Memory prices up over 500%. Does that still count as good news? A cycle view, and how I trade it with sell puts Written Thursday, 24 Sept (SGT). First, is the 500% number real? Mostly, yes. It depends on which chip and which price you look at. For the newest standard memory, DDR5 is up nearly 500% year on year. The spot market is even more extreme: DRAM spot prices have surged nearly 700% over the past year, according to a Bloomberg report from July. Contract prices, which is what big buyers actually pay, moved in huge quarterly steps. TrendForce measured conventional DRAM contract prices up 93% to 98% quarter over quarter in Q1 2026, with many DDR5 SKUs up 3.5 to 4 times and DDR4 kits roughly doubling. Even after all of that, prices were still rising in August. PC DRAM averaged a record $

$SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ as i predicted yesterday.  Liquidity sucked in and sucked dry.  Follow to find out weekly range  Enter 1600 this week 

We have a cumulative surge of 500% in memory contract prices which span across DRAM, NAND Flash, and High Bandwidth Memory (HBM). This has transformed the semiconductor market into an extraordinary structural expansion. In the article we would like to discuss how to navigate the 500% memory supercycle, in terms of valuation, risks and what are some of the top stock picks investors can look into. 1. A 500% PRICE SURGE: IS IT STILL GOOD NEWS? In traditional memory cycles, a 500% rise in dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) or NAND Flash contract prices signalled an imminent market top. Historically, such violent price spikes triggered demand destruction among consumer electronics original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), rapidly followed by aggressive overexpansion of capital expenditures by m

The three US indices closed Friday almost where they started. The $Dow Jones(.DJI)$ fell 0.18 per cent to 51,682.64, down 95.40 points on the day; the $S&P 500(.SPX)$ closed 0.17 per cent higher at 7,650.50, up 12.74 points; and the $NASDAQ(.IXIC)$ Composite closed 0.39 per cent higher at 26,522.54. It was a triple-witching day, with stock options, index futures and index options all expiring together and an index rebalancing on top, so volume was always going to be heavy. The calm at index level says very little; what was actually happening was money moving between sectors. The split between the indices is par

Everyone saw the headline. Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan said memory prices have risen 5–7x, with supply constraints potentially getting worse. The market’s reaction was immediate: 📈 $MU +5.50% 📈 $SNDK +6.21% 📈 $SK Hynix +4.64% 📈 $INTC +7.67% But here’s the part I find more interesting: Who is actually benefiting from those higher prices? For memory manufacturers, rising prices can mean dramatically higher revenue and margins — especially when supply is constrained. For PC makers, phone companies and other hardware customers, it’s the opposite. They’re paying more for a critical component. That means the same 500%+ price increase can be interpreted in two completely different ways: 🟢 Bull case: AI demand is overwhelming supply, giving memory producers pricing power. 🔴 Risk case: Prices have moved s

$Micron Technology(MU)$   Memory just gave us another reminder that this cycle is anything but normal. Intel's CEO warned that memory prices have risen more than 500% and shortages could worsen next year. The market immediately heard the supplier-side implication: extraordinary pricing power. MU jumped 5.50% to $977.50, while SNDK gained about 6.2%.  But there is an important distinction: 500% higher memory costs are fantastic for sellers. They are painful for buyers. And eventually, extremely high prices can become their own demand problem. 🔥 Why I Am Still Bullish The shortage thesis is getting harder to dismiss. AI servers require enormous amounts of memory, supply remains constrained, and Intel is now war

Short answer: **not automatically**. A 500% jump in memory prices can be good news for memory makers in the short term, but it is usually bad news for buyers, margins downstream, and often a sign that the cycle is getting stretched. Recent market data shows DRAM and NAND prices are still elevated, driven largely by AI infrastructure demand, but the pace of gains has started to slow from the sharpest months. What the price surge means - For memory producers such as DRAM and NAND suppliers, higher prices usually mean better revenue and stronger near-term profitability if supply is tight. - For electronics OEMs, server builders, and PC/device makers**, it raises input costs and can compress margins unless they can pass costs on to customers. - For consumers it can mean higher prices for PCs,

The emerging partnership framework between $SK hynix(SKHY)$ SK Hynix and $Intel(INTC)$ Intel Foundry represents a strategic shift in the semiconductor ecosystem, moving from modular component sourcing to deep hardware co-optimization. In this article, we would like to discuss how this collaboration can offer a critical proof-of-concept for Intel advanced packaging and foundry services, creating a pathway to capture non-wafer value even if front-end node transitions face steep competition. 1. The Structural Shift: Why Memory and Logic Are Merging The rapid scale of Large Language Models (LLMs) and real-time inference engines has exposed the limitations of traditional chip architecture. In standard computin

$RAM 20260918 14.0 PUT$ assignment of put of $T-REX 2X Long DRAM Daily Target ETF(RAM)$ which is the 2x leverage of $Roundhill Memory ETF(DRAM)$

Short answer: **not automatically**. A 500% jump in memory prices can be good news for memory makers in the short term, but it is usually bad news for buyers, margins downstream, and often a sign that the cycle is getting stretched. Recent market data shows DRAM and NAND prices are still elevated, driven largely by AI infrastructure demand, but the pace of gains has started to slow from the sharpest months. What the price surge means - For memory producers such as DRAM and NAND suppliers, higher prices usually mean better revenue and stronger near-term profitability if supply is tight. - For electronics OEMs, server builders, and PC/device makers**, it raises input costs and can compress margins unless they can pass costs on to customers. - For consumers  it can mean higher prices for

Everyone is celebrating the memory-stock rally. But I think there’s a more interesting question: If memory prices really are rising 5–7×, who ultimately pays for it? 👀 Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan said memory prices have surged roughly 5–7×, helping trigger another sharp move in memory names. On Thursday, $MU jumped 5.5%, $SNDK 6.2% and SK Hynix about 4.6%.  🔥 THE BULL CASE For memory manufacturers, this is exactly what investors want to see: • Supply remains tight • AI infrastructure is consuming enormous amounts of memory • Higher ASPs can translate into dramatically higher revenue and margins • Micron’s latest quarter already showed how powerful the pricing cycle can become Micron reported $41.46B of fiscal Q3 revenue, up sharply from $23.86B the previous quarter, and guided to around $50B rev

The number that caught my attention today: Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan said memory prices have surged 5–7×. That sounds incredibly bullish for memory makers like $MU, $SNDK and $SK Hynix — and the market reacted accordingly: 📈 MU +5.50% 📈 SNDK +6.21% 📈 SK Hynix +4.64% 📈 INTC +7.67% But there’s another side to this story. Higher memory prices mean pricing power and potentially stronger margins for suppliers. But for PC, smartphone and other device makers, memory is becoming a much bigger input cost. Reuters reports smaller manufacturers are already struggling to secure supply, with the shortage expected to persist into 2027.  So I’m looking at the 500% figure two ways: 🟢 Bull case: supply is tight enough to give memory manufacturers exceptional pricing power. 🔴 Warning: if memory becomes too expe

🌟🌟🌟 $Intel(INTC)$ skyrocketed another 7.67% today, building a massive momentum on top of yesterday's 4.03% jump.  $SK hynix(SKHY)$ is reportedly in advance talks to manufacture memory chips on US soil for the first time. The plan is for Hynix to lease a big chunk of Intel's Ohio plant or they team up with Intel & Big Tech hyperscalers to form a huge memory producing joint venture. Investors are faced with a dilemma: to buy Intel now or wait for the actual deal to be signed: The Believers: Buy now If Hynix moves into Intel's Ohio plant, it validates Intel's manufacturing capabilities.  Waiting for signature may mean missing out on Intel's valuation re-rating. The Realists: Waiting until the

I read it as both, but more bullish for memory suppliers in the near term. The interesting part is that the “5-7x” comment came from Intel, a buyer complaining about costs, rather than Micron or SK Hynix talking up their own pricing power. That gives the shortage story more credibility. But 5-7x pricing is also a warning. If memory becomes too expensive, customers delay projects, cut specs or reduce demand. So the next confirmation has to come from MU’s margins and guidance, not just spot prices. For now, scarcity is helping memory makers. The question is when high prices start destroying demand.