To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
Pierre0520
+Follow
Posts · 750
Posts · 750
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-04-08
Ok
@Siang3361：
[微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑]
[微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑]
看
2.70K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-04-06
Ok
@Building_Benjamins：
The Fed increased its Balance Sheet and paused QT. Banks are bad investments.
The Fed increased its Balance Sheet and paused QT. Banks are bad investments.
看
2.71K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-19
Like
"0DTE" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility
ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect inv
"0DTE" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility
看
3.30K
回复
Comment
点赞
3
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-18
Like
"0DTE" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility
ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect inv
"0DTE" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility
看
3.52K
回复
Comment
点赞
37
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-17
Like
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
3.14K
回复
Comment
点赞
12
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-16
Like
72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape
Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer m
72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape
看
3.10K
回复
2
点赞
24
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-15
Like
Inflation: Consumer Prices Rise 6% over Last Year in February, Slowest since Sept. 2021
Inflation rose in February but was in line with expectations, providing a key input into whether the
Inflation: Consumer Prices Rise 6% over Last Year in February, Slowest since Sept. 2021
看
2.76K
回复
Comment
点赞
12
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-14
Like
Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge
Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet
Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge
看
3.06K
回复
1
点赞
22
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-13
Ok
Current List of Companies With SVB Deposits
@LCapitaljr：
Current List of Companies With Silicon Valley Bank$SVB Financial Group(SIVB)$ Deposits:1. Circle: $3.3 billion2. Roku$Roku Inc(ROKU)$ : $487 million3. BlockFi: $227 million4. Roblox$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$ : $150 million5. Ginkgo Bio$Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Inc.(DNA)$ : $74 million6. iRhythm$Irhythm Technologies Inc.(IRTC)$ : $55 million7. Rocket Lab$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ : $38 million8. Sangamo Therapeutics$Sangamo BioSciences(SGMO)$ : $34 million9. Lending Club
Current List of Companies With SVB Deposits
看
2.61K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Pierre0520
Pierre0520
·
2023-03-13
Like
20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB
SVB Financial Group faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big l
20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB
看
3.46K
回复
1
点赞
12
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4087619312283300","uuid":"4087619312283300","gmtCreate":1624516249198,"gmtModify":1624516249198,"name":"Pierre0520","pinyin":"pierre0520","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":101,"headSize":73,"tweetSize":750,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.08.03","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":19,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9946845992,"gmtCreate":1680923512216,"gmtModify":1680923515691,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9946845992","repostId":"9946846075","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9946846075,"gmtCreate":1680923149697,"gmtModify":1680923154456,"author":{"id":"4114996731215852","authorId":"4114996731215852","name":"Siang3361","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/8009336bbd9de99632a6b25c426b9cc3","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4114996731215852","authorIdStr":"4114996731215852"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"[微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] ","listText":"[微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] ","text":"[微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑] [微笑]","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9946846075","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2695,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9948239067,"gmtCreate":1680710551659,"gmtModify":1680710554261,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9948239067","repostId":"9948294431","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9948294431,"gmtCreate":1680710358523,"gmtModify":1680710536250,"author":{"id":"4120815800439642","authorId":"4120815800439642","name":"Building_Benjamins","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/00c2ed479079ae9ff15cebbf92ee8c11","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4120815800439642","authorIdStr":"4120815800439642"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"\n \n \n The Fed increased its Balance Sheet and paused QT. Banks are bad investments.\n \n","listText":"The Fed increased its Balance Sheet and paused QT. Banks are bad investments.","text":"The Fed increased its Balance Sheet and paused QT. Banks are bad investments.","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9948294431","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"c037cc238de84bcc8ec753d1a0680974","tweetId":"9948294431","title":"The Fed increased its Balance Sheet and paused QT. Banks are bad investments.","videoUrl":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1680710352506c612f26dc47558ec8f99c01e3d6186f4.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f5a871fb432b1b2e7503943f42ba5cba","shareLink":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/1680710352506c612f26dc47558ec8f99c01e3d6186f4.mp4"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2713,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943329415,"gmtCreate":1679155273638,"gmtModify":1679155277729,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ","listText":"Like ","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943329415","repostId":"1119914899","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1119914899","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1679064597,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119914899?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-17 22:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"0DTE\" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119914899","media":"Reuters","summary":"ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect inv","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f83c49a96fec622f3c20f5afaf8b15d\" tg-width=\"4163\" tg-height=\"2776\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect investors from violent intraday price swings, but their popularity at a time of rising market instability could have the opposite effect.</p><p>So-called 'zero days to expiry' or '0DTE' options, are designed for institutional investors to hedge their exposure to outsized price swings on days of known event risk, such as U.S. employment and inflation data releases, or Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.</p><p>But they are attracting the attention of more speculative parts of the investment and trading community, at a time of increased market fragility due to higher interest rates, an unfolding banking crisis, and growing fears of wider economic and financial turmoil.</p><p>In a report published earlier this month, analysts at JP Morgan sketched out a worst-case scenario in which these options could trigger anintraday 25% routin the S&P 500 if they are unwound following an initial, sudden 5% market drop.</p><p>Understandably, a potential 25% crash in one day garnered a lot of attention. But even the less gloomy hypotheticals outlined in the report, such as a sudden 1% or 2% slump, still pointed to an even greater selloff than the original fall.</p><p>Peng Cheng, one of the authors, says this kind of scenario is less likely to play out on 'event days' like nonfarm payrolls data or Fed policy decisions. Investors know the event risk so they tighten controls, and are generally more cautious.</p><p>All else equal, this helps reduce systemic risk to the wider market. But on 'non-event days,' speculative activity increases.</p><p>"These options are being used more now for systematic trading, which is surprising ... (and) because of that, they have more potential to increase volatility on 'non-event days,'" Cheng said.</p><p>"On 'non-event days' there is more chance of an unexpected market shock, in which case investors may face greater losses in their short option positions, and that may increase intraday volatility," he added.</p><p>This nods to the Rumsfeldian world of 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' Calendar event risk, or 'known unknowns,' may unleash market volatility, but investors can hedge or sit on the sidelines. Their '0DTE' options positions are much more likely to be hit by 'unknown unknowns' at random times.</p><h2>POPULARITY SURGES</h2><p>Data from Cboe Global Markets shows that '0DTE' options have grown in stature over the past several months. They have accounted for more than 40% of daily turnover in all S&P 500 index options since last July - a year ago it was around 20%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/49738df15659929132dfafb2049810fc\" tg-width=\"910\" tg-height=\"508\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>Nominal trading volumes in these contracts often spikes up on 'event days' like U.S. jobs and inflation data days. The 1.7 million contracts traded on March 10, the day of the February employment report, is second only to the 1.76 million traded on Oct. 13, the day September CPI inflation data was released.</p><p>However, as a share of overall options turnover - which Cheng says is a better indication of potential market risk - many of the recent peaks have been on random 'non-event' days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86d43f3ca40d072c8df8f5bc0859549f\" tg-width=\"615\" tg-height=\"411\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>He and his colleagues estimate that the daily notional value of trading in '0DTE' options has grown to about $1 trillion.Reuters exclusively reportedlast week that Wall Street players and a major U.S. clearing house are examining the potential risks the explosion in trading these contracts poses.</p><p>But the Cboe points out that volume is evenly split between 'put' and 'call' options, reflecting a balanced market. Some 65%-70% of trades are closed out before expiry, which caps the accumulation of large, outsized positions, the exchange adds.</p><p>But it is worth monitoring how these options evolve, particularly with the Fed switching to a more data-dependent policy stance, which could in turn generate more speculative activity on big calendar 'event days.'</p><p>Fed Chair Jerome Powell indicated to lawmakers earlier this month that the decision to raise rates by 25 or 50 basis points at the March 21-22 policy meeting would likely hinge on February employment and CPI inflation data. These reports were released on March 10 and 14.</p><p>It's one thing for central banks to be 'data-dependent,' another to pin policy decisions on specific data.</p><p>"My sense is that Powell was trying not to surprise the market with 50bp — a little bit of forward guidance," said John Silvia, economist and founder of Dynamic Economic Strategy. "But it is very rare — and risky – to make such a specific number outlook."</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"0DTE\" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"0DTE\" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-17 22:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f83c49a96fec622f3c20f5afaf8b15d\" tg-width=\"4163\" tg-height=\"2776\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect investors from violent intraday price swings, but their popularity at a time of rising market instability could have the opposite effect.</p><p>So-called 'zero days to expiry' or '0DTE' options, are designed for institutional investors to hedge their exposure to outsized price swings on days of known event risk, such as U.S. employment and inflation data releases, or Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.</p><p>But they are attracting the attention of more speculative parts of the investment and trading community, at a time of increased market fragility due to higher interest rates, an unfolding banking crisis, and growing fears of wider economic and financial turmoil.</p><p>In a report published earlier this month, analysts at JP Morgan sketched out a worst-case scenario in which these options could trigger anintraday 25% routin the S&P 500 if they are unwound following an initial, sudden 5% market drop.</p><p>Understandably, a potential 25% crash in one day garnered a lot of attention. But even the less gloomy hypotheticals outlined in the report, such as a sudden 1% or 2% slump, still pointed to an even greater selloff than the original fall.</p><p>Peng Cheng, one of the authors, says this kind of scenario is less likely to play out on 'event days' like nonfarm payrolls data or Fed policy decisions. Investors know the event risk so they tighten controls, and are generally more cautious.</p><p>All else equal, this helps reduce systemic risk to the wider market. But on 'non-event days,' speculative activity increases.</p><p>"These options are being used more now for systematic trading, which is surprising ... (and) because of that, they have more potential to increase volatility on 'non-event days,'" Cheng said.</p><p>"On 'non-event days' there is more chance of an unexpected market shock, in which case investors may face greater losses in their short option positions, and that may increase intraday volatility," he added.</p><p>This nods to the Rumsfeldian world of 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' Calendar event risk, or 'known unknowns,' may unleash market volatility, but investors can hedge or sit on the sidelines. Their '0DTE' options positions are much more likely to be hit by 'unknown unknowns' at random times.</p><h2>POPULARITY SURGES</h2><p>Data from Cboe Global Markets shows that '0DTE' options have grown in stature over the past several months. They have accounted for more than 40% of daily turnover in all S&P 500 index options since last July - a year ago it was around 20%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/49738df15659929132dfafb2049810fc\" tg-width=\"910\" tg-height=\"508\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>Nominal trading volumes in these contracts often spikes up on 'event days' like U.S. jobs and inflation data days. The 1.7 million contracts traded on March 10, the day of the February employment report, is second only to the 1.76 million traded on Oct. 13, the day September CPI inflation data was released.</p><p>However, as a share of overall options turnover - which Cheng says is a better indication of potential market risk - many of the recent peaks have been on random 'non-event' days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86d43f3ca40d072c8df8f5bc0859549f\" tg-width=\"615\" tg-height=\"411\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>He and his colleagues estimate that the daily notional value of trading in '0DTE' options has grown to about $1 trillion.Reuters exclusively reportedlast week that Wall Street players and a major U.S. clearing house are examining the potential risks the explosion in trading these contracts poses.</p><p>But the Cboe points out that volume is evenly split between 'put' and 'call' options, reflecting a balanced market. Some 65%-70% of trades are closed out before expiry, which caps the accumulation of large, outsized positions, the exchange adds.</p><p>But it is worth monitoring how these options evolve, particularly with the Fed switching to a more data-dependent policy stance, which could in turn generate more speculative activity on big calendar 'event days.'</p><p>Fed Chair Jerome Powell indicated to lawmakers earlier this month that the decision to raise rates by 25 or 50 basis points at the March 21-22 policy meeting would likely hinge on February employment and CPI inflation data. These reports were released on March 10 and 14.</p><p>It's one thing for central banks to be 'data-dependent,' another to pin policy decisions on specific data.</p><p>"My sense is that Powell was trying not to surprise the market with 50bp — a little bit of forward guidance," said John Silvia, economist and founder of Dynamic Economic Strategy. "But it is very rare — and risky – to make such a specific number outlook."</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119914899","content_text":"ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect investors from violent intraday price swings, but their popularity at a time of rising market instability could have the opposite effect.So-called 'zero days to expiry' or '0DTE' options, are designed for institutional investors to hedge their exposure to outsized price swings on days of known event risk, such as U.S. employment and inflation data releases, or Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.But they are attracting the attention of more speculative parts of the investment and trading community, at a time of increased market fragility due to higher interest rates, an unfolding banking crisis, and growing fears of wider economic and financial turmoil.In a report published earlier this month, analysts at JP Morgan sketched out a worst-case scenario in which these options could trigger anintraday 25% routin the S&P 500 if they are unwound following an initial, sudden 5% market drop.Understandably, a potential 25% crash in one day garnered a lot of attention. But even the less gloomy hypotheticals outlined in the report, such as a sudden 1% or 2% slump, still pointed to an even greater selloff than the original fall.Peng Cheng, one of the authors, says this kind of scenario is less likely to play out on 'event days' like nonfarm payrolls data or Fed policy decisions. Investors know the event risk so they tighten controls, and are generally more cautious.All else equal, this helps reduce systemic risk to the wider market. But on 'non-event days,' speculative activity increases.\"These options are being used more now for systematic trading, which is surprising ... (and) because of that, they have more potential to increase volatility on 'non-event days,'\" Cheng said.\"On 'non-event days' there is more chance of an unexpected market shock, in which case investors may face greater losses in their short option positions, and that may increase intraday volatility,\" he added.This nods to the Rumsfeldian world of 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' Calendar event risk, or 'known unknowns,' may unleash market volatility, but investors can hedge or sit on the sidelines. Their '0DTE' options positions are much more likely to be hit by 'unknown unknowns' at random times.POPULARITY SURGESData from Cboe Global Markets shows that '0DTE' options have grown in stature over the past several months. They have accounted for more than 40% of daily turnover in all S&P 500 index options since last July - a year ago it was around 20%.chartNominal trading volumes in these contracts often spikes up on 'event days' like U.S. jobs and inflation data days. The 1.7 million contracts traded on March 10, the day of the February employment report, is second only to the 1.76 million traded on Oct. 13, the day September CPI inflation data was released.However, as a share of overall options turnover - which Cheng says is a better indication of potential market risk - many of the recent peaks have been on random 'non-event' days.chartHe and his colleagues estimate that the daily notional value of trading in '0DTE' options has grown to about $1 trillion.Reuters exclusively reportedlast week that Wall Street players and a major U.S. clearing house are examining the potential risks the explosion in trading these contracts poses.But the Cboe points out that volume is evenly split between 'put' and 'call' options, reflecting a balanced market. Some 65%-70% of trades are closed out before expiry, which caps the accumulation of large, outsized positions, the exchange adds.But it is worth monitoring how these options evolve, particularly with the Fed switching to a more data-dependent policy stance, which could in turn generate more speculative activity on big calendar 'event days.'Fed Chair Jerome Powell indicated to lawmakers earlier this month that the decision to raise rates by 25 or 50 basis points at the March 21-22 policy meeting would likely hinge on February employment and CPI inflation data. These reports were released on March 10 and 14.It's one thing for central banks to be 'data-dependent,' another to pin policy decisions on specific data.\"My sense is that Powell was trying not to surprise the market with 50bp — a little bit of forward guidance,\" said John Silvia, economist and founder of Dynamic Economic Strategy. \"But it is very rare — and risky – to make such a specific number outlook.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,"QQQ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3299,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943944295,"gmtCreate":1679068901418,"gmtModify":1679068905511,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ","listText":"Like ","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":37,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943944295","repostId":"1119914899","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"1119914899","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1679064597,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1119914899?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-17 22:49","market":"us","language":"en","title":"\"0DTE\" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1119914899","media":"Reuters","summary":"ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect inv","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f83c49a96fec622f3c20f5afaf8b15d\" tg-width=\"4163\" tg-height=\"2776\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect investors from violent intraday price swings, but their popularity at a time of rising market instability could have the opposite effect.</p><p>So-called 'zero days to expiry' or '0DTE' options, are designed for institutional investors to hedge their exposure to outsized price swings on days of known event risk, such as U.S. employment and inflation data releases, or Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.</p><p>But they are attracting the attention of more speculative parts of the investment and trading community, at a time of increased market fragility due to higher interest rates, an unfolding banking crisis, and growing fears of wider economic and financial turmoil.</p><p>In a report published earlier this month, analysts at JP Morgan sketched out a worst-case scenario in which these options could trigger anintraday 25% routin the S&P 500 if they are unwound following an initial, sudden 5% market drop.</p><p>Understandably, a potential 25% crash in one day garnered a lot of attention. But even the less gloomy hypotheticals outlined in the report, such as a sudden 1% or 2% slump, still pointed to an even greater selloff than the original fall.</p><p>Peng Cheng, one of the authors, says this kind of scenario is less likely to play out on 'event days' like nonfarm payrolls data or Fed policy decisions. Investors know the event risk so they tighten controls, and are generally more cautious.</p><p>All else equal, this helps reduce systemic risk to the wider market. But on 'non-event days,' speculative activity increases.</p><p>"These options are being used more now for systematic trading, which is surprising ... (and) because of that, they have more potential to increase volatility on 'non-event days,'" Cheng said.</p><p>"On 'non-event days' there is more chance of an unexpected market shock, in which case investors may face greater losses in their short option positions, and that may increase intraday volatility," he added.</p><p>This nods to the Rumsfeldian world of 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' Calendar event risk, or 'known unknowns,' may unleash market volatility, but investors can hedge or sit on the sidelines. Their '0DTE' options positions are much more likely to be hit by 'unknown unknowns' at random times.</p><h2>POPULARITY SURGES</h2><p>Data from Cboe Global Markets shows that '0DTE' options have grown in stature over the past several months. They have accounted for more than 40% of daily turnover in all S&P 500 index options since last July - a year ago it was around 20%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/49738df15659929132dfafb2049810fc\" tg-width=\"910\" tg-height=\"508\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>Nominal trading volumes in these contracts often spikes up on 'event days' like U.S. jobs and inflation data days. The 1.7 million contracts traded on March 10, the day of the February employment report, is second only to the 1.76 million traded on Oct. 13, the day September CPI inflation data was released.</p><p>However, as a share of overall options turnover - which Cheng says is a better indication of potential market risk - many of the recent peaks have been on random 'non-event' days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86d43f3ca40d072c8df8f5bc0859549f\" tg-width=\"615\" tg-height=\"411\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>He and his colleagues estimate that the daily notional value of trading in '0DTE' options has grown to about $1 trillion.Reuters exclusively reportedlast week that Wall Street players and a major U.S. clearing house are examining the potential risks the explosion in trading these contracts poses.</p><p>But the Cboe points out that volume is evenly split between 'put' and 'call' options, reflecting a balanced market. Some 65%-70% of trades are closed out before expiry, which caps the accumulation of large, outsized positions, the exchange adds.</p><p>But it is worth monitoring how these options evolve, particularly with the Fed switching to a more data-dependent policy stance, which could in turn generate more speculative activity on big calendar 'event days.'</p><p>Fed Chair Jerome Powell indicated to lawmakers earlier this month that the decision to raise rates by 25 or 50 basis points at the March 21-22 policy meeting would likely hinge on February employment and CPI inflation data. These reports were released on March 10 and 14.</p><p>It's one thing for central banks to be 'data-dependent,' another to pin policy decisions on specific data.</p><p>"My sense is that Powell was trying not to surprise the market with 50bp — a little bit of forward guidance," said John Silvia, economist and founder of Dynamic Economic Strategy. "But it is very rare — and risky – to make such a specific number outlook."</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>\"0DTE\" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n\"0DTE\" Options Trading Could Exacerbate Stock Market Volatility\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-17 22:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f83c49a96fec622f3c20f5afaf8b15d\" tg-width=\"4163\" tg-height=\"2776\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect investors from violent intraday price swings, but their popularity at a time of rising market instability could have the opposite effect.</p><p>So-called 'zero days to expiry' or '0DTE' options, are designed for institutional investors to hedge their exposure to outsized price swings on days of known event risk, such as U.S. employment and inflation data releases, or Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.</p><p>But they are attracting the attention of more speculative parts of the investment and trading community, at a time of increased market fragility due to higher interest rates, an unfolding banking crisis, and growing fears of wider economic and financial turmoil.</p><p>In a report published earlier this month, analysts at JP Morgan sketched out a worst-case scenario in which these options could trigger anintraday 25% routin the S&P 500 if they are unwound following an initial, sudden 5% market drop.</p><p>Understandably, a potential 25% crash in one day garnered a lot of attention. But even the less gloomy hypotheticals outlined in the report, such as a sudden 1% or 2% slump, still pointed to an even greater selloff than the original fall.</p><p>Peng Cheng, one of the authors, says this kind of scenario is less likely to play out on 'event days' like nonfarm payrolls data or Fed policy decisions. Investors know the event risk so they tighten controls, and are generally more cautious.</p><p>All else equal, this helps reduce systemic risk to the wider market. But on 'non-event days,' speculative activity increases.</p><p>"These options are being used more now for systematic trading, which is surprising ... (and) because of that, they have more potential to increase volatility on 'non-event days,'" Cheng said.</p><p>"On 'non-event days' there is more chance of an unexpected market shock, in which case investors may face greater losses in their short option positions, and that may increase intraday volatility," he added.</p><p>This nods to the Rumsfeldian world of 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' Calendar event risk, or 'known unknowns,' may unleash market volatility, but investors can hedge or sit on the sidelines. Their '0DTE' options positions are much more likely to be hit by 'unknown unknowns' at random times.</p><h2>POPULARITY SURGES</h2><p>Data from Cboe Global Markets shows that '0DTE' options have grown in stature over the past several months. They have accounted for more than 40% of daily turnover in all S&P 500 index options since last July - a year ago it was around 20%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/49738df15659929132dfafb2049810fc\" tg-width=\"910\" tg-height=\"508\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>Nominal trading volumes in these contracts often spikes up on 'event days' like U.S. jobs and inflation data days. The 1.7 million contracts traded on March 10, the day of the February employment report, is second only to the 1.76 million traded on Oct. 13, the day September CPI inflation data was released.</p><p>However, as a share of overall options turnover - which Cheng says is a better indication of potential market risk - many of the recent peaks have been on random 'non-event' days.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/86d43f3ca40d072c8df8f5bc0859549f\" tg-width=\"615\" tg-height=\"411\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>chart</p><p>He and his colleagues estimate that the daily notional value of trading in '0DTE' options has grown to about $1 trillion.Reuters exclusively reportedlast week that Wall Street players and a major U.S. clearing house are examining the potential risks the explosion in trading these contracts poses.</p><p>But the Cboe points out that volume is evenly split between 'put' and 'call' options, reflecting a balanced market. Some 65%-70% of trades are closed out before expiry, which caps the accumulation of large, outsized positions, the exchange adds.</p><p>But it is worth monitoring how these options evolve, particularly with the Fed switching to a more data-dependent policy stance, which could in turn generate more speculative activity on big calendar 'event days.'</p><p>Fed Chair Jerome Powell indicated to lawmakers earlier this month that the decision to raise rates by 25 or 50 basis points at the March 21-22 policy meeting would likely hinge on February employment and CPI inflation data. These reports were released on March 10 and 14.</p><p>It's one thing for central banks to be 'data-dependent,' another to pin policy decisions on specific data.</p><p>"My sense is that Powell was trying not to surprise the market with 50bp — a little bit of forward guidance," said John Silvia, economist and founder of Dynamic Economic Strategy. "But it is very rare — and risky – to make such a specific number outlook."</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"QQQ":"纳指100ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1119914899","content_text":"ORLANDO, Florida, March 17 (Reuters) - Ultra-short-dated U.S. equity options should help protect investors from violent intraday price swings, but their popularity at a time of rising market instability could have the opposite effect.So-called 'zero days to expiry' or '0DTE' options, are designed for institutional investors to hedge their exposure to outsized price swings on days of known event risk, such as U.S. employment and inflation data releases, or Federal Reserve interest rate decisions.But they are attracting the attention of more speculative parts of the investment and trading community, at a time of increased market fragility due to higher interest rates, an unfolding banking crisis, and growing fears of wider economic and financial turmoil.In a report published earlier this month, analysts at JP Morgan sketched out a worst-case scenario in which these options could trigger anintraday 25% routin the S&P 500 if they are unwound following an initial, sudden 5% market drop.Understandably, a potential 25% crash in one day garnered a lot of attention. But even the less gloomy hypotheticals outlined in the report, such as a sudden 1% or 2% slump, still pointed to an even greater selloff than the original fall.Peng Cheng, one of the authors, says this kind of scenario is less likely to play out on 'event days' like nonfarm payrolls data or Fed policy decisions. Investors know the event risk so they tighten controls, and are generally more cautious.All else equal, this helps reduce systemic risk to the wider market. But on 'non-event days,' speculative activity increases.\"These options are being used more now for systematic trading, which is surprising ... (and) because of that, they have more potential to increase volatility on 'non-event days,'\" Cheng said.\"On 'non-event days' there is more chance of an unexpected market shock, in which case investors may face greater losses in their short option positions, and that may increase intraday volatility,\" he added.This nods to the Rumsfeldian world of 'known unknowns' and 'unknown unknowns.' Calendar event risk, or 'known unknowns,' may unleash market volatility, but investors can hedge or sit on the sidelines. Their '0DTE' options positions are much more likely to be hit by 'unknown unknowns' at random times.POPULARITY SURGESData from Cboe Global Markets shows that '0DTE' options have grown in stature over the past several months. They have accounted for more than 40% of daily turnover in all S&P 500 index options since last July - a year ago it was around 20%.chartNominal trading volumes in these contracts often spikes up on 'event days' like U.S. jobs and inflation data days. The 1.7 million contracts traded on March 10, the day of the February employment report, is second only to the 1.76 million traded on Oct. 13, the day September CPI inflation data was released.However, as a share of overall options turnover - which Cheng says is a better indication of potential market risk - many of the recent peaks have been on random 'non-event' days.chartHe and his colleagues estimate that the daily notional value of trading in '0DTE' options has grown to about $1 trillion.Reuters exclusively reportedlast week that Wall Street players and a major U.S. clearing house are examining the potential risks the explosion in trading these contracts poses.But the Cboe points out that volume is evenly split between 'put' and 'call' options, reflecting a balanced market. Some 65%-70% of trades are closed out before expiry, which caps the accumulation of large, outsized positions, the exchange adds.But it is worth monitoring how these options evolve, particularly with the Fed switching to a more data-dependent policy stance, which could in turn generate more speculative activity on big calendar 'event days.'Fed Chair Jerome Powell indicated to lawmakers earlier this month that the decision to raise rates by 25 or 50 basis points at the March 21-22 policy meeting would likely hinge on February employment and CPI inflation data. These reports were released on March 10 and 14.It's one thing for central banks to be 'data-dependent,' another to pin policy decisions on specific data.\"My sense is that Powell was trying not to surprise the market with 50bp — a little bit of forward guidance,\" said John Silvia, economist and founder of Dynamic Economic Strategy. \"But it is very rare — and risky – to make such a specific number outlook.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SPY":0.9,"QQQ":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3523,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9943047594,"gmtCreate":1679005091718,"gmtModify":1679005095729,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ","listText":"Like ","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9943047594","repostId":"1130069870","repostType":2,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3141,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949768907,"gmtCreate":1678896208010,"gmtModify":1678896210830,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ","listText":"Like ","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":24,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949768907","repostId":"1123603567","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123603567","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1678891090,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123603567?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-15 22:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123603567","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer m","content":"<div>\n<p>Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer money should be used.It was approaching midnight in Washington and 9 p.m. in Santa Clara, California....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n72 Hours in Washington: How the Frenzied SVB Rescue Took Shape\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-15 22:38 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer money should be used.It was approaching midnight in Washington and 9 p.m. in Santa Clara, California....</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"WAL":"阿莱恩斯西部银行","SBNY":"签字银行","PACW":"西太平洋合众银行"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-15/svb-bailout-shaped-by-biden-administration-over-72-hours?srnd=premium","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123603567","content_text":"Haunted by the fallout from the 2008 financial crisis, President Biden told aides that no taxpayer money should be used.It was approaching midnight in Washington and 9 p.m. in Santa Clara, California. The news was bad—and getting worse. Everyone from President Joe Biden on down was getting acrash courseonSilicon Valley Bank, the once-obscure tech lender that has now cast abig shadow over the financial markets.At the White House and the US Department of the Treasury next door, bleary-eyed officials were racing to prevent the trouble at SVB from exploding into a full-blown banking crisis. A block west at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., regulators were arguing about what to do. Over at the Gridiron Club dinner, Washington’s annual see-and-be-seen white-tie journalism roast, a marquee guest, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, was conspicuously absent.That Saturday, March 11, the fate of techdom’s preeminent bank—and with it, some feared, the future of the global economy—was being gamed out in Washington. Over the next 24 hours, almost everyone in the financial industry would be on tenterhooks as federal officials raced to complete a rescue before Asian markets opened Sunday night.Almost a week later, the implications of the SVB fiasco, thesecond-biggest bank failure in US history, are still coming into focus. Questions keep piling up. How could SVB, a favorite of venture capitalists and unicorn startups, succumb to arun in the smartphone age? Why hadn’t banking regulators seen this coming?Federal authorities want answers, too. The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission haveopened investigationsinto the collapse. One potential focus:sales of SVB stockin the weeks before the failure by Greg Becker, chief executive officer of the bank’s parent company. Biden, meanwhile, has pledged a push totighten banking rules, which the Fed is already considering doing for midsize institutions like SVB.This much is sure: All these years later, Washington is still haunted by the Wall Street fiascoes that triggered the Great Recession. The colossal bank bailouts of that era saved the economy, but they also rankled ordinary Americans, gave birth to the Tea Party movement on the right and Occupy Wall Street on the left, and transformed US politics. Backlash to the bailouts died down, but the resentment never really went away. It may have ultimately helped Donald Trump win the White House in 2016, some political scientists havesaid.Which is probably why President Biden has been reluctant to even say the word “bailout.” He vowed on March 13 that “no losses will be borne by the taxpayers.” For the time being, Biden is right. This doesn’t look like aLehman momentthat could upend the whole economy. But itdoeslook likea Bear Stearns one—a smaller debacle pointing to more pain to come, in this case, because of the sharp rise in interest rates that triggered SVB’s problems and are still roiling the financial system.Federal authorities have taken the extraordinary step ofguaranteeing all deposits at SVBand opening a broaderemergency lending program. By midweek, the fix was holding. If it doesn’t, the next move might have to be a suspension of the$250,000 limit on federal deposit insurance.Policymakers, venture capitalists, banking executives and tech entrepreneurs are all struggling to figure out the next steps. SVB’s failure has changed the conversation about banking and the regulators who oversee it. Suddenly, everyone is thinking about other risks that might be lurking. On March 14,Moody’s Investors Service cut its outlook for the entire US banking system, to negative from stable, citing the run on deposits at SVB. Two other lenders have gone bust, too: crypto playersSilvergate Capital Corp.andSignature Bank.The death spiral at SVB began with credit ratings. In early March, Moody’s informed the bank it was considering a multilevel downgrade that would have pushed it to the brink of junk-bond status. In response, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., hired by SVB to help it raise fresh capital, jumped into action. It offloaded a chunk of SVB’s investment portfolio at a $1.8 billion loss. On Wednesday, March 8, Goldman pitched a plan to investors to help plug that hole, and then some, by raising $2.25 billion in capital fromGeneral Atlanticand other investors. Itdidn’t work.“The Catch-22 of the situation is that, by announcing the need to raise capital, they in essence accelerated customer concern, resulting in the liquidity stress that ultimately caused their collapse,” says Olivier Sarkozy, managing partner atFurther Global, a private equity firm. “It would have been far better to announce the $2.25 billion they were seeking had been secured.”In the bankers’ view, they were racing the clock to defuse the Moody’s threat. That didn’t leave them enough time to canvass the market, line up the funding and present a neatly put-together deal. Then CEO Becker held what turned out to be a disastrous call with VCs and limited partners. “Stay calm,” he said. It was too late. Bankers tapping away at their phones watched, aghast, as social media lit up with reports of a viral bank run.By 3 p.m. the next day, Thursday, March 9, the news out of Santa Clarahad reached the White House. Such high-profile venture firms asUnion Square Venturesand thePeter Thiel-backedFounders Fundhad already been encouraging the companies they invested in to yank their deposits, almost all of which were uninsured because they exceeded the $250,000 limit on federal guarantees. Founders Fund haddrained its own accountsfrom the bank by midday.The message was echoed by other VC titans.Bookface, an internal social network for founders of companies backed by the startup acceleratorY Combinator, was abuzz, as was a messenger threadof more than 1,000 founders fromAndreessen Horowitz, with many encouraging each other to pull cash from the bank. By day’s end, depositors had tried to withdraw $42 billion.Silicon Valley bigs—many with a libertarian, get-government-off-our-backs bent—quickly looked to Washington. They implored the administration to step in and rescue depositors, or risk having banks topple like dominoes. On Friday morning, March 10, the new White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients and Lael Brainard, the former Fed vice chair who’djust becomedirector of Biden’s National Economic Council, went to the Oval Office to brief the president. They told him there was potential for the bank to be shut down—as it was later that day, even before the close of financial markets—and that there was a possibility of contagion, according to a source familiar with the discussion.From dawn to midnight the following day, Zients, Brainard and other aides working in the White House’s West Wing developed a set of options. By Saturday afternoon, it was clear that regulators would probably need to take action to prevent contagion. When Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and top aides briefed Biden on the options, he was adamant: The federal government stood ready to protect depositors, small businesses and employees. Executives and investors could take their lumps. He didn’t want taxpayers to be on the hook, and any deal had to include firing management.In the Bay Area, Iba Masood was struggling to make sense of it all. Masood, the co-founder and CEO of a tech startup calledTara.AI, had raised $14 million from investors. And she’d parked every penny of the company’s money at SVB. Masood began firing off emails and texts—hundreds and hundreds of them, until her carpal tunnel flared up. Tara.AI, she told her investors, was facing a perilous squeeze. She hopped in her C300 Mercedes-Benz and raced through a driving rainstorm to a Bank of America branch. Drenched, she hastily opened a corporate account. She felt good, she said, confident. She’d wake up the next morning and have the money in the new account.But there was no next morning for SVB. It was too late. The money was frozen.Trae Stephens, a partner at Founders Fund, said the firm had had a long, fruitful relationship with SVB. But that long, fruitful relationship wasn’t going to help Thiel’s firm honor its fiduciary duty to look out for its backers and limited partners. And it wasn’t going to help all those startups make payroll.“The most inconvenient thing about the situation last week was actually the name of the bank. It got instantly politicized,” Stephens said in aMarch 14 interview on Bloomberg Television. To him, the idea that Washington had somehow bailed out rich VCs and techies is hogwash. “The government did what it needed to protect and shore up these smaller regional banks, to ensure there weren’t any further runs. It seems like they acted quickly—and did the right thing.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FRC":0.9,"PACW":0.9,"WAL":0.9,"SIVB":0.9,"SBNY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3098,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949414319,"gmtCreate":1678814264532,"gmtModify":1678814268418,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ","listText":"Like ","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949414319","repostId":"1104135804","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1104135804","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1678797046,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1104135804?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-14 20:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Inflation: Consumer Prices Rise 6% over Last Year in February, Slowest since Sept. 2021","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1104135804","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Inflation rose in February but was in line with expectations, providing a key input into whether the","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Inflation rose in February but was in line with expectations, providing a key input into whether the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates.</p><p>The consumer price index increased 0.4% for the month, putting the annual inflation rate at 6%, the Labor Department reported Tuesday. Both readings were exactly in line with Dow Jones estimates. The 6% jump in inflation marks the slowest annual increase in consumer prices since September 2021.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, core CPI increased 0.5% in February and 5.5% on a 12-month basis. The monthly reading was slightly ahead of the 0.4% estimate, but the annual level was in line.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3364ebc77888be5903f76a25ec47c2e1\" tg-width=\"1172\" tg-height=\"264\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>CPI measures a broad basket of goods and services and is one of several key measures the Fed uses when formulating monetary policy. The report along with Wednesday’s producer price index will be the last inflation-related data points policymakers will see before they meet March 21-22.</p><p>Heading into the release, markets had widely expected the Fed to approve another 0.25 percentage point increase to its benchmark federal funds rate.</p><p>However, banking sector turmoil in recent days has kindled speculation that the central bank could signal that it soon will halt the rate hikes as officials observe the impact that a series of tightening measures have had over the past year.</p><p>Markets Tuesday morning were pricing a peak, or terminal, rate of about 4.92%, which would mean the upcoming increase would be the last. Futures pricing is volatile, though, and unexpectedly strong inflation reports this week likely would cause a repricing.</p><p>Either way, market sentiment has shifted dramatically.</p><p>Fed Chairman Jerome Powell last week told two congressional committees that the central bank is prepared to push rates higher than expected if inflation does not come down. That set off a wave of speculation that the Fed could be teeing up a 0.5 percentage point hike next week.</p><p>However, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank over the past several days paved the way for a more restrained view for monetary policy.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Inflation: Consumer Prices Rise 6% over Last Year in February, Slowest since Sept. 2021</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nInflation: Consumer Prices Rise 6% over Last Year in February, Slowest since Sept. 2021\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-14 20:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Inflation rose in February but was in line with expectations, providing a key input into whether the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates.</p><p>The consumer price index increased 0.4% for the month, putting the annual inflation rate at 6%, the Labor Department reported Tuesday. Both readings were exactly in line with Dow Jones estimates. The 6% jump in inflation marks the slowest annual increase in consumer prices since September 2021.</p><p>Excluding volatile food and energy prices, core CPI increased 0.5% in February and 5.5% on a 12-month basis. The monthly reading was slightly ahead of the 0.4% estimate, but the annual level was in line.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3364ebc77888be5903f76a25ec47c2e1\" tg-width=\"1172\" tg-height=\"264\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>CPI measures a broad basket of goods and services and is one of several key measures the Fed uses when formulating monetary policy. The report along with Wednesday’s producer price index will be the last inflation-related data points policymakers will see before they meet March 21-22.</p><p>Heading into the release, markets had widely expected the Fed to approve another 0.25 percentage point increase to its benchmark federal funds rate.</p><p>However, banking sector turmoil in recent days has kindled speculation that the central bank could signal that it soon will halt the rate hikes as officials observe the impact that a series of tightening measures have had over the past year.</p><p>Markets Tuesday morning were pricing a peak, or terminal, rate of about 4.92%, which would mean the upcoming increase would be the last. Futures pricing is volatile, though, and unexpectedly strong inflation reports this week likely would cause a repricing.</p><p>Either way, market sentiment has shifted dramatically.</p><p>Fed Chairman Jerome Powell last week told two congressional committees that the central bank is prepared to push rates higher than expected if inflation does not come down. That set off a wave of speculation that the Fed could be teeing up a 0.5 percentage point hike next week.</p><p>However, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank over the past several days paved the way for a more restrained view for monetary policy.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1104135804","content_text":"Inflation rose in February but was in line with expectations, providing a key input into whether the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates.The consumer price index increased 0.4% for the month, putting the annual inflation rate at 6%, the Labor Department reported Tuesday. Both readings were exactly in line with Dow Jones estimates. The 6% jump in inflation marks the slowest annual increase in consumer prices since September 2021.Excluding volatile food and energy prices, core CPI increased 0.5% in February and 5.5% on a 12-month basis. The monthly reading was slightly ahead of the 0.4% estimate, but the annual level was in line.CPI measures a broad basket of goods and services and is one of several key measures the Fed uses when formulating monetary policy. The report along with Wednesday’s producer price index will be the last inflation-related data points policymakers will see before they meet March 21-22.Heading into the release, markets had widely expected the Fed to approve another 0.25 percentage point increase to its benchmark federal funds rate.However, banking sector turmoil in recent days has kindled speculation that the central bank could signal that it soon will halt the rate hikes as officials observe the impact that a series of tightening measures have had over the past year.Markets Tuesday morning were pricing a peak, or terminal, rate of about 4.92%, which would mean the upcoming increase would be the last. Futures pricing is volatile, though, and unexpectedly strong inflation reports this week likely would cause a repricing.Either way, market sentiment has shifted dramatically.Fed Chairman Jerome Powell last week told two congressional committees that the central bank is prepared to push rates higher than expected if inflation does not come down. That set off a wave of speculation that the Fed could be teeing up a 0.5 percentage point hike next week.However, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank over the past several days paved the way for a more restrained view for monetary policy.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2755,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949599546,"gmtCreate":1678723396086,"gmtModify":1678723399160,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ","listText":"Like ","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":22,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949599546","repostId":"1105902626","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105902626","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1678717774,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1105902626?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-13 22:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105902626","media":"Bloomberg","summary":"Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet","content":"<div>\n<p>Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet the collapse of three US lenders will compel policymakers to halt interest-rate increases.Swaps now...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"lsy1584095487587","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Traders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTraders Bet on No More Fed Hikes, US Two-Year Yields Plunge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-13 22:29 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse><strong>Bloomberg</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet the collapse of three US lenders will compel policymakers to halt interest-rate increases.Swaps now...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SBNY":"签字银行"},"source_url":"https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-12/dollar-falls-as-us-emergency-steps-ease-concern-at-svb-collapse","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105902626","content_text":"Treasury bonds surged, pushing key two-year yields to their lowest level this year, as investors bet the collapse of three US lenders will compel policymakers to halt interest-rate increases.Swaps now show a less than one-in-two chance that the Federal Reserve will implement another quarter-point hike this cycle. Yields on two-year Treasury notes — the most sensitive to changes in policy — fell as much as 60 basis points to less than 3.99%, the lowest since October.The three-month London interbank offered rate for dollars, a key benchmark, dropped by 27 basis points, the most since March 2020. The dollar also declined.Money markets are betting the Federal Reserve is probably done with hiking this cycle. Traders are now pricing a less than one-in two chance the Fed will hike by another quarter point at all this cycle, with cuts after that.It’s the latest abrupt change in the stop-start trajectory in recent months for further interest-rate hikes, as traders factor in the risk of banking contagion alongside the prospects for growth and prices. Some analysts warn the outlook may shift again if US inflation data due Tuesday beats expectations, although the immediate fragility of the financial system may well overshadow matters.“Mr Market always want to search out the weak link,” said Jack McIntyre, a portfolio manager at Brandywine. “The data is not as important as what is going on with the financial system. Just have to let the dust settle and see how CPI plays out.”Treasuries have beenwhipsawedin recent sessions by the evolving rate-hike outlook. Two-year US yields slid in the past few days after jumping above 5% last week when Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the central bank was likely to liftinterest rateshigher and potentially faster than previously anticipated with inflation persisting.That view of Powell’s may change after the failure of three lenders in recent days, including Silicon Valley Bank, highlighted the fallout from higher interest rates. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. hasscrappedits call for a rate hike at next week’s Fed meeting, although it still sees tightening this year.“We have to add one more factor to Fed policymakers’ thinking, which is the burden on the financial system,” said Kenta Inoue, a senior bond strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities Co. in Tokyo. “It’s become quite difficult for them to opt for a 50-basis point hike. SVB’s collapse has increased the probability that the end of the Fed’s rate hikes isn’t too far off now.”The impact of the banks’ collapse also triggered shock waves around the world, with German and Japanese yields plunging.Traders are now watching for further responses from policymakers. The Fed set up a new emergency facility to let banks pledge a range of high-quality assets for cash over a term of one year, in the wake of SVB’s collapse. Regulators also pledged to fully protect even uninsured depositors at the lender.SVB’s descent into FDIC receivership — the second-largest US bank failure in history behind Washington Mutual in 2008 — came suddenly on Friday, after a couple of days where its long-established customer base of tech startups yanked deposits.Still, concerns are growing that the failure of the three banks may just be the tip of the iceberg.“The risks are clearly there” that SVB’s collapse may be the canary in the coal mine, TD Securities strategists led by Priya Misra wrote in a research note on Sunday. “The macro fallout of SVB on the tech sector and bank lending standards as a whole should weigh on risk sentiment and longer term growth expectations.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FRC":0.9,"SIVB":0.9,"SBNY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3064,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949672610,"gmtCreate":1678666820031,"gmtModify":1678666823459,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949672610","repostId":"9949672829","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":9949672829,"gmtCreate":1678666755661,"gmtModify":1678671336492,"author":{"id":"4108876163249870","authorId":"4108876163249870","name":"LCapitaljr","avatar":"https://static.itradeup.com/news/7b9bba3b8a16b21e39f65381a6213c57","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4108876163249870","authorIdStr":"4108876163249870"},"themes":[],"title":"Current List of Companies With SVB Deposits ","htmlText":"Current List of Companies With Silicon Valley Bank<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIVB\">$SVB Financial Group(SIVB)$</a> Deposits:1. Circle: $3.3 billion2. Roku<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ROKU\">$Roku Inc(ROKU)$</a> : $487 million3. BlockFi: $227 million4. Roblox<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a> : $150 million5. Ginkgo Bio<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/DNA\">$Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Inc.(DNA)$</a> : $74 million6. iRhythm<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/IRTC\">$Irhythm Technologies Inc.(IRTC)$</a> : $55 million7. Rocket Lab<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RKLB\">$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$</a> : $38 million8. Sangamo Therapeutics<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SGMO\">$Sangamo BioSciences(SGMO)$</a> : $34 million9. Lending Club","listText":"Current List of Companies With Silicon Valley Bank<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SIVB\">$SVB Financial Group(SIVB)$</a> Deposits:1. Circle: $3.3 billion2. Roku<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/ROKU\">$Roku Inc(ROKU)$</a> : $487 million3. BlockFi: $227 million4. Roblox<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RBLX\">$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$</a> : $150 million5. Ginkgo Bio<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/DNA\">$Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Inc.(DNA)$</a> : $74 million6. iRhythm<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/IRTC\">$Irhythm Technologies Inc.(IRTC)$</a> : $55 million7. Rocket Lab<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/RKLB\">$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$</a> : $38 million8. Sangamo Therapeutics<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/SGMO\">$Sangamo BioSciences(SGMO)$</a> : $34 million9. Lending Club","text":"Current List of Companies With Silicon Valley Bank$SVB Financial Group(SIVB)$ Deposits:1. Circle: $3.3 billion2. Roku$Roku Inc(ROKU)$ : $487 million3. BlockFi: $227 million4. Roblox$Roblox Corporation(RBLX)$ : $150 million5. Ginkgo Bio$Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings Inc.(DNA)$ : $74 million6. iRhythm$Irhythm Technologies Inc.(IRTC)$ : $55 million7. Rocket Lab$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ : $38 million8. Sangamo Therapeutics$Sangamo BioSciences(SGMO)$ : $34 million9. Lending Club","images":[{"img":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aa832970f307092ada64fdb746d1cef8","width":"-1","height":"-1"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949672829","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2612,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9949652591,"gmtCreate":1678638848413,"gmtModify":1678638852263,"author":{"id":"4087619312283300","authorId":"4087619312283300","name":"Pierre0520","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4087619312283300","authorIdStr":"4087619312283300"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like ","listText":"Like ","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":12,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9949652591","repostId":"2318857796","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2318857796","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1678601805,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2318857796?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-12 14:16","market":"us","language":"en","title":"20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2318857796","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"SVB Financial Group faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big l","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBO\">SVB Financial Group</a> faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big losses if they were forced to dump securities to raise cash</p><p>Silicon Valley Bank has failed following a run on deposits, after its parent company's share price crashed a record 60% on Thursday.</p><p>Trading of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBP\">SVB Financial Group</a>'s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">$(SIVB)$</a> stock was halted early Friday, after the shares plunged again in premarket trading. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said SVB was one of a few banks she was "monitoring very carefully." Reaction poured in from several analysts who discussed the bank's liquidity risk.</p><p>California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank and handed the wreckage over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Administration later on Friday.</p><p>Below is the same list of 10 banks we highlighted on Thursday that showed similar red flags to those shown by SVB Financial through the fourth quarter. This time, we will show how much they reported in unrealized losses on securities -- an item that played an important role in SVB's crisis.</p><p>Below that is a screen of U.S. banks with at least $10 billion in total assets, showing those that appeared to have the greatest exposure to unrealized securities losses, as a percentage of total capital, as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>First, a quick look at SVB</h3><p>Some media reports have referred to SVB of Santa Clara, Calif., as a small bank, but it had $212 billion in total assets as of Dec. 31, making it the 17th largest bank in the Russell 3000 Index as of Dec. 31. That makes it the largest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008.</p><p>One unique aspect of SVB was its decades-long focus on the venture capital industry. The bank's loan growth had been slowing as interest rates rose. Meanwhile, when announcing its $21 billion dollars in securities sales on Thursday, SVB said it had taken the action not only to lower its interest-rate risk, but because "client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted."</p><p>SVB estimated it would book a $1.8 billion loss on the securities sale and said it would raise $2.25 billion in capital through two offerings of new shares and a convertible bond offering. That offering wasn't completed.</p><p>So this appears to be an example of what can go wrong with a bank focused on a particular industry. The combination of a balance sheet heavy with securities and relatively light on loans, in a rising-rate environment in which bond prices have declined and in which depositors specific to that industry are themselves suffering from a decline in cash, led to a liquidity problem.</p><h3>Unrealized losses on securities</h3><p>Banks leverage their capital by gathering deposits or borrowing money either to lend the money out or purchase securities. They earn the spread between their average yield on loans and investments and their average cost for funds.</p><p>The securities investments are held in two buckets:</p><p>In its regulatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies--FR Y-9C, filed with the Federal Reserve, SVB Financial, reported a negative $1.911 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income as of Dec. 31. That is line 26.b on Schedule HC of the report, for those keeping score at home. You can look up regulatory reports for any U.S. bank holding company, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary institution at the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council's National Information Center. Be sure to get the name of the company or institution right -- or you may be looking at the wrong entity.</p><p>Here's how accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is defined in the report: "Includes, but is not limited to, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, and accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan adjustments."</p><p>In other words, it was mostly unrealized losses on SVB's available-for-sale securities. The bank booked an estimated $1.8 billion loss when selling "substantially all" of these securities on March 8.</p><p>The list of 10 banks with unfavorable interest margin trends</p><p>On the regulatory call reports, AOCI is added to regulatory capital. Since SVB's AOCI was negative (because of its unrealized losses on AFS securities) as of Dec. 31, it lowered the company's total equity capital. So a fair way to gauge the negative AOCI to the bank's total equity capital would be to divide the negative AOCI by total equity capital less AOCI -- effectively adding the unrealized losses back to total equity capital for the calculation.</p><p>Getting back to our list of 10 banks that raised similar red margin flags to those of SVB, here's the same group, in the same order, showing negative AOCI as a percentage of total equity capital as of Dec. 31. We have added SVB to the bottom of the list. The data was provided by FactSet:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12eb7c2420e69b60c526a6b6ef79626d\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) -- the third largest bank on the list by Dec. 31 total assets -- stands out as having the largest percentage of negative accumulated comprehensive income relative to total equity capital as of Dec. 31.</p><p>To be sure, these numbers don't mean that a bank is in trouble, or that it will be forced to sell securities for big losses. But SVB had both a troubling pattern for its interest margins and what appeared to be a relatively high percentage of securities losses relative to capital as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>Banks with the highest percentage of negative AOCI to capital</h3><p>There are 108 banks in the Russell 3000 Index that had total assets of at least $10.0 billion as of Dec. 31. FactSet provided AOCI and total equity capital data for 105 of them. Here are the 20 which had the highest ratios of negative AOCI to total equity capital less AOCI (as explained above) as of Dec. 31:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8c786a5e88cfaa8510ac5458b4a31b86\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bbd38b51d92ae37f23e7fbff46e9c08\" tg-width=\"879\" tg-height=\"668\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Again, this is not to suggest that any particular bank on this list based on Dec. 31 data is facing the type of perfect storm that has hurt SVB Financial. A bank sitting on large paper losses on its AFS securities may not need to sell them. In fact <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMA\">Comerica Inc.</a>, which tops the list, also improved its interest margin the most over the past four quarters, as shown here.</p><p>But it is interesting to note that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SI\">Silvergate Capital Corp.</a>, which focused on serving clients in the virtual currency industry, made the list. It is shuttering its bank subsidiary voluntarily.</p><p>Another bank on the list facing concern among depositors is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBNY\">Signature Bank</a> of New York, which has a diverse business model, but has also faced a backlash related to the services it provides to the virtual currency industry. The bank’s shares fell 12% on Thursday and were down another 24% in afternoon trading on Friday.</p><p>Signature Bank said in a statement that it was in a “strong, well-diversified financial position.”</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n20 Banks That Are Sitting on Huge Potential Securities Losses--As Was SVB\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-12 14:16</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBO\">SVB Financial Group</a> faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big losses if they were forced to dump securities to raise cash</p><p>Silicon Valley Bank has failed following a run on deposits, after its parent company's share price crashed a record 60% on Thursday.</p><p>Trading of <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVBP\">SVB Financial Group</a>'s <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SIVB\">$(SIVB)$</a> stock was halted early Friday, after the shares plunged again in premarket trading. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said SVB was one of a few banks she was "monitoring very carefully." Reaction poured in from several analysts who discussed the bank's liquidity risk.</p><p>California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank and handed the wreckage over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Administration later on Friday.</p><p>Below is the same list of 10 banks we highlighted on Thursday that showed similar red flags to those shown by SVB Financial through the fourth quarter. This time, we will show how much they reported in unrealized losses on securities -- an item that played an important role in SVB's crisis.</p><p>Below that is a screen of U.S. banks with at least $10 billion in total assets, showing those that appeared to have the greatest exposure to unrealized securities losses, as a percentage of total capital, as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>First, a quick look at SVB</h3><p>Some media reports have referred to SVB of Santa Clara, Calif., as a small bank, but it had $212 billion in total assets as of Dec. 31, making it the 17th largest bank in the Russell 3000 Index as of Dec. 31. That makes it the largest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008.</p><p>One unique aspect of SVB was its decades-long focus on the venture capital industry. The bank's loan growth had been slowing as interest rates rose. Meanwhile, when announcing its $21 billion dollars in securities sales on Thursday, SVB said it had taken the action not only to lower its interest-rate risk, but because "client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted."</p><p>SVB estimated it would book a $1.8 billion loss on the securities sale and said it would raise $2.25 billion in capital through two offerings of new shares and a convertible bond offering. That offering wasn't completed.</p><p>So this appears to be an example of what can go wrong with a bank focused on a particular industry. The combination of a balance sheet heavy with securities and relatively light on loans, in a rising-rate environment in which bond prices have declined and in which depositors specific to that industry are themselves suffering from a decline in cash, led to a liquidity problem.</p><h3>Unrealized losses on securities</h3><p>Banks leverage their capital by gathering deposits or borrowing money either to lend the money out or purchase securities. They earn the spread between their average yield on loans and investments and their average cost for funds.</p><p>The securities investments are held in two buckets:</p><p>In its regulatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies--FR Y-9C, filed with the Federal Reserve, SVB Financial, reported a negative $1.911 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income as of Dec. 31. That is line 26.b on Schedule HC of the report, for those keeping score at home. You can look up regulatory reports for any U.S. bank holding company, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary institution at the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council's National Information Center. Be sure to get the name of the company or institution right -- or you may be looking at the wrong entity.</p><p>Here's how accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is defined in the report: "Includes, but is not limited to, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, and accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan adjustments."</p><p>In other words, it was mostly unrealized losses on SVB's available-for-sale securities. The bank booked an estimated $1.8 billion loss when selling "substantially all" of these securities on March 8.</p><p>The list of 10 banks with unfavorable interest margin trends</p><p>On the regulatory call reports, AOCI is added to regulatory capital. Since SVB's AOCI was negative (because of its unrealized losses on AFS securities) as of Dec. 31, it lowered the company's total equity capital. So a fair way to gauge the negative AOCI to the bank's total equity capital would be to divide the negative AOCI by total equity capital less AOCI -- effectively adding the unrealized losses back to total equity capital for the calculation.</p><p>Getting back to our list of 10 banks that raised similar red margin flags to those of SVB, here's the same group, in the same order, showing negative AOCI as a percentage of total equity capital as of Dec. 31. We have added SVB to the bottom of the list. The data was provided by FactSet:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12eb7c2420e69b60c526a6b6ef79626d\" tg-width=\"887\" tg-height=\"715\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/></p><p>Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) -- the third largest bank on the list by Dec. 31 total assets -- stands out as having the largest percentage of negative accumulated comprehensive income relative to total equity capital as of Dec. 31.</p><p>To be sure, these numbers don't mean that a bank is in trouble, or that it will be forced to sell securities for big losses. But SVB had both a troubling pattern for its interest margins and what appeared to be a relatively high percentage of securities losses relative to capital as of Dec. 31.</p><h3>Banks with the highest percentage of negative AOCI to capital</h3><p>There are 108 banks in the Russell 3000 Index that had total assets of at least $10.0 billion as of Dec. 31. FactSet provided AOCI and total equity capital data for 105 of them. Here are the 20 which had the highest ratios of negative AOCI to total equity capital less AOCI (as explained above) as of Dec. 31:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8c786a5e88cfaa8510ac5458b4a31b86\" tg-width=\"884\" tg-height=\"618\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6bbd38b51d92ae37f23e7fbff46e9c08\" tg-width=\"879\" tg-height=\"668\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Again, this is not to suggest that any particular bank on this list based on Dec. 31 data is facing the type of perfect storm that has hurt SVB Financial. A bank sitting on large paper losses on its AFS securities may not need to sell them. In fact <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/CMA\">Comerica Inc.</a>, which tops the list, also improved its interest margin the most over the past four quarters, as shown here.</p><p>But it is interesting to note that <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SI\">Silvergate Capital Corp.</a>, which focused on serving clients in the virtual currency industry, made the list. It is shuttering its bank subsidiary voluntarily.</p><p>Another bank on the list facing concern among depositors is <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SBNY\">Signature Bank</a> of New York, which has a diverse business model, but has also faced a backlash related to the services it provides to the virtual currency industry. The bank’s shares fell 12% on Thursday and were down another 24% in afternoon trading on Friday.</p><p>Signature Bank said in a statement that it was in a “strong, well-diversified financial position.”</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BK4166":"消费信贷","BK4191":"家用电器","BOLT":"Bolt Biotherapeutics, Inc.","BK4588":"碎股","LU1861217088.USD":"贝莱德金融科技A2","CRCT":"Cricut, Inc.","ALLY":"Ally Financial Inc.","BK4548":"巴美列捷福持仓","LU1861220207.SGD":"Blackrock FinTech A2 SGD-H","BK4007":"制药","LU0266013472.USD":"AXA WF - Framlington Longevity Economy A Cap USD","SBNY":"签字银行","BK4211":"区域性银行","BK4539":"次新股","BK4561":"索罗斯持仓","BK4585":"ETF&股票定投概念","BK4139":"生物科技","TERN":"Terns Pharmaceuticals, Inc.","LU0390134368.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL GROWTH \"A\" (USD) ACC","SI":"Shoulder Innovations, Inc.","KEY":"KeyCorp"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2318857796","content_text":"SVB Financial Group faced a perfect storm, but there are plenty of other banks that would face big losses if they were forced to dump securities to raise cashSilicon Valley Bank has failed following a run on deposits, after its parent company's share price crashed a record 60% on Thursday.Trading of SVB Financial Group's $(SIVB)$ stock was halted early Friday, after the shares plunged again in premarket trading. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said SVB was one of a few banks she was \"monitoring very carefully.\" Reaction poured in from several analysts who discussed the bank's liquidity risk.California regulators closed Silicon Valley Bank and handed the wreckage over to the Federal Deposit Insurance Administration later on Friday.Below is the same list of 10 banks we highlighted on Thursday that showed similar red flags to those shown by SVB Financial through the fourth quarter. This time, we will show how much they reported in unrealized losses on securities -- an item that played an important role in SVB's crisis.Below that is a screen of U.S. banks with at least $10 billion in total assets, showing those that appeared to have the greatest exposure to unrealized securities losses, as a percentage of total capital, as of Dec. 31.First, a quick look at SVBSome media reports have referred to SVB of Santa Clara, Calif., as a small bank, but it had $212 billion in total assets as of Dec. 31, making it the 17th largest bank in the Russell 3000 Index as of Dec. 31. That makes it the largest U.S. bank failure since Washington Mutual in 2008.One unique aspect of SVB was its decades-long focus on the venture capital industry. The bank's loan growth had been slowing as interest rates rose. Meanwhile, when announcing its $21 billion dollars in securities sales on Thursday, SVB said it had taken the action not only to lower its interest-rate risk, but because \"client cash burn has remained elevated and increased further in February, resulting in lower deposits than forecasted.\"SVB estimated it would book a $1.8 billion loss on the securities sale and said it would raise $2.25 billion in capital through two offerings of new shares and a convertible bond offering. That offering wasn't completed.So this appears to be an example of what can go wrong with a bank focused on a particular industry. The combination of a balance sheet heavy with securities and relatively light on loans, in a rising-rate environment in which bond prices have declined and in which depositors specific to that industry are themselves suffering from a decline in cash, led to a liquidity problem.Unrealized losses on securitiesBanks leverage their capital by gathering deposits or borrowing money either to lend the money out or purchase securities. They earn the spread between their average yield on loans and investments and their average cost for funds.The securities investments are held in two buckets:In its regulatory Consolidated Financial Statements for Holding Companies--FR Y-9C, filed with the Federal Reserve, SVB Financial, reported a negative $1.911 billion in accumulated other comprehensive income as of Dec. 31. That is line 26.b on Schedule HC of the report, for those keeping score at home. You can look up regulatory reports for any U.S. bank holding company, savings and loan holding company or subsidiary institution at the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council's National Information Center. Be sure to get the name of the company or institution right -- or you may be looking at the wrong entity.Here's how accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) is defined in the report: \"Includes, but is not limited to, net unrealized holding gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, accumulated net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments, and accumulated defined benefit pension and other postretirement plan adjustments.\"In other words, it was mostly unrealized losses on SVB's available-for-sale securities. The bank booked an estimated $1.8 billion loss when selling \"substantially all\" of these securities on March 8.The list of 10 banks with unfavorable interest margin trendsOn the regulatory call reports, AOCI is added to regulatory capital. Since SVB's AOCI was negative (because of its unrealized losses on AFS securities) as of Dec. 31, it lowered the company's total equity capital. So a fair way to gauge the negative AOCI to the bank's total equity capital would be to divide the negative AOCI by total equity capital less AOCI -- effectively adding the unrealized losses back to total equity capital for the calculation.Getting back to our list of 10 banks that raised similar red margin flags to those of SVB, here's the same group, in the same order, showing negative AOCI as a percentage of total equity capital as of Dec. 31. We have added SVB to the bottom of the list. The data was provided by FactSet:Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) -- the third largest bank on the list by Dec. 31 total assets -- stands out as having the largest percentage of negative accumulated comprehensive income relative to total equity capital as of Dec. 31.To be sure, these numbers don't mean that a bank is in trouble, or that it will be forced to sell securities for big losses. But SVB had both a troubling pattern for its interest margins and what appeared to be a relatively high percentage of securities losses relative to capital as of Dec. 31.Banks with the highest percentage of negative AOCI to capitalThere are 108 banks in the Russell 3000 Index that had total assets of at least $10.0 billion as of Dec. 31. FactSet provided AOCI and total equity capital data for 105 of them. Here are the 20 which had the highest ratios of negative AOCI to total equity capital less AOCI (as explained above) as of Dec. 31:Again, this is not to suggest that any particular bank on this list based on Dec. 31 data is facing the type of perfect storm that has hurt SVB Financial. A bank sitting on large paper losses on its AFS securities may not need to sell them. In fact Comerica Inc., which tops the list, also improved its interest margin the most over the past four quarters, as shown here.But it is interesting to note that Silvergate Capital Corp., which focused on serving clients in the virtual currency industry, made the list. It is shuttering its bank subsidiary voluntarily.Another bank on the list facing concern among depositors is Signature Bank of New York, which has a diverse business model, but has also faced a backlash related to the services it provides to the virtual currency industry. The bank’s shares fell 12% on Thursday and were down another 24% in afternoon trading on Friday.Signature Bank said in a statement that it was in a “strong, well-diversified financial position.”","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"SIVB":0.9,"SBNY":0.9,"KEY":0.9,"SI":0.9,"ALLY":1,"CRCT":0.9,"TERN":0.9,"BOLT":0.9,"FRC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3455,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}