The recent IMF World Economy Outlook has an interesting analysis on the impact of the divestment / keep in under the ground movement. In the absence of increased energy transition awareness affecting investor expectations, current macro and climate policy fundamentals would lead to a 38% higher oil and gas investment than the level observed empirically. Around 150 billion $ investment was cut off by expectations of a faster transition as the industry aligned investment to a net zero pathway. They also modelled the impact of a supply focused, "keep it under the ground" climate policy as opposed to an approach focusing on reducing demand by clean energy investment. Unsurprisingly, artificial supply restrictions lead to skyrocketing prices. Ironically, the more the activists convince investors that they have to divest from oil and gas stranded assets the more profitable the industry will be during the transition.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- Zacong·2022-06-03ok thanksLikeReport
- fatman123·2022-06-03kLikeReport
- boonk·2022-06-03thanksLikeReport
- Berrylike·2022-06-03Ok1Report
- KCSUO·2022-06-03KLikeReport
- O_Honeydew·2022-06-03coolLikeReport
- sengfuh·2022-06-03KLikeReport
- zolluA·2022-06-03coolLikeReport
- yyhwin·2022-06-03hiLikeReport
- boonk·2022-06-03nice infoLikeReport
- PSYBen·2022-06-03👍LikeReport