In fact, since last year, the so-called computing power competition no longer uses nanometers as the criterion.
The performance improvement brought about by the advancement of manufacturing processes in the past five years will be visibly reduced, and the installed capacity will also go down as the replacement rate of mobile devices decreases. Why did this year the Android camp start to adopt the strategy of releasing new products twice a year? The main reason is to ship as much as possible before the curve becomes ugly.
As for desktop computing cores, the overall business direction (such as large models or AI) is to stack performance rather than optimize performance. The application cycle of accumulated computing power chips is calculated in several years. Short-term progress requires It will take some time in the future to be verified by the market, so the impact on most existing businesses will not be too great.$Apple(AAPL)$
The U.S.'s manufacturing process advantages$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$
Or put it this way, if even All-in companies like Microsoft.US are unable to commercialize AI in the next 3-5 years, then the debate about chips will become a chamber pot in Parliament, no. Just mention it.
Can you really detect any essential difference between Mate 60 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.