To The Moon

I didn't realize that the U.S. General Election Debate could attract the attention of top streamer Taylor Swift, but if it were in the entertainment industry, Trump would already be dead.

At this juncture to do such a large section of justified publicity, obviously also brokers together to discuss the results, after all, the people in this industry know the most about the flow, but also the most understanding of "The Crowd", and even in this contrast, Elon Musk's counter-attacks also seem a little "furious!".

At the end of the day, Trump's debates are really bad, but not that bad compared to his past performances - after all, he's not a "reasonable" (in the purely literal sense of the word) person - so Kamala Harris hits him on a couple of key points, and they're right on the money:

1. Trump can't come up with or understand a "governing program", he's just a liar; (for swing states)

2. He continues to sling mud at the black history of the past; (raiding the red states)

3. Put something "politically incorrect" over his head.(consolidating blue states)

The entertainment industry, which happens to be "vanguard" and "politically correct" and "liberal and democratic", is overwhelmingly in the Democratic Party's sphere of influence, and it would be strange to support Trump.

The rot of the Democrat Party will only surface with the collapse of the "superiority complex", and that may not be the case yet.

Why is Taylor Swift's statement important?

First, she has influence in areas where Trump has an advantage.Because country music started, many of her roots are still in the red states, equivalent to the Republican territory of the KOL "water".In addition, the audience group is wide, it is easy to influence the current situation in the "swing state".

Second, she awakened young people "sleepy vote".Many young people have no interest in the political arena, or disappointed to the extreme, to the election itself is resistant, and these people to vote for who is not important (although more still support the Democratic Party), more important is the "active voting".If the supporters of the idol are supporting the idol because of the idol's call, then relatively speaking Trump is under a lot of pressure.

Third, Taylor Swift is probably more upset with Trump.She slammed Trump for sucking up to her AI image, accused Trump of being a "Misinformation" instead, and satirized Trump's "J.D. Vance" co-star with a "Childless Cat Lady.J.D. Vance", and incidentally also hit Trump-supporting corporate bigwigs, such as Elon, the old information security free speech but also love to play the AI Erchuang celebrities.

The result.

1. The fanbase was up, and before Kamala knew it, Taylor's fanbase was already raising money.

2. The buzz is up, and the whole market is talking about how her Endorsement was particularly "accurate" and damaging.

3. Trump's supporters are starting to panic, such as Elon Musk, who responded, jokingly, that sending her a child would not help.

   

With a duration of less than two months, this time frame is already critical, and importantly, once turnout comes up, it's bad for Trump.Right now Trump's saving grace is still the passage of the voting bill (disallowing foreigners and mail-in ballots).But in any case, the lack of support from influential celebrities is in itself a sign of weakness.

Because Kamala Harris can get more votes just by being "anti-Trump".

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ $Trump Media & Technology(DJT)$ $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$