To The Moon

The rotation looks significant, but I would avoid chasing it after a single session. A weak payroll report can support lower interest rates over time, which is often favourable for growth stocks. However, the immediate market reaction reflects investors reducing exposure to crowded AI infrastructure trades and rotating into sectors viewed as more defensive or less expensive. Rather than making a wholesale switch, I would prefer a balanced approach: Trim positions only if AI hardware names have become outsized in the portfolio. Keep exposure to high conviction AI leaders whose long-term earnings outlook remains intact. Gradually add quality value sectors if their fundamentals are improving, rather than buying solely because money rotated there for one day. Short-term rotations can reverse q

TSLA is at an important technical level. Around US$400 has become a clear battleground. If the broader market weakness persists, a brief break below US$400 and a fill of yesterday's gap would not be surprising. Gap fills are common after sharp rebounds and do not necessarily invalidate the longer-term trend. However, if TSLA quickly reclaims US$400 with strong trading volume, it would suggest institutional buyers are defending the level, keeping the bullish momentum intact. The reported price target increase and speculation around a potential SpaceX link provide positive sentiment, but unless supported by confirmed developments, macro conditions and overall tech market direction are still likely to dominate near-term price action. For now, I would watch US$400 more closely than daily headl

A move back above US$400 is technically encouraging, but one strong session does not settle the longer-term picture. If you're already holding Tesla, trimming a small portion into strength can be reasonable if it has become an oversized position. If you're looking to buy, waiting to see whether US$400 holds as support after a pullback offers a more favourable risk-reward than chasing a sharp rally. The longer-term debate remains unchanged. Tesla still has strengths in software, AI, robotics and autonomous driving, while competition, especially from BYD, continues to pressure its EV market share. Unless new catalysts materially improve earnings expectations, patience around key support levels is a prudent approach rather than buying purely because of one breakout.

A 14% decline is painful, but by itself it does not invalidate the memory supercycle. Memory stocks are among the most cyclical and sentiment-driven names, so sharp corrections after strong rallies are common. The key questions are whether: HBM and enterprise SSD demand remain strong. Customer inventory stays healthy rather than building excessively. Pricing for DRAM and NAND remains firm over the next few quarters. If those fundamentals remain intact, this looks more like a valuation reset than the end of the cycle. If, however, hyperscalers begin cutting AI infrastructure spending or memory pricing weakens materially, then the thesis would deserve reassessment. Rather than trying to call the exact bottom, I would prefer averaging in gradually over several tranches. That captures potentia

A one-day rotation alone would not make me abandon the AI theme. The weak payrolls report strengthens the case for lower rates over time, but it does not change the structural drivers behind AI infrastructure demand.  My preference would be a barbell approach: Keep core positions in high-quality AI leaders with durable earnings and pricing power. Gradually add exposure to value sectors such as industrials, healthcare and financials that can benefit from a broader market rotation. If this becomes a multi-week trend with sustained earnings downgrades for AI capex beneficiaries, I would trim weaker, highly valued hardware names first rather than exit the theme wholesale. Conversely, if AI demand and corporate spending remain robust through earnings season, the recent sell-off could prove

Tesla's 7.5% drop suggests the market had already priced in a delivery beat. Investors now care more about whether vehicle demand, margins and the AI and robotaxi strategy can justify Tesla's premium valuation than about one quarter's deliveries. Aggressive capex is a double-edged sword. If it accelerates autonomous driving, AI infrastructure and manufacturing efficiency, it could strengthen Tesla's long-term position. If returns are delayed while automotive margins remain under pressure, investors may stay cautious. For long-term investors, a gradual accumulation on weakness can be reasonable if they believe in Tesla's AI roadmap. For shorter-term traders, waiting for clearer evidence of improving margins or stronger forward guidance may offer a better risk-reward balance. Any future link

I would avoid treating a day or two of price action as confirmation of a lasting rotation. If softer labour data ultimately supports Fed rate cuts, both AI hardware and software could benefit. Hardware names also tend to be more cyclical and volatile, so sharp pullbacks are not unusual after strong rallies. Rather than switching wholesale, I would prefer a balanced approach: Keep core exposure to quality AI infrastructure if the long-term demand for compute and memory remains intact. Add selectively to software and platform leaders where earnings growth justifies valuations. Wait for the NFP report and upcoming earnings before concluding that capital has permanently rotated away from hardware. A durable rotation should be confirmed by fundamentals and earnings, not just a few sessions of m

I would avoid taking a high-conviction position immediately before the delivery report. A delivery beat could spark a relief rally, especially if expectations have already been revised lower. However, one quarter of deliveries does not resolve the bigger questions around margins, pricing power and execution of Tesla's AI, robotaxi and chip ambitions. Burry's short reflects downside risk if demand disappoints or guidance weakens. Gary Black's view suggests deliveries may exceed consensus, but even a beat may not lift the stock if investors were expecting more. The more important signal is management's outlook. I would rather react to both the delivery figures and commentary than gamble on the binary outcome. Over the long term, Tesla's valuation still depends more on successful execution in

The listing is strategically important because it gives U.S. investors direct exposure to the current HBM leader rather than relying on proxies. SK Hynix has confirmed plans for a Nasdaq ADR listing, with proceeds earmarked for new fabs, advanced packaging and EUV equipment, signalling confidence that AI memory demand will remain strong.  If I were building a position today, I would not buy solely because of the listing. I would: Keep core exposure to memory leaders already trading if valuations remain reasonable. Reserve cash to evaluate the ADR prospectus, including pricing, ADR ratio, dilution, lock-up terms and governance. Avoid chasing if listing enthusiasm pushes valuations far beyond earnings expectations. The long-term AI memory thesis remains compelling, but the memory indust

AI's gains have been unusually concentrated. While the S&P 500 rose only about 8%, memory and AI infrastructure names surged several hundred percent, showing how selective this rally has been. Q2 earnings are the next major test. Strong AI-driven revenue, margins and capex could justify current valuations. Any signs of slowing demand or weaker guidance could trigger sharp profit-taking. For H2, I'd avoid chasing memory after its huge run. I'd keep core exposure but gradually diversify into other AI infrastructure areas such as power, grid equipment, cooling, networking and cloud. The AI theme remains intact, but spreading exposure across the value chain offers a more balanced risk-reward than doubling down on the year's biggest winners.