Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?

Seeking Alpha2022-09-30

SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

124

Report

Comment（20）

Guardian_J
·2022-10-01
Woo
Reply
2
Report
mwlim1992
·2022-10-01
Good read
Reply
Like
Report
来人
·2022-09-30
Both
Reply
Like
Report
Sysy
·2022-09-30
Ok
Reply
2
Report
Uasbau
·2022-09-30
Good article. Thanks
Reply
Like
Report
Fold Replies
- Guardian_J:
  goo
  2022-10-01
  Reply
  Report
来人
·2022-09-30
Ok
Reply
1
Report
Fold Replies
- Sysy:
  k
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
BGTAN
·2022-09-30
Ok
Reply
3
Report
Carolq
·2022-09-30
Alphabet
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- peng321:
  agree
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
- Pflanze:
  agreed
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
MireyaMiya万亿丰
·2022-09-30
Google
Reply
2
Report
Swordmerlin
·2022-09-30
Both can consider
Reply
2
Report
Fold Replies
- jeff123:
  agreeed
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
cryptous
·2022-09-30
Haha
Reply
1
Report
Julianw
·2022-09-30
I like the extensive analysis of this article. I'm also in line with an investment with Google.
Reply
3
Report
IsleofSkye
·2022-09-30
Thks for the analysis
Reply
1
Report
Andrewinho
·2022-09-30
Both great n cheap!!! 🤭🤭🤭
Reply
2
Report
Vincentan59
·2022-09-30
Can make money is better[Sly] [Sly]
Reply
3
Report
Fold Replies
- Vincentan59:
  Thank you
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
- Azerone.Kee:
  definitely you are right.
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
- JinHan:
  Pick Google then!
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
Miketee74
·2022-09-30
Okay
Reply
4
Report
Gackky
·2022-09-30
me[Cool]
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- ___ _:
  my red pudding is the cutest!
  2022-10-02
  Reply
  Report
- ___ _:
  agreeee
  2022-10-02
  Reply
  Report
- HelenJanet:
  [Cool][LOL][LOL]
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
MrHuattt
·2022-09-30
Okay
Reply
5
Report
Fold Replies
- nicholastsj:
  lk
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
- MrHuattt:
  Sure
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
Heemeng
·2022-09-30
GOOG better
Reply
6
Report
Fold Replies
- JinHan:
  Agreed! Google PE is lower too
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
- _dachad:
  agree. meta has lost the plot
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report
CL777
·2022-09-30
Both are
Reply
4
Report
Fold Replies
- CL777:
  [Smile][Smile]
  2022-10-02
  Reply
  Report
- kkennn:
  Yes
  2022-09-30
  Reply
  Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"1121656018","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","media":"Seeking Alpha","content":"<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":null,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"GOOG","symbol_name":"谷歌","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","article_id":"1121656018","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"sourceInfo":null,"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A","META":"Meta Platforms, Inc."},"translate_title":"谷歌vs。梅塔：哪个更吸引人？","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"GOOG":0.9,"GOOGL":0.9,"META":0.9},"content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":true,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9916508561,"gmtCreate":1664617418754,"gmtModify":1676537485640,"author":{"id":"3577512169946317","authorId":"3577512169946317","name":"Guardian_J","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5732d3790ba7ded4910ae093423ed15","vip":1,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3577512169946317","idStr":"3577512169946317"},"htmlText":"Woo","listText":"Woo","text":"Woo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916508561","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916252479,"gmtCreate":1664607685591,"gmtModify":1676537484753,"author":{"id":"3567409676969355","authorId":"3567409676969355","name":"mwlim1992","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3567409676969355","idStr":"3567409676969355"},"htmlText":"Good read","listText":"Good read","text":"Good read","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916252479","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916184370,"gmtCreate":1664536096591,"gmtModify":1676537473455,"author":{"id":"3575544575320394","authorId":"3575544575320394","name":"来人","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0af89587decbb8a1d3e1596adc29cb98","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575544575320394","idStr":"3575544575320394"},"htmlText":"Both&nbsp;","listText":"Both&nbsp;","text":"Both","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916184370","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916112903,"gmtCreate":1664532501102,"gmtModify":1676537472936,"author":{"id":"3581726174893746","authorId":"3581726174893746","name":"Sysy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f89400ba2f20ed80423858c0f6a3d8ee","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581726174893746","idStr":"3581726174893746"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916112903","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916137024,"gmtCreate":1664530335968,"gmtModify":1676537472641,"author":{"id":"3581724772671504","authorId":"3581724772671504","name":"Uasbau","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67cdf409f2239595269918513a5faac9","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581724772671504","idStr":"3581724772671504"},"htmlText":"Good article. Thanks&nbsp;","listText":"Good article. Thanks&nbsp;","text":"Good article. Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916137024","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104172791,"gmtCreate":1664617433476,"gmtModify":1664617436647,"authorId":3577512169946317,"author":{"id":3577512169946317,"idStr":"3577512169946317","authorId":3577512169946317,"name":"Guardian_J","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5732d3790ba7ded4910ae093423ed15","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-2","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Master Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 100","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ad22cfbe2d05aa393b18e9226e4b0307","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36702e6ff3ffe46acafee66cc85273ca","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d52eb88fa385cf5abe2616ed63781765","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"80.31%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916137024,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"goo","text":"goo","html":"goo"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916379837,"gmtCreate":1664520591029,"gmtModify":1676537470963,"author":{"id":"3575544575320394","authorId":"3575544575320394","name":"来人","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0af89587decbb8a1d3e1596adc29cb98","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575544575320394","idStr":"3575544575320394"},"htmlText":"Ok&nbsp;","listText":"Ok&nbsp;","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916379837","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104159618,"gmtCreate":1664532516239,"gmtModify":1664532520070,"authorId":3581726174893746,"author":{"id":3581726174893746,"idStr":"3581726174893746","authorId":3581726174893746,"name":"Sysy","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f89400ba2f20ed80423858c0f6a3d8ee","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916379837,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"k","text":"k","html":"k"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916370374,"gmtCreate":1664520430998,"gmtModify":1676537470917,"author":{"id":"3578630064980119","authorId":"3578630064980119","name":"BGTAN","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8ca7305b1f6bd1d4dd9abf3c54e6fbdb","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3578630064980119","idStr":"3578630064980119"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916370374","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916370964,"gmtCreate":1664520419259,"gmtModify":1676537470909,"author":{"id":"4108976279272700","authorId":"4108976279272700","name":"Carolq","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a323d71bf71b538e65538ddb2681b97e","vip":1,"crmLevel":9,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4108976279272700","idStr":"4108976279272700"},"htmlText":"Alphabet&nbsp;","listText":"Alphabet&nbsp;","text":"Alphabet","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916370964","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104159149,"gmtCreate":1664528987634,"gmtModify":1664528991110,"authorId":4087387556186030,"author":{"id":4087387556186030,"idStr":"4087387556186030","authorId":4087387556186030,"name":"peng321","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916370964,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"agree","text":"agree","html":"agree"},{"id":104158175,"gmtCreate":1664521750763,"gmtModify":1664521753918,"authorId":3570037604440960,"author":{"id":3570037604440960,"idStr":"3570037604440960","authorId":3570037604440960,"name":"Pflanze","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d1e55f7d9e1df6e15adabc7185268e2f","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916370964,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"agreed","text":"agreed","html":"agreed"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916344817,"gmtCreate":1664519730139,"gmtModify":1676537470832,"author":{"id":"3580082297864003","authorId":"3580082297864003","name":"MireyaMiya万亿丰","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1124aa19e932df4e4bb55e398ab6f78a","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3580082297864003","idStr":"3580082297864003"},"htmlText":"Google","listText":"Google","text":"Google","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916344817","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916342998,"gmtCreate":1664518890114,"gmtModify":1676537470724,"author":{"id":"3582338758553096","authorId":"3582338758553096","name":"Swordmerlin","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/1f836008e90c916e86b10677e7b767fd","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3582338758553096","idStr":"3582338758553096"},"htmlText":"Both can consider&nbsp;","listText":"Both can consider&nbsp;","text":"Both can consider","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916342998","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104158300,"gmtCreate":1664523026573,"gmtModify":1664523029882,"authorId":3578111079453218,"author":{"id":3578111079453218,"idStr":"3578111079453218","authorId":3578111079453218,"name":"jeff123","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d2c71145c4a9a4565a59fc5476086738","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916342998,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"agreeed","text":"agreeed","html":"agreeed"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916346425,"gmtCreate":1664518788168,"gmtModify":1676537470717,"author":{"id":"3581640085724727","authorId":"3581640085724727","name":"cryptous","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c66c79b1c0f576bf4133fe7ceb3916ae","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581640085724727","idStr":"3581640085724727"},"htmlText":"Haha","listText":"Haha","text":"Haha","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916346425","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916341201,"gmtCreate":1664518364304,"gmtModify":1676537470648,"author":{"id":"4126956022313922","authorId":"4126956022313922","name":"Julianw","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/b3e5ee8e00fbd5d2d070fb101e902b5d","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4126956022313922","idStr":"4126956022313922"},"htmlText":"I like the extensive analysis of this article. I'm also in line with an investment with Google.&nbsp;","listText":"I like the extensive analysis of this article. I'm also in line with an investment with Google.&nbsp;","text":"I like the extensive analysis of this article. I'm also in line with an investment with Google.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916341201","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916343332,"gmtCreate":1664518054626,"gmtModify":1676537470608,"author":{"id":"3568855588230949","authorId":"3568855588230949","name":"IsleofSkye","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67513c367fa2b32512713968a36dcf7d","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3568855588230949","idStr":"3568855588230949"},"htmlText":"Thks for the analysis","listText":"Thks for the analysis","text":"Thks for the analysis","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916343332","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916349334,"gmtCreate":1664517813229,"gmtModify":1676537470550,"author":{"id":"3581563418944392","authorId":"3581563418944392","name":"Andrewinho","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3127e2bc40ab23064a5187a00a63e19b","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3581563418944392","idStr":"3581563418944392"},"htmlText":"Both great n cheap!!! 🤭🤭🤭","listText":"Both great n cheap!!! 🤭🤭🤭","text":"Both great n cheap!!! 🤭🤭🤭","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916349334","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916340742,"gmtCreate":1664517733286,"gmtModify":1676537470539,"author":{"id":"4098866635611070","authorId":"4098866635611070","name":"Vincentan59","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a5c91735e742c607283b7643b505c8e4","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ae1f49570794979e009a5efdeb6f4789","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4098866635611070","idStr":"4098866635611070"},"htmlText":"Can make money is better[Sly]&nbsp;[Sly]&nbsp;","listText":"Can make money is better[Sly]&nbsp;[Sly]&nbsp;","text":"Can make money is better[Sly] [Sly]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916340742","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104161845,"gmtCreate":1664545862924,"gmtModify":1664545866810,"authorId":4098866635611070,"author":{"id":4098866635611070,"idStr":"4098866635611070","authorId":4098866635611070,"name":"Vincentan59","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/a5c91735e742c607283b7643b505c8e4","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.03.09","exceedPercentage":"93.84%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916340742,"type":1,"supId":104161758,"prevId":0,"content":"Thank you","text":"Thank you","html":"Thank you"},{"id":104161758,"gmtCreate":1664545055717,"gmtModify":1664545060103,"authorId":4101545765383330,"author":{"id":4101545765383330,"idStr":"4101545765383330","authorId":4101545765383330,"name":"Azerone.Kee","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/d39387dc5f4bc64e4716bd64e398a9e2","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"29815c1501c442c58b708482689df577-1","templateUuid":"29815c1501c442c58b708482689df577","name":"Emerging Contributor","description":"Contributors who received Editor's Pick for the 1st time","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4ce9180a952c61a51c39f70d533b81a7","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f98cf16cf4b858114f7ab9a779f9e6f1","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/TW/9000980585","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.15","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2005},"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916340742,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"definitely you are right.","text":"definitely you are right.","html":"definitely you are right."},{"id":104157457,"gmtCreate":1664517857837,"gmtModify":1664517861949,"authorId":3581586102966898,"author":{"id":3581586102966898,"idStr":"3581586102966898","authorId":3581586102966898,"name":"JinHan","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/023377e47661ee615bf8b22d4bd036e3","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2-1","templateUuid":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2","name":"Monthly Top Contributor","description":"Top 3 Contributors with the most and best Editor's Picks every month","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0cad6192443c33dca826a001250fbd4","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ccd98c646815ce7610b0df338e060cc","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/TW/9000980585","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.07","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2003},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916340742,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Pick Google then!","text":"Pick Google then!","html":"Pick Google then!"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916340413,"gmtCreate":1664517713132,"gmtModify":1676537470539,"author":{"id":"3585785590601618","authorId":"3585785590601618","name":"Miketee74","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/09ea58a03e562828bff08f7347bbcdb4","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3585785590601618","idStr":"3585785590601618"},"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916340413","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916337960,"gmtCreate":1664508190550,"gmtModify":1676537468495,"author":{"id":"3574326723774097","authorId":"3574326723774097","name":"Gackky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5898b44bf5a31bf2b9d4e37227ed8177","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3574326723774097","idStr":"3574326723774097"},"htmlText":"me[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"me[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"me[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916337960","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104182259,"gmtCreate":1664683643632,"gmtModify":1664683648015,"authorId":3566385558470298,"author":{"id":3566385558470298,"idStr":"3566385558470298","authorId":3566385558470298,"name":"___ _","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e0600059befbdbcd780f0d15118a44d6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916337960,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"my red pudding is the cutest!","text":"my red pudding is the cutest!","html":"my red pudding is the cutest!"},{"id":104182256,"gmtCreate":1664683628118,"gmtModify":1664683631611,"authorId":3566385558470298,"author":{"id":3566385558470298,"idStr":"3566385558470298","authorId":3566385558470298,"name":"___ _","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e0600059befbdbcd780f0d15118a44d6","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916337960,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"agreeee","text":"agreeee","html":"agreeee"},{"id":104159865,"gmtCreate":1664533661521,"gmtModify":1664533664991,"authorId":3581735774790928,"author":{"id":3581735774790928,"idStr":"3581735774790928","authorId":3581735774790928,"name":"HelenJanet","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1730eb70f7129a82541df3a6f640a671","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916337960,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"[Cool][LOL][LOL]","text":"[Cool][LOL][LOL]","html":"[Cool][LOL][LOL]"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916335127,"gmtCreate":1664508019269,"gmtModify":1676537468448,"author":{"id":"4089116574465250","authorId":"4089116574465250","name":"MrHuattt","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e67f8f8c2b0192fadc4cd499a84e6c8b","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"4089116574465250","idStr":"4089116574465250"},"htmlText":"Okay","listText":"Okay","text":"Okay","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916335127","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104155462,"gmtCreate":1664508885431,"gmtModify":1664508888854,"authorId":3574929829220175,"author":{"id":3574929829220175,"idStr":"3574929829220175","authorId":3574929829220175,"name":"nicholastsj","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d43d1a543e192369160adfc42ef5e783","vip":1,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916335127,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"lk","text":"lk","html":"lk"},{"id":104155287,"gmtCreate":1664508023219,"gmtModify":1664508026646,"authorId":4089116574465250,"author":{"id":4089116574465250,"idStr":"4089116574465250","authorId":4089116574465250,"name":"MrHuattt","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e67f8f8c2b0192fadc4cd499a84e6c8b","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916335127,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Sure","text":"Sure","html":"Sure"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916338941,"gmtCreate":1664507274183,"gmtModify":1676537468305,"author":{"id":"3580653303727490","authorId":"3580653303727490","name":"Heemeng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/233557b79108934fcf6cea2199c46012","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3dee1aa3a3a3c1814833a4d3f8a5669","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"authorIdStr":"3580653303727490","idStr":"3580653303727490"},"htmlText":"GOOG better","listText":"GOOG better","text":"GOOG better","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916338941","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104157463,"gmtCreate":1664517876438,"gmtModify":1664517880372,"authorId":3581586102966898,"author":{"id":3581586102966898,"idStr":"3581586102966898","authorId":3581586102966898,"name":"JinHan","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/023377e47661ee615bf8b22d4bd036e3","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2-1","templateUuid":"c4ee29b388ff41cc8462b3b7ea00d1e2","name":"Monthly Top Contributor","description":"Top 3 Contributors with the most and best Editor's Picks every month","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0cad6192443c33dca826a001250fbd4","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ccd98c646815ce7610b0df338e060cc","redirectLinkEnabled":1,"redirectLink":"https://ttm.financial/TW/9000980585","hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.10.07","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2003},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916338941,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Agreed! Google PE is lower too","text":"Agreed! Google PE is lower too","html":"Agreed! Google PE is lower too"},{"id":104155443,"gmtCreate":1664508704718,"gmtModify":1664508710197,"authorId":4106309378680090,"author":{"id":4106309378680090,"idStr":"4106309378680090","authorId":4106309378680090,"name":"_dachad","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/e6856c1f1ee94253ef9a7fa17811e96c","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-1","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"Boss Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $100,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c8dfc27c1ee0e25db1c93e9d0b641101","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f43908c142f8a33c78f5bdf0e2897488","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/82165ff19cb8a786e8919f92acee5213","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.03.14","exceedPercentage":"60.10%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916338941,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"agree.&nbsp; meta has lost the plot","text":"agree.&nbsp; meta has lost the plot","html":"agree.&nbsp; meta has lost the plot"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9916392695,"gmtCreate":1664505863017,"gmtModify":1676537467997,"author":{"id":"3560241002253187","authorId":"3560241002253187","name":"CL777","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9aef3dd830373a0427a3447b1b564e3","vip":1,"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3560241002253187","idStr":"3560241002253187"},"htmlText":"Both are&nbsp;","listText":"Both are&nbsp;","text":"Both are","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9916392695","repostId":1121656018,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1121656018","pubTimestamp":1664504430,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1121656018?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-30 10:20","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1121656018","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD]","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2>Summary</h2><ul><li>Both Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.</li><li>Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.</li><li>However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.</li><li>In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/83986253810705267bbca929658b8dce\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"500\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>JHVEPhoto<h2>Investment Thesis</h2><ul><li>In this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.</li><li>Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook&#39;s brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s (Aa2 compared to A1).</li><li>I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta&#39;s.</li><li>I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.</li><li>My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).</li><li>At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.</li></ul><h2>The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and Meta</h2>For both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world&#39;s most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet&#39;s most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody&#39;s credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody&#39;s). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.<h2>The Valuation of Alphabet and Meta</h2>Discounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Company Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years</td><td>8%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tax Rate</td><td>15.7%</td><td>16.7</td></tr><tr><td>Discount Rate [WACC]</td><td>7.75%</td><td>7.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Perpetual Growth Rate</td><td>4%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>EV/EBITDA Multiple</td><td>12x</td><td>7.2x</td></tr><tr><td>Current Price/Share</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Shares Outstanding</td><td>13,044</td><td>2,688</td></tr><tr><td>Debt</td><td>$28,810</td><td>$16,679</td></tr><tr><td>Cash</td><td>$17,936</td><td>$12,681</td></tr><tr><td>Capex</td><td>$29,816</td><td>$32,000</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic Value<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>Market Value</td><td>$99.17</td><td>$140.41</td></tr><tr><td>Upside</td><td>42.90%</td><td>35.30%</td></tr><tr><td>Intrinsic Value</td><td>$141.71</td><td>$190.02</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet&#39;s current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Alphabet Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$75.00</td><td>26%</td></tr><tr><td>$80.00</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>$85.00</td><td>22%</td></tr><tr><td>$90.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$95.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$99.17</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$100.00</td><td>18%</td></tr><tr><td>$105.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$110.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$115.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta&#39;s current stock price of $140.41.)<table><tbody><tr><td>Purchase Priceof the Meta Stock</td><td>Internal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model</td></tr><tr><td>$120.00</td><td>21%</td></tr><tr><td>$125.00</td><td>20%</td></tr><tr><td>$130.00</td><td>19%</td></tr><tr><td>$135.00</td><td>17%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.00</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$140.41</td><td>16%</td></tr><tr><td>$145.00</td><td>15%</td></tr><tr><td>$150.00</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>$155.00</td><td>13%</td></tr><tr><td>$160.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$165.00</td><td>12%</td></tr><tr><td>$170.00</td><td>11%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet&#39;s P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta&#39;s current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.<h2>Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. Meta</h2>Alphabet&#39;s market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta&#39;s EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet&#39;s 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta&#39;s (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet&#39;s EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet&#39;s Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta&#39;s (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet&#39;s potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival&#39;s.This analysis of the companies&#39; fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.<table><tbody><tr><td>Alphabet</td><td>Meta</td></tr><tr><td>General Information</td><td>Ticker</td><td>GOOG</td><td>META</td></tr><tr><td>Sector</td><td>Communication Services</td><td>Communication Services</td></tr><tr><td>Industry</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td><td>Interactive Media and Services</td></tr><tr><td>Market Cap</td><td>1.29T</td><td>377.36B</td></tr><tr><td>Profitability</td><td>EBIT Margin</td><td>29.65%</td><td>33.41%</td></tr><tr><td>ROE</td><td>29.22%</td><td>25.48%</td></tr><tr><td>Valuation</td><td>P/E GAAP [FWD]</td><td>19.05</td><td>14.30</td></tr><tr><td>P/E GAAP [TTM]</td><td>18.36</td><td>11.61</td></tr><tr><td>Growth</td><td>Revenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>23.32%</td><td>24.02%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]</td><td>22.88%</td><td>29.20%</td></tr><tr><td>EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]</td><td>33.92%</td><td>22.80%</td></tr><tr><td>EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]</td><td>27.01%</td><td>3.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow</td><td>Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM]</td><td>4.97%</td><td>9.27%</td></tr><tr><td>Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]</td><td>24.39%</td><td>4.23%</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends</td><td>Dividend Yield [FWD]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Dividend Frequency</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Income Statement</td><td>Revenue</td><td>278.14B</td><td>119.41B</td></tr><tr><td>EBITDA</td><td>96.89B</td><td>48.03B</td></tr><tr><td>Balance Sheet</td><td>Total Debt to Equity Ratio</td><td>11.28%</td><td>13.26%</td></tr></tbody></table>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>The High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard</h2>&#34;The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.&#34; Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard&#34;In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.&#34;<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/faeb3c51917ef152ddf3a5712155e673\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"402\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC Scorecard<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/af2bd93cd88da9505eea2a2524677ae1\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"366\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet&#39;s overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet&#39;s is 2.81 and Meta&#39;s is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet&#39;s is 29.65% and Meta&#39;s is 33.41%) and high ROE&#39;s (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta&#39;s higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet&#39;s 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet&#39;s higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet&#39;s better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78786f44287999703b96d424cf579307\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"266\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking</h2>My investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dc9089ef15c1e03dcf81b8420660782c\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"181\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts Rating</h2>As according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0183857b361e5803d79ef3e2d9f66812\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"175\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Source: Seeking Alpha<h2>Risks</h2>One of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies&#39; business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet&#39;s other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet&#39;s total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta&#39;s business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company&#39;s revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies&#39; advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta&#39;s business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta&#39;s significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company&#39;s high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta&#39;s revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.<h2>The Bottom Line</h2>I consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet&#39;s ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet&#39;s Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet&#39;s higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta&#39;s $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash &amp; ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody&#39;s compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta&#39;s revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta&#39;s high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?</body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Google Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nGoogle Vs. Meta: Which Is More Attractive?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-30 10:20 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"META":"Meta Platforms, Inc.","GOOG":"谷歌","GOOGL":"谷歌A"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4543761-google-vs-meta-more-attractive","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1121656018","content_text":"SummaryBoth Alphabet and Meta currently have an attractive valuation: while Alphabet has a P/E [FWD] Ratio of 19.05, Meta’s is even lower at 14.30.Alphabet has a higher brand value, a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating than Meta.However, Meta has a higher EBIT margin and shows a higher free cash flow yield.In this comparative analysis, I will show you which of the two companies I would pick if I could only choose one.JHVEPhotoInvestment ThesisIn this comparative analysis on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and Meta (NASDAQ:META), I come to the conclusion that I would select Alphabet over Meta if I could only invest in one of the two companies.Alphabet has ahigher brand value than Meta ($263,425M compared to Facebook's brand value of $101,201M as according to Brand Finance), a higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments compared to $40,489M) and a stronger credit rating by Moody's (Aa2 compared to A1).I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky, particularly due to the fact its business is less dependent on advertising than Meta's.I currently rate Meta as a buy and Alphabet as a strong buy. I consider Alphabet to be even more attractive when it comes to risk and reward.My investment thesis is underlined by the results of theHQC Scorecardin which Alphabet scores 91/100 while Meta scores 80/100. Furthermore, it is supported by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, in which Alphabet is ranked 2nd within the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61).At the current stock prices, I expect a compound annual rate of return of about 18% for Alphabet and one of 16% for Meta. Both are based on the calculations of my DCF Models.The Competitive Positions of Alphabet and MetaFor both Alphabet and Meta I see the enormous amount of data and their ability to analyse and use this data as strong competitive advantages over their rivals in the Interactive Media and Services Industry. In addition to that, both companies are among the top 10 of the world's most valuable brands: according toBrand Finance, Google is ranked 3rd with a brand value of $263,425M and Facebook is ranked 7th with a brand value of $101,201M.Both Alphabet and Meta have a proven ability of successfully integrating new businesses into their companies. One of Alphabet's most successful acquisitions was YouTube, for which the company paid $1.65 billion back in 2006. Meta acquired Instagram for$1.0 billionin 2012 and WhatsApp for$19 billionin 2014.The enormous financial strength of Alphabet and Meta provide them with another significant competitive advantage: while Alphabet has $124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments at this moment in time, Meta currently disposes of $40,489M. Having a high amount of cash puts both companies in a position to make large acquisitions in order to ensure further future growth. This financial strength is also backed up by a Moody's credit rating of Aa2 for Alphabet and A1 for Meta.Both Alphabet and Meta have strong competitive advantages. However, I would like to summarize that Alphabet is slightly ahead of Meta when it comes to brand value (Alphabet has a brand value of $263,425M while the one of Facebook is $101,201M) and when considering financial strength (Alphabet has a higher cash position and a stronger credit rating by Moody's). This supports my investment thesis to prefer Alphabet over Meta.The Valuation of Alphabet and MetaDiscounted Cash Flow [DCF]-ModelIn terms of valuation, I have used the DCF Model to determine the intrinsic value of Alphabet and Meta. The method calculates a fair value of $141.71 for Alphabet and $190.02 for Meta. At the current stock prices, this gives Alphabet an upside of 42.90% and Meta an upside of 35.30%.My calculations are based on the following assumptions as presented below (in $ millions except per share items):AlphabetMetaCompany TickerGOOGMETARevenue Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%EBIT Growth Rate for the next 5 years8%5%Tax Rate15.7%16.7Discount Rate [WACC]7.75%7.75%Perpetual Growth Rate4%3%EV/EBITDA Multiple12x7.2xCurrent Price/Share$99.17$140.41Shares Outstanding13,0442,688Debt$28,810$16,679Cash$17,936$12,681Capex$29,816$32,000Source: The AuthorBased on the above, I calculated the following results:Market Value vs. Intrinsic ValueAlphabetMetaMarket Value$99.17$140.41Upside42.90%35.30%Intrinsic Value$141.71$190.02Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for AlphabetTheInternal Rate of Return[IRR] is defined as the expected compound annual rate of return earned on an investment. Below you can find the Internal Rate of Return as according to my DCF Model (when assuming different purchase prices for the Alphabet stock).At Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 18% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 8% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 4% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Alphabet's current stock price of $99.17.) Please note that the Internal Rates of Return below are a result of the calculations of my DCF Model and changing its assumptions could result in different results.Purchase Priceof the Alphabet StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$75.0026%$80.0024%$85.0022%$90.0021%$95.0019%$99.1718%$100.0018%$105.0016%$110.0015%$115.0013%$120.0012%$125.0011%Source: The AuthorInternal Rate of Return for MetaAt Meta's current stock price of $140.41, my DCF Model indicates an Internal Rate of Return of approximately 16% for the company (while assuming a Revenue and EBIT Growth Rate of 5% for the next 5 years and a Perpetual Growth Rate of 3% afterwards). (In bold you can see the Internal Rate of Return for Meta's current stock price of $140.41.)Purchase Priceof the Meta StockInternal Rate of Returnas according to my DCF Model$120.0021%$125.0020%$130.0019%$135.0017%$140.0016%$140.4116%$145.0015%$150.0014%$155.0013%$160.0012%$165.0012%$170.0011%Source: The AuthorRelative Valuation ModelsTheP/E [FWD] Ratio for Alphabet and MetaAlphabet's P/E [FWD] Ratio is currently 19.05, which is 31.55% below its 5 Year Average (27.84), providing us with an indicator that the company is currently undervalued.Meta's current P/E [FWD] Ratio is 14.30, which is 42.78% below its 5 Year Average of 24.99, indicating that Meta is also currently undervalued.Fundamentals: Alphabet vs. MetaAlphabet's market capitalization is currently $1.29T, more than three times higher than the one of its competitor Meta ($377.36B). Meta currently has a slightly lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 when compared to Alphabet (19.05).Although Meta's EBIT Margin (33.41% compared to Alphabet's 29.65%) and Free Cash Flow Yield [TTM] (9.27% compared to 4.97%) are higher, the following contributes to the fact that I would select Alphabet if I had to choose one of the two companies from the Interactive Media and Services Industry:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than Meta's (25.48%), which implies that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits.Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than that of Meta (with an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% in the same period of time).In addition to that, Alphabet's EPS Growth Rate Diluted [FWD] of 27.01% is higher than the one of Meta (3.12%), indicating that Alphabet is growing its profitability with a higher rate.Additionally, Alphabet's Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD] of 24.39% is significantly superior to Meta's (4.23%), demonstrating that Alphabet's potential to produce cash and profits is growing faster than its rival's.This analysis of the companies' fundamentals strengthens my investment thesis that Alphabet is currently the more attractive of the two. Below you can find an overview of selected financial data for both Alphabet and Meta.AlphabetMetaGeneral InformationTickerGOOGMETASectorCommunication ServicesCommunication ServicesIndustryInteractive Media and ServicesInteractive Media and ServicesMarket Cap1.29T377.36BProfitabilityEBIT Margin29.65%33.41%ROE29.22%25.48%ValuationP/E GAAP [FWD]19.0514.30P/E GAAP [TTM]18.3611.61GrowthRevenue Growth 3 Year [CAGR]23.32%24.02%Revenue Growth 5 Year [CAGR]22.88%29.20%EBIT Growth 3 Year [CAGR]33.92%22.80%EPS Growth Diluted [FWD]27.01%3.12%Free Cash FlowFree Cash Flow Yield [TTM]4.97%9.27%Free Cash Flow Per Share Growth Rate [FWD]24.39%4.23%DividendsDividend Yield [FWD]--Dividend Growth 3 Yr [CAGR]--Dividend Growth 5 Yr [CAGR]--Consecutive Years of Dividend Growth--Dividend Frequency--Income StatementRevenue278.14B119.41BEBITDA96.89B48.03BBalance SheetTotal Debt to Equity Ratio11.28%13.26%Source: Seeking AlphaThe High-Quality Company [HQC] Scorecard\"The aim of the HQC Scorecard that I have developed is to help investors identify companies which are attractive long-term investments in terms of risk and reward.\" Here you can find adetailed descriptionof how the HQC Scorecard works.Overview of the Items on the HQC Scorecard\"In the graphic below, you can find the individual items and weighting for each category of theHQC Scorecard. A score between 0 and 5 is given (with 0 being the lowest rating and 5 the highest) for each item on the Scorecard. Furthermore, you can see the conditions that must be met for each point of every rated item.\"Source: The AuthorAlphabet and Meta According to the HQC ScorecardSource: The AuthorAlthough both companies are rated as very attractive as according to the HQC Scorecard, Alphabet's overall score (91/100) is slightly higher than the one of Meta (80/100).In the category of Economic Moat, Alphabet scores 93/100 points while Meta only reaches 57/100.In terms of Financial Strength, both are rated as very attractive. These strong results are a consequence of both companies having a low Total Debt to Equity Ratio, as well as a high Current Ratio (Alphabet's is 2.81 and Meta's is 2.52), Quick Ratio (2.62 and 2.34) and Cash Ratio (2.0 and 1.8).In the category of Profitability, both companies are rated with 100/100 points, a result of having high EBIT Margins (Alphabet's is 29.65% and Meta's is 33.41%) and high ROE's (29.22% and 25.48%).For Valuation, Alphabet receives 80/100 while Meta gets 92/100. Meta's higher scoring in this category is a consequence of its even lower P/E [FWD] Ratio of 14.30 as compared to Alphabet's 19.05.For Growth, Alphabet receives 88/100 and Meta gets 76/100.For Expected Return, both receive 100/100 points, this is mostly due to the high Expected Internal Rate of Return for the companies as according to my DCF Model.Alphabet's higher overall rating (91/100) as according to the HQC Scorecard, strengthens my opinion of choosing the company over Meta at this moment in time.Alphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor GradesWhen taking into consideration the Seeking Alpha Quant Factor Grades, we can see that Meta is rated slightly better in terms of Valuation (with a C-) as compared to Alphabet (D rating). In terms of Growth, however, Alphabet (C- rating) is better rated than Meta (D- rating). For Profitability, both companies receive an A+ rating. For Momentum, Alphabet is more appealing (C+) than Meta (C rating).Alphabet's better rating in terms of Growth and Momentum once again underlines my investment thesis.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Quant RankingMy investment thesis is also underlined by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking where Alphabet is ranked significantly better than Meta: while Alphabet is 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry, Meta is ranked 14th (both out of 61). Within the Communication Services Sector, Alphabet is currently ranked 7th and Meta is in 52nd place (both out of 247). The Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking reinforces my opinion to select Alphabet over Meta.Source: Seeking AlphaAlphabet and Meta According to the Seeking Alpha Authors Rating and Wall Street Analysts RatingAs according to the Seeking Alpha Quant Rating, Alphabet is currently a strong buy and Meta a hold. The Seeking Alpha Authors rate both companies as a buy while the Wall Street Analysts rate Alphabet as a strong buy and Meta as a buy.Source: Seeking AlphaRisksOne of the main risk factors I see for both Alphabet and Meta is the fact that the largest portion of the companies' business results depend on advertising.When taking a closer look at Alphabet, it can be highlighted that80%of the company's revenue is generated by its business unit Google Advertising. However, Alphabet's other business units are becoming more and more important (in 2Q22, Google Cloud accounted for 9% of Alphabet's total revenue while it was only 7.5% in the same quarter of the year before).While having a deeper look into Meta's business, we find that its dependency on advertising is even higher than that of its competitor:98%of the company's revenue is generated by advertising from Facebook and Instagram.This comparison of the companies' advertising dependency indicates that a reduction in customer spending on marketing would impact Meta's business to a higher amount than it would affect Alphabet. Meta's significantly higher dependence on advertising contributes to the fact that I see an investment in Alphabet as being less risky.Another additional risk factor when investing in Meta is the company's high spending to build the metaverse. In 2021 alone, the company spent about$10 billionthrough its Reality Labs division in order to build the metaverse. This amount is five times higher than what the company paid to buyOculus VR business in 2014and 10 times higher than the amountit paid to buy Instagramback in 2012. Although the investments could pay off in the future, they currently represent a risk for the shareholders due to the fact that the success of this project is not yet foreseeable.Additionally, I see the effect that data privacy will continue to have on the operating results of Meta as an additional risk factor for the company. At the beginning of this year, Alphabet announced new privacy restrictions which cut tracking across apps on its Android devices, following a similar move to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). This resulted in a decrease of Meta's revenue by about$10 billion.Summarizing, I see Alphabet as the lower-risk investment when compared with Meta, which once again underlines my thoughts on picking Alphabet out of the two. This lower risk also contributes to the fact that I would overweight the Alphabet position in an investment portfolio. On the other hand, the higher risk factors concerning Meta, contribute to my opinion of giving the company a small position in a long-term investment portfolio.The Bottom LineI consider the valuation of both Alphabet and Meta to currently be very appealing. However, when considering risk and reward, I came to the conclusion of selecting Alphabet over Meta. My opinion is based on the following facts and thoughts:Alphabet's ROE of 29.22% is higher than the one of Meta (25.48%), implying that Alphabet is even more efficient in converting its equity financing into profits. Furthermore, Alphabet's Average EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] over the last three years of 33.92% is also higher than the one of Meta (which has an EBIT Growth Rate [CAGR] of 22.80% over the same period).Alphabet's higher brand value ($263,425M as compared to Meta's $101,201M), as well as its higher cash position ($124,997M in Total Cash & ST Investments vs. $40,489M) and higher credit rating (Aa2 credit rating by Moody's compared to A1) additionally support my investment thesis to select the company over Meta.My opinion is further underlined by the rating of the HQC Scorecard in which Alphabet scores 91/100 points while Meta scores 80/100. Additionally, the theory is strengthened by the results of the Seeking Alpha Quant Ranking, where Alphabet is ranked 2nd in the Interactive Media and Services Industry while Meta is 14th (both out of 61).When it comes to risk, I also see Alphabet as being ahead of Meta. Alphabet is less dependent on its advertising business: while 98% of Meta's revenue is from Facebook and Instagram advertising, Alphabet generates about 80% of its revenue from advertising. Furthermore, Alphabet is becoming more independent from its advertising business through the increasing revenue of its cloud business. In addition to that, Meta's high spending in the metaverse implies an additional risk factor for the Meta shareholder.The investment thesis of selecting Alphabet over Meta is also reflected in my own personal long-term investment portfolio, in which Alphabet holds one of my largest positions, while Meta only has a small position. My investment decision has been based on the fact that I consider Alphabet to be significantly more attractive than Meta in terms of risk and reward.Which is your favorite out of Alphabet and Meta?","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":104178831,"gmtCreate":1664675604485,"gmtModify":1664675608522,"authorId":3560241002253187,"author":{"id":3560241002253187,"idStr":"3560241002253187","authorId":3560241002253187,"name":"CL777","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9aef3dd830373a0427a3447b1b564e3","vip":1,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.09.20","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},"crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916392695,"type":1,"supId":104155134,"prevId":0,"content":"[Smile][Smile]","text":"[Smile][Smile]","html":"[Smile][Smile]"},{"id":104155134,"gmtCreate":1664507284893,"gmtModify":1664507288084,"authorId":3558617926022722,"author":{"id":3558617926022722,"idStr":"3558617926022722","authorId":3558617926022722,"name":"kkennn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cfb6967409b5a69e663a7006e885e221","vip":1,"crmLevel":5,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9916392695,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Yes","text":"Yes","html":"Yes"}],"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":124,"commentSize":20,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}