To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
mengseng
+Follow
Posts · 69
Posts · 69
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-08-20
?????
Tucson surged more than 15%, and it was said that it was overweight by the "bull market queen"
周四，图森未来低开高走，股价一路抬升，截至发稿涨幅扩大至15%。 市场消息，“牛市女皇”、ARK基金的创始人凯西·伍德（Catherine Wood）在周三增持图森未来约22.1万股，当日该股收涨2
Tucson surged more than 15%, and it was said that it was overweight by the "bull market queen"
看
4.73K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-08-13
???
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
5.18K
回复
1
点赞
4
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-08-10
???
TSMC's 3nm chips are officially mass-produced one year ahead of schedule, and Intel steals Apple's first adoption
此次英特尔向台积电下的订单包含带有集成显卡的三种服务器CPU，均为该公司的核心产品，首批数量约为4000片，明年7月正式量产。 据中国台湾经济日报，英特尔将成为第一家采用台积电3nm芯片制程的半导体
TSMC's 3nm chips are officially mass-produced one year ahead of schedule, and Intel steals Apple's first adoption
看
4.84K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-08-08
???
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
5.90K
回复
1
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-08-05
???
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
4.35K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-08-04
???
Foreign Media Headlines: Household Debt in the Second Quarter of the United States Increased by the Largest Increase in 2013
在抵押贷款热潮推动下，第二季度美国家庭债务创下2013年以来最快增速。低借贷成本以及对更宽敞居家办公空间的渴望催生了房贷需求。 纽约联储周二公布报告显示 ，截至6月底，家庭负债增长3130亿美元，至14.96万亿美元，较三个月前增长2.1%。 总体而言，家庭债务占经济的比重仍远低于2008年金融危机前几年创下的高点。而且一些借款余额仍低于疫情爆发前水平。
Foreign Media Headlines: Household Debt in the Second Quarter of the United States Increased by the Largest Increase in 2013
看
4.08K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-07-31
???
AMD rose more than 3% to a record high, and received a number of major banks to raise their target prices after the results
7月30日，AMD涨超3%，现报106.2美元，股价再创历史新高，近3个交易日累计涨幅已超16%，绩后获多家大行上调目标价。 AMD二季度营收达38.5亿美元，同比增长99%；净利润达7.1亿美元，
AMD rose more than 3% to a record high, and received a number of major banks to raise their target prices after the results
看
3.85K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-07-28
???
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
7.54K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-07-28
?
Chinese Concept Stocks Exit from the US Market, Could This Happen?
谁都不希望坏事发生，但如果发生，也不至于措手不及。
Chinese Concept Stocks Exit from the US Market, Could This Happen?
看
4.05K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
mengseng
mengseng
·
2021-07-26
???
[Change] Intel fell more than 5%, CEO said chip shortage will last until 2023
7月23日，英特尔跌超5%，CEO 称芯片短缺将持续至2023年。 业界越来越多的人认为，芯片供应中断不会很快得到解决，Gelsinger的预测为这种观点增添了业内领先人物的声音。 在周四的采访中，他
[Change] Intel fell more than 5%, CEO said chip shortage will last until 2023
看
4.97K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3579764409572228","uuid":"3579764409572228","gmtCreate":1616670385673,"gmtModify":1623244611910,"name":"mengseng","pinyin":"mengseng","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":3,"tweetSize":69,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":2,"name":"无畏虎","nameTw":"無畏虎","represent":"初生牛犊","factor":"发布3条非转发主帖,1条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.05.04","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"cbe1c45c584340f3bd9ae6c77e0e9981-1","templateUuid":"cbe1c45c584340f3bd9ae6c77e0e9981","name":"Academy Experiencer","description":"5 lessons learned","bigImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/fb5ae275631fb96a92d475cdc85d2302","smallImgUrl":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/c2660a1935bd2105e97c9915619936c3","grayImgUrl":null,"redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.08.06","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":2006,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.02.25","exceedPercentage":"93.89%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.23","exceedPercentage":"93.63%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLinkType":null,"redirectLink":null,"redirectLinkValidityFrom":null,"redirectLinkValidityTo":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100,"isScarce":0,"effectConfig":null,"effectEnabled":0,"plateImgUrl":null,"plateColors":null,"validityTo":null,"validityToTimestamp":null,"wearingSort":0}],"userBadgeCount":6,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":1,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":838264107,"gmtCreate":1629414609709,"gmtModify":1676530030702,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?????","listText":"?????","text":"?????","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/838264107","repostId":"1177892933","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1177892933","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1629388917,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1177892933?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-20 00:01","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Tucson surged more than 15%, and it was said that it was overweight by the \"bull market queen\"","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1177892933","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"周四，图森未来低开高走，股价一路抬升，截至发稿涨幅扩大至15%。\n\n市场消息，“牛市女皇”、ARK基金的创始人凯西·伍德（Catherine Wood）在周三增持图森未来约22.1万股，当日该股收涨2","content":"<p>On Thursday,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSP\">TuSimple</a>open low went high, and its share price rose all the way, expanding to 15% as of press time.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1212649a8e8e4b1eda6464876147076\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>According to market news, Catherine Wood, the \"bull queen\" and founder of ARK Fund, increased her holdings of TuSimple by about 221,000 shares on Wednesday, and the stock closed up 2.65% on that day.</p><p>In terms of performance, TuSimple achieved revenue of US$1.482 million in the second quarter of 2021, representing a year-over-year increase of 463.5% and a quarter-over-quarter increase of 57%; Net loss was US$117 million, an increase of 316.6% year-on-year; Operating loss was $121 million, a year-over-year expansion of 331.8%.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tucson surged more than 15%, and it was said that it was overweight by the \"bull market queen\"</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTucson surged more than 15%, and it was said that it was overweight by the \"bull market queen\"\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-20 00:01</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>On Thursday,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSP\">TuSimple</a>open low went high, and its share price rose all the way, expanding to 15% as of press time.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e1212649a8e8e4b1eda6464876147076\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>According to market news, Catherine Wood, the \"bull queen\" and founder of ARK Fund, increased her holdings of TuSimple by about 221,000 shares on Wednesday, and the stock closed up 2.65% on that day.</p><p>In terms of performance, TuSimple achieved revenue of US$1.482 million in the second quarter of 2021, representing a year-over-year increase of 463.5% and a quarter-over-quarter increase of 57%; Net loss was US$117 million, an increase of 316.6% year-on-year; Operating loss was $121 million, a year-over-year expansion of 331.8%.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3b9accdc5716a7368b1240a904c5b874","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1177892933","content_text":"周四，图森未来低开高走，股价一路抬升，截至发稿涨幅扩大至15%。\n\n市场消息，“牛市女皇”、ARK基金的创始人凯西·伍德（Catherine Wood）在周三增持图森未来约22.1万股，当日该股收涨2.65%。\n业绩方面，2021年第二季度图森未来实现营收148.2万美元，同比增长463.5%，环比上一季度增长57%；净亏损为1.17亿美元，同比扩大316.6%；运营亏损1.21亿美元，同比扩大331.8%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSP":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4727,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":894109547,"gmtCreate":1628809820889,"gmtModify":1676529859143,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/894109547","repostId":"1160603020","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5176,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896349714,"gmtCreate":1628558503538,"gmtModify":1703508054394,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/896349714","repostId":"1167003752","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1167003752","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"追踪全球财经热点，精选影响您财富的资讯，投资理财必备神器！","home_visible":1,"media_name":"华尔街见闻","id":"1084101182","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/66809d1f5c2e43e2bdf15820c6d6897e"},"pubTimestamp":1628558299,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1167003752?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-10 09:18","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"TSMC's 3nm chips are officially mass-produced one year ahead of schedule, and Intel steals Apple's first adoption","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1167003752","media":"华尔街见闻","summary":"此次英特尔向台积电下的订单包含带有集成显卡的三种服务器CPU，均为该公司的核心产品，首批数量约为4000片，明年7月正式量产。\n\n据中国台湾经济日报，英特尔将成为第一家采用台积电3nm芯片制程的半导体","content":"<p>This time<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>To<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The order includes three server CPUs with integrated graphics cards, all of which are the core products of the company. The first batch is about 4,000 pieces, which will be officially mass-produced in July next year. According to Taiwan Economic Daily, Intel will be the first semiconductor company to adopt TSMC's 3nm chip process. This process will be used to produce server chips. It is expected that the film will be put into TSMC's 18b factory in the second quarter of next year, and it will be officially mass-produced in July. The actual mass-production time is one year ahead of the original plan.</p><p>For a long time, TSMC's state-of-the-art chip manufacturing processes have generally been<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>As the first customer, it mainly produced the A-series processors of the latest iPhone that year.</p><p>This partnership between Intel and TSMC means that the company affirms that TSMC is ahead of<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>The dominant position of. According to TSMC's previous statement, 3nm processability can be improved by 10~15% compared with 5nm, and power consumption can be reduced by 25~30%.</p><p>China Taiwan Economic Daily quoted TSMC suppliers as saying that Intel's order to TSMC this time includes three server CPUs with integrated graphics cards, all of which are the company's core products, with the first batch of about 4,000 pieces.</p><p>Recently, Liu Deyin, chairman of TSMC, answered a shareholder's question, \"What do you think of Intel's involvement in wafer foundry?\" He emphasized that \"Intel is a customer of TSMC, and we believe that Intel will adopt TSMC's most advanced technology\". The implication seems to be that Intel and its cooperation in the production of 3nm chips have long been concluded.</p><p>As of yesterday's closing of U.S. stocks, Intel's share price was reported at $54.05, up 0.24%; TSMC shares were trading at $118.22, up 0.01%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc745ca5f258c25e7fb72f90285fa61e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dfc30fe83cc22ec1d2c8172e669f59a1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>TSMC's 3nm chips are officially mass-produced one year ahead of schedule, and Intel steals Apple's first adoption</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTSMC's 3nm chips are officially mass-produced one year ahead of schedule, and Intel steals Apple's first adoption\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1084101182\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/66809d1f5c2e43e2bdf15820c6d6897e);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">华尔街见闻 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-08-10 09:18</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>This time<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>To<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSM\">TSMC</a>The order includes three server CPUs with integrated graphics cards, all of which are the core products of the company. The first batch is about 4,000 pieces, which will be officially mass-produced in July next year. According to Taiwan Economic Daily, Intel will be the first semiconductor company to adopt TSMC's 3nm chip process. This process will be used to produce server chips. It is expected that the film will be put into TSMC's 18b factory in the second quarter of next year, and it will be officially mass-produced in July. The actual mass-production time is one year ahead of the original plan.</p><p>For a long time, TSMC's state-of-the-art chip manufacturing processes have generally been<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a>As the first customer, it mainly produced the A-series processors of the latest iPhone that year.</p><p>This partnership between Intel and TSMC means that the company affirms that TSMC is ahead of<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SMSN.UK\">Samsung</a>The dominant position of. According to TSMC's previous statement, 3nm processability can be improved by 10~15% compared with 5nm, and power consumption can be reduced by 25~30%.</p><p>China Taiwan Economic Daily quoted TSMC suppliers as saying that Intel's order to TSMC this time includes three server CPUs with integrated graphics cards, all of which are the company's core products, with the first batch of about 4,000 pieces.</p><p>Recently, Liu Deyin, chairman of TSMC, answered a shareholder's question, \"What do you think of Intel's involvement in wafer foundry?\" He emphasized that \"Intel is a customer of TSMC, and we believe that Intel will adopt TSMC's most advanced technology\". The implication seems to be that Intel and its cooperation in the production of 3nm chips have long been concluded.</p><p>As of yesterday's closing of U.S. stocks, Intel's share price was reported at $54.05, up 0.24%; TSMC shares were trading at $118.22, up 0.01%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fc745ca5f258c25e7fb72f90285fa61e\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dfc30fe83cc22ec1d2c8172e669f59a1\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/975836d8c6eb511241583dccb0d387f2","relate_stocks":{"159813":"芯片","EWT":"台湾ETF-iShares MSCI","03145":"华夏亚洲高息股","INTC":"英特尔","TSM":"台积电","AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1167003752","content_text":"此次英特尔向台积电下的订单包含带有集成显卡的三种服务器CPU，均为该公司的核心产品，首批数量约为4000片，明年7月正式量产。\n\n据中国台湾经济日报，英特尔将成为第一家采用台积电3nm芯片制程的半导体公司。该制程将用于生产服务器芯片，预计明年二季度开始在台积电18b厂投片，7月份正式量产，实际量产时间较原计划提前一年。\n长期以来，台积电最先进的芯片制程通常以苹果作为第一个客户，主要生产当年最新款iPhone的A系列处理器。\n英特尔与台积电的本次合作，意味着该公司肯定台积电领先于三星的优势地位。按照台积电此前的说法，3nm工艺性较5nm能提升10~15%，功耗降低25~30%。\n中国台湾经济日报援引台积电供应商称，此次英特尔向台积电下的订单包含带有集成显卡的三种服务器CPU，均为该公司的核心产品，首批数量约为4000片。\n近日，台积电董事长刘德音答股东问“如何看待英特尔涉足晶圆代工时强调“英特尔是台积电的客户，我们相信英特尔会采用台积电的最先进技术”。言下之意似乎对英特尔与其合作3纳米芯片生产早有定论。\n截至昨日美股收盘，英特尔股价报54.05美元，涨0.24%；台积电股价报118.22美元，涨0.01%。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"159813":0.9,"TWmain":0.9,"AAPL":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"EWT":0.9,"TSM":0.9,"03145":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4840,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891466099,"gmtCreate":1628413014211,"gmtModify":1703506035456,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/891466099","repostId":"1183188196","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":5903,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":890549697,"gmtCreate":1628125594719,"gmtModify":1703501638499,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/890549697","repostId":"2157748502","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4346,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807873964,"gmtCreate":1628032597958,"gmtModify":1703499790819,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/807873964","repostId":"2156201911","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2156201911","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628026500,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2156201911?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-04 05:35","market":"sh","language":"zh","title":"Foreign Media Headlines: Household Debt in the Second Quarter of the United States Increased by the Largest Increase in 2013","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2156201911","media":"新浪财经","summary":" 在抵押贷款热潮推动下，第二季度美国家庭债务创下2013年以来最快增速。低借贷成本以及对更宽敞居家办公空间的渴望催生了房贷需求。 纽约联储周二公布报告显示 ，截至6月底，家庭负债增长3130亿美元，至14.96万亿美元，较三个月前增长2.1%。 总体而言，家庭债务占经济的比重仍远低于2008年金融危机前几年创下的高点。而且一些借款余额仍低于疫情爆发前水平。","content":"<p><b>The headlines that the global financial media paid common attention to last night and this morning mainly include:</b></p><p><b>1. Mortgage boom drives U.S. household debt to the biggest increase since 2013</b><b>2. French Commerce Bank: It is expected that the Federal Reserve will wait until after the 2024 election before rate hike</b><b>3. US SEC Chairman Gensler guides the way for Bitcoin ETF: accept strict supervision</b><b>4. The Delta variant virus is fierce and the threshold of herd immunity is expected to be pushed up to more than 80%</b><b>5. The world's biggest banks made $170 billion in profit during the epidemic, the most profitable year ever</b><b>6. Britain is reported to be considering blocking the largest US chipmaker due to national security concerns<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA</a>Acquisition of Arm</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/42d7305c68055f3de54cae5c51091b1e\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Mortgage boom drives U.S. household debt to biggest rise since 2013</b></p><p>U.S. household debt grew at the fastest pace since 2013 in the second quarter, fueled by the mortgage boom. Low borrowing costs and a desire for more spacious home office space have spawned demand for mortgages.</p><p>Household debt rose $313 billion to $14.96 trillion at the end of June, up 2.1% from three months ago, according to a report released by the New York Fed on Tuesday. The increase was mainly from mortgage balances.</p><p>Credit standards have been easing for other types of credit, such as auto loans and credit cards, according to the Federal Reserve's July Senior Lending Commissioner Opinion Survey released Monday.</p><p>Overall, household debt as a share of the economy remains well below the highs reached in the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. And some borrowing balances remain below pre-pandemic levels.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e8de5a34c997f13ec1aab21f9a9b5ef\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Fed is expected to wait until after 2024 election before rate hike: Fédération</b></p><p>Bond investors expecting the Fed to change course may have to wait a long time.</p><p>\"My guess is that we won't tighten policy until after the next presidential election,\" Joseph LaVorgna, chief economist for the Americas at Commerce France, said in an interview Tuesday. \"You look at the last two cycles, the average time from the last rate cut to the first rate hike is seven years. So it's really not that unusual.\"</p><p>LaVorgna served as a financial markets and economic adviser to former U.S. President Donald Trump, where he served as special assistant and chief economist at the National Economic Council. He said that after strong growth this year, economic growth is poised to slow in 2022, putting little pressure on the Fed to take interest rate action.</p><p>\"Next year I think growth is only 2% or even lower,\" he said. \"Inflation will be temporary. That's what the market is telling us.\"</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efff1ba5fb6313b1cce4bfb7b8dde08f\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"378\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>U.S. SEC Chairman Gensler Shows the Way for Bitcoin ETFs: Accept Strict Regulation</b></p><p>Gary Gensler, chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hinted at a path to approve the establishment of Bitcoin ETFs, saying that ETFs that meet the SEC's strict rules on mutual funds can provide investors with the necessary protection.</p><p>Crypto enthusiasts believe that Bitcoin ETFs are essential for cryptocurrencies to enter the mainstream. In his first major speech on cryptocurrencies, Gensler also hinted at an openness to Bitcoin futures-focused ETFs. The futures are offered by CME group and require investors to put up a substantial margin.</p><p>\"With these important safeguards in place, I look forward to staff review of such applications, especially if these ETFs are limited to CME-traded Bitcoin futures,\" he said in a speech prepared for the Aspen Safety Forum on Tuesday.</p><p>Under Gensler and former Chairman Jay Clayton, the SEC has repeatedly refused to approve cryptocurrency ETFs, concerned about transparency and risk of manipulation in the Bitcoin spot market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5b16f07eb7d6ece2c21db131847c236\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"373\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Delta variant virus is fierce and the threshold of herd immunity is expected to be pushed up to more than 80%</b></p><p>The spread of the delta coronavirus variant has pushed the threshold for herd immunity above 80 percent and could approach 90 percent, the American Society for Infectious Diseases said Tuesday at a briefing.</p><p>Richard Franco, an assistant professor at the University of Alabama, said this is \"much higher\" than previous estimates of 60 to 70 percent because delta has twice the spread rate of previous viruses.</p><p>\"Obviously this is a very dangerous virus, much more dangerous than the original virus,\" Franco said.</p><p>Herd immunity is based on the idea that immunization when a certain percentage of the population has been vaccinated or has been previously infected will help protect the wider population and reduce the spread of the virus.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b52ef92fbf36ab71df9cf269a097a761\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>The world's biggest banks earn $170 billion in pandemic, record their most profitable year ever</b></p><p>The dust has settled on earnings season and the combined profits of more than a dozen of the biggest banks over the past four quarters exceeded $170 billion, underscoring how dramatically the industry has changed from the downturn of the early pandemic.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>Especially good, earning the equivalent of $131 million a day.</p><p>Some successful deals in the early days of COVID helped the industry. As last year's market volatility recedes, investment bankers are poised to drive acquisition and fundraising activities through special purpose acquisition vehicles. Then as the world economy began to recover, banks with wealth management and asset management divisions enjoyed the dividends of the stock market. The same trend has benefited the retail division, which has long been seen as a drag on performance, as they begin to cut loan loss provisions.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MS\">Morgan Stanley</a>Both break their own earnings records, European peers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>And Barclays' profits were at their highest levels in a decade.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DB\">Deutsche Bank</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0J6Y.UK\">Société Générale</a>And other banks said their businesses had benefited from the improving global economy. Bank stocks reflect the impact of this wave of strong results, Dow Jones<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a>The industry index has risen 59% over the past year, and the European Stoxx index has risen 56%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a80a0b994f4a61751162e92c143ca57c\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"277\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>The UK is reportedly considering blocking Nvidia's acquisition of Arm, the largest US chipmaker, over national security concerns</b></p><p>The United Kingdom is considering blocking Nvidia's acquisition of Arm Ltd. due to potential national security risks, according to people familiar with the matter.</p><p>Nvidia, the largest chip company in the United States by market value, announced last September that it would acquire Arm for $40 billion to expand its territory in the rapidly growing semiconductor market. Arm is currently owned by Japanese conglomerate SoftBank.</p><p>In April, Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden asked the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to prepare a report on whether the deal could be considered anti-competitive and to aggregate any national security concerns raised by third parties.</p><p>The assessment, released at the end of July, contains national security concerns, and the UK is currently inclined to dismiss the deal. Another person familiar with the matter said the UK could take a more in-depth assessment of the merger due to national security concerns.</p>","source":"sina","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Foreign Media Headlines: Household Debt in the Second Quarter of the United States Increased by the Largest Increase in 2013</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nForeign Media Headlines: Household Debt in the Second Quarter of the United States Increased by the Largest Increase in 2013\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">新浪财经</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-04 05:35</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b>The headlines that the global financial media paid common attention to last night and this morning mainly include:</b></p><p><b>1. Mortgage boom drives U.S. household debt to the biggest increase since 2013</b><b>2. French Commerce Bank: It is expected that the Federal Reserve will wait until after the 2024 election before rate hike</b><b>3. US SEC Chairman Gensler guides the way for Bitcoin ETF: accept strict supervision</b><b>4. The Delta variant virus is fierce and the threshold of herd immunity is expected to be pushed up to more than 80%</b><b>5. The world's biggest banks made $170 billion in profit during the epidemic, the most profitable year ever</b><b>6. Britain is reported to be considering blocking the largest US chipmaker due to national security concerns<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/NVDA\">NVIDIA</a>Acquisition of Arm</b><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/42d7305c68055f3de54cae5c51091b1e\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"334\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Mortgage boom drives U.S. household debt to biggest rise since 2013</b></p><p>U.S. household debt grew at the fastest pace since 2013 in the second quarter, fueled by the mortgage boom. Low borrowing costs and a desire for more spacious home office space have spawned demand for mortgages.</p><p>Household debt rose $313 billion to $14.96 trillion at the end of June, up 2.1% from three months ago, according to a report released by the New York Fed on Tuesday. The increase was mainly from mortgage balances.</p><p>Credit standards have been easing for other types of credit, such as auto loans and credit cards, according to the Federal Reserve's July Senior Lending Commissioner Opinion Survey released Monday.</p><p>Overall, household debt as a share of the economy remains well below the highs reached in the years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis. And some borrowing balances remain below pre-pandemic levels.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6e8de5a34c997f13ec1aab21f9a9b5ef\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Fed is expected to wait until after 2024 election before rate hike: Fédération</b></p><p>Bond investors expecting the Fed to change course may have to wait a long time.</p><p>\"My guess is that we won't tighten policy until after the next presidential election,\" Joseph LaVorgna, chief economist for the Americas at Commerce France, said in an interview Tuesday. \"You look at the last two cycles, the average time from the last rate cut to the first rate hike is seven years. So it's really not that unusual.\"</p><p>LaVorgna served as a financial markets and economic adviser to former U.S. President Donald Trump, where he served as special assistant and chief economist at the National Economic Council. He said that after strong growth this year, economic growth is poised to slow in 2022, putting little pressure on the Fed to take interest rate action.</p><p>\"Next year I think growth is only 2% or even lower,\" he said. \"Inflation will be temporary. That's what the market is telling us.\"</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/efff1ba5fb6313b1cce4bfb7b8dde08f\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"378\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>U.S. SEC Chairman Gensler Shows the Way for Bitcoin ETFs: Accept Strict Regulation</b></p><p>Gary Gensler, chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, hinted at a path to approve the establishment of Bitcoin ETFs, saying that ETFs that meet the SEC's strict rules on mutual funds can provide investors with the necessary protection.</p><p>Crypto enthusiasts believe that Bitcoin ETFs are essential for cryptocurrencies to enter the mainstream. In his first major speech on cryptocurrencies, Gensler also hinted at an openness to Bitcoin futures-focused ETFs. The futures are offered by CME group and require investors to put up a substantial margin.</p><p>\"With these important safeguards in place, I look forward to staff review of such applications, especially if these ETFs are limited to CME-traded Bitcoin futures,\" he said in a speech prepared for the Aspen Safety Forum on Tuesday.</p><p>Under Gensler and former Chairman Jay Clayton, the SEC has repeatedly refused to approve cryptocurrency ETFs, concerned about transparency and risk of manipulation in the Bitcoin spot market.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5b16f07eb7d6ece2c21db131847c236\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"373\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Delta variant virus is fierce and the threshold of herd immunity is expected to be pushed up to more than 80%</b></p><p>The spread of the delta coronavirus variant has pushed the threshold for herd immunity above 80 percent and could approach 90 percent, the American Society for Infectious Diseases said Tuesday at a briefing.</p><p>Richard Franco, an assistant professor at the University of Alabama, said this is \"much higher\" than previous estimates of 60 to 70 percent because delta has twice the spread rate of previous viruses.</p><p>\"Obviously this is a very dangerous virus, much more dangerous than the original virus,\" Franco said.</p><p>Herd immunity is based on the idea that immunization when a certain percentage of the population has been vaccinated or has been previously infected will help protect the wider population and reduce the spread of the virus.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b52ef92fbf36ab71df9cf269a097a761\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"285\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>The world's biggest banks earn $170 billion in pandemic, record their most profitable year ever</b></p><p>The dust has settled on earnings season and the combined profits of more than a dozen of the biggest banks over the past four quarters exceeded $170 billion, underscoring how dramatically the industry has changed from the downturn of the early pandemic.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JPM\">JPMorgan Chase</a>Especially good, earning the equivalent of $131 million a day.</p><p>Some successful deals in the early days of COVID helped the industry. As last year's market volatility recedes, investment bankers are poised to drive acquisition and fundraising activities through special purpose acquisition vehicles. Then as the world economy began to recover, banks with wealth management and asset management divisions enjoyed the dividends of the stock market. The same trend has benefited the retail division, which has long been seen as a drag on performance, as they begin to cut loan loss provisions.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MS\">Morgan Stanley</a>Both break their own earnings records, European peers<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UBS\">UBS</a>And Barclays' profits were at their highest levels in a decade.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DB\">Deutsche Bank</a>And<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/0J6Y.UK\">Société Générale</a>And other banks said their businesses had benefited from the improving global economy. Bank stocks reflect the impact of this wave of strong results, Dow Jones<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BAC\">Bank of America</a>The industry index has risen 59% over the past year, and the European Stoxx index has risen 56%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a80a0b994f4a61751162e92c143ca57c\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"277\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>The UK is reportedly considering blocking Nvidia's acquisition of Arm, the largest US chipmaker, over national security concerns</b></p><p>The United Kingdom is considering blocking Nvidia's acquisition of Arm Ltd. due to potential national security risks, according to people familiar with the matter.</p><p>Nvidia, the largest chip company in the United States by market value, announced last September that it would acquire Arm for $40 billion to expand its territory in the rapidly growing semiconductor market. Arm is currently owned by Japanese conglomerate SoftBank.</p><p>In April, Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden asked the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to prepare a report on whether the deal could be considered anti-competitive and to aggregate any national security concerns raised by third parties.</p><p>The assessment, released at the end of July, contains national security concerns, and the UK is currently inclined to dismiss the deal. Another person familiar with the matter said the UK could take a more in-depth assessment of the merger due to national security concerns.</p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source：<a href=\"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-08-04/doc-ikqciyzk9379676.shtml\">新浪财经</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5b16f07eb7d6ece2c21db131847c236","relate_stocks":{"161125":"标普500","513500":"标普500ETF博时","DJX":"1/100道琼斯","OEX":"标普100","OEF":"标普100指数ETF-iShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","QID":"两倍做空纳斯达克指数ETF-ProShares","SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares","CAN":"嘉楠科技","QQQ":"纳指100ETF","EBON":"亿邦国际",".DJI":"道琼斯","PSQ":"做空纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空","QLD":"2倍做多纳斯达克100指数ETF-ProShares",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares"},"source_url":"https://finance.sina.com.cn/stock/usstock/c/2021-08-04/doc-ikqciyzk9379676.shtml","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/b0d1b7e8843deea78cc308b15114de44","article_id":"2156201911","content_text":"全球财经媒体昨夜今晨共同关注的头条新闻主要有：\n\n1、抵押贷款热潮推动美国家庭债务创2013年以来最大增幅\n\n\n2、法国外贸银行：预计美联储要等到2024年大选后才加息\n\n\n3、美国SEC主席根斯勒为比特币ETF指路：接受严格监管\n\n\n4、Delta变种病毒来势凶猛 群体免疫门槛料被推高至80%以上\n\n\n5、全球大银行疫情中盈利1700亿美元 创下有史以来最赚钱的一年\n\n\n6、英国据悉因国家安全关切考虑阻止美国最大芯片商英伟达收购Arm\n\n\n抵押贷款热潮推动美国家庭债务创2013年以来最大增幅\n在抵押贷款热潮推动下，第二季度美国家庭债务创下2013年以来最快增速。低借贷成本以及对更宽敞居家办公空间的渴望催生了房贷需求。\n纽约联储周二公布报告显示 ，截至6月底，家庭负债增长3130亿美元，至14.96万亿美元，较三个月前增长2.1%。增量主要来自抵押贷款余额。\n美联储周一公布的7月高级贷款专员意见调查显示，对于其他类型的信贷，例如汽车贷款和信用卡，信贷标准一直在放松。\n总体而言，家庭债务占经济的比重仍远低于2008年金融危机前几年创下的高点。而且一些借款余额仍低于疫情爆发前水平。\n\n法国外贸银行：预计美联储要等到2024年大选后才加息\n期待美联储改弦更张的债券投资者可能要等很久。\n“我的猜测是我们要等到下一次总统大选之后才会收紧政策，”法国外贸银行首席美洲经济学家Joseph LaVorgna周二接受采访时表示。“你看看最近两个周期，从最后一次降息到第一次加息的平均时间是七年。所以这真不是那么不寻常。”\nLaVorgna曾任美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普的金融市场和经济顾问，职务是国家经济委员会特别助理兼首席经济学家。他表示，在今年强劲增长后，2022年经济增长势将放缓，令美联储采取利率行动的压力不大。\n“明年我认为增长率只有2%，甚至更低，”他说。“通胀将是暂时的。这是市场告诉我们的。”\n\n美国SEC主席根斯勒为比特币ETF指路：接受严格监管\n美国证券交易委员会主席根斯勒（Gary Gensler）暗示了一条批准设立比特币ETF的途径，表示符合SEC关于共同基金严格规则的ETF能给投资者提供必要的保护。\n加密货币爱好者认为，比特币ETF对于加密货币进入主流领域至关重要。在他首次有关加密货币的重要演讲中，Gensler还暗示对专注于比特币期货的ETF持开放态度。这种期货由芝商所提供，并要求投资者拿出可观的保证金。\n“有了这些重要的保护措施，我期待工作人员对此类申请进行审查，特别是如果这些ETF仅限于CME交易的比特币期货，”他在周二为阿斯彭安全论坛准备的讲话中表示。\n在Gensler及前任主席Jay Clayton领导下，SEC多次拒绝批准加密货币ETF，担心比特币现货市场的透明度和操纵风险。\n\nDelta变种病毒来势凶猛 群体免疫门槛料被推高至80%以上\n美国传染病学会周二在一次情况通报会上表示，delta新冠病毒变种的传播已将群体免疫的门槛推高至80%以上，并可能接近90%。\n阿拉巴马大学助理教授Richard Franco表示，这比之前估计的60%至70%“高得多”，因为delta的传播率是先前病毒的两倍。\n“显然这是一种非常危险的病毒，比原始病毒危险得多，” Franco说。\n群体免疫是基于这样的想法：当一定比例的人口已经接种疫苗或之前曾感染而获得免疫，将有助于保护更广泛的人群并减少病毒的传播。\n\n全球大银行疫情中盈利1700亿美元 创下有史以来最赚钱的一年\n财报季尘埃落定，十几家最大银行过去四个季度的利润总和超过1700亿美元，彰显出该行业与疫情早期的低迷相比发生了多么巨大的变化。摩根大通尤为出色，所获利润相当于每天赚进1.31亿美元。\n新冠疫情早期一些成功的交易帮助了该行业。随着去年的市场波动消退，投资银行家准备通过特殊目的收购工具来推动收购和筹资活动。然后随着世界经济开始复苏，拥有财富管理和资产管理部门的银行享受到了股市的红利。同样的趋势也惠及长期以来被视为拖业绩后腿的零售部门，因为他们开始削减贷款损失拨备。\n高盛和摩根士丹利双双打破自身盈利纪录，欧洲同行瑞银和巴克莱的利润都创十年来最高水平。德意志银行和法国兴业银行等银行表示业务受益于全球经济改善。银行股反映了这一波强劲业绩的影响，道琼斯美国银行业指数过去一年上涨59%，欧洲斯托克银行股指数上涨56%。\n\n英国据悉因国家安全关切考虑阻止美国最大芯片商英伟达收购Arm\n据知情人士透露，英国因潜在国家安全风险正考虑阻止英伟达收购Arm Ltd．。\n按市值计算美国最大芯片公司英伟达去年9月宣布以400亿美元收购Arm，以在发展迅猛的半导体市场扩大地盘。Arm目前为日本企业集团软银所有。\n今年4月，英国文化大臣Oliver Dowden要求竞争和市场管理局（CMA）准备一份有关该交易是否可被视为反竞争的报告，并汇总第三方提出的任何国家安全关切。\n7月底出炉的评估报告包含国家安全关切，英国目前倾向于否定该交易。另一位知情人士表示，出于国家安全考虑，英国可能会对这笔并购进行更深入的评估。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"161125":0.9,"513500":0.9,"IVV":0.9,"NQmain":0.9,".DJI":0.9,"UPRO":0.9,"SQQQ":0.9,"DOG":0.9,"QLD":0.9,"OEF":0.9,"SDS":0.9,"SH":0.9,"TQQQ":0.9,"DXD":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SDOW":0.9,"ESmain":0.9,"DJX":0.9,"EBON":0.9,"PSQ":0.9,"MNQmain":0.9,"DDM":0.9,"OEX":0.9,"SSO":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"CAN":0.9,"QQQ":0.9,"XBTmain":0.9,"BTCmain":0.9,"UDOW":0.9,"QID":0.9,"SPXU":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4080,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806564390,"gmtCreate":1627680566410,"gmtModify":1703494497374,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806564390","repostId":"1114965747","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1114965747","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627655569,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1114965747?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:32","market":"other","language":"zh","title":"AMD rose more than 3% to a record high, and received a number of major banks to raise their target prices after the results","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1114965747","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"7月30日，AMD涨超3%，现报106.2美元，股价再创历史新高，近3个交易日累计涨幅已超16%，绩后获多家大行上调目标价。\n\nAMD二季度营收达38.5亿美元，同比增长99%；净利润达7.1亿美元，","content":"<p>July 30,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>It rose by more than 3%, now reported at $106.2, and the stock price reached a record high. In the past three trading days, the cumulative increase has exceeded 16%. After the results, many major banks raised the target price.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ff371be500c72b396cac54bbf67a525\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>AMD's revenue in the second quarter reached $3.85 billion, a year-on-year increase of 99%; Net income reached $710 million, up 352% year over year. After the company's results, a number of major banks raised their target prices.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Arguing that Wall Street underestimated AMD's potential for long-and short-term revenue growth and margin expansion, it raised its price target to $115 from $106. Goldman Sachs reiterated its \"Buy\" rating on Supermicro, while reiterating where Supermicro sits on its Confident Buy list.</p><p>AMD price target raised to $110 from $107 at Mizuho; Argus rose to $120 from a price target of $106, maintaining a \"buy\" rating.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD rose more than 3% to a record high, and received a number of major banks to raise their target prices after the results</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD rose more than 3% to a record high, and received a number of major banks to raise their target prices after the results\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-30 22:32</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>July 30,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMD\">AMD</a>It rose by more than 3%, now reported at $106.2, and the stock price reached a record high. In the past three trading days, the cumulative increase has exceeded 16%. After the results, many major banks raised the target price.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ff371be500c72b396cac54bbf67a525\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>AMD's revenue in the second quarter reached $3.85 billion, a year-on-year increase of 99%; Net income reached $710 million, up 352% year over year. After the company's results, a number of major banks raised their target prices.<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GS\">Goldman Sachs</a>Arguing that Wall Street underestimated AMD's potential for long-and short-term revenue growth and margin expansion, it raised its price target to $115 from $106. Goldman Sachs reiterated its \"Buy\" rating on Supermicro, while reiterating where Supermicro sits on its Confident Buy list.</p><p>AMD price target raised to $110 from $107 at Mizuho; Argus rose to $120 from a price target of $106, maintaining a \"buy\" rating.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a593d85be38c3aa543ab3056553101ff","relate_stocks":{"GS":"高盛","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1114965747","content_text":"7月30日，AMD涨超3%，现报106.2美元，股价再创历史新高，近3个交易日累计涨幅已超16%，绩后获多家大行上调目标价。\n\nAMD二季度营收达38.5亿美元，同比增长99%；净利润达7.1亿美元，同比增长352%。公司绩后获多家大行上调目标价，高盛认为华尔街低估了AMD的长短期收入增长和利润率扩张的潜力，因此将其目标价从106美元上调至115美元。高盛重申了美国超微公司“买入”评级，同时重申美国超微公司在其确信购买名单上的位置。\n瑞穗将AMD目标价从107美元上调至110美元；Argus从目标价106美元升至120美元，维持“买入”评级。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AMD":0.9,"GS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3849,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803360000,"gmtCreate":1627421480300,"gmtModify":1703489466813,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803360000","repostId":"1168202239","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":7539,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":803384752,"gmtCreate":1627421314776,"gmtModify":1703489464968,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/803384752","repostId":"1120859674","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1120859674","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"秦朔朋友圈是由中国著名媒体人、财经观察家秦朔牵头创立的一个新媒体与专业服务品牌，包括微信公众号、微博、视频节目、音频节目等。内容聚焦于经济、金融和商业领域，关注重点为全球和中国财经商业热点、企业家精神、创新与发明创造、商业文明探索等。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"秦朔朋友圈","id":"60","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/707686f07ebc41778130c729f4eea24e"},"pubTimestamp":1627352185,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1120859674?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-27 10:16","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Chinese Concept Stocks Exit from the US Market, Could This Happen?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1120859674","media":"秦朔朋友圈","summary":"谁都不希望坏事发生，但如果发生，也不至于措手不及。","content":"<p>Text/Jia Ming</p><p>On July 23rd, a document issued by the CPC Central Office entitled \"Opinions on Further Reducing the Burden of Homework and Off-campus Training for Students in Compulsory Education\" circulated on the Internet. The \"Opinions\" include measures such as \"capitalization\" operation of education and training institutions, and all discipline training institutions are prohibited from listing for financing. Overseas listed education stocks have fallen in response. For example, the share price of New Oriental on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange was once \"halved\" (New Oriental S, closed down 40.61% on the 23rd and 47.02% on the 26th; New Oriental Online closed down 28.07% and 33.45% on the 23rd and 26th respectively; New Oriental closed down 54.22% on the 23rd in the US stock market). On the 23rd, Gaotu fell 63.26% in the US stock market, and TAL fell more than 70%.</p><p>The official has officially announced the document on the evening of July 24th, and many media have forwarded it in full. Interested readers can look for it.</p><p>Today's article does not analyze Circular No.40 of the Central Office, but wants to explore two issues.</p><p>First, why do so many Chinese companies choose to go public in the United States?</p><p>Second, considering Sino-US relations, Ruixing's fraud, Didi's removal from the shelves and other events, what is the future fate of these Chinese stocks listed overseas?</p><p><b>Main reasons</b></p><p>Chinese companies are more enthusiastic about listing on American stock exchanges than any other non-American company, even after the apparent chill in U.S. -China relations.</p><p>In 2019, 32 companies went public in the United States, compared to 34 in 2020, and in the first half of 2021, 37 companies completed listing in the United States. According to wind data, as of July 2021, there were 286 Chinese companies listed in the United States — including those registered in offshore centers such as Hong Kong, China or the Cayman Islands, but most of their revenue and profits came from mainland China — in fact, most Chinese companies listed in the United States basically adopted this listing method.</p><p>Since 2018, while suppressing Chinese technology companies, the United States has raised its audit requirements for Chinese companies listed in the United States. The overall environment for Chinese companies to go public in the United States is not good, so why do Chinese companies still resolutely choose to go public in the United States?</p><p>Several well-known reasons are;</p><p>First, the capital market construction in the United States is relatively early, and the financing system and laws and regulations are relatively more mature and perfect. From the perspective of the overall financing environment, the United States is generally optimistic about Internet companies and high-tech companies. If the same stock is listed in the United States, it is relatively easy to obtain a higher valuation and raise more funds.</p><p>Second, and more importantly, the US capital market adopts a registration system, and there is no profit threshold for companies to be listed. As long as your company's business grows rapidly and occupies a large market share, it can go public even if it loses money. China adopts the audit system, and the necessary condition for applying for A-share listing is to make profits for three consecutive years.</p><p>Internet businesses are growing fast, so they are always very short of money. Some Internet companies, perhaps only a few years after their establishment, have become unicorns with a valuation of more than one billion. At this time, facing the pressure of investors to realize cash and further development, they have to prepare to go public for large-scale fundraising. However, most companies may have just begun to make profits at this time, or even not yet, so they can't meet the conditions of making profits for three consecutive years, and they can't go public for financing in the A-share market. If you wait for two or three years before going public to raise funds, you may not only miss the best development opportunity, but also fail to raise funds, and it is unknown whether the enterprise can survive. Therefore, we can only go abroad.</p><p>Third, the length of China's listing approval cycle is uncertain. When the listing approval is suspended and the company wants to go public, the whole process may take three or four years. Time is money, and many enterprises can't afford to wait.</p><p>The above three reasons, especially the second and third, should be the two main reasons for Chinese companies to go public in the United States. But beyond that, here are a few reasons that shouldn't be overlooked.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/24b35bd20e43d6773e8057d5090c82e8\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Reason of origin</b></p><p>We often say now that Chinese Internet companies are doing very well. We usually call around 2000 the first year of China's Internet. But we can't forget that in the early days of the development of the Internet, few people could understand this format, so it was impossible for these enterprises to get bank loans.</p><p>In fact, it is difficult to get bank loans not only in the initial stage of the Internet, but also in the initial stage of all enterprises. Because of the strict loan approval procedures and natural risk aversion, commercial banks would rather earn less loan interest than lend money to stable enterprises.</p><p>Banks are not institutions that invest in start-ups. Investing in start-ups should be something that angel investors and venture capital institutions do. At that time, there was no venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) in China. These Internet companies can't find money in China, but they need money for development. What should they do? Only overseas capital can be introduced.</p><p>You know, in the early days of our reform and opening up, we also exchanged domestic markets for overseas capital and technology. Therefore, as Deng Gong said, it doesn't matter if it is a black cat or a white cat, if it can catch mice, it is a good cat. Capital is neutral, regardless of whether it is good or bad. If only geography is used as the classification basis, it is certainly possible. But if you want to make a value judgment, it is more important to look at the specific things that these capitals are used for, rather than the origins of these capitals.</p><p>Therefore, many Internet giants in China (in order to avoid unnecessary trouble, I won't give examples here) were Sino-foreign joint ventures at the beginning of their establishment. This begs another question: the question of the legitimacy of the VIE architecture.</p><p>Variable Interest Entity Structure, referred to as VIE Structure, usually referred to as \"Agreement Control\", refers to a listed Entity registered overseas by a proposed listed company, which is separated from the mainland business operating Entity, and the overseas listed Entity controls the domestic business operating Entity through an agreement, and transfers its income and profits to the overseas company. VIE architecture has derived many different forms, but the essence is the same, so it will not be expanded here.</p><p>Because China's laws have strict restrictions on the industry access of overseas funds in \"information transmission, software and information technology services\", overseas capital is not allowed to directly invest in telecommunications and Internet-related enterprises. Of course, companies in these industries are not allowed to directly raise funds or go public overseas. Therefore, these enterprises adopt VIE architecture to bypass supervision.</p><p>Of course, regulation knows this form. The reason why it is not completely forbidden is that on the one hand, this structure is not \"obviously illegal\", and on the other hand, it is certainly a kind of regulatory wisdom.</p><p>However, if this kind of enterprise is listed in China, it still has to strictly follow the regulatory requirements of listing. Then the legality of this VIE structure becomes a problem, so it can't be listed directly in China.</p><p>This means that the roots of some Internet companies are crooked from the day they were born. If the root is not crooked, you can't survive, and if you survive, you will leave a bad background-\"lack of money-introduce foreign capital-become a joint venture-adopt a VIE structure-the legality of domestic listing is problematic-overseas listing\".</p><p>It is much better now. China's multi-level capital market construction is becoming more and more perfect, and there are more RMB venture capital and private placement. The problem of not finding money in China has been greatly alleviated.</p><p>Wang Xiaobo said in \"The Silent Majority\" that it is too easy to make value judgments. If we are a male rabbit, we naturally know that the big bad wolf is bad and the female rabbit is good. But the rabbit doesn't know how to memorize the multiplication table. Figuring out the above background is a bit like a multiplication table. No matter what kind of value evaluation we make on Internet companies going public overseas-how to evaluate it is our freedom-at least our judgment is based on the complete ins and outs of things.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f4d1b82e56c3a630026ec35cf9663d6\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Other reasons</b></p><p>There are also two reasons, respectively, the free circulation of capital and the pursuit of different rights of the same share.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, because many enterprises are funded by international private equity funds and venture capital companies, and China implements foreign exchange control and lists at home, it will be troublesome for venture capital funds to make profits and have exchange risks, so they also have the incentive to encourage business owners to list abroad. Some business owners have the ambition of being multinational enterprises and are willing to go public in the United States, which is not only conducive to expanding the popularity of enterprises, but also conducive to the global layout of fund-raising and assets of enterprises, achieving multiple goals with one stone.</p><p>To be more verbose, private equity and venture capital eat the bowl of rice with high risk and high return. As long as they can make money in compliance with the law, it can't be said that there is anything wrong with people making a profit and exiting after the company goes public. Of course, if you violate the law and discipline, you must be held accountable according to law.</p><p>Some people may ask that when listed in Hong Kong, capital can also flow freely. Listed company entrepreneurs and early investors can easily convert Hong Kong dollars raised by listing into US dollars or any other currency. This leads to another reason, \"the same shares have the same rights\" and \"the same shares have different rights\".</p><p>Companies listed in mainland China should strictly abide by the regulations of same shares and same rights, that is, how many shares you own in the company will have as many voting rights when voting on major events. This is the reason why many companies don't want to go public, and are afraid that they will not own many shares after listing, which will lead to the company founders being speechless on the board of directors or even being kicked out. This is also the reason for the previously popular \"barbarian\" malicious takeovers, as long as someone else holds more shares than you, even if you are the founder, you will be kicked out.</p><p>Before 2018, listing in Hong Kong was also a requirement of the same shares and rights. In 2018, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange introduced a reform that allows technology companies and companies in the life sciences to adopt an American-style structure of same shares with different rights. Since then, more and more Chinese companies have chosen to list in Hong Kong, or in both Hong Kong, China and New York, USA.</p><p>Not that equal shares and equal rights are bad. Everything has its pros and cons. Founders with the same shares and rights are required to be cautious about listing, because they may be overlooked or even kicked out of the decision-making level after listing. However, cautious listing may slow down the development of enterprises and miss the golden development period.</p><p>Going public in the United States provides an option of different rights for the same shares, which means that even if you hold less than 50% of the equity of the company, even if you only hold 10% or even less, you can still maintain control of the company. Although it is convenient for enterprises to go public and raise funds, it can easily lead to the problem of \"insider control\". As the actual controller of an enterprise is not the largest shareholder, when there is a conflict between the interests of shareholders and the interests of operators, the actual controller will easily pretend to be public for personal gain, enrich his own pockets, or adopt some risky business behaviors. In some countries, identical rights are considered to be one of the root causes of corporate governance problems.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c43b7c0037505392758b59f3788cc488\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Crisis of trust</b></p><p>The previous article basically explains why Chinese enterprises are more willing to go public in the United States. There are various reasons, including regulatory system and business operation. Generally speaking, it is a very normal business behavior of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages.</p><p>However, after the escalation of the Sino-US trade conflict, the United States has successively sanctioned Chinese companies, some of which are Chinese companies listed in the United States. This increases the risk of listing in the United States. Even if some companies that have already listed are not sanctioned, the risks brought by changes in international relations between the two countries are increasing. In 2020, Luckin's financial fraud aggravated the trust crisis of Chinese concept stocks.</p><p>The Trump administration took the opportunity to sign the Foreign Company Accountability Act before the end of its term, threatening to delist Chinese listed companies from American stock exchanges if China fails to allow the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to obtain audit working papers for three consecutive years.</p><p>On June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed another proposal, proposing that the delisting time could be advanced by one year.</p><p>The immediate reason for the U.S. threatening to delist Chinese companies is to protect U.S. investors from losses caused by accounting fraud similar to that of Luckin last year. To be honest, this actually seems quite reasonable. Financial fraud is a crime. Not only the United States, but we believe that the capital market of any country should crack down on financial fraud.</p><p>But here are a few questions.</p><p>First, China and the United States have been negotiating on the issue of audit papers, but why are they suddenly turning their faces now?</p><p>In 2009, China issued a law requiring enterprises to \"store the working papers and other files formed by securities companies and securities service institutions that provide related securities services in China in the process of issuing and listing securities overseas\".</p><p>In 2013, PCAOB of China and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding on cooperation, and provided PCAOB with audit working papers of four enterprises.</p><p>From 2016 to 2019, the regulatory authorities of both sides have also made some cooperative attempts on how to effectively inspect. When the relationship is good, there is business and quantity, but when the relationship is bad, it is a bit of turning your face and denying people.</p><p>Second, whether providing accounting papers is an effective form of combating financial fraud.</p><p>For example, in 2002, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were greatly revised in response to the financial fraud incident of Enron Company, forming the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act for short, which made many new provisions in corporate governance, Accounting professional supervision and securities market supervision. In fact, this is conducive to protecting both listed companies and investors, which is a good thing.</p><p>But the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board established after Sarbanes-Oxley Act can already review the audit papers of listed companies, but then there are accounting problems with WorldCom, Southern Health Care, Freddie Mac, AIG and Lehman Brothers. However, most serious accounting fraud incidents are often found by professional short-selling organizations by using \"private unannounced visits\" to investigate the company's business flow on the spot, and audit companies will not use these means.</p><p>The U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) may not necessarily be able to identify these financial frauds by auditing working papers. In other words, audit papers may help to combat financial fraud, but they are not an essential method and are not always 100 percent effective.</p><p>Third, the important target of the Foreign Company Accountability Act is Chinese stock companies, but it is not the first day that the United States knows that Chinese listed companies adopt VIE structure. If the United States thinks that there is a problem with the VIE structure, it can directly ban the listing of Chinese stocks.</p><p>When the relationship between the two countries is friendly, the audit paper is not a very important issue. The two countries can negotiate and solve it, and cooperate in supervision because of mutual trust. Now this mutual trust is gone.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69e2b71cb10ca93f5741a9e9b49df382\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"428\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Prepare for a rainy day</b></p><p>We hope that Sino-US relations can return to friendship in the new competitive relationship. But if the gap between the two countries gets wider and wider, then Chinese companies listed in the United States really need to be prepared.</p><p>For China and the United States, the delisting of Chinese companies from the U.S. market does not seem to be an unbearable price.</p><p>As far as the United States is concerned, although the volatility of Chinese stocks is relatively large, the overall performance of Chinese stocks is better than that of most American listed companies, and the losses caused by financial fraud of Chinese enterprises are far smaller than those of American companies such as Enron and Lehman.</p><p>If Chinese stocks are delisted, American investors will lose a better investment target. However, after the delisting of Chinese stocks, they can go to Hong Kong stocks and A shares to be listed. If American investors are still optimistic about Chinese enterprises, they can continue to buy and invest in Hong Kong through the Qualified Foreign Investor Mechanism (QFII) or the interconnection mechanism.</p><p>As far as China is concerned, China is a country with high savings and a net exporter of capital, so it is not necessary to list in the United States to raise funds. China's own capital market is also gradually improving, and the registration system is also being piloted on the Science and Technology Innovation Board. It is likely that it will be fully rolled out in the near future. In the future, the convenience of Chinese enterprises listing in China will be greatly improved. Although the valuation of listing in A shares or Hong Kong stocks is likely to shrink, this is not an unacceptable challenge for the whole country.</p><p>Therefore, if Chinese companies are delisted in the United States, it is not an unacceptable event for both countries, and their fate will be more influenced by international relations and historical processes. At this time, what enterprises should do is to take precautions and prevent problems before they happen.</p><p>No one wants bad things to happen, but if they do, they will not be caught off guard.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Chinese Concept Stocks Exit from the US Market, Could This Happen?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChinese Concept Stocks Exit from the US Market, Could This Happen?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/60\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/707686f07ebc41778130c729f4eea24e);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">秦朔朋友圈 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-27 10:16</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Text/Jia Ming</p><p>On July 23rd, a document issued by the CPC Central Office entitled \"Opinions on Further Reducing the Burden of Homework and Off-campus Training for Students in Compulsory Education\" circulated on the Internet. The \"Opinions\" include measures such as \"capitalization\" operation of education and training institutions, and all discipline training institutions are prohibited from listing for financing. Overseas listed education stocks have fallen in response. For example, the share price of New Oriental on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange was once \"halved\" (New Oriental S, closed down 40.61% on the 23rd and 47.02% on the 26th; New Oriental Online closed down 28.07% and 33.45% on the 23rd and 26th respectively; New Oriental closed down 54.22% on the 23rd in the US stock market). On the 23rd, Gaotu fell 63.26% in the US stock market, and TAL fell more than 70%.</p><p>The official has officially announced the document on the evening of July 24th, and many media have forwarded it in full. Interested readers can look for it.</p><p>Today's article does not analyze Circular No.40 of the Central Office, but wants to explore two issues.</p><p>First, why do so many Chinese companies choose to go public in the United States?</p><p>Second, considering Sino-US relations, Ruixing's fraud, Didi's removal from the shelves and other events, what is the future fate of these Chinese stocks listed overseas?</p><p><b>Main reasons</b></p><p>Chinese companies are more enthusiastic about listing on American stock exchanges than any other non-American company, even after the apparent chill in U.S. -China relations.</p><p>In 2019, 32 companies went public in the United States, compared to 34 in 2020, and in the first half of 2021, 37 companies completed listing in the United States. According to wind data, as of July 2021, there were 286 Chinese companies listed in the United States — including those registered in offshore centers such as Hong Kong, China or the Cayman Islands, but most of their revenue and profits came from mainland China — in fact, most Chinese companies listed in the United States basically adopted this listing method.</p><p>Since 2018, while suppressing Chinese technology companies, the United States has raised its audit requirements for Chinese companies listed in the United States. The overall environment for Chinese companies to go public in the United States is not good, so why do Chinese companies still resolutely choose to go public in the United States?</p><p>Several well-known reasons are;</p><p>First, the capital market construction in the United States is relatively early, and the financing system and laws and regulations are relatively more mature and perfect. From the perspective of the overall financing environment, the United States is generally optimistic about Internet companies and high-tech companies. If the same stock is listed in the United States, it is relatively easy to obtain a higher valuation and raise more funds.</p><p>Second, and more importantly, the US capital market adopts a registration system, and there is no profit threshold for companies to be listed. As long as your company's business grows rapidly and occupies a large market share, it can go public even if it loses money. China adopts the audit system, and the necessary condition for applying for A-share listing is to make profits for three consecutive years.</p><p>Internet businesses are growing fast, so they are always very short of money. Some Internet companies, perhaps only a few years after their establishment, have become unicorns with a valuation of more than one billion. At this time, facing the pressure of investors to realize cash and further development, they have to prepare to go public for large-scale fundraising. However, most companies may have just begun to make profits at this time, or even not yet, so they can't meet the conditions of making profits for three consecutive years, and they can't go public for financing in the A-share market. If you wait for two or three years before going public to raise funds, you may not only miss the best development opportunity, but also fail to raise funds, and it is unknown whether the enterprise can survive. Therefore, we can only go abroad.</p><p>Third, the length of China's listing approval cycle is uncertain. When the listing approval is suspended and the company wants to go public, the whole process may take three or four years. Time is money, and many enterprises can't afford to wait.</p><p>The above three reasons, especially the second and third, should be the two main reasons for Chinese companies to go public in the United States. But beyond that, here are a few reasons that shouldn't be overlooked.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/24b35bd20e43d6773e8057d5090c82e8\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Reason of origin</b></p><p>We often say now that Chinese Internet companies are doing very well. We usually call around 2000 the first year of China's Internet. But we can't forget that in the early days of the development of the Internet, few people could understand this format, so it was impossible for these enterprises to get bank loans.</p><p>In fact, it is difficult to get bank loans not only in the initial stage of the Internet, but also in the initial stage of all enterprises. Because of the strict loan approval procedures and natural risk aversion, commercial banks would rather earn less loan interest than lend money to stable enterprises.</p><p>Banks are not institutions that invest in start-ups. Investing in start-ups should be something that angel investors and venture capital institutions do. At that time, there was no venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) in China. These Internet companies can't find money in China, but they need money for development. What should they do? Only overseas capital can be introduced.</p><p>You know, in the early days of our reform and opening up, we also exchanged domestic markets for overseas capital and technology. Therefore, as Deng Gong said, it doesn't matter if it is a black cat or a white cat, if it can catch mice, it is a good cat. Capital is neutral, regardless of whether it is good or bad. If only geography is used as the classification basis, it is certainly possible. But if you want to make a value judgment, it is more important to look at the specific things that these capitals are used for, rather than the origins of these capitals.</p><p>Therefore, many Internet giants in China (in order to avoid unnecessary trouble, I won't give examples here) were Sino-foreign joint ventures at the beginning of their establishment. This begs another question: the question of the legitimacy of the VIE architecture.</p><p>Variable Interest Entity Structure, referred to as VIE Structure, usually referred to as \"Agreement Control\", refers to a listed Entity registered overseas by a proposed listed company, which is separated from the mainland business operating Entity, and the overseas listed Entity controls the domestic business operating Entity through an agreement, and transfers its income and profits to the overseas company. VIE architecture has derived many different forms, but the essence is the same, so it will not be expanded here.</p><p>Because China's laws have strict restrictions on the industry access of overseas funds in \"information transmission, software and information technology services\", overseas capital is not allowed to directly invest in telecommunications and Internet-related enterprises. Of course, companies in these industries are not allowed to directly raise funds or go public overseas. Therefore, these enterprises adopt VIE architecture to bypass supervision.</p><p>Of course, regulation knows this form. The reason why it is not completely forbidden is that on the one hand, this structure is not \"obviously illegal\", and on the other hand, it is certainly a kind of regulatory wisdom.</p><p>However, if this kind of enterprise is listed in China, it still has to strictly follow the regulatory requirements of listing. Then the legality of this VIE structure becomes a problem, so it can't be listed directly in China.</p><p>This means that the roots of some Internet companies are crooked from the day they were born. If the root is not crooked, you can't survive, and if you survive, you will leave a bad background-\"lack of money-introduce foreign capital-become a joint venture-adopt a VIE structure-the legality of domestic listing is problematic-overseas listing\".</p><p>It is much better now. China's multi-level capital market construction is becoming more and more perfect, and there are more RMB venture capital and private placement. The problem of not finding money in China has been greatly alleviated.</p><p>Wang Xiaobo said in \"The Silent Majority\" that it is too easy to make value judgments. If we are a male rabbit, we naturally know that the big bad wolf is bad and the female rabbit is good. But the rabbit doesn't know how to memorize the multiplication table. Figuring out the above background is a bit like a multiplication table. No matter what kind of value evaluation we make on Internet companies going public overseas-how to evaluate it is our freedom-at least our judgment is based on the complete ins and outs of things.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1f4d1b82e56c3a630026ec35cf9663d6\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Other reasons</b></p><p>There are also two reasons, respectively, the free circulation of capital and the pursuit of different rights of the same share.</p><p>As mentioned earlier, because many enterprises are funded by international private equity funds and venture capital companies, and China implements foreign exchange control and lists at home, it will be troublesome for venture capital funds to make profits and have exchange risks, so they also have the incentive to encourage business owners to list abroad. Some business owners have the ambition of being multinational enterprises and are willing to go public in the United States, which is not only conducive to expanding the popularity of enterprises, but also conducive to the global layout of fund-raising and assets of enterprises, achieving multiple goals with one stone.</p><p>To be more verbose, private equity and venture capital eat the bowl of rice with high risk and high return. As long as they can make money in compliance with the law, it can't be said that there is anything wrong with people making a profit and exiting after the company goes public. Of course, if you violate the law and discipline, you must be held accountable according to law.</p><p>Some people may ask that when listed in Hong Kong, capital can also flow freely. Listed company entrepreneurs and early investors can easily convert Hong Kong dollars raised by listing into US dollars or any other currency. This leads to another reason, \"the same shares have the same rights\" and \"the same shares have different rights\".</p><p>Companies listed in mainland China should strictly abide by the regulations of same shares and same rights, that is, how many shares you own in the company will have as many voting rights when voting on major events. This is the reason why many companies don't want to go public, and are afraid that they will not own many shares after listing, which will lead to the company founders being speechless on the board of directors or even being kicked out. This is also the reason for the previously popular \"barbarian\" malicious takeovers, as long as someone else holds more shares than you, even if you are the founder, you will be kicked out.</p><p>Before 2018, listing in Hong Kong was also a requirement of the same shares and rights. In 2018, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange introduced a reform that allows technology companies and companies in the life sciences to adopt an American-style structure of same shares with different rights. Since then, more and more Chinese companies have chosen to list in Hong Kong, or in both Hong Kong, China and New York, USA.</p><p>Not that equal shares and equal rights are bad. Everything has its pros and cons. Founders with the same shares and rights are required to be cautious about listing, because they may be overlooked or even kicked out of the decision-making level after listing. However, cautious listing may slow down the development of enterprises and miss the golden development period.</p><p>Going public in the United States provides an option of different rights for the same shares, which means that even if you hold less than 50% of the equity of the company, even if you only hold 10% or even less, you can still maintain control of the company. Although it is convenient for enterprises to go public and raise funds, it can easily lead to the problem of \"insider control\". As the actual controller of an enterprise is not the largest shareholder, when there is a conflict between the interests of shareholders and the interests of operators, the actual controller will easily pretend to be public for personal gain, enrich his own pockets, or adopt some risky business behaviors. In some countries, identical rights are considered to be one of the root causes of corporate governance problems.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c43b7c0037505392758b59f3788cc488\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"367\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Crisis of trust</b></p><p>The previous article basically explains why Chinese enterprises are more willing to go public in the United States. There are various reasons, including regulatory system and business operation. Generally speaking, it is a very normal business behavior of seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages.</p><p>However, after the escalation of the Sino-US trade conflict, the United States has successively sanctioned Chinese companies, some of which are Chinese companies listed in the United States. This increases the risk of listing in the United States. Even if some companies that have already listed are not sanctioned, the risks brought by changes in international relations between the two countries are increasing. In 2020, Luckin's financial fraud aggravated the trust crisis of Chinese concept stocks.</p><p>The Trump administration took the opportunity to sign the Foreign Company Accountability Act before the end of its term, threatening to delist Chinese listed companies from American stock exchanges if China fails to allow the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) to obtain audit working papers for three consecutive years.</p><p>On June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed another proposal, proposing that the delisting time could be advanced by one year.</p><p>The immediate reason for the U.S. threatening to delist Chinese companies is to protect U.S. investors from losses caused by accounting fraud similar to that of Luckin last year. To be honest, this actually seems quite reasonable. Financial fraud is a crime. Not only the United States, but we believe that the capital market of any country should crack down on financial fraud.</p><p>But here are a few questions.</p><p>First, China and the United States have been negotiating on the issue of audit papers, but why are they suddenly turning their faces now?</p><p>In 2009, China issued a law requiring enterprises to \"store the working papers and other files formed by securities companies and securities service institutions that provide related securities services in China in the process of issuing and listing securities overseas\".</p><p>In 2013, PCAOB of China and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding on cooperation, and provided PCAOB with audit working papers of four enterprises.</p><p>From 2016 to 2019, the regulatory authorities of both sides have also made some cooperative attempts on how to effectively inspect. When the relationship is good, there is business and quantity, but when the relationship is bad, it is a bit of turning your face and denying people.</p><p>Second, whether providing accounting papers is an effective form of combating financial fraud.</p><p>For example, in 2002, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 were greatly revised in response to the financial fraud incident of Enron Company, forming the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act for short, which made many new provisions in corporate governance, Accounting professional supervision and securities market supervision. In fact, this is conducive to protecting both listed companies and investors, which is a good thing.</p><p>But the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board established after Sarbanes-Oxley Act can already review the audit papers of listed companies, but then there are accounting problems with WorldCom, Southern Health Care, Freddie Mac, AIG and Lehman Brothers. However, most serious accounting fraud incidents are often found by professional short-selling organizations by using \"private unannounced visits\" to investigate the company's business flow on the spot, and audit companies will not use these means.</p><p>The U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) may not necessarily be able to identify these financial frauds by auditing working papers. In other words, audit papers may help to combat financial fraud, but they are not an essential method and are not always 100 percent effective.</p><p>Third, the important target of the Foreign Company Accountability Act is Chinese stock companies, but it is not the first day that the United States knows that Chinese listed companies adopt VIE structure. If the United States thinks that there is a problem with the VIE structure, it can directly ban the listing of Chinese stocks.</p><p>When the relationship between the two countries is friendly, the audit paper is not a very important issue. The two countries can negotiate and solve it, and cooperate in supervision because of mutual trust. Now this mutual trust is gone.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/69e2b71cb10ca93f5741a9e9b49df382\" tg-width=\"550\" tg-height=\"428\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p><p><b>Prepare for a rainy day</b></p><p>We hope that Sino-US relations can return to friendship in the new competitive relationship. But if the gap between the two countries gets wider and wider, then Chinese companies listed in the United States really need to be prepared.</p><p>For China and the United States, the delisting of Chinese companies from the U.S. market does not seem to be an unbearable price.</p><p>As far as the United States is concerned, although the volatility of Chinese stocks is relatively large, the overall performance of Chinese stocks is better than that of most American listed companies, and the losses caused by financial fraud of Chinese enterprises are far smaller than those of American companies such as Enron and Lehman.</p><p>If Chinese stocks are delisted, American investors will lose a better investment target. However, after the delisting of Chinese stocks, they can go to Hong Kong stocks and A shares to be listed. If American investors are still optimistic about Chinese enterprises, they can continue to buy and invest in Hong Kong through the Qualified Foreign Investor Mechanism (QFII) or the interconnection mechanism.</p><p>As far as China is concerned, China is a country with high savings and a net exporter of capital, so it is not necessary to list in the United States to raise funds. China's own capital market is also gradually improving, and the registration system is also being piloted on the Science and Technology Innovation Board. It is likely that it will be fully rolled out in the near future. In the future, the convenience of Chinese enterprises listing in China will be greatly improved. Although the valuation of listing in A shares or Hong Kong stocks is likely to shrink, this is not an unacceptable challenge for the whole country.</p><p>Therefore, if Chinese companies are delisted in the United States, it is not an unacceptable event for both countries, and their fate will be more influenced by international relations and historical processes. At this time, what enterprises should do is to take precautions and prevent problems before they happen.</p><p>No one wants bad things to happen, but if they do, they will not be caught off guard.</p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab6f6a5034baf0d08c9227da13ca9733","relate_stocks":{"513050":"中概互联网ETF易方达"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1120859674","content_text":"文/贾铭\n7月23日，一份名为《关于进一步减轻义务教育阶段学生作业负担和校外培训负担的意见》的中办发文件在网络流传。《意见》包含，严禁教育培训机构“资本化”运作，学科类培训机构一律不得上市融资等措施，海外上市的教育类股票应声而跌。比如，新东方在港交所的股价一度“腰斩”（新东方S，23号收跌40.61%，26号再收跌47.02%；新东方在线23号和26号分别收跌28.07%、33.45%；新东方在美股收盘跌幅23号为54.22%），23号，高途在美股跌幅达63.26%，好未来跌幅更是超过70%。\n官方已经于7月24日晚正式公布该文件，多家媒体有全文转发，感兴趣的读者可以找来看。\n今天这篇文章，并不分析中办的40号文，而是想探讨两个问题。\n第一，为什么这么多中国企业选择在美上市？\n第二，考虑到中美关系、瑞幸造假、滴滴下架等事件，在海外上市的这些中概股，未来命运如何？\n主要原因\n中国企业在美国的证券交易所上市的热情，差不多超过其他任何非美国的企业，即使在中美关系明显遇冷之后，依然如此。\n2019年，有32家企业赴美上市，2020年为34家，2021年上半年，已完成赴美上市的企业有37家。据wind数据，截至2021年7月，共有286家中国企业在美国上市——包括那些注册在中国香港或者开曼群岛等离岸中心，但大部分收入和利润来自中国内地的企业——事实上，大部分在美国上市的中国企业，基本都采取了这种上市方式。\n2018年以来，美国在打压中国科技企业的同时，提高了对赴美上市中国企业的审计要求，中企赴美上市的整体环境并不佳，那为什么中国企业仍毅然选择赴美上市呢？\n众所周知的几个原因是：\n第一，美国的资本市场建设比较早，融资体系和法律法规相对来讲更加成熟和完善。从总体融资环境看，美国对于互联网公司、高科技公司普遍看好，同样的一只股票，在美国上市，相对容易获得更高的估值，募集更多的资金。\n第二，更重要的是，美国资本市场采取注册制，对于拟上市公司不设盈利门槛。只要你的公司业务高速增长，占据很大的市场份额，即便亏损也能上市。我国采取审核制，申请A股上市的必要条件是连续三年盈利。\n互联网企业成长很快，所以总是非常缺钱。有的互联网企业，或许仅仅创立几年，就成为了估值超过十亿的独角兽，这时候面临投资人变现的压力和进一步发展的压力，就要准备上市做大规模筹资了，但是多数企业这时候可能才刚刚开始盈利，甚至还没有盈利，所以达不到连续三年盈利的条件，也就无法在A股市场上市融资。要是等两三年后再去上市筹资，不仅可能错过最好的发展时机，融不到资，企业能不能活下去都成了未知数。所以，只能去国外。\n第三，我国的上市审批周期长短不定，遇到上市审批暂停，企业想上市，整个流程长的话可能要三四年。时间就是金钱，很多企业等不起。\n以上三个原因，尤其是第二和第三，应该是中国企业赴美上市最主要的两个原因。但除此之外，还有以下几个原因不应该被忽视。\n\n出身原因\n我们现在经常说，中国的互联网企业做的很好。我们又通常把2000年前后，称为中国的互联网元年。但我们不能忘记，在互联网发展初期，没有几个人能看得懂这种业态，所以这些企业不可能拿到银行贷款。\n其实不仅仅是互联网初创期，所有企业初创期，都很难拿到银行贷款。由于商业银行严格的贷款审批手续和天生的风险厌恶属性，它宁愿少赚点贷款利息，也更愿意把钱贷给四平八稳的企业。\n银行本来就不是给初创企业投资的机构，给初创企业投资，应该是天使投资人和风投机构干的事儿，而我国那时候没有什么风险投资（VC）和私募股权（PE）。这些互联网企业在国内找不到钱，但发展又需要钱，怎么办？只能引进境外资本。\n要知道，我们的改革开放早期，也是用境内的市场换境外的资本和技术。所以还是邓公说的好，管它黑猫白猫，能抓老鼠就是好猫。资本本是中性，无所谓好坏，如果只是用地域作为分类依据，当然是可以的。但如果要做价值判断，更重要的是要看这些资本被用来做的具体的事情，而不是这些资本的出身。\n所以，我国的很多互联网巨头（为了避免不必要的麻烦，这里就不举例了），在设立之初，就是中外合资企业。这又引出了另一个问题：VIE架构的合法性问题。\n可变利益实体架构（Variable Interest Entity），简称VIE架构，通常被称为“协议控制”，是指拟上市公司在境外注册的上市实体，与内地业务经营主体分离，由境外上市实体透过协议方式控制境内业务经营主体，并把收入和利润转移到境外公司。VIE架构又衍生出很多不同的形式，但本质是一样的，这里不展开。\n因为我国法律对境外资金在“信息传输、软件和信息技术服务业”的行业准入有严格限制，不允许境外资本直接投资电信、互联网相关企业。当然也不允许这些行业的公司直接在海外集资或者上市。所以，这些企业采取VIE架构绕开监管。\n监管当然知道这种形式，之所以没有完全禁绝，一方面是这种架构并不“明显违法”，另一方面当然也是一种监管智慧。\n但这种企业在境内上市的话，还是要严格按照上市的监管要求，那这种VIE架构的合法性就成了问题，所以不能直接境内上市。\n这就意味着，一部分互联网企业从诞生的那天起，根就是歪的。根不歪就活不下来，活下来了又留下了不好的出身——“缺钱-引进外资-变成合资企业-采取VIE架构-境内上市的合法性有问题-境外上市”。\n现在好多了，我国的多层次资本市场建设越来越完善，人民币风投和私募也多了，在国内找不到钱的问题，得到了很大的缓解。\n王小波在《沉默的大多数》中说，做价值判断太容易了，如果我们是一只公兔子，我们天然就知道大灰狼坏，母兔子好。但兔子不知道怎么背九九乘法表。搞清楚上面这个背景，就有点九九乘法表的意思，无论我们对互联网企业去境外上市做出何种价值评价——如何评价是我们的自由——但起码我们的评判是基于事情完整的来龙去脉做出来的。\n\n其他原因\n还有两个原因分别是，资本的自由流通和同股不同权的追求。\n如前所述，由于很多企业的资金来源包括国际私募基金和风险投资公司，而中国又实行外汇管制，在境内上市，风投资金获利退出会很麻烦，有汇兑风险，所以他们也有动力鼓励企业所有者在境外上市。有的企业所有者有做跨国企业的雄心，也愿意在美国上市，这既有利于拓展企业的知名度，又有利于企业募资和资产的全球布局，一举多得。\n又得啰嗦一点，私募和风投吃的就是高风险高收益这碗饭，只要他们能遵纪守法地赚钱，就不能说人家在企业上市后获利退出有什么不对。当然，如果违法乱纪，那必然是要依法追责的。\n有人可能会问，在香港上市，资本也可以自由流动啊。上市公司创业者与早期投资者可以轻松地将上市筹集的港元兑换成美元或其他任何货币。这就到了另一个原因，“同股同权”和“同股不同权”。\n在我国内地上市的公司要严格遵守同股同权的条例，即你拥有该公司多少股份，在重大事件投票时就拥有多少的投票权，这就是很多公司不想上市的原因，害怕上市之后拥有的股份不多，导致公司创始人在董事会说不上话甚至会被踢出局。这也是之前流行的“野蛮人”恶意收购的原因，只要别人持有比你更多的股份，哪怕你是创始人，也会被踢出局。\n在2018年以前，在香港上市，也是同股同权的要求。2018年，港交所推出了一项改革，允许科技企业和生命科学领域里的企业采用美国式的同股不同权的结构。此后，越来越多的中国企业选择在香港上市，或者在中国香港和美国纽约两地同时挂牌。\n不是说同股同权不好。凡事都是有利有弊。同股同权要求持股不多的创始人谨慎上市，因为上市后可能被架空甚至踢出决策层，但谨慎上市又可能拖慢企业发展的速度，错过黄金发展期。\n赴美上市提供了一个同股不同权的选项，这就意味着，即使持有企业小于50%的股权，哪怕只持有10%甚至更低，也可以保持对企业的控制权。虽然方便了企业上市融资，但这很容易导致“内部人控制”问题。由于企业的实际控制人并不是最大的股东，那股东利益与经营者利益存在冲突的时候，实控人就容易假公济私，中饱私囊，或者采取一些风险比较大的经营行为。在一些国家，同股不同权被认为是企业治理问题的根源之一。\n\n信任危机\n前文基本解释了中国企业为啥更愿意去美国上市，有各种原因，有监管制度上的，有企业经营上的，总体而言，是一种很正常的趋利避害的商业行为。\n但中美贸易冲突升级以后，美国接连制裁中国的企业，有一些就是在美上市的中国企业。这增大了在美上市的风险，已经上市的部分企业，即使没有被制裁，因两国国际关系变动而带来的风险也在变大。2020年，瑞幸财务造假，更加剧了中概股的信任危机。\n特朗普政府趁机在任期结束之前签署《外国公司问责法案》，威胁说，如果中国方面连续三年不能够让美国上市公司会计监督委员会（PCAOB）获得审计工作底稿，中国的上市企业将会被美国证券交易所摘牌。\n2021年6月22日，美国参议院又通过了另一项提案，提出退市时间可以提前一年。\n美国威胁要让中国企业退市的直接理由是保护美国投资者免受类似于去年瑞幸咖啡那样的会计造假带来的损失。说实话，这看起来其实挺有道理。财务造假是犯罪，不仅美国，我们相信任何一个国家的资本市场都要打击财务造假。\n但这里有几个问题。\n第一，中美双方一直在就审计底稿的问题进行磋商，但为啥现在突然翻脸。\n2009年，我国出台法律，要求企业“在境外发行证券与上市过程中，提供相关证券服务的证券公司、证券服务机构在境内形成的工作底稿等档案应当存放在境内”。\n2013年，我国和美国的PCAOB签署了一份合作谅解备忘录，并向PCAOB提供了4家企业的审计工作底稿。\n2016年到2019年，双方监管部门也一直就如何来有效地检查，有过一些合作尝试。关系好的时候有商有量，关系不好的时候就有点翻脸不认人的意思。\n第二，提供会计底稿是不是打击财务造假的一种有效形式。\n美国的证券市场监管法规一直在不断升级，比如2002年针对安然公司财务造假事件对《1933年证券法》《1934年证券交易法》做出大幅修订，形成了《2002年上市公司会计改革和投资者保护法案》（Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002），简称《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》，在公司治理、会计职业监管、证券市场监管等方面作出了许多新的规定。这事实上既有利于保护上市公司，也有利于保护投资者，是好事儿。\n但《萨班斯-奥克斯利法案》之后建立的美国上市公司会计监督委员会已经可以审阅上市公司的审计底稿了，可之后又出现了世通、南方保健、房地美、美国国际集团和雷曼兄弟的会计问题。而大多数比较严重的会计造假事件，往往是由专业的卖空机构，通过使用“私服暗访”实地调查公司业务流量等技巧手段发现问题的，审计公司不会使用这些手段。\n美国上市公司会计监督委员会（PCAOB）不一定能通过审计工作底稿来发现这些财务造假。换言之，审计底稿或许有助于打击财务造假，但并不是一种必不可少的方式，也不总是百分百有效。\n第三，《外国公司问责法案》的重要目标就是中概股公司，但美国不是第一天知道中国上市公司采用VIE架构。如果美国认为VIE架构有问题，那直接禁止中概股上市即可。\n两国在关系友好的时候，审计底稿并不是一个很重要的问题，两国可以协商解决，合作监管，因为互相信任。现在这种互信没有了。\n\n未雨绸缪\n我们希望中美关系可以在新的竞争关系中复归友好。但如果两国的隔阂越来越大，那在美上市的中国企业，确实需要做好两手准备。\n对中美两国来讲，中国企业从美国市场退市，似乎都不是难以承受的代价。\n对美国来讲，尽管中概股的波动比较大，但中概股的整体表现优于大部分美国上市公司股票，中国企业财务造假带来的损失，也远小于安然、雷曼这些美国公司。\n如果中概股退市，美国投资者会失去一个比较好的投资标的。但中概股退市后可以去港股和A股上市，如果美国投资者依旧看好中国企业，可以继续在香港地区通过合格境外投资者机制（QFII）或者互联互通机制买进，进行投资。\n对中国来讲，我国是一个高储蓄国家和资本净出口国，并非一定要在美国上市募资。我国自己的资本市场也在逐渐完善，注册制也在科创板试点，很可能不久后的未来就会全面铺开，未来中国企业在国内上市的便利度会大幅度提升，虽然在A股或者港股上市，估值很可能有缩水，但这对整个国家来讲，并不是什么不可接受的挑战。\n所以，如果中国企业在美退市，对两国来讲并不是什么不可接受的事件，那它们的命运就更多地受国际关系和历史进程的影响。这时候，企业应该做的就是未雨绸缪，防患于未然。\n谁都不希望坏事发生，但如果发生，也不至于措手不及。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"513050":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4053,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":177492503,"gmtCreate":1627256637602,"gmtModify":1703485974163,"author":{"id":"3579764409572228","authorId":"3579764409572228","name":"mengseng","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fa459e0d8e39660281c1567ec5207287","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3579764409572228","idStr":"3579764409572228"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"???","listText":"???","text":"???","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/177492503","repostId":"2153840759","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2153840759","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"为用户提供金融资讯、行情、数据，旨在帮助投资者理解世界，做投资决策。","home_visible":1,"media_name":"老虎资讯综合","id":"102","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627052471,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2153840759?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-23 23:01","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"[Change] Intel fell more than 5%, CEO said chip shortage will last until 2023","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2153840759","media":"老虎资讯综合","summary":"7月23日，英特尔跌超5%，CEO 称芯片短缺将持续至2023年。\n业界越来越多的人认为，芯片供应中断不会很快得到解决，Gelsinger的预测为这种观点增添了业内领先人物的声音。 在周四的采访中，他","content":"<p>July 23,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>Dropped more than 5%, CEO said chip shortage will last until 2023.</p><p>There is a growing belief in the industry that chip supply disruptions won't be resolved anytime soon, and Gelsinger's predictions add to the voices of the industry's leading figures. In an interview Thursday, he said it could take one to two years for the semiconductor industry to return to a reasonable supply-demand balance. We still have a long way to go because it takes a long time to build manufacturing capacity. In addition, Intel is already adding new chip production plants, though some of that capacity won't be in place for about two years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/198a9c06c3ac52d89ba193e88d320c04\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>[Change] Intel fell more than 5%, CEO said chip shortage will last until 2023</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n[Change] Intel fell more than 5%, CEO said chip shortage will last until 2023\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/102\">\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">老虎资讯综合 </p>\n<p class=\"h-time smaller\">2021-07-23 23:01</p>\n</div>\n</a>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>July 23,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/INTC\">Intel</a>Dropped more than 5%, CEO said chip shortage will last until 2023.</p><p>There is a growing belief in the industry that chip supply disruptions won't be resolved anytime soon, and Gelsinger's predictions add to the voices of the industry's leading figures. In an interview Thursday, he said it could take one to two years for the semiconductor industry to return to a reasonable supply-demand balance. We still have a long way to go because it takes a long time to build manufacturing capacity. In addition, Intel is already adding new chip production plants, though some of that capacity won't be in place for about two years.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/198a9c06c3ac52d89ba193e88d320c04\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c74be4c2a08964ef2daf32217f693b44","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔"},"is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2153840759","content_text":"7月23日，英特尔跌超5%，CEO 称芯片短缺将持续至2023年。\n业界越来越多的人认为，芯片供应中断不会很快得到解决，Gelsinger的预测为这种观点增添了业内领先人物的声音。 在周四的采访中，他表示，半导体行业可能需要一到两年时间才能恢复合理的供需平衡。 我们还有很长的路要走，因为建立制造产能需要很长的时间。此外，英特尔已经在增加新的芯片生产工厂，不过其中一些产能在大约两年内不会到位。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":4968,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}