ghtyu

Old-School Stocks Shing! Prefer “Story Stocks” or “Cash-Paying” Ones?

@Tiger_comments
Earnings season is here—are you only watching AI, semiconductors, and high-growth names? But take a look at $Coca-Cola(KO)$ — profits are rock-solid; and $Amazon.com(AMZN)$ ? It’s actually the worst-performing stock among the Magnificent 7 this year. So here’s the real question — while everyone’s chasing “growth,” are these ignored, cash-rich “old-school stocks” secretly setting up for a year-end breakout? 🧐 At Berkshire Hathaway’s 1994 shareholder meeting, Buffett said something worth remembering: $Berkshire Hathaway(BRK.B)$ “We can perfectly well buy businesses that don’t grow at all. If the return is satisfactory, we’ll gladly own them.” He gave a simple example: An account with 10% annual return but no capital growth, vs. an account with 2% annual return that grows 10% each year. After ten years, the first one pays back your principal early and keeps printing profit; the second one looks prettier on paper but delivers far less real cash. That’s exactly what Buffett values most: Free Cash Flow and Capital Recovery Speed. 📈 If a company can generate tons of cash every year without heavy capital spending — that’s basically owning a money-printing machine. Even with zero growth, the cash flow alone can keep compounding your wealth. Look at Buffett’s bet on Japan’s five major trading houses: Combined net profit: ¥3.8 trillion (~$25B USD), Free cash flow: ¥3 trillion, All light-asset businesses. As Buffett put it: “Some of our best businesses don’t grow, but they generate so much cash that we can use it to buy other assets.” That’s the magic of boomer stocks — Not companies selling stories, but companies paying you real cash. 💰 ⚡ With oil prices rebounding, energy names like $Occidental(OXY)$ are heating up again. Coca-Cola and P&G, the classic cash cows, are quietly outperforming too. When growth stocks get overcrowded near bubble levels, steady cash flow and low-valuation giants might just become the next surprise winners. Buffett also said: “There isn’t only one way to invest — but there are some very useful ones.” Peter Lynch beat Wall Street by investing in what he saw in daily life, Buffett won by harvesting cash flow. There’s no single “right” path — the real key is whether you can spot value where others can’t. 💬 Let’s Discuss: 1️⃣ Which stock today best represents a true “boomer stock”? 2️⃣ If you could hold only one high-cash-flow, low-growth stock forever, which would it be? 3️⃣ Do you prefer buying “story stocks” or “cash-paying” ones? Leave your comments to win tiger coins~
Old-School Stocks Shing! Prefer “Story Stocks” or “Cash-Paying” Ones?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

  • Top
  • Latest
empty
No comments yet