Earnings of the week (21Oct24) - should we get some SAP?

Earnings Calendar (21Oct24)

Q4/2024 has started. We have some interesting earnings namely, SAP, GM, Tesla, UPS and IBM.

Let us look at SAP.

Observations of SAP:

  • Revenue grew from $21.6 billion in 2014 to $34 billion in 2023.

  • Gross profit grew from $15.5 billion in 2014 to $24.5 billion in 2023.

  • Operating profit grew from $5.8 billion in 2014 to $6.5 billion in 2023.

  • Earnings per share EPS grew from $3.38 in 2014 to $5.67 in 2023.

  • The 10-year median margins for gross profit is at 70.7% and 16.1% for free cash flow (FCF).

  • The P/E ratio stands at 94.3.

The stock price grew 76% from a year ago.

The Technical Analysis recommends a “STRONG BUY”.

The Analysts Sentiment recommends a “BUY” rating with a price target of $242.19 that represents an upside of 5.10%.

For the coming earnings, the forecast of its EPS and revenue are $1.32 and $9.26 Billion.

The expenses in SAP is concerning as the increase of its expenses is more than the increase of its revenue, thus leading to the most recent operating income.

With a P/E ratio of over 94, this seems a tad expensive. I prefer to monitor the stock.

@TigerStars

$SAP SE(SAP)$

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$

$United Parcel Service Inc(UPS)$

# Earnings Season: Which Companies Are You Focusing on?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment1

  • Top
  • Latest
  • VernaFred
    ·10-21 16:32
    I agree with your cautious approach.
    Reply
    Report