Profile - To The Moon

华美虎

Posts · 98Posts · 98
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- 华美虎华美虎
  ·2023-03-31
  nonsense[微笑]
  Is the market about to experience a catastrophe? Learn from history: Fed rate cuts are not a good thing!
  市场都在押注美联储降息，但是以史为鉴，美联储降息对市场来说恐又是一场浩劫！
  Is the market about to experience a catastrophe? Learn from history: Fed rate cuts are not a good thing!
  3.51K Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- 华美虎华美虎
  ·2021-02-18
  an interesting company
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  3.69K Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
No following yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3481012429279872","uuid":"3481012429279872","gmtCreate":1528123074276,"gmtModify":1607524458996,"name":"华美虎","pinyin":"hmhhuameihu","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/069e1f4d34b1cef685e7c8573928fad2","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":3,"headSize":35,"tweetSize":98,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":900,"accountStatus":3,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":null,"userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-4","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Tiger Star","description":"Join the tiger community for 2000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dddf24b906c7011de2617d4fb3f76987","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53d58ad32c97254c6f74db8b97e6ec49","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6304700d92ad91c7a33e2e92ec32ecc1","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2026.04.23","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":659458174,"gmtCreate":1680217311199,"gmtModify":1680225639699,"author":{"id":"3481012429279872","authorId":"3481012429279872","name":"华美虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/069e1f4d34b1cef685e7c8573928fad2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3481012429279872","authorIdStr":"3481012429279872"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"nonsense[微笑]&nbsp;","listText":"nonsense[微笑]&nbsp;","text":"nonsense[微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/659458174","repostId":"2323678027","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2323678027","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1680170043,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2323678027?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-30 17:54","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Is the market about to experience a catastrophe? Learn from history: Fed rate cuts are not a good thing!","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2323678027","media":"金十数据","summary":"市场都在押注美联储降息，但是以史为鉴，美联储降息对市场来说恐又是一场浩劫！","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>The market is betting on a Federal Reserve rate cut, but history shows that a Fed rate cut could be another catastrophe for the market! Michael Lebowitz, an investment analyst and portfolio manager at RIA Advisors, wrote:</p><p>\"A Fed rate cut doesn't mean a bull market is coming,\" Roberts said.<strong>Stock investors betting on the Federal Reserve's policy adjustments may need to rethink their logic.</strong></p><p>The second largest bank failure in US history and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>The emergency sale at a significant discount has led investors to bet that the Federal Reserve will shift its focus. They don't seem to care about the heat and stickiness of inflation, and despite the evolving crisis, the Federal Reserve remains determined to keep interest rates \"high for a longer period of time.\"</p><p>Like Pavlov's dog, investors buy when they hear the bell at the crucial moment.<strong>If history is a lesson, investors' conditioned reflexes can be harmful.</strong></p><p><strong>Interest rate cuts always bring widespread sorrow.</strong></p><p>Since 1970, the Federal Reserve has significantly lowered its Federal Funds rate nine times.<strong>The average maximum pullback/retracement for the S&P 500 from the start of each rate cut cycle to the market bottom is 27.25%.</strong></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f03a5178e50b7a4dce343ded734f8f37\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"417\"/></p><p>The last three declines were above average, and of the other six experiences, only the 1974-1977 decline was worse than average.</p><p>Then,<strong>Why have recent pullback/retracement been more severe than before 1990?</strong>Because the Federal Reserve was more active before 1990. Therefore, they do not allow interest rates to be significantly higher or lower than the natural growth rate of the economy. The exception is that high inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s forced the Federal Reserve to remain vigilant. Whatever the reason, high interest rates help curb speculative bubbles.</p><p><strong>Over the past 20 years, the Federal Reserve has dominated a low-interest-rate environment.</strong>。 The chart below shows that real yields (nominal yields minus inflation expectations) have been declining for 40 years. From the pandemic until the Federal Reserve began rate hike in March 2022, the 10-year real yield was often negative.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53f0eeae55291adb1bc75e929c0c8da3\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"534\"/></p><p><strong>When interest rates are at predictably low levels, speculative activity tends to flourish.</strong>As we have seen, the speculative behavior generated by the Federal Reserve's easing policies in 2020 and 2021 led to conservative bankers and aggressive hedge funds taking on enormous risks. Because if they don't invest in riskier products, they have to accept negative real returns, which is detrimental to profits.</p><p><strong>Federal Reserve rate cuts could trigger the next round of sharp declines.</strong></p><p>Given that the market experienced a significant decline during the rate hike cycle that began in March 2022,<strong>Have most of the pullback/retracement related to interest rate cuts already occurred?</strong></p><p>The chart below shows the S&P 500's largest pullback/retracement since the rate hike cycle.<strong>The average decline in the rate hike cycle was 11.50%.</strong>However, it has fallen by nearly 25% in this cycle.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46b1c2dfa074f9f1ebff7f403c4a0ffa\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"419\"/></p><p>When assessing how the Federal Reserve's next shift will affect stock market expectations,<strong>There are two other factors to consider.</strong>。</p><p>First, the chart below shows the maximum pullback/retracement during the interest rate cut period and the one-year return after the rate cut ends. From May 2020 to May 2021, the year after the last interest rate cut, the S&P 500 rose by more than 50%.<strong>This ratio is three times the average return of 16% over the previous eight cycles. Therefore, it is not surprising that the largest decline in the current rate hike cycle is greater than the average.</strong></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f50898eeee026c0a6ffd62ae6458b47\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"419\"/></p><p>Secondly, valuations help explain why recent stock market declines during the Federal Reserve's policy shift have been more severe than before the dot-com bubble burst. The image below shows,<strong>The last three rate cuts all began when CAPE10 valuations were above the historical average.</strong>In contrast, previous examples all occurred when valuations were below average.</p><p><em>Note: CAPE (Cyclically Adjusted P/E), also known as Shiller P/E or P/E 10 ratio, is a valuation indicator commonly used in the U.S. S&P 500 stock market. It is defined as the price divided by the inflation-adjusted 10-year average income (moving average).</em></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c2d76a2c5ad5be94c5856d8b792390a\" tg-width=\"798\" tg-height=\"536\"/></p><p>While CAPE's current valuation is not as high as it was at the end of 2021, it is about 50% higher than the average. Although the market has made some adjustments,<strong>Valuations may still return to or below average levels</strong>Just like in 2003 and 2009. Roberts said:</p><p>\"It is difficult to draw conclusions about the pullback/retracement in 2020. Unprecedented fiscal and monetary policies played a prominent role in boosting the stock market. Given inflation and political divisions, we believe that even if the market experiences a more severe decline now, it is unlikely that Federal Reserve members or politicians will increase fiscal and monetary stimulus.\"<strong>Market expectations for interest rate cuts are unrealistic.</strong></p><p>The Federal Reserve remained outspoken last week, stating its desire for inflation to return to its 2% target.<strong>If they are going to cut interest rates as quickly and sharply as the market predicts, then something must be wrong.</strong>。 Currently, interest rate cuts suggested by the market are only justified in severely unfavorable circumstances such as a banking crisis or a rapidly deteriorating economy. Please note,<strong>Neither a crisis nor a recession is good for a company's earnings or stock price.</strong></p><p>There is another point worth considering regarding the Federal Reserve's policy shift. If the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates, the yield curve may return to normal. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been a warning sign of a recession.</p><p>The chart below shows two highly anticipated U.S. Treasury Bond yield curves. In the four cases mentioned above (i.e., the pullback/retracement was larger than average) and in other cases prior to 1990, both steepening curves were accompanied by economic recessions. And<strong>Over the past two weeks, the 2-10 year US Treasury yield curve has steepened by 60 basis points.</strong></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361e1e203de45df7c9ee78346425ff90\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"538\"/></p><p></body></html></p>","source":"xnew_highlight","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is the market about to experience a catastrophe? Learn from history: Fed rate cuts are not a good thing!</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs the market about to experience a catastrophe? Learn from history: Fed rate cuts are not a good thing!\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">金十数据</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2023-03-30 17:54</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>The market is betting on a Federal Reserve rate cut, but history shows that a Fed rate cut could be another catastrophe for the market! Michael Lebowitz, an investment analyst and portfolio manager at RIA Advisors, wrote:</p><p>\"A Fed rate cut doesn't mean a bull market is coming,\" Roberts said.<strong>Stock investors betting on the Federal Reserve's policy adjustments may need to rethink their logic.</strong></p><p>The second largest bank failure in US history and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CS\">Credit Suisse</a>The emergency sale at a significant discount has led investors to bet that the Federal Reserve will shift its focus. They don't seem to care about the heat and stickiness of inflation, and despite the evolving crisis, the Federal Reserve remains determined to keep interest rates \"high for a longer period of time.\"</p><p>Like Pavlov's dog, investors buy when they hear the bell at the crucial moment.<strong>If history is a lesson, investors' conditioned reflexes can be harmful.</strong></p><p><strong>Interest rate cuts always bring widespread sorrow.</strong></p><p>Since 1970, the Federal Reserve has significantly lowered its Federal Funds rate nine times.<strong>The average maximum pullback/retracement for the S&P 500 from the start of each rate cut cycle to the market bottom is 27.25%.</strong></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f03a5178e50b7a4dce343ded734f8f37\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"417\"/></p><p>The last three declines were above average, and of the other six experiences, only the 1974-1977 decline was worse than average.</p><p>Then,<strong>Why have recent pullback/retracement been more severe than before 1990?</strong>Because the Federal Reserve was more active before 1990. Therefore, they do not allow interest rates to be significantly higher or lower than the natural growth rate of the economy. The exception is that high inflation in the 1970s and early 1980s forced the Federal Reserve to remain vigilant. Whatever the reason, high interest rates help curb speculative bubbles.</p><p><strong>Over the past 20 years, the Federal Reserve has dominated a low-interest-rate environment.</strong>。 The chart below shows that real yields (nominal yields minus inflation expectations) have been declining for 40 years. From the pandemic until the Federal Reserve began rate hike in March 2022, the 10-year real yield was often negative.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/53f0eeae55291adb1bc75e929c0c8da3\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"534\"/></p><p><strong>When interest rates are at predictably low levels, speculative activity tends to flourish.</strong>As we have seen, the speculative behavior generated by the Federal Reserve's easing policies in 2020 and 2021 led to conservative bankers and aggressive hedge funds taking on enormous risks. Because if they don't invest in riskier products, they have to accept negative real returns, which is detrimental to profits.</p><p><strong>Federal Reserve rate cuts could trigger the next round of sharp declines.</strong></p><p>Given that the market experienced a significant decline during the rate hike cycle that began in March 2022,<strong>Have most of the pullback/retracement related to interest rate cuts already occurred?</strong></p><p>The chart below shows the S&P 500's largest pullback/retracement since the rate hike cycle.<strong>The average decline in the rate hike cycle was 11.50%.</strong>However, it has fallen by nearly 25% in this cycle.</p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/46b1c2dfa074f9f1ebff7f403c4a0ffa\" tg-width=\"619\" tg-height=\"419\"/></p><p>When assessing how the Federal Reserve's next shift will affect stock market expectations,<strong>There are two other factors to consider.</strong>。</p><p>First, the chart below shows the maximum pullback/retracement during the interest rate cut period and the one-year return after the rate cut ends. From May 2020 to May 2021, the year after the last interest rate cut, the S&P 500 rose by more than 50%.<strong>This ratio is three times the average return of 16% over the previous eight cycles. Therefore, it is not surprising that the largest decline in the current rate hike cycle is greater than the average.</strong></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f50898eeee026c0a6ffd62ae6458b47\" tg-width=\"622\" tg-height=\"419\"/></p><p>Secondly, valuations help explain why recent stock market declines during the Federal Reserve's policy shift have been more severe than before the dot-com bubble burst. The image below shows,<strong>The last three rate cuts all began when CAPE10 valuations were above the historical average.</strong>In contrast, previous examples all occurred when valuations were below average.</p><p><em>Note: CAPE (Cyclically Adjusted P/E), also known as Shiller P/E or P/E 10 ratio, is a valuation indicator commonly used in the U.S. S&P 500 stock market. It is defined as the price divided by the inflation-adjusted 10-year average income (moving average).</em></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1c2d76a2c5ad5be94c5856d8b792390a\" tg-width=\"798\" tg-height=\"536\"/></p><p>While CAPE's current valuation is not as high as it was at the end of 2021, it is about 50% higher than the average. Although the market has made some adjustments,<strong>Valuations may still return to or below average levels</strong>Just like in 2003 and 2009. Roberts said:</p><p>\"It is difficult to draw conclusions about the pullback/retracement in 2020. Unprecedented fiscal and monetary policies played a prominent role in boosting the stock market. Given inflation and political divisions, we believe that even if the market experiences a more severe decline now, it is unlikely that Federal Reserve members or politicians will increase fiscal and monetary stimulus.\"<strong>Market expectations for interest rate cuts are unrealistic.</strong></p><p>The Federal Reserve remained outspoken last week, stating its desire for inflation to return to its 2% target.<strong>If they are going to cut interest rates as quickly and sharply as the market predicts, then something must be wrong.</strong>。 Currently, interest rate cuts suggested by the market are only justified in severely unfavorable circumstances such as a banking crisis or a rapidly deteriorating economy. Please note,<strong>Neither a crisis nor a recession is good for a company's earnings or stock price.</strong></p><p>There is another point worth considering regarding the Federal Reserve's policy shift. If the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates, the yield curve may return to normal. Historically, an inverted yield curve has been a warning sign of a recession.</p><p>The chart below shows two highly anticipated U.S. Treasury Bond yield curves. In the four cases mentioned above (i.e., the pullback/retracement was larger than average) and in other cases prior to 1990, both steepening curves were accompanied by economic recessions. And<strong>Over the past two weeks, the 2-10 year US Treasury yield curve has steepened by 60 basis points.</strong></p><p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/361e1e203de45df7c9ee78346425ff90\" tg-width=\"799\" tg-height=\"538\"/></p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://xnews.jin10.com/webapp/details.html?id=109346&type=news&data_type=0\">金十数据</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0f9e9a265cb0e7e8cb195039b2fe24a4","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF博时","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","BK4581":"高盛持仓","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares",".DJI":"道琼斯","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","PSQ":"做空纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","BK4559":"巴菲特持仓","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares","BK4504":"桥水持仓","QLD":"2倍做多纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","BK4588":"碎股","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","QID":"两倍做空纳斯达克指数ETF-ProShares","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空","SPY":"标普500ETF","OEX":"标普100","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://xnews.jin10.com/webapp/details.html?id=109346&type=news&data_type=0","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2323678027","content_text":"市场都在押注美联储降息，但是以史为鉴，美联储降息对市场来说恐又是一场浩劫！RIA Advisors的投资分析师和投资组合经理罗伯维兹（Michael Lebowitz）撰文表示：“美联储降息并不代表牛市来了。”罗伯维兹称，押注美联储调整政策的股票投资者可能需要重新思考他们的逻辑。美国史上第二大银行倒闭案以及瑞士信贷大幅折价紧急出售，令投资者押注美联储将转向。他们似乎并不关心通胀的热度和粘性，而尽管危机不断发展，美联储仍然决心将利率“更长时间地保持在较高水平”。就像巴甫洛夫的狗一样，投资者在听到关键时刻的铃声时买入。如果以史为鉴，投资者的条件反射可能是有害的。降息总是“哀鸿遍野”自1970年以来，美联储曾9次大幅下调联邦基金利率。标普500指数从每个降息周期开始到市场低谷的平均最大回撤为27.25%。最近三次的跌幅都超过了平均水平，而在其他六次经历中，只有1974-1977年那次出现了比平均水平更糟的下降。那么，为什么最近几次的回撤都比1990年以前更严重呢？因为在1990年之前，美联储更为活跃。因此，他们不允许利率大幅高于或低于经济的自然增速。例外就是，上世纪70年代和80年代初的高通胀曾迫使美联储保持警惕。不管是什么原因，高利率有助于抑制投机泡沫。在过去20年里，美联储主导了低利率环境。下图显示，实际收益率（名义收益率减去通胀预期）40年来一直呈下降趋势。从疫情到美联储于2022年3月开始加息，10年期实际收益率经常为负数。当利率处于可预见的低水平时，投机活动往往盛行。正如我们所看到的，美联储在2020年和2021年的宽松政策所产生的投机行为，导致保守的银行家和激进的对冲基金承担了巨大的风险。因为如果不投资风险更高的产品，他们就必须接受负的实际回报，这对利润不利。美联储降息恐引发下一轮暴跌鉴于市场在2022年3月开始的加息周期中经历了相当大的下跌，与降息相关的大部分回撤是否已经发生了呢？下图显示了标普500指数从加息周期开始的最大回撤，加息周期的平均降幅为11.50%，但在本轮周期中却下跌了近25%。在判断美联储下一次转向会如何影响股市预期时，还有两个需要考虑的因素。首先，下图显示了降息期间的最大回撤以及降息结束后的一年回报率。从2020年5月到2021年5月，也就是上次降息后的一年时间里，标普500指数上涨了50%以上。这一比例是前8个周期平均回报率16%的三倍。因此，当前加息周期的最大降幅大于平均水平也就不足为奇了。其次，估值有助于解释为什么最近几次在美联储政策转向期间的股市下跌比互联网泡沫破裂前的更严重。下图显示，最近三次降息都是在CAPE10估值高于历史平均水平时开始的，相比之下，此前的例子都发生在低于平均估值的情况下。注：CAPE(周期性调整市盈率)又称希勒市盈率(Shiller P/E)或P/E 10比率，是一种通常用于美国标普500指数股市的估值指标。它的定义是价格除以经过通货膨胀调整的10年平均收入(移动平均)。目前的CAPE估值虽然没有2021年底那么高，但比平均水平高出约50%。尽管市场已经进行了一些调整，但估值仍可能回到平均水平或低于平均水平，就像2003年和2009年那样。罗伯维兹称：“很难对2020年的回撤做出结论。史无前例的财政和货币政策在提振股市方面发挥了突出作用。考虑到通胀和政治分歧，我们认为，现在就算市场出现更严重的下跌，美联储成员或政界人士都不太可能加大财政和货币政策的刺激。”市场对降息的预期并不现实美联储上周仍直言不讳地表示，希望通胀率回到2%的目标。如果他们要像市场预测的那样迅速且大幅降息，那一定是出了问题。目前，只有在银行业危机或经济迅速恶化的严重不利形势下，才有理由采取市场暗示的那种降息。请注意，无论是危机还是衰退，对公司收益和股价来说都不是好事。关于美联储的政策转向，还有一点值得考虑。如果美联储降息，收益率曲线可能会恢复正常。从历史上看，收益率曲线的倒挂只是衰退的警告。下图显示了两条备受关注的美国国债收益率曲线。在上述四种情况（即回撤幅度大于平均水平）和1990年之前的其他情况中，两条曲线变陡都伴随着经济衰退。而过去两周，2-10年期美债收益率曲线变陡了60个基点。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.6,"513500":0.6,"SSO":0.6,"DXD":0.6,"ESmain":0.6,"DDM":0.6,"TQQQ":0.6,"SDOW":0.6,"QID":0.6,"MNQmain":0.6,"DJX":0.6,"UDOW":0.6,"DOG":0.6,"SPY":1,"PSQ":0.6,".SPX":0.6,"SDS":0.6,"SQQQ":0.6,"QQQ":0.6,"SH":0.6,"NQmain":0.6,"UPRO":0.6,".DJI":1,"OEF":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"IVV":0.6,".IXIC":1,"OEX":0.6,"QLD":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3514,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":384271492,"gmtCreate":1613659194116,"gmtModify":1704883345652,"author":{"id":"3481012429279872","authorId":"3481012429279872","name":"华美虎","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/069e1f4d34b1cef685e7c8573928fad2","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3481012429279872","authorIdStr":"3481012429279872"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"an interesting company","listText":"an interesting company","text":"an interesting company","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/384271492","repostId":"1138482876","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3693,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"following","isTTM":true}