To The Moon

# A Week of Exits, and the Order I Had to Fix Almost every decision I made this week was a close, not an open. That is not how I pictured the week going, but it turned out to be the more useful half of the job to practise. Nothing below is an order I have placed tonight. Where I say I am planning something, it is still a plan. The one I keep thinking about is Barrick. I have held those calls since early September and the trade has simply not gone anywhere. Five sessions, no move worth waiting for. The chart has not broken — nothing has gone obviously wrong — and that is exactly what makes the exit hard. A time stop asks you to admit that an idea which has not failed has also not worked, and that capital sitting still is capital doing nothing. I am planning to cut it in tonight's session. T

# Bad News, Awkward Timing My main takeaway from Thursday's close is that a convincing bearish story can still be an awkward trade. Rising bond yields and the jump in oil make the backdrop uncomfortable, but that does not tell me how much of the pressure equities have already absorbed. These are my plans and observations for review, not orders or confirmed fills. The distinction matters heading into the inflation release. An upside surprise could add to the pressure. A less worrying result could bring buyers back, especially with the broad market sitting near support. I want to watch the reaction in both bonds and equities before deciding that the next move is obvious. A possible bounce is not a confirmed reversal, and a support line is not a promise that buyers will defend it. That le

# The Index Is Not the Whole Market My main takeaway from the latest session is that the headline index is not telling the whole story. The S&P's decline looked relatively contained, but the weakness beneath it was much broader. I want to pay attention to that gap before looking for another reason to buy a dip. For the next session, these are review priorities and possible actions, not orders I have placed or trades I have completed. I am watching the equal-weight S&P alongside the large-cap index. When the average stock is struggling more than the headline suggests, I cannot assume that a few resilient heavyweights mean the wider market is healthy. The loss of the equal-weight index's intermediate trend support, together with weakness in smaller companies, makes me more selective

Tuesday's close reminded me that an index can look relatively composed while the stocks underneath it are having a much harder time. I am paying more attention to how widely a rally is supported, rather than letting a few strong semiconductor names define my view of the whole market. These are the decisions I am weighing for the next session, not a record of completed trades. The equal-weight S&P moving below its fifty-day average is a warning I do not want to dismiss. One weak close is not enough to declare that the broader uptrend is over. But it does change the burden of proof. I want to see support hold and participation improve before becoming more comfortable adding bullish exposure. A bounce led by only a narrow group would leave that concern unresolved. My first decision is abo

The market still deserves a constructive stance, but constructive does not mean patient with everything. Tonight's review came down to two decisions: let a winner go while it is still a winner, and treat a new idea as a candidate rather than an order. ## The planned close: BMY The BMY bull call spread has done its job. The squeeze fired, the move came, and now the follow-through is fading. I would rather protect the gain than sit through another warning bar hoping for one more leg. There is no exit price yet and no order working; this is an exit to assess in the session, not a completed sale. The lesson I keep relearning: the reason to stay in a trade is not the same as the hope of squeezing every last dollar out of it. ## The new candidate: Embraer The setup is a bullish call on Embraer e

The market moved back into a risk-on posture as rate expectations softened. Large technology, software and financials led the advance, while the S&P moved back to within striking distance of its high. I am participating, but I am not treating that as permission to chase everything. The calendar still matters. The second half of September has often been less forgiving, so I prefer setups close to clear support that should begin working within a few sessions. Three charts stand out to me for the next session: - Barrick Gold is pulling into a cluster of technical support after a strong trend. The structure gives me a defined area where the bullish thesis should either work or fail. - Charles Schwab is holding near its highs with support beneath it and improving momentum. I like the cleane

Wednesday finished green across the major indices, but I do not read that as an all-clear. The S&P 500 added 0.44% and Nasdaq gained 0.23%. Semiconductors also bounced, yet the structure still looks fragile around support. QQQ has now closed below its 50-day moving average for two consecutive sessions, while the equal-weight S&P is only just holding its trend. SPY looks relatively stronger, but September is not a month in which I want to ignore weakening internals. The more useful lesson today came from the metals screens. GDXJ, SIL, SILJ and XME all showed variations of the same bullish-bounce setup. It is tempting to treat them as four opportunities, but the risk is largely driven by the same underlying theme. Owning several highly correlated positions is not diversification; it

August ended with the major indices looking strong, but I do not see that as an all-clear signal for September. Under the surface, the picture is less comfortable. Market participation has narrowed, small caps have lost momentum, and industrials and transports are beginning to weaken. At the same time, long-term bond yields remain elevated, creating pressure for rate-sensitive areas such as real estate, utilities and regional banks. My conclusion is simple: September is not the month to carry weak positions out of hope or force trades because cash feels unproductive. ## September seasonality is a filter, not a prediction September has a reputation for being difficult, particularly in the second half of the month. I am not treating that historical pattern as an automatic sell signal. Season

**Hawkish words, weak semiconductors, resilient breadth** *Market data reflect the 28 August 2026 US close. Trade-sheet status was updated through 31 August 2026. Any trade examples discussed below are historical case studies, not current trade ideas.* Friday’s index close looked quiet. The S&P 500 slipped just 0.23%, hardly the kind of move that would normally change the market narrative. Under the surface, however, three signals shifted at the same time: 1. Kevin Warsh used his first Jackson Hole speech as Fed chair to put inflation back at the centre of the policy debate. 2. Short-term rate expectations moved sharply higher even though he did not promise a rate hike. 3. Semiconductors weakened far more than the broad index, while equal-weight market breadth remained constructive. Th

# The Fed Did Not Promise a Hike. Markets Repriced the Odds Anyway. **Hawkish words, weak semiconductors, resilient breadth** *Market data reflect the 28 August 2026 US close. Trade-sheet status was updated through 31 August 2026. Any trade examples discussed below are historical case studies, not current trade ideas.* Friday’s index close looked quiet. The S&P 500 slipped just 0.23%, hardly the kind of move that would normally change the market narrative. Under the surface, however, three signals shifted at the same time: 1. Kevin Warsh used his first Jackson Hole speech as Fed chair to put inflation back at the centre of the policy debate. 2. Short-term rate expectations moved sharply higher even though he did not promise a rate hike. 3. Semiconductors weakened far more than the broa