To The Moon

The filing of SpaceX S-1 documents has created massive excitement across the market because many investors see it as the next “Tesla moment.” Reports suggest the IPO could become one of the largest public listings ever, with valuations discussed anywhere from over $1 trillion to even higher depending on demand. 

At the same time, many investors are asking the same question:

Is it already too late to chase space stocks?

My idea of simply waiting for the actual SpaceX IPO instead of rushing into every space-related stock is actually a very disciplined approach. Space investing is extremely hype-driven. When a company like SpaceX enters the public market, traders often push up related names long before real profits appear. Some of these companies are excellent businesses, while others are mostly “story stocks” moving on momentum.

Right now, the entire commercial space industry is entering a new phase. Space is no longer only about rockets. It now includes:

* Satellite internet

* Military contracts

* Space data

* AI infrastructure

* Launch systems

* Lunar missions

* Space stations

* Deep-space logistics

The S-1 filing revealed just how huge SpaceX’s ambitions are. The company is not positioning itself only as a rocket company anymore. It is integrating Starlink, AI computing infrastructure, satellite services, and long-term Mars ambitions into one ecosystem. (businessinsider.com)

Because of that, many investors are now trying to buy “SpaceX proxies” — companies connected to the same trends.

One of the biggest names benefiting from this narrative is Rocket Lab USA Inc..

Rocket Lab surged after the SpaceX filing because investors immediately viewed it as one of the few publicly traded pure-play space companies. The company already has successful Electron launches and is developing the larger Neutron rocket to compete in heavier payload missions. (prnewswire.com)

However, this creates an important debate.

Some investors believe SpaceX going public helps Rocket Lab because:

* More money flows into the space sector

* Governments increase spending

* Public interest grows

* Satellite demand keeps expanding

* Commercial launches become mainstream

Others believe SpaceX could dominate the sector so aggressively that smaller companies struggle to compete.

That is why many traders are cautious about chasing RKLB after sharp rallies.

Personally, I would rather wait for the actual SpaceX IPO because:

* I want direct exposure instead of indirect exposure

* I prefer owning the industry leader

* I do not want to overpay for speculative smaller companies

* I want to avoid FOMO buying

Historically, IPO hype can be dangerous. Reuters recently highlighted that many large IPOs underperform after their debut despite huge excitement. (reuters.com)

That does not mean SpaceX will fail. It simply means valuation matters.

A company can be amazing while the stock becomes overpriced.

For example:

* Tesla became one of the greatest growth stories ever

* But investors who bought at euphoric peaks sometimes waited years to recover

The same risk exists with space stocks.

Another important point is that SpaceX itself may absorb a huge amount of investor attention and capital once listed. Some speculative money could leave smaller space companies and rotate directly into SpaceX shares.

Still, there are several publicly traded companies closely connected to the SpaceX ecosystem or broader commercial space trend.

Here are some of the major SpaceX-related stocks investors watch:

⸻

1. Rocket Lab USA Inc.

Rocket Lab is probably the most popular SpaceX-related stock.

Why investors like it:

* Regular rocket launches

* Government contracts

* Satellite manufacturing

* Neutron rocket development

* Growing defense exposure

Risks:

* Still relatively small compared to SpaceX

* Heavy capital spending

* Valuation can become stretched during hype rallies

Many options traders sell cash-secured puts on RKLB because:

* Options premiums can be attractive

* The stock is volatile

* Many investors are willing to own shares lower

My mindset is:

“I do not mind owning RKLB at a cheaper entry price while collecting premium.”

That is very similar to my NVDA cash-secured put strategy.

⸻

2. AST SpaceMobile Inc.

ASTS focuses on direct-to-cell satellite communication.

Bull case:

* Satellite mobile connectivity

* Partnerships with telecom companies

* Massive long-term TAM

Risks:

* Very speculative

* Execution risk is huge

* Cash burn remains important

ASTS options are extremely volatile, which means:

* Higher premiums

* Higher risk

If I sell puts here, I need strong risk management because price swings can be violent.

⸻

3. Intuitive Machines Inc.

This company focuses on lunar missions and NASA contracts.

Why investors watch it:

* Moon mission exposure

* NASA partnerships

* Lunar infrastructure narrative

Risks:

* Revenue still developing

* Mission failures can heavily impact sentiment

Options traders sometimes sell puts after major pullbacks when implied volatility spikes.

⸻

4. Redwire Corporation

Redwire is more of a space infrastructure company.

Business exposure includes:

* Space manufacturing

* Satellite systems

* Space station technologies

This is less “rocket hype” and more infrastructure exposure.

⸻

5. EchoStar Corporation

EchoStar gained attention because of links to satellite and spectrum developments tied to SpaceX discussions. (simplywall.st)

This is more indirect exposure but still part of the broader satellite ecosystem.

⸻

6. Virgin Galactic Holdings Inc.

SPCE became one of the earliest retail “space hype” stocks.

However, many investors became more cautious because:

* Revenue growth disappointed

* Commercial scaling has been difficult

* Heavy dilution hurt shareholders

This stock shows why hype alone is not enough.

⸻

Selling Puts on SpaceX-Related Companies

Cash-secured puts can actually fit space stocks well because these names are highly volatile.

The idea behind the strategy:

* I collect premium income

* If assigned, I buy shares at lower prices

* I only sell puts on companies I truly want to own

For space-related stocks, many traders focus on:

* RKLB

* ASTS

* LUNR

* SPCE

because they usually have:

* High implied volatility

* Active options chains

* Large retail interest

However, the risk is much higher than blue-chip stocks.

These companies can:

* Drop 20–40% quickly

* Dilute shareholders

* Miss launches

* Delay projects

* Burn cash aggressively

So the most important rule is:

I only sell puts at prices where I genuinely want to own the shares.

That is exactly the mindset I mentioned with NVDA.

A conservative way I approach this:

* Sell farther out-of-the-money puts

* Keep lots of cash reserves

* Avoid leverage

* Use smaller position sizing

* Treat assignment as acceptable

For example:

* Instead of chasing momentum

* I wait for panic selloffs

* Then I sell puts at lower strike prices

This approach reduces emotional trading.

⸻

Why Waiting for SpaceX IPO Might Be Smart

Waiting could actually be one of the safest decisions because:

* I avoid speculative hype

* I can study the prospectus further

* I can observe valuation after listing

* IPO volatility may create better entries later

Many IPOs spike initially due to excitement and then cool down later. (reuters.com)

SpaceX is clearly an incredible company operationally:

* Dominant launch business

* Starlink recurring revenue

* Government contracts

* Strong brand power

* Massive technological lead

But even great companies can become poor investments if purchased at unrealistic prices.

That is why patience matters.

⸻

Final Thoughts

The SpaceX S-1 filing is probably the beginning of a major new era for commercial space investing. (finance.yahoo.com)

It will likely:

* Increase retail interest

* Bring more institutional money into space

* Push governments to spend more

* Accelerate satellite infrastructure growth

But it will also separate:

* Real businesses

from

* Pure hype stocks

My idea of waiting for the actual SpaceX IPO while selectively watching related companies is a disciplined strategy.

Among the current public names:

* RKLB is viewed as the strongest operational competitor

* ASTS offers huge upside but huge risk

* LUNR gives moon mission exposure

* RDW focuses on infrastructure

* SATS provides indirect satellite exposure

* SPCE remains highly speculative

For selling puts, I mainly prefer:

* RKLB for stronger fundamentals

* ASTS for higher premiums but higher risk

* LUNR during volatility spikes

The key is keeping enough cash, respecting volatility, and only selling puts on companies I truly want to own long term.

Find out more here: SocGen 0 commission

@MillionaireTiger @TigerStars @Daily_Discussion @MillionaireTiger @Shernice軒嬣 2000 @Pilates @TheBeautyofOptions @武松打的老虎