Recently, a programmer in Singapore shared his experience online after calling an electrician. The repair took just 40 minutes but cost him S$300, which translates to an eye-popping S$450 per hour. Netizens joked, “Time to sign up for electrical courses!”
At first glance, technical trades like electricians, plumbers, locksmiths, or even nail technicians seem to earn far more than regular office workers. After all, they can charge premium rates for urgent jobs. But look closer, and you’ll see that high hourly pay ≠ high income.
From an investing perspective, this looks a lot like high-volatility assets:
When opportunities strike, returns can be huge—but they’re rare and costly to maintain. By contrast, a steady full-time job—whether in IT, finance, or other industries—resembles fixed-income assets: the returns may not be flashy, but they’re consistent and predictable.
Now, when high hourly pay also comes with stability, that’s the real jackpot: effortless high income. But let’s be honest—opportunities like that are extremely rare. In investing terms, it’s like finding a high-beta stock that not only spikes but also delivers consistent, repeatable gains.
For most investors, the reality is closer to 1 win out of 10, often ending in a net loss.
Questions for you:
Would you choose:
A. To upskill yourself and take on side gigs with high hourly pay?
In investing: sharpening your stock-picking ability to capture high-volatility, high-return opportunities.
B. To stick with your main job and easy way to get stable income?
In investing: add to high-dividend stocks, and reinvesting those dividends for compounding returns.
REWARDS
All valid comments will receive 5 Tiger Coins (5-50 coins; depend on comment quality)
Tag your friends to win another 5 Tiger Coins
High quality comments will win options handbook or mouse pads
—————
Open a CBA today and enjoy access to a trading limit of up to SGD 20,000 with upcoming 0-commission, unlimited trading on SG, HK, and US stocks, as well as ETFs. Find out more here.
Other helpful links:
Comments
As Warren Buffett likes to say : "Never depend on a single income. Make an investment to create a second source."
He also said :
"If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die."
Therefore my main job is my active income engine while my investments are passive income.
@Tiger_SG @TigerStars @CaptainTiger @Tiger_comments @TigerClub
That’s not to say I don’t admire those who go for Option A. Upskilling to take on high-value side gigs can boost income, but it often comes with uncertainty, irregular demand, and physical limits on how much you can handle. In investing terms, it’s like timing volatile trades—you might win big once, but sustaining it is tough.
So I prefer focusing on stability while letting my portfolio compound in the background. Dividend reinvestment feels like the “silent worker” that doesn’t need me constantly chasing the next opportunity. Over time, that reliability gives me peace of mind and financial freedom without worrying about the next high-paying gig.
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @Tiger_SG
Everyone should always upskill themselves, and build multiple source of income. See each source of income as a small stream of water, no matter how small it is. When all the steam of water is form up, it will become a lake or even a river.
@UTOtrader
@AN88
@TheStrategist
@FTGR
@Jackosen
@ECLC
@Sachy
@Zarkness
@1PC
@Zarkness
@Mrzorro
@Joker_Smile
@KienBoon
@dragonfyre
@Zarkness
@LucasOng
@TimothyX
@太复杂的我不懂
@Subramanyan
@北极篂
@koolgal
@SN19
@MHh
@Shyon
現在,當高時薪也伴隨着穩定性時,這纔是真正的頭獎:毫不費力的高收入。但說實話,這樣的機會極其罕見。從投資角度來看,這就像找到一隻高貝塔值股票,它不僅會飆升,還會帶來持續、可重複的收益。
對於大多數投資者來說,現實情況更接近十分之一的勝利,通常以淨虧損告終。