To The Moon

Why Donald Trump Winning Matters for America and the World: A Comparison with Kamala Harris

1. Economic Policy: Trump’s Economic Growth vs. Harris’s Economic Equity

Trump supporters often highlight his focus on deregulation, tax cuts, and business-friendly policies, believing they spur economic growth and job creation across all income levels. Trump’s past policies have aimed at driving economic productivity by reducing government intervention, allowing businesses to expand and employ more Americans.

In contrast, Harris has emphasized economic equity, with policies that aim to reduce income inequality through government intervention and higher taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations. While supporters see this as promoting fairness, Trump supporters argue that higher taxes and increased regulation could burden small businesses and potentially slow economic growth.

2. Global Presence: “America First” vs. “Global Cooperation”

Trump’s “America First” philosophy is built on renegotiating trade deals to prioritize American jobs and reducing reliance on foreign entities. His supporters argue that this approach allows the U.S. to maintain a strong stance against countries that don’t adhere to fair trade practices, giving America a competitive edge in the global market.

Harris, who is part of the current administration, generally advocates for strengthening international alliances and supporting global cooperation. While supporters believe this promotes diplomatic stability, Trump supporters argue that it sometimes results in the U.S. shouldering an unfair share of global issues and that a more assertive stance might better protect U.S. interests.

3. National Security and Immigration: Strong Borders vs. Humanitarian Approach

Trump supporters point to his policies on border security and immigration, such as building a wall along the southern border, as a measure for national security. They believe these policies reduce illegal immigration, prevent crime, and protect American jobs.

Harris has emphasized a more humanitarian approach to immigration, including pathways to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. While supporters view this as compassionate, Trump supporters argue that looser policies could strain resources and challenge border control.

4. Judicial Influence: Constitutional Conservative vs. Progressive Reform

During his previous term, Trump appointed numerous conservative judges, shaping the judiciary toward a more traditional, originalist interpretation of the Constitution. His supporters argue that this ensures a conservative balance in rulings on issues like gun rights, free speech, and federal power.

Harris is generally aligned with more progressive reforms in the judicial system, supporting judges who prioritize social justice, environmental protection, and expanding healthcare access. Trump supporters see these priorities as potential overreaches of federal power and favor a more restrained judicial approach.

5. Energy and Environment: Energy Independence vs. Climate Prioritization

Trump’s energy policy centers around maximizing the use of American resources, like oil and natural gas, which he argues leads to lower energy costs and independence from foreign energy suppliers. His supporters believe this approach makes the U.S. more self-sufficient and less vulnerable to global market shifts.

Harris, like many Democrats, places a high priority on climate change, supporting policies to transition the U.S. to renewable energy. While these policies are seen as necessary for environmental sustainability by supporters, Trump advocates argue that a rapid shift away from fossil fuels could increase energy costs and create dependency on other countries for renewable technology and minerals.

In summary, supporters see a Trump victory as a choice for economic growth, self-reliance, and security, while viewing Harris’s approach as more focused on government intervention and global cooperation. For those who prioritize a traditional, assertive, and America-centric approach, Trump’s policies seem more aligned with these goals.