Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought

Seeking Alpha2023-04-11

SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

117

Report

Comment（8）

blessed_1
·2023-04-12
Thanks
Reply
1
Report
Sphere
·2023-04-12
Rubbish
Reply
1
Report
Seah CL
·2023-04-12
K
Reply
10
Report
Nggimseng
·2023-04-12
Nice
Reply
13
Report
MIe
·2023-04-12
Apple stable upside to add portfolio
Reply
11
Report
Fold Replies
- Sphere:
  Up
  2023-04-12
  Reply
  Report
Player_K
·2023-04-12
[Cool]
Reply
12
Report
phongy 45
·2023-04-12
Ok
Reply
12
Report
Abundance Thankful
·2023-04-12
[What]
Reply
8
Report

Most Discussed

7x24

All

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","id":"1129119494","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","media":"Seeking Alpha","content":"<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"seekingalpha","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"AAPL","symbol_name":"苹果","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","article_id":"1129119494","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":[],"rights":null,"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"seekingalpha","name":"Seeking Alpha"},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"seekingalpha.com","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"translate_title":"苹果·斯托克：比我想象的要糟糕得多","themeId":"","isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9},"content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","kind":null,"is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":null,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"0","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":1},"commentList":[{"id":9942572416,"gmtCreate":1681263218836,"gmtModify":1681263220944,"author":{"id":"4112410321254552","authorId":"4112410321254552","name":"blessed_1","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/71622697830d9517eb67a61917d8a95f","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"4112410321254552","authorIdStr":"4112410321254552"},"htmlText":"Thanks","listText":"Thanks","text":"Thanks","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942572416","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9942561150,"gmtCreate":1681256973270,"gmtModify":1681266447700,"author":{"id":"3573432013960035","authorId":"3573432013960035","name":"Sphere","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3573432013960035","authorIdStr":"3573432013960035"},"htmlText":"Rubbish","listText":"Rubbish","text":"Rubbish","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942561150","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9942598267,"gmtCreate":1681251273359,"gmtModify":1681251276646,"author":{"id":"4102135564535180","authorId":"4102135564535180","name":"Seah CL","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/970bca7b04e85a42a2c8eabed7ec96d0","vip":1,"crmLevel":3,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4102135564535180","authorIdStr":"4102135564535180"},"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":10,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942598267","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9942505616,"gmtCreate":1681249414036,"gmtModify":1681249417561,"author":{"id":"3586164268210037","authorId":"3586164268210037","name":"Nggimseng","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/0f4a59087543e775843eb0622ae81fe7","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b073a07f77dbe6b3bec6b12311fde6bd","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3586164268210037","authorIdStr":"3586164268210037"},"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":13,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942505616","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9942277234,"gmtCreate":1681244399629,"gmtModify":1681244406689,"author":{"id":"3577182936341023","authorId":"3577182936341023","name":"MIe","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f84d87792f02cf78e80ee34979fd31e5","crmLevel":6,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3577182936341023","authorIdStr":"3577182936341023"},"htmlText":"Apple stable upside to add portfolio&nbsp;","listText":"Apple stable upside to add portfolio&nbsp;","text":"Apple stable upside to add portfolio","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":11,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942277234","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"comments":[{"id":106283446,"gmtCreate":1681257003071,"gmtModify":1681257006406,"authorId":3573432013960035,"author":{"id":3573432013960035,"idStr":"3573432013960035","authorId":3573432013960035,"name":"Sphere","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":9942277234,"type":1,"supId":0,"prevId":0,"content":"Up","text":"Up","html":"Up"}],"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9942273104,"gmtCreate":1681239572408,"gmtModify":1681239575817,"author":{"id":"3581392377788426","authorId":"3581392377788426","name":"Player_K","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7852b6f9c1f6e12c9d35e70fd4f217e5","vip":1,"hat":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b0a2963eb37c60c5d6d4a8dbcd266952","crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3581392377788426","authorIdStr":"3581392377788426"},"htmlText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","listText":"[Cool]&nbsp;","text":"[Cool]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942273104","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9942256626,"gmtCreate":1681233275866,"gmtModify":1681233279236,"author":{"id":"4101978790494150","authorId":"4101978790494150","name":"phongy 45","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f6f41e543307358288f75d55fe347ad2","vip":1,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"4101978790494150","authorIdStr":"4101978790494150"},"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942256626","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"},{"id":9942289848,"gmtCreate":1681229337784,"gmtModify":1681229341586,"author":{"id":"3572176137415007","authorId":"3572176137415007","name":"Abundance Thankful","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3596d672dc89783cd009721d4bab5ddb","vip":1,"crmLevel":4,"crmLevelSwitch":1,"idStr":"3572176137415007","authorIdStr":"3572176137415007"},"htmlText":"[What]&nbsp;","listText":"[What]&nbsp;","text":"[What]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":8,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9942289848","repostId":1129119494,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1129119494","pubTimestamp":1681224782,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129119494?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-04-11 22:53","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129119494","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I se","content":"<html><head></head><body><h2 style=\"text-align: left;\">Summary</h2><ul><li>Last time, I called Apple Inc.&#39;s earnings miss based on Samsung&#39;s operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple&#39;s failure for Q1 2023.</li><li>Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple&#39;s revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.</li><li>At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.</li><li>CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.</li><li>Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple&#39;s stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I&#39;m downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.</li></ul><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffb2b859c81022666d4118f05f93e6eb\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"750\" tg-height=\"563\"/><h2>Introduction</h2>I previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company&#39;s largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company&#39;s report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts&#39; forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that&#39;s precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/baaff3a44a533af9d9a0b0ae168d7348\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"285\"/>It&#39;s been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&amp;P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can&#39;t even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung&#39;s recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let&#39;s dive in for more detail.<h2>Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - Again</h2>The world&#39;s largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14b6112dd2e3ef7d5564a780500ddc35\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"115\"/>Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea&#39;s largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation&#39;s GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung&#39;s smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company&#39;s upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5ba25566e840227550e3ed15def35b8b\" alt=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"369\"/>Samsung&#39;s Q1 2022 results, author&#39;s notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple&#39;s closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung&#39;s total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company&#39;s attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung&#39;s Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company&#39;s and its competitors&#39; attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9089eb1e751853f396101a84c93e967\" alt=\"Bloomberg\" title=\"Bloomberg\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"363\"/>BloombergSecond, Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple&#39;s main source of revenue.<h2>Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced In</h2>While Samsung&#39;s Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c158ad24716ac552811680c2d04b414\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"327\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b702266026e6c334728af3402f94cbf7\" alt=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"251\"/>Seeking Alpha, author&#39;s notes<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/45ed0f1f7f98c902c3421656a80c49c5\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"501\"/>ChartData by YCharts<blockquote>Our PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]</blockquote>How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f103d67be615f199657b3bbab74725fc\" alt=\"Chart\" title=\"Chart\" tg-width=\"635\" tg-height=\"433\"/>ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9a259b6dface7eeceb6bc22a934d5080\" alt=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" title=\"BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"411\"/>BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA&#39;s report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL&#39;s implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook&#39;s presumably cautious guidance again.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c4d0f80a5edb8c45bf4229cc68f34a0\" alt=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" title=\"Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"495\"/>Macrotrends.net [author&#39;s notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b2e8039897e007c092a477d345d651fa\" alt=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" title=\"TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"309\"/>TrendSpider Software, author&#39;s notes<h2>Your Takeaway</h2>Of course, I&#39;m sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company&#39;s loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple&#39;s innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company&#39;s potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple&#39;s solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&amp;D, M&amp;A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung&#39;s guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.&#39;s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.</body></html>","source":"seekingalpha","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Stock: It's Way Worse Than I Thought\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-04-11 22:53 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade>Seeking Alpha</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\nSummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment ...\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4593262-apple-stock-its-way-worse-than-i-thought-rating-downgrade","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/5a36db9d73b4222bc376d24ccc48c8a4","article_id":"1129119494","content_text":"SummaryLast time, I called Apple Inc.'s earnings miss based on Samsung's operating data. Today, I see even more reason to expect Apple's failure for Q1 2023.Samsung's Mobile Experience segment operating profit is guided to fall by ~34.5% YoY. Apple's revenue is projected to fall by just 5.91% YoY in Q1 2023.At the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical multiples for years to come.CEO Tim Cook has sold part of his shares for the first time since mid-2021.Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple's stock could decline by 19.5% this year. I'm downgrading Apple Inc. stock to Sell.IntroductionI previously published my analysis of how Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and its results depend on the results of the company's largest competitor, Samsung (OTCPK:SSNLF). At that time, on February 1, 2022, I analyzed the Korean company's report and concluded that Apple will most likely not be able to beat analysts' forecasts and that Apple CEO Tim Cook will likely disappoint investors with his guidance. As time has shown, that's precisely what happened. And that EPS miss has become the first one in recent years.It's been a little over 2 months since then, and all the while I have remained neutral on AAPL. The stock continued to rise - since that publication its total return amounted to 13.4% against the S&P 500 Index (SP500) return of -0.34% as many began to seek a safe haven in mega-cap tech stocks.At the moment, however, I see no reason to be optimistic - I can't even remain neutral anymore. In this article, I analyze Samsung's recent report and other key factors that led me to downgrade my previous Neutral rating to Sell. Let's dive in for more detail.Samsung Sends Apple Investors A Warning Message - AgainThe world's largest memory chips maker reported on Friday that its operating profit is going to fall more than 95% YoY to 0.5-0.7 trillion won (~$455 million) in Q1 2023, according to Seeking Alpha News. The last time Samsung’s semiconductor business saw such a loss was in Q1 2009, when the world was recovering from the 2008 financial crisis.Samsung has announced it will cut production of memory chip production due to continued weak demand. As South Korea's largest family-run conglomerate, Samsung contributes to more than 20% of the nation's GDP, and its economic struggles are worrisome. This is the second consecutive quarter of significant profit decline for Samsung. In Q4 2022, profits fell by nearly 70% due to the conflict in Ukraine and inflation.On a positive note, Samsung's smartphone division may have helped mitigate some of the losses, the full extent of which will be elaborated on during the company's upcoming quarterly earnings call later this month. Samsung's Mobile Experience segment - the company’s smartphone division - reportedly earned profits of around KRW 3.3 trillion (~$2.5 billion), according to sammobile.com. However, everything is learned by comparison - if we compare this guidance with Q1 FY2022, it turns out that this positive operating profit is still ~34.55% lower than last year and ~43% lower than in Q1 2021:Samsung's Q1 2022 results, author's notesLet me remind you that Samsung is Apple's closest competitor when it comes to smartphone sales, even though this segment accounts for only 34.55% of Samsung's total revenue [based on Q1 2022 data]. For Apple, the iPhone segment still accounts for about 52% despite all the company's attempts to diversify into Services in recent years.In my opinion, there are 2 bad news pieces for Apple in the whole story with Samsung's Q1 2023 guidance. First, the Korean company's and its competitors' attempts to cut chip production may point to the realization of a scenario I have long written about in my articles on Apple and other tech stocks - if their products are not a pressing need for consumers, the elasticity of demand to changes in the real incomes of the population will be quite high; as a result, smartphone sales will come under severe pressure - there is nothing to change them for if they still work. Especially if there is not much change in functionality. Yes, certain segments of the population are willing to cut corners on other costs just to get a new device - but we are talking about the majority here, not the minority. And the trend in chip production around the world suggests that manufacturers are preparing in advance for the consequences of this very high elasticity:BloombergSecond, Samsung's Mobile Experience segment itself shows a sharp decline in operating profit - a bad sign for Apple's main source of revenue.Apple Stock Valuation: The Earnings Dip Is Not Priced InWhile Samsung's Mobile Experience operating profit is expected to decline by up to 34.5% in Q1 2023, Apple stock is pricing in a slight deviation from its long-term EPS growth [-5.91% YoY], which looks like normal seasonality.Seeking Alpha, author's notesAt the same time, Wall Street analysts give Apple a fairly high premium to its valuation, deviating from historical valuation multiples. Below I give an example from a recent report by Bank of America analysts who first estimate the P/E multiple for FY2024 at 26 times and then explain that this is in line with the historical range of 9-34x with the median at 14x - in my opinion, the reader should have a sense of contradiction just from the very description of these assumptions.Seeking Alpha, author's notesChartData by YChartsOur PO of $168 is based on ~26x our E2024 EPS of $6.30. Our target multiple compares to the long-term historical range of 9-34x (median 14x). We believe a multiple at the higher end of the historical range is justified given a large cash balance and opportunity to diversify into new end markets, increasing mix and diversity of services.Source: BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]How can a year-end target multiple of ~26x be compared to the median of 14x?I understand that there should be a premium for Apple being the largest tech company in the world with a huge moat and therefore part of the assets of most passive funds. But if we are going to put a premium based also on the large cash balance as BofA says, would not it be fair to also take into account the rate at which those cash piles have been depleted in recent years?ChartData by YChartsI agree that Apple deserves a premium for being able to continue diversifying into Services - however, the current state of affairs in that segment is not the best, either, according to the same BofA report:BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]BofA's report as of April 5, 2023 [proprietary source]The current situation reminds me of Q1 2022. Back then, a year ago, AAPL's implied P/E multiple rose to 28.22x while the stock price was around $174/share. The TTM EPS reached $6.15, which was a record high. After that, the multiple dropped to 22.5 by mid-2022, TTM EPS dropped just 10 cents [to $6.05], and the share price dropped to ~$136 [-22%]. I think today the risk of such a scenario repeating itself has risen sharply again - Q1 2023 results are unlikely to please investors, as is Tim Cook's presumably cautious guidance again.Macrotrends.net [author's notes]By the way, a few words about Tim Cook - as an indirect confirmation of the high probability of my conclusions are his recent sales. On April 3, the CEO sold over $9 million worth of company stock at prices ranging from $165.41 to $165.845 per share. The last time Mr. Cook sold was in mid-2021. This coincided with another indirect confirmation of my conclusions about the impending multiple contraction due to weaker-than-expected operating results - the weekly chart of AAPL stock shows strong resistance from which a correction of at least ~16% looks quite likely:TrendSpider Software, author's notesYour TakeawayOf course, I'm sure that Apple Inc. is very well positioned for the long term. The company's loyal customer base is known to readily adopt new products and stay within the Apple ecosystem, which contributes to consistent revenue. Apple's innovative product pipeline, which includes iconic products such as the iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch, often fuels investor optimism about the company's potential for breakthrough technologies. Diversifying revenue not only through hardware but also through services such as Apple Music, iCloud, Apple TV + and Apple Arcade helps minimize risk and generate multiple revenue streams. In addition, Apple's solid balance sheet and still-substantial cash reserves allow it to invest in R&D, M&A, and share buybacks, which has a positive impact on the stock price.My revised Sell rating is based solely on tactical positioning, highlighting that the market has not yet adjusted to this information, or is choosing not to, despite common sense. Samsung's guidance, which proved to be worse than initially anticipated, serves as a reminder that Apple is not impervious to slowing demand and that the company may not always meet high expectations. The path to long-term success inevitably includes setbacks and crises, and it appears we are currently witnessing one of them.I project Apple Inc.'s P/E ratio to be around 23x by the end of FY2023, with a full-year EPS of $5.76 - a negative miss of 3.64% compared to the consensus [like in Q4 2022]. Based on this analysis, I anticipate that Apple Inc. stock could decline by 19.5% this year.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"tweetType":1,"langContent":"EN"}],"hasMoreComments":true,"newsSizeData":{"likeSize":117,"commentSize":8,"repostSize":9,"favoriteSize":2,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false}}