-year low in the proportion of publicly traded companies seeing net-buying by insiders. Either they think the price is too high, or they see red flags internally, or perhaps even just have less cash than usual to deploy on stock purchases… generally it’s not a healthy sign.

6. Issues

After surging during the IPO boom and SPAC frenzy of 2020/21, the total number of issues traded has peaked and is steadily declining.

7. Buyback Yield

If you add on the effect of buybacks to the dividend yield, it significantly improves the level (vs dividends only), but still leaves the overall yield at the bottom end of the historical range.

8. Created Equal

There has been much talk in recent years of the merits of market-cap based indexes (particularly during the rise and rise of passive investing), but despite the recent dominance of the top stocks, mag-7, FAANG, etc — it turns out over the long run the equal-weighted index has outperformed the cap-weighted index.

9. Not Top

Taking it from a different angle, keeping it cap-weighted but excluding the top 10 stocks has historically resulted in higher returns over the long-run vs plain cap-weighted. I suspect that this comes from the fact that market-cap weighted indexes will drift you into the most bubbly and overpriced stocks (which probably fall the most when the cycle runs its course).

10. Getting Better at M&A? 

This chart from Bain shows companies are apparently getting better at M&A, especially serial acquirers. They suggest this is due to: shifting focus from cost/defense to growth/offense (scale to scope), better due diligence (tech enabled + more thoughtful), experience from just doing more deals, and avoiding big dumb deals (e.g. AOL/Time Warner). I suspect this is true, but I also can’t help but ponder if there is some odd effects like winning companies have more cash and creativity to do deals (selection bias), and 2000-2010 was not a great time in markets vs the 2010-2020 raging ZIRP bull (performance measurement cloudiness).

https://www.chartstorm.info/p/weekly-s-and-p500-chartstorm-21-april-d39

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment1

  • Top
  • Latest
  • marketpre
    ·04-22
    Can see a lot of effort put in.
    Reply
    Report